An intelligent interface for learning content: Combining an open learner model and social comparison to support self-regulated learning and engagement

International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Proceedings IUI

Volumn 07-10-March-2016, Issue , 2016, Pages 152-163

  Guerra, Julio ^a,b   Hosseini, Roya ^b   Somyurek, Sibel ^c   Brusilovsky, Peter ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD AUSTRAL DE CHILE   (Chile)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^c GAZI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Achievement Goal Orientation; Open Learner Model; Self Regulated Learning; Social Comparison

Indexed keywords

MOTIVATION; USER INTERFACES;

ADAPTIVE NAVIGATION; ADAPTIVE NAVIGATION SUPPORT; GOAL ORIENTATIONS; INTELLIGENT INTERFACE; OPEN LEARNER MODELING; PERFORMANCE-ORIENTED; SELF-REGULATED LEARNING; SOCIAL COMPARISON;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84963718183     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2856767.2856784     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. Ames, C. Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of educational psychology 84, 3 (1992), 261.
2. Bandura, A. Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc, 1986.
3. Brusilovsky, P., Edwards, S., Kumar, A., Malmi, L., Benotti, L., Buck, D., Ihantola, P., Prince, R., Sirki, T., Sosnovsky, S., Urquiza, J., Vihavainen, A., and Wollowski, M. Increasing adoption of smart learning content for computer science education. In Proceedings of the Working Group Reports of the 2014 on Innovation &38; Technology in Computer Science Education Conference, ACM (2014), 31-57.
4. Brusilovsky, P., Somyürek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., and Zadorozhny, V. The value of social: Comparing open student modeling and open social student modeling. In User Modeling, Adaptation and Personalization. Springer, 2015, 44-55.
5. Brusilovsky, P., and Sosnovsky, S. Individualized exercises for self-assessment of programming knowledge: An evaluation of quizpack. ACM Journal on Educational Resources in Computing 5, 3 (2005), Article No. 6.
6. Brusilovsky, P., and Yudelson, M. From webex to navex: Interactive access to annotated program examples. Proceedings of the IEEE 96, 6 (2008), 990-999.
7. Bull, S., and Kay, J. Student models that invite the learner in: The smili: (+) open learner modelling framework. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17, 2 (2007), 89-120.
8. Bull, S., and Kay, J. Open learner models. In Advances in intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, 2010, 301-322.
9. Bull, S., and Kay, J. Open learner models as drivers for metacognitive processes. In International Handbook of Metacognition and Learning Technologies. Springer, 2013, 349-365.
10. Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., and Sheldon, K. M. Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology 35, 1 (2010), 88-99.
11. Elliot, A. J., and Murayama, K. On the measurement of achievement goals: Critique, illustration, and application. Journal of Educational Psychology 100, 3 (2008), 613.
12. Hosseini, R., Hsiao, I.-H., Guerra, J., and Brusilovsky, P. What should i do next? adaptive sequencing in the context of open social student modeling. In Design for Teaching and Learning in a Networked World. Springer, 2015, 155-168.
13. Hsiao, I.-H., Bakalov, F., Brusilovsky, P., and König-Ries, B. Progressor: social navigation support through open social student modeling. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia 19, 2 (2013), 112-131.
14. Hsiao, I.-H., Sosnovsky, S., and Brusilovsky, P. Guiding students to the right questions: adaptive navigation support in an e-learning system for java programming. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26, 4 (2010), 270-283.
15. Levy, R. B.-B., Ben-Ari, M., and Uronen, P. A. The jeliot 2000 program animation system. Computers and Education 40, 1 (2003), 1-15.
16. Lindstaedt, S. N., Beham, G., Kump, B., and Ley, T. Getting to know your user unobtrusive user model maintenance within work-integrated learning environments. In 4th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (ECTEL 2009), U. Cress, V. Dimitrova, and M. Specht, Eds., vol. 5794 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer-Verlag (2009), 73-87.
17. Loboda, T. D., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., and Brusilovsky, P. Mastery grids: An open source social educational progress visualization. In Open Learning and Teaching in Educational Communities. Springer, 2014, 235-248.
18. Long, Y., and Aleven, V. Active learners: Redesigning an intelligent tutoring system to support self-regulated learning. In 8th European Conference on Technology Enhanced Learning (EC-TEL 2013), D. Hernandez-Leo, T. Ley, R. Klamma, and A. Harrer, Eds., vol. 8095 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science (2013), 490495.
19. Mitrovic, A., and Martin, B. Evaluating the effect of open student models on self-assessment. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 17, 2 (2007), 121-144.
20. O'Keefe, P. A., Ben-Eliyahu, A., and Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. Shaping achievement goal orientations in a mastery-structured environment and concomitant changes in related contingencies of self-worth. Motivation and Emotion 37, 1 (2013), 50-64.
21. Paas, F. G., and Van Merriënboer, J. J. The efficiency of instructional conditions: An approach to combine mental effort and performance measures. Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 35, 4 (1993), 737-743.
22. Papanikolaou, K. A., Grigoriadou, M., Kornilakis, H., and Magoulas, G. D. Personalising the interaction in a web-based educational hypermedia system: the case of inspire. User Modeling and User Adapted Interaction 13, 3 (2003), 213-267. Questions: interaction between goals. Sequencing? Self-choice? Al-la chapter?
23. Schunk, D. H. Goal setting and self-efficacy during self-regulated learning. Educational psychologist 25, 1 (1990), 71-86.
24. Sirkiä, T., and Sorva, J. How do students use program visualizations within an interactive ebook? In Proceedings of the Eleventh Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research, ICER '15, ACM (New York, NY, USA, 2015), 179-188.
25. Sosnovsky, S., and Brusilovsky, P. Evaluation of topic-based adaptation and student modeling in quizguide. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 25, 4 (2015), 371-424.
26. Spacco, J., Hovemeyer, D., Pugh, W., Emad, F., Hollingsworth, J. K., and Padua-Perez, N. Experiences with marmoset: Designing and using an advanced submission and testing system for programming courses. In 11th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education, ITiCSE'2006, M. Goldweber and P. Salomoni, Eds., ACM Press (2006), 13-17.
27. Wolters, C. A., Shirley, L. Y., and Pintrich, P. R. The relation between goal orientation and students' motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and individual differences 8, 3 (1996), 211-238.
28. Zimmerman, B. J. Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: An overview. Educational psychologist 25, 1 (1990), 3-17.
29. Zimmerman, B. J. Self-regulating academic learning and achievement: The emergence of a social cognitive perspective. Educational psychology review 2, 2 (1990), 173-201.