Using auditory steady state responses to outline the functional connectivity in the tinnitus brain

PLoS ONE

Volumn 3, Issue 11, 2008, Pages

  Schlee, Winfried ^a   Weisz, Nathan ^a,b   Bertrand, Olivier ^b   Hartmann, Thomas ^a   Elbert, Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b INSERM   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BRAIN FUNCTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EVOKED AUDITORY RESPONSE; EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HEARING ACUITY; HUMAN; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; NERVE CELL NETWORK; PARIETAL LOBE; STEADY STATE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TINNITUS; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN MAPPING; HEARING; HEARING LOSS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBRAL CORTEX; FEMALE; HEARING LOSS; HUMANS; MAGNETOENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NERVE NET; TINNITUS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 56649103587     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003720     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Heller AJ (2003) Classification and epidemiology of tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 36: 239-248.
2. Dobie RA (2003) Depression and tinnitus. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 36: 383-388.
3. Dandy WE (1941) The surgical treatment of intracranial aneurysms of the internal carotid artery. Ann Surg 114: 336-340.
4. Silverstein H (1976) Transmeatal labyrinthectomy with and without cochleovestibular neurectomy. Laryngoscope 86: 1777-1791.
5. Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE (2004) The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci 27: 676-682.
6. Muhlau M, Rauschecker JP, Oestreicher E, Gaser C, Rottinger M, et al. (2006) Structural brain changes in tinnitus. Cereb Cortex 16: 1283-1288.
7. Mirz F, Brahe Pedersen C, Ishizu K, Johannsen P, et al. (1999) Positron emission tomography of cortical centers of tinnitus. Hear Res 134: 133-144.
8. Weisz N, Moratti S, Meinzer M, Dohrmann K, Elbert T (2005) Tinnitus perception and distress is related to abnormal spontaneous brain activity as measured by magnetoencephalography. PLoS Med 2: e153.
9. Jastreboff PJ (1990) Phantom auditory perception (tinnitus): mechanisms of generation and perception. Neuroscience research 8: 221-254.
10. Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8: 194-208.
11. Pantev C, Elbert T, Makeig S, Hampson S, Eulitz C (1993) Relationship of transient and steady-state auditory evoked fields. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol.
12. Pantev C, Makeig S, Hoke M, Galambos R, Hampson S, et al. (1991) Human auditory evoked gamma-band magnetic fields. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 88: 8996-9000.
13. Weisz N, Keil A, Wienbruch C, Hoffmeister S, Elbert T (2004) One set of sounds, two tonotopic maps: exploring auditory cortex with amplitude-modulated tones. Clin Neurophysiol 115: 1249-1258.
14. Wienbruch C, Paul I, Weisz N, Elbert T, Roberts LE (2006) Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus. Neuroimage 33: 180-194.
15. Alain C, McDonald K, Kovacevic N, McIntosh A (2008) Spatiotemporal Analysis of Auditory "What" and "Where" Working Memory. Cereb Cortex.
16. Arnott S (2004) Assessing the auditory dual-pathway model in humans. NeuroImage 22: 401-408.
17. Degerman A, Rinne T, Salmi J, Salonen O, Alho K (2006) Selective attention to sound location or pitch studied with fMRI. Brain Research 1077: 123-134.
18. Maeder P (2001) Distinct Pathways Involved in Sound Recognition and Localization: A Human fMRI Study. NeuroImage 14: 802-816.
19. Goebel G, Hiller W (1998) Tinnitus Fragebogen (TF): Ein Instrument zur Erfassung von Belastung und Schweregrad bei Tinnitus. Göttingen: Hogrefe.
