Systems Biology Analysis of Heterocellular Signaling

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 8, 2016, Pages 627-637

  Tape, Christopher J ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF CANCER RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

^b Massachusetts Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

cell signaling; cell cell communication; heterocellular; mass cytometry; phosphoproteomics; PTM; systems biology

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; CELL CULTURE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS; CYTOLOGY; ISOTOPES; NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASES; PULSE TIME MODULATION; SIGNALING;

CELL-CELL COMMUNICATIONS; CYTOMETRY; HETEROCELLULAR; PHOSPHOPROTEOMICS; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY;

CELL SIGNALING;

CELL ADHESION; CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL SPECIFICITY; EPITHELIUM CELL; IMMUNOCOMPETENT CELL; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; MESENCHYME CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CELL SEPARATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LAB ON A CHIP; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TISSUE MICROARRAY;

PROTEOME;

CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL SEPARATION; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; LAB-ON-A-CHIP DEVICES; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEOME; SYSTEMS BIOLOGY; TISSUE ARRAY ANALYSIS;

EID: 84963632377     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.016     Document Type: Review

References (75)

1. 1 Bianconi, E., et al. An estimation of the number of cells in the human body. Ann. Hum. Biol. 40 (2013), 463–471.
2. 2 Miller-Jensen, K., et al. Common effector processing mediates cell-specific responses to stimuli. Nature 448 (2007), 604–608.
3. 3 Iwamoto, N., et al. Context-specific flow through the MEK/ERK module produces cell- and ligand-specific patterns of ERK single and double phosphorylation. Sci. Signal., 9, 2016, ra13.
4. 4 Freeman, M., Feedback control of intercellular signalling in development. Nature 408 (2000), 313–319.
5. 5 Manz, B.N., Groves, J.T., Spatial organization and signal transduction at intercellular junctions. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 11 (2010), 342–352.
6. 6 Kitano, H., Systems biology: a brief overview. Science 295 (2002), 1662–1664.
7. 7 Hood, L., et al. Systems biology and new technologies enable predictive and preventative medicine. Science 306 (2004), 640–643.
8. 8 Pawson, T., Scott, J.D., Protein phosphorylation in signaling – 50 years and counting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30 (2005), 286–290.
9. 9 Chan, S.M., et al. Protein microarrays for multiplex analysis of signal transduction pathways. Nat. Med. 10 (2004), 1390–1396.
10. 10 Mertins, P., et al. Integrated proteomic analysis of post-translational modifications by serial enrichment. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 634–637.
11. 11 Roux, P.P., Thibault, P., The coming of age of phosphoproteomics – from large data sets to inference of protein functions. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 12 (2013), 3453–3464.
12. 12 Janes, K.A., Yaffe, M.B., Data-driven modelling of signal-transduction networks. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 7 (2006), 820–828.
13. 13 Janes, K.A., Lauffenburger, D.A., Models of signalling networks – what cell biologists can gain from them and give to them. J. Cell Sci. 126 (2013), 1913–1921.
14. 14 Larance, M., Lamond, A.I., Multidimensional proteomics for cell biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 16 (2015), 269–280.
15. 15 Spencer, K.H., et al. A screen for short-range paracrine interactions. Integr. Biol. (Camb.) 6 (2014), 382–387.
16. 16 Wang, Y., Klemke, R.L., Biochemical purification of pseudopodia from migratory cells. Methods Mol. Biol. 370 (2007), 55–66.
17. 17 Mardakheh, F.K., et al. Global analysis of mRNA, translation, and protein localization: local translation is a key regulator of cell protrusions. Dev. Cell 35 (2015), 344–357.
18. 18 Quail, D.F., Joyce, J.A., Microenvironmental regulation of tumor progression and metastasis. Nat. Med. 19 (2013), 1423–1437.
19. 19 Marie, R., et al. Integrated view of genome structure and sequence of a single DNA molecule in a nanofluidic device. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 4893–4898.
20. 20 Simmons, A.J., et al. Cytometry-based single-cell analysis of intact epithelial signaling reveals MAPK activation divergent from TNF-α-induced apoptosis in vivo. Mol. Syst. Biol., 11, 2015, 835.
