Meat and the benefits of ambivalence

The Ethics of Consumption: The Citizen, the Market and the Law

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 290-295

  van der Weele, C N ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960240394     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.3920/978-90-8686-784-4_47     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Bankier, D. (1996). The Germans and the final solution: public opinion under Nazism. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, UK.
2. Bastian, B., Loughnan, S., Haslam, H. and Radke, H. (2012). Don't mind meat? The denial of mind to animals used for human consumption. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38/2: 247-256.
3. Cohen, S. (2001). States of denial. Knowing about atrocities and suffering. Polity Press, Cambridge, UK.
4. Dana, J., Kuang, J. and Weber, R. (2007). Exploiting moral wiggle room: experiments demonstrating an illusory preference for fairness. Economic Theory 33(1): 67-80.
5. Darwin, C. (2004/1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Penguin, London, UK.
6. Driessen, C. and Korthals, M. (2012). Pig towers and in vitro meat: disclosing moral worlds by design. Social Studies of Science 42(6): 797-820.
7. Duve, K. (2011). Anständiges Essen: ein Selbstversuch. Galinai, Berlin, Germany.
8. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, USA.
9. Foer, J.S. (2009). Eating animals. Little, Brown & Co, New York, NY, USA.
10. Harmon-Jones, E. and Harmon-Jones, C. (2007). Cognitive dissonance theory after 50 years of development. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 38(1): 7-16.
11. Holm, L. and Møhl, M. (2000). The role of meat eating in everyday food culture: an analysis of an interview study in Copenhagen. Appetite 34: 277-283.
12. Hopkins, P. and Dacey, A. (2008). Vegetarian meat: could technology save animals and satisfy meat eaters? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21: 579-596.
13. Kaminer, A. (2012). The meat you eat. The winner of our contest on the ethics of eating meat. New York Times, May 3.www.nytimes.com/2012/05/06/magazine/the-winner-of-our-contest-on-the-ethics-of-eating-meat.html?_r=0.
14. Korzen, S. and Lassen, J. (2010). Meat in context. On the relation between perceptions and context. Appetite 54: 274-281.
15. Loughnan, S., Haslam, N. and Bastian, B. (2010). The role of meat consumption in the denial of moral status and mind to meat animals. Appetite 55: 156-159.
16. Muller, J.F. (2011). Disability, ambivalence and the law. American Journal of Law and Medicine 37: 469-521.
17. Norgaard, K. (2011). Living in denial. Climate change, emotions and everyday life. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
18. PETA (2008). In vitro meat press release. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals www.peta.org/features/In-Vitro-Meat-Contest.aspx.
19. Pinker, S. (2011). The better angels of our nature. Why violence has declined. Viking, New York, NY, USA.
20. Singer, P. (2011/1981). The expanding circle. Ethics, evolution and moral progress. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NY, USA.
21. Steinfeld, H., Gerber, P., Wassenaar, T., Castel, V., Rosales, M. and De Haan, C. (2006). Livestock's long shadow, environmental issues and options. Food an Agricultural Organization of the United Nations. Rome, Italy.
22. Tuomisto, H. and Teixeira de Mattos, M. (2011). Environmental impacts of cultured meat production. Environmental Science and Technology 45(14): 6117-6123.
23. Van Harreveld, F., Van der Pligt, J. and De Liver, Y. (2009). The agony of ambivalence and ways to resolve it: introducing the MAID model. Personality and Social Psychology Review 13: 45-61
24. Welin, S. and Van der Weele, C. (2012). Cultured meat: will it separate us from nature? In: Potthast, T. and Meisch, S. (eds.) Climate change and sustainable development. Wageningen Academic Publishers, Wageningen, the Netherlands.
25. Wirzba, N. (2011). Food and faith. A theology of eating. Cambride University Press, Cambridge, UK.