3D cine phase-contrast MRI at 3T in intracranial aneurysms compared with patient-specific computational fluid dynamics

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 34, Issue 9, 2013, Pages 1785-1791

  Van Ooij, P ^a   Schneiders, J J ^a   Marquering, H A ^a   Majoie, C B ^a   Van Bavel, E ^a   Nederveen, A J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BLOOD FLOW; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTATIONAL FLUID DYNAMICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SCANNER; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SYSTOLE; THREE DIMENTIONAL PHASE CONTRAST NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; INTRACRANIAL ANEURYSM; MAGNETIC RESONANCE ANGIOGRAPHY; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, CINE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RHEOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85047689065     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: 1936959X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3484     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Nieuwkamp DJ, Setz LE, Algra A, et al. Changes in case fatality of aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage over time, according to age, sex, and region: a meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:635-42
2. Greebe P, Rinkel GJ, Hop JW, et al. Functional outcome and quality of life 5 and 12.5 years after aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage. J Neurol 2010;257:2059-64
3. Vega C, Kwoon JV, Lavine SD. Intracranial aneurysms: current evidence and clinical practice. Am Fam Physician 2002;66:601-08
4. Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP, Huston J, 3rd, et al. Unruptured intracranial aneurysms: natural history, clinical outcome, and risks of surgical and endovascular treatment. Lancet 2003;362:103-10
5. Ford MD, Nikolov HN, Milner JS, et al. PIV-measured versus CFD-predicted flow dynamics in anatomically realistic cerebral aneurysm models. J Biomech Eng 2008;130:021015
6. Geers AJ, Larrabide I, Radaelli AG, et al. Patient-specific computational hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms from 3D rotational angiography and CT angiography: an invivo reproducibility study. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:581-86
7. Ford MD, Lee SW, Lownie SP, et al. Onthe effectofparent-aneurysm angle on flow patternsin basilar tip aneurysms: towards asurrogate geometric marker of intra-aneurismal hemodynamics. J Biomech 2008;41:241-48
8. Rayz VL, Boussel L, Lawton MT, et al. Numerical modeling of the flow in intracranial aneurysms: prediction of regions prone to thrombus formation. Ann Biomed Eng 2008;36:1793-1804
9. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Burgess JE, et al. Characterization of cerebral aneurysms for assessing risk of rupture by using patient-specific computational hemodynamics models. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2550-59
10. Boussel L, Rayz V, Martin A, et al. Phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging measurements in intracranial aneurysms in vivo of flow patterns, velocity fields, and wall shear stress: comparison with computational fluid dynamics. Magn Reson Med 2009;61:409-17
11. Cebral JR, Castro MA, Appanaboyina S, et al. Efficient pipeline for image-based patient-specific analysis of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics: technique and sensitivity. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2005;24:457-67
12. Chien A, Castro MA, Tateshima S, et al. Quantitative hemodynamic analysis of brain aneurysms at different locations. AJNR AMJNeuroradiol 2009;30:1507-12
13. Sforza DM, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 2009;41:91-107
14. Venugopal P, Valentino D, Schmitt H, et al. Sensitivity of patientspecific numerical simulation of cerebral aneurysm hemodynamics to inflow boundary conditions. J Neurosurg 2007;106:1051-60
15. Mut F, Lohner R, Chien A, et al. Computational hemodynamics framework for the analysis of cerebral aneurysms. Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng 2011;27:822-39
16. van Ooij P, Guédon A, Poelma C, et al. Complex flow patterns in a real-size intracranialaneurysm phantom: phasecontrast MRI compared with particle image velocimetry and computational fluid dynamics. NMR in Biomed 2012;25:14-26
17. Wilson JT, Pettigrew LE, Teasdale GM. Structured interviews for the Glasgow Outcome Scale and the extended Glasgow Outcome Scale: guidelines for their use. J Neurotrauma 1998;15:573-85
