Quick win or slow burn: Modelling UK HE CAA uptake

Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education

Volumn 34, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 257-272

  Warburton, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assessment; CAA; CBA; E assessment; Uptake

Indexed keywords

EID: 78049290757     PISSN: 02602938     EISSN: 1469297X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02602930802071080     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Bull, J. 1999. Update on the National TLTP3 Project 'The implementation and evaluation of computer-assisted assessment'. Paper presented at the 3rd International CAA Conference, June 28-29, in Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
2. Bull, J. 2001. TLTP85 Implementation and Evaluation of Computer-assisted Assessment: Final Report. [online] available: http://www.caacentre.ac.uk/dldocs/final_report.pdf [last accessed 16 March 2003]
3. Bull, J., and C. McKenna. 2004. Blueprint for computer-assisted assessment. London: Routledge- Falmer.
4. Davies, W., and H. Davis. 2007. Designing assessment tools in a service oriented architecture. http://eprints.ecs.soton.ac.uk/10646/1/davies_davis_paper.pdf (accessed November 9, 2007).
5. Gibbs, G., T. Habeshaw, and M. Yorke. 2000. Institutional learning and teaching strategies in English higher education. Higher Education 40: 351-72.
6. Hambrick, K.A. 2002. Critical issues in online, large-scale assessment: An exploratory study to identify and refine the issues. PhD dissertation, Capella University.
7. Harwood, I. 2006. Confidentiality constraints within mergers and acquisitions: Gaining insights through a 'bubble' metaphor. British Journal of Management 17: 347-59.
8. Harwood, I., and W. Warburton. 2004. Thinking the unthinkable: Using project risk management when introducing computer-assisted assessments. Paper presented at the 8th International CAA Conference, July 6-7, in Loughborough University, Leicestershire, UK.
9. LTSN. 2003. A guide for learning technologists. London: LTSN.
10. McKenna, C., and J. Bull. 2000. Quality assurance of computer-assisted assessment: Practical and strategic issues. Quality Assurance in Education 8, no. 1: 24-31.
11. Oliver, M., R. Sharpe, J. Duggleby, D. Jennings, and D. Kay. 2004. Accrediting learning technologists: A review of the literature, schemes and programmes. Oxford: ALT.
12. Sadler, R. 2005. Interpretations of criteria-based assessment and grading in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 30, no. 2: 175-94.
13. Shephard, K., W. Warburton, A. Warren, and P. Maier. 2006. Preparing for BS7988: Developing and evaluating computer-assisted assessment in higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 31, no. 5: 583-95.
14. Stephens, D., and J. Mascia. 1997. Results of a (1995) survey into the use of computer-assisted assessment in institutions of higher education in the UK. http://www.lboro.ac.uk/service/ltd/flicaa/downloads/survey.pdf (accessed November 5, 2003).
15. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1990. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. London: Sage.
16. Strauss, A., and J. Corbin. 1998. Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). London: Sage.
17. Tillmann, I. 2003. Strategic management accounting and sense making: A grounded theory study. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Southampton.
18. Warburton, W. 2006. Towards a grounded theory of computer-assisted assessment uptake in UK higher education. PhD dissertation, University of Southampton.
19. Warburton, W., and G. Conole. 2003. CAA in UK HEIs: The state of the Art. In Proceedings of the 7th International CAA Conference, ed. J. Christie, 433-441. Leicestershire: Loughborough University.
20. Warburton, W., and G. Conole. 2005. Wither e-assessment? Paper presented at the 9th International CAA Conference, July 5-6, in University of Loughborough, Leicestershire.
21. Wilson, G., and E. Stacey. 2004. Online interaction impacts on learning: Teaching the teachers to teach online. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20, no. 1: 33-48.
22. Zakrzewski, S., and C. Steven. 2000. A model for computer-based assessment: The Catherine wheel principle. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 25, no. 2: 201-15.
23. Zakrzewski, S., and C. Steven. 2003. Computer-based assessment: Quality assurance issues, the hub of the wheel. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 28, no. 6: 609-23.