Three-dimensional printing of anatomically accurate, patient specific intracranial aneurysm models

Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 517-520

  Anderson, Jeff R ^a   Thompson, Walker L ^a   Alkattan, Abdulaziz K ^a   Diaz, Orlando ^b   Klucznik, Richard ^b   Zhang, Yi J ^b   Britz, Gavin W ^b   Grossman, Robert G ^b   Karmonik, Christof ^a,b  

^a HOUSTON METHODIST RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b HOUSTON METHODIST HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

POLYLACTIC ACID;

ANEURYSM DIAMETER; ANGIOGRAPHY DEVICE; ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FUSED DEPOSITION MODELING; HUMAN; IMAGE PROCESSING; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHANTOM; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURGICAL ANATOMY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; THREE DIMENSIONAL PRINTING; ANATOMIC MODEL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; IMAGING PHANTOM; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; HUMANS; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MODELS, ANATOMIC; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PRINTING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 84963749897     PISSN: 17598478     EISSN: 17598486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2015-011686     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Cebral JR, Vazquez M, Sforza DM, et al. Analysis of hemodynamics and wall mechanics at sites of cerebral aneurysm rupture. J Neurointerv Surg Published Online First: 14 May 2014.
2. Schnell S, Ansari SA, Vakil P, et al. Three-dimensional hemodynamics in intracranial aneurysms: influence of size and morphology. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;39:120-31.
3. Levitt MR, McGah PM, Aliseda A, et al. Cerebral aneurysms treated with flow-diverting stents: computational models with intravascular blood flow measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:143-8.
4. Chien A, Sayre J. Morphologic and hemodynamic risk factors in ruptured aneurysms imaged before and after rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:2130-5.
5. Karmonik C, Diaz O, Klucznik R, et al. Quantitative comparison of hemodynamic parameters from steady and transient CFD simulations in cerebral aneurysms with focus on the aneurysm ostium. J Neurointerv Surg Published Online First: 10 Apr 2014.
6. Ansari SA, Schnell S, Carroll T, et al. Intracranial 4D flow MRI: toward individualized assessment of arteriovenous malformation hemodynamics and treatment-induced changes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1922-8.
7. Futami K, Sano H, Misaki K, et al. Identification of the inflow zone of unruptured cerebral aneurysms: comparison of 4D flow MRI and 3D TOF MRA data. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1363-70.
8. Karmonik C, Zhang YJ, Diaz O, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging as a tool to assess reliability in simulating hemodynamics in cerebral aneurysms with a dedicated computational fluid dynamics prototype: preliminary results. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther 2014;4:207-12.
9. Costalat V, Lebars E, Sarry L, et al. In vitro evaluation of 2D-digital subtraction angiography versus 3D-time-of-flight in assessment of intracranial cerebral aneurysm filling after endovascular therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:177-84.
10. Goubergrits L, Thamsen B, Berthe A, et al. In vitro study of near-wall flow in a cerebral aneurysm model with and without coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1521-8.
11. Imbesi SG, Knox K, Kerber CW. Aneurysm flow dynamics: alterations of slipstream flow for neuroendovascular treatment with liquid embolic agents. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:2044-9.
12. Isoda H, Hirano M, Takeda H, et al. Visualization of hemodynamics in a silicon aneurysm model using time-resolved, 3D, phase-contrast MRI. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1119-22.
13. Piotin M, Iijima A, Wada H, et al. Increasing the packing of small aneurysms with complex-shaped coils: an in vitro study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1446-8.
14. A view from inside the 3D manufacturing movement. http://www.washingtonpost. com/blogs/innovations/post/a-view-from-inside-the-3d-manufacturing-movement/2010/12/20/gIQAVYzCgR-blog.html (accessed 30 May 2014).
15. Rengier F, Mehndiratta A, von Tengg-Kobligk H, et al. 3D printing based on imaging data: review of medical applications. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg 2010;5:335-41.
16. Noecker AM, Chen JF, Zhou Q, et al. Development of patient-specific three-dimensional pediatric cardiac models. ASAIO J 2006;52:349-53.
17. Opolski AC, Erbano BO, Schio NA, et al. Experimental three-dimensional biomodel of complex aortic aneurysms by rapid prototyping technology. 3D Print Addit Manufact 2014;1:88-94.
18. Wurm G, Tomancok B, Pogady P, et al. Cerebrovascular stereolithographic biomodeling for aneurysm surgery. Technical note. J Neurosurg 2004;100:139-45.
19. Mashiko T, Otani K, Kawano R, et al. Development of three-dimensional hollow elastic model for cerebral aneurysm clipping simulation enabling rapid and low cost prototyping. World Neurosurg 2013;83:351-61.
20. Kimura T, Morita A, Nishimura K, et al. Simulation of and training for cerebral aneurysm clipping with 3-dimensional models. Neurosurgery 2009;65:719-25; discussion 725-716.
21. Khan IS, Kelly PD, Singer RJ. Prototyping of cerebral vasculature physical models. Surg Neurol Int 2014;5:11.
22. Mordasini P, Kraehenbuehl AK, Byrne JV, et al. In vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics assessment of polymeric coils compared with standard platinum coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2177-83.
23. Otsu N. A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Syst Man Cybern IEEE Trans 1979;9:62-6.
24. Prewitt JMS, Mendelsohn ML. The analysis of cell images. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1966;128:1035-53.
25. Schindelin J, Arganda-Carreras I, Frise E, et al. Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis. Nat Methods 2012;9:676-82.
26. Erbano BO, Opolski AC, Olandoski M, et al. Rapid prototyping of three-dimensional biomodels as an adjuvant in the surgical planning for intracranial aneurysms. Acta Cir Bras 2013;28:756-61.
27. D'Urso PS, Thompson RG, Atkinson RL, et al. Cerebrovascular biomodelling: a technical note. Surg Neurol 1999;52:490-500.
28. Liepsch D, Zimmer R. [A method for the preparation of true-to-scale inflexible and natural elastic human arteries (author's transl)]. Biomed Tech (Berl) 1978;23:227-30.
29. Chueh JY, Wakhloo AK, Gounis MJ. Neurovascular modeling: small-batch manufacturing of silicone vascular replicas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1159-64.
30. van Ooij P, Schneiders JJ, Marquering HA, et al. 3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:1785-91.
31. Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, et al. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:021015.
32. Anderson JR, Diaz O, Klucznik R, et al. Validation of computational fluid dynamics methods with anatomically exact, 3D printed MRI phantoms and 4D pcMRI. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2014;2014:6699-701.
33. Valencia A, Muñoz F, Araya S, et al. Comparison between computational fluid dynamics, fluid-structure interaction and computational structural dynamics predictions of flow-induced wall mechanics in an anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm model. Int J Comput Fluid Dyn 2009;23:649-66.