In vitro and in vivo imaging characteristics assessment of polymeric coils compared with standard platinum coils for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 34, Issue 11, 2013, Pages 2177-2183

  Mordasini, Pasquale ^a   Kraehenbuehl, A K ^a   Byrne, J V ^c   Vandenberghe, S ^b   Reinert, M ^a   Hoppe, H ^a   Gralla, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BERN   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PLATINUM; POLYMER;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CAROTID ARTERY ANEURYSM; CAROTID BIFURCATION ANEURYSM; COIL EMBOLIZATION; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC ANGIOGRAPHY; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; EMBOLIZATION COIL; IMAGE QUALITY; IN VITRO STUDY; IN VIVO STUDY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ANIMALS; ARTIFACTS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; FEMALE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; PLATINUM; POLYMERS; RABBITS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STENTS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84888178755     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3589     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809-17 (Pubitemid 41557380)
2. Byrne JV, Sohn MJ, Molyneux AJ, et al. Five-year experience in using coil embolization for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: outcomes and incidence of late rebleeding. J Neurosurg 1999;90:656-63 (Pubitemid 29152854)
3. Raymond J, Guilbert F, Weill A, et al. Long-term angiographic recurrences after selective endovascular treatment of aneurysms with detachable coils. Stroke 2003;34:1398-403 (Pubitemid 36693505)
4. Kang HS, Han MH, Kwon BJ, et al. Repeat endovascular treatment in post-embolization recurrent intracranial aneurysms. Neurosurgery 2006;58:60-70
5. Campi A, Ramzi N, Molyneux AJ, et al. Retreatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms in patients randomized by coiling or clipping in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT). Stroke 2007;38:1538-44 (Pubitemid 46684171)
6. Fernandez ZA, Guglielmi G, Vinuela F, et al. Endovascular occlusion of intracranial aneurysms with electrically detachable coils: correlation of aneurysm neck size and treatment results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:815-20 (Pubitemid 24153770)
7. Ries T, Siemonsen S, Thomalla G, et al. Long-term follow-up of cerebral aneurysms after endovascular therapy prediction and outcome of retreatment. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1755-61 (Pubitemid 47598155)
8. Bakker NA, Westerlaan HE, Metzemaekers JD, et al. Feasibility of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) follow-up as the primary imaging modality after coiling of intracranial aneurysms. Acta Radiol 2010;51:226-32
9. Ferre JC, Carsin-Nicol B, Morandi X, et al. Time-of-flight MR angiography at 3T versus digital subtraction angiography in the imaging follow-up of 51 intracranial aneurysms treated with coils. Eur J Radiol 2009;72:365-69
10. Wallace RC, Karis JP, Partovi S, et al. Noninvasive imaging of treated cerebral aneurysms, part I: MR angiographic follow-up of coiled aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1001-08 (Pubitemid 46984530)
11. Urbach H, Dorenbeck U, von Falkenhausen M, et al. Three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography at 3 T compared to digital subtraction angiography in the follow-up of ruptured and coiled intracranial aneurysms: a prospective study. Neuroradiology 2008;50:383-89
12. Gonner F, Heid O, Remonda L, et al. MR angiography with ultrashort echo time in cerebral aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1324-28 (Pubitemid 30418682)
13. Walker MT, Tsai J, Parish T, et al. MR angiographic evaluation of platinum coil packs at 1.5T and 3T: an in vitro assessment of artifact production: technical note. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:848-53 (Pubitemid 43079780)
14. Hennemeyer CT, Wicklow K, Feinberg DA, et al. In vitro evaluation of platinum Guglielmi detachable coils at 3 T with a porcine model: safety issues and artifacts. Radiology 2001;219:732-37 (Pubitemid 32476265)
15. Gauvrit JY, Leclerc X, Caron S, et al. Intracranial aneurysms treated with Guglielmi detachable coils: imaging follow-up with contrast-enhanced MR angiography. Stroke 2006;37:1033-37
16. Agid R, Willinsky RA, Lee SK, et al. Characterization of aneurysm remnants after endovascular treatment: contrast-enhanced MR angiography versus catheter digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1570-74
17. Constant MJ, Keeley EM, Cruise GM. Preparation, characterization, and evaluation of radiopaque hydrogel filaments for endovascular embolization. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2009;89:306-13
18. McCoy MR, Cruise GM, Killer M. Angiographic and artefact-free computed tomography imaging of experimental aneurysms embolised with hydrogel filaments. Eur Radiol 2010;20:870-76
19. Killer M, McCoy MR, Vestal MC, et al. Use of CT angiography in comparison with other imaging techniques for the determination of embolus and remnant size in experimental aneurysms embolized with hydrogel filaments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:923-28
20. Forrest MD, O'Reilly GV. Production of experimental aneurysms at a surgically created arterial bifurcation. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1989;10:400-02 (Pubitemid 19082634)
21. Willinsky RA, Taylor SM, TerBrugge K, et al. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522-28 (Pubitemid 36514772)
22. Kaufmann TJ, Huston J III, Mandrekar JN, et al. Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients. Radiology 2007;243:812-19 (Pubitemid 46799436)
23. Anzalone N, Scomazzoni F, Cirillo M, et al. Follow-up of coiled cerebral aneurysms: comparison of three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography at 3 Tesla with three-dimensional time-of-flight magnetic resonance angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 1.5 Tesla. Invest Radiol 2008;43:559-67
24. Sprengers ME, Schaafsma JD, van Rooij WJ, et al. Evaluation of the occlusion status of coiled intracranial aneurysms with MR angiography at 3T: is contrast enhancement necessary? AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1665-71
25. Pierot L, Portefaix C, Boulin A, et al. Follow-up of coiled intracranial aneurysms: comparison of 3D time-of-flight and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography at 3T in a large, prospective series. Eur Radiol 2012;22:2255-63
26. Richter G, Engelhorn T, Struffert T, et al. Flat panel detector angiographic CT for stent-assisted coil embolization of broad-based cerebral aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1902-08 (Pubitemid 350174732)
27. Masaryk AM, Frayne R, Unal O, et al. Utility of CT angiography and MR angiography for the follow-up of experimental aneurysms treated with stents or Guglielmi detachable coils. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1523-31