20. Weisz N, Voss S, Berg P, Elbert T (2004) Abnormal auditory mismatch response in tinnitus sufferers with high-frequency hearing loss is associated with subjective distress level. BMC neuroscience 5: 8.
21. Cohen JD, MacWhinney B, Flatt M, Provost J (1993) PsyScope: A new graphic interactive environment for designing psychology experiments. Behavioral Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers 25: 257-271.
22. Moore BC, Huss M, Vickers DA, Glasberg BR, Alcantara JI (2000) A test for the diagnosis of dead regions in the cochlea. Br J Audiol 34: 205-224.
23. Norena A, Micheyl C, Chery-Croze S, Collet L (2002) Psychoacoustic characterization of the tinnitus spectrum: implications for the underlying mechanisms of tinnitus. Audiol Neurootol 7: 358-369.
24. Weisz N, Hartmann T, Dohrmann K, Schlee W, Norena A (2006) High-frequency tinnitus without hearing loss does not mean absence of deafferenta Hear Res 222: 108-114.
25. Lockwood AH, Salvi RJ, Coad ML, Towsley ML, Wack DS, et al. (1998) The functional neuroanatomy of tinnitus: evidence for limbic system links and neural plasticity. Neurology 50: 114-120.
26. Downar J, Crawley AP, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2002) A cortical network sensitive to stimulus salience in a neutral behavioral context across multiple sensory modalities. Journal of neurophysiology 87: 615-620.
27. Downar J, Mikulis DJ, Davis KD (2003) Neural correlates of the prolonged salience of painful stimulation. NeuroImage 20: 1540-1551.
28. Mesulam MM (1999) Spatial attention and neglect: parietal, frontal and cingulate contributions to the mental representation and attentional targeting of salient extrapersonal events. Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London Series B, Biological sciences 354: 1325-1346.
29. Mevorach C, Humphreys GW, Shalev L (2006) Opposite biases in salience-based selection for the left and right posterior parietal cortex. Nature neuroscience 9: 740-742.
30. Dehaene S, Changeux J-P (2004) Neural Mechanisms for access to consciousness. In: Gazzaniga M, ed. The Cognitive Neurosciences III. MIT Press.
31. Goldman-Rakic PS (1988) Topography of Cognition: Parallel Distributed Networks in Primate Association Cortex. Annu Rev Neurosci.
32. Bingel U, Rose M, Gläscher J, Büchel C (2007) FMRI reveals how pain modulates visual object processing in the ventral visual stream. Neuron 55: 157-167.
33. Ploghaus A, Tracey I, Gati JS, Clare S, Menon RS, et al. (1999) Dissociating pain from its anticipation in the human brain. Science 284: 1979-1981.
34. Price DD (2000) Psychological and neural mechanisms of the affective dimension of pain. Science 288: 1769-1772.
35. Rainville P, Duncan GH, Price DD, Carrier B, Bushnell MC (1997) Pain affect encoded in human anterior cingulate but not somatosensory cortex. Science 277: 968-971.
36. Tolle TR, Kaufmann T, Siessmeier T, Lautenbacher S, Berthele A, et al. (1999) Region-specific encoding of sensory and affective components of pain in the human brain: a positron emission tomography correlation analysis. Ann Neurol 45: 40-47.
37. Carlsson K, Andersson J, Petrovic P, Petersson KM, Ohman A, et al. (2006) Predictability modulates the affective and sensory-discriminative neural processing of pain. Neuroimage 32: 1804-1814.
38. Cohen MX, Heller AS, Ranganath C (2005) Functional connectivity with anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortices during decision-making. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 23: 61-70.
39. Kalin NH, Shelton SE, Davidson RJ (2007) Role of the Primate Orbitofrontal Cortex in Mediating Anxious Temperament. Biol Psychiatry.
40. Morris JS, Dolan RJ (2001) Involvement of human amygdala and orbitofrontal cortex in hunger-enhanced memory for food stimuli. J Neurosci 21: 5304-5310.
41. Dehaene S, Changeux J-P, Naccache L, Sackur J, Sergent C (2006) Conscious, preconscious, and subliminal processing: a testable taxonomy. Trends in cognitive sciences 10: 204-211.