18. Slavin GS, Bluemke DA. Spatial and temporal resolution in cardiovascular MR imaging: review and recommendations. Radiology 2005;234:330-38
19. Lotz J, Meier C, Leppert A, et al. Cardiovascular flow measurement with phase-contrast MR imaging: basic facts and implementation. Radiographics 2002;22:651-71
20. Li C, Xu C, Gui C, et al. Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, San Diego, California. June 20-25, 2005:430-36
21. Antiga L, Piccinelli M, Botti L, et al. An image-based modeling framework for patient-specific computational hemodynamics. Med Biol Eng Comput 2008;46:1097-112
22. Jenkinson M, Smith S. A global optimisation method for robust affine registration of brain images. Med Image Anal 2001;5:143-56
23. Murray CD. The physiological principle of minimum work: I. The vascular system and the cost of blood volume. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1926;12:207-14
24. Price RR, Axel L, Morgan T, et al. Quality assurance methods and phantoms for magnetic resonance imaging: report of AAPM Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Task Group No. 1. Med Phys 1990;17:287-95
25. Liu W, Ribeiro E. Scale and rotation invariant detection of singular patterns in vector flow fields. In: Hancock E, Wilson R, Windeatt T, et al, eds. SSPR & SPR Proceedings of the 2010 Joint IAPR International Conference on Structural, Syntactic, and Statistical Pattern Recognition, LNCS No, 6218. Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 2010:522-31
26. Marquering HA, van Ooij P, Streekstra GJ, et al. Multiscale flow patterns within an intracranial aneurysm phantom. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2011;58:3447-50
27. Cebral JR, Mut F, Weir J, et al. Association of hemodynamic characteristics and cerebral aneurysm rupture. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2011;32:264-70
28. Stalder AF, Liu Z, Hennig J, et al. Patient specific hemodynamics: combined 4D flow-sensitive MRI and CFD. In: Wittek A, Nielsen PMF, Miller K, eds. Computational Biomechanics for Medicine. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2011:27-38
29. Isoda H, Ohkura Y, Kosugi T, et al. Comparison of hemodynamics of intracranial aneurysms between MR fluid dynamics using 3D cine phase-contrast MRI and MR-based computational fluid dynamics. Neuroradiology 2010;52:913-20
30. Jiang J, Johnson K, Valen-Sendstad K, et al. Flow characteristics in a canine aneurysm model: a comparison of 4D accelerated phasecontrast MR measurements and computational fluid dynamics simulations. Med Phys 2011;38:6300-12
31. Castro MA, Putman CM, Cebral JR. Computational fluid dynamics modeling of intracranial aneurysms: effects of parent artery segmentation on intra-aneurysmal hemodynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1703-09
32. Stalder A, Russe M, Frydrychowicz A, et al. Quantitative 2D and 3D phase contrast MRI: optimized analysis of blood flow and vessel wall parameters. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1218-31
33. Schneiders JJ, Ferns SP, van Ooij P, et al. Comparison of phasecontrast MR imaging and endovascular sonography for intracranial blood flow velocity measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:1786-90
34. Wentland A, Grist TM, Wieben O. Repeatability and internal consistency of abdominal 2D and 4D PCMR flow measurements. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2012;14(Suppl 1):W13
35. Kallmes DF. Point: CFD-computational fluid dynamics or confounding factor dissemination. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:395-96
36. Cebral JR, Meng H. Counterpoint: realizing the clinical utility of computational fluid dynamics-closing the gap. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2012;33:396-98
37. Schneiders JJ, Marquering HA, Antiga L, et al. Intracranial aneurysm neck size overestimation with 3D rotational angiography: an exploratory study on the impact onintra-aneurysmal hemodynamics simulated with computational fluid dynamics. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:121-28
38. Thunberg P, Karlsson M, Wigstrom L. Accuracy and reproducibility in phase contrast imaging using SENSE. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1061-68
39. van Ooij P, Zwanenburg JJM, Visser F, et al. Quantification and visualization of flow in the circle of Willis: time-resolved three-dimensional phase contrast MRI at 7 T compared with 3 T. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:868-76
40. Busch J, Giese D, Wissmann L, et al. Construction ofdivergence-free velocity fields from cine 3D phase-contrast flow measurements. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:200-10