21. 21 Irish, J.M., et al. Single cell profiling of potentiated phospho-protein networks in cancer cells. Cell 118 (2004), 217–228.
22. 22 Bandura, D.R., et al. Mass cytometry: technique for real time single cell multitarget immunoassay based on inductively coupled plasma time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 81 (2009), 6813–6822.
23. 23 Di Palma, S., Bodenmiller, B., Unraveling cell populations in tumors by single-cell mass cytometry. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 31 (2015), 122–129.
24. 24 Bodenmiller, B., et al. Multiplexed mass cytometry profiling of cellular states perturbed by small-molecule regulators. Nat. Biotechnol. 30 (2012), 858–867.
25. 25 Krishnaswamy, S., et al. Systems biology. Conditional density-based analysis of T cell signaling in single-cell data. Science, 346, 2014, 1250689.
26. 26 Levine, J.H., et al. Data-driven phenotypic dissection of AML reveals progenitor-like cells that correlate with prognosis. Cell 162 (2015), 184–197.
27. 27 Trapnell, C., Defining cell types and states with single-cell genomics. Genome Res. 25 (2015), 1491–1498.
28. 28 Niederlein, A., et al. Image analysis in high-content screening. Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screen. 12 (2009), 899–907.
29. 29 Zanella, F., et al. High content screening: seeing is believing. Trends Biotechnol. 28 (2010), 237–245.
30. 30 Gerdes, M.J., et al. Highly multiplexed single-cell analysis of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded cancer tissue. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110 (2013), 11982–11987.
31. 31 Zrazhevskiy, P., Gao, X., Quantum dot imaging platform for single-cell molecular profiling. Nat. Commun., 4, 2013, 1619.
32. 32 Lin, J.R., et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of single cells using a high-throughput cyclic immunofluorescence method. Nat. Commun., 6, 2015, 8390.
33. 33 Bakal, C., et al. Quantitative morphological signatures define local signaling networks regulating cell morphology. Science 316 (2007), 1753–1756.
34. 34 Yin, Z., et al. A screen for morphological complexity identifies regulators of switch-like transitions between discrete cell shapes. Nat. Cell Biol. 15 (2013), 860–871.
35. 35 Barr, A.R., et al. A dynamical framework for the all-or-none G1/S transition. Cell Systems 2 (2016), 27–37.
36. 36 Giesen, C., et al. Highly multiplexed imaging of tumor tissues with subcellular resolution by mass cytometry. Nat. Methods 11 (2014), 417–422.
37. 37 Angelo, M., et al. Multiplexed ion beam imaging of human breast tumors. Nat. Med. 20 (2014), 436–442.
38. 38 Levenson, R.M., et al. Immunohistochemistry and mass spectrometry for highly multiplexed cellular molecular imaging. Lab. Invest. 95 (2015), 397–405.
39. 39 Baker, M., Reproducibility crisis: blame it on the antibodies. Nature 521 (2015), 274–276.
40. 40 Aebersold, R., Mann, M., Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature 422 (2003), 198–207.
41. 41 Olsen, J.V., Mann, M., Status of large-scale analysis of post-translational modifications by mass spectrometry. Mol. Cell Proteomics 12 (2013), 3444–3452.
42. 42 Ong, S.E., et al. Stable isotope labeling by amino acids in cell culture, SILAC, as a simple and accurate approach to expression proteomics. Mol. Cell Proteomics 1 (2002), 376–386.
43. 43 Jørgensen, C., et al. Cell-specific information processing in segregating populations of Eph receptor ephrin-expressing cells. Science 326 (2009), 1502–1509.
44. 44 Tian, R., et al. Combinatorial proteomic analysis of intercellular signaling applied to the CD28 T-cell costimulatory receptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 112 (2015), E1594–E1603.
45. 45 Locard-Paulet, M., et al. Phosphoproteomic analysis of interacting tumor and endothelial cells identifies regulatory mechanisms of transendothelial migration. Sci. Signal., 9, 2016, ra15.
46. 46 Anton, K.A., et al. PKA-regulated VASP phosphorylation promotes extrusion of transformed cells from the epithelium. J. Cell Sci. 127 (2014), 3425–3433.
47. 47 Rechavi, O., et al. Trans-SILAC: sorting out the non-cell-autonomous proteome. Nat. Methods 7 (2010), 923–927.
48. 48 Biran, A., et al. Senescent cells communicate via intercellular protein transfer. Genes Dev. 29 (2015), 791–802.
49. 49 Gauthier, N.P., et al. Cell-selective labeling using amino acid precursors for proteomic studies of multicellular environments. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 768–773.
50. 50 Huang, H.T., et al. Racemization of lysine by Proteus vulgaris. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 80 (1952), 1006–1007.
51. 51 Dewey, D.L., Work, E., Diaminopimelic acid decarboxylase. Nature 169 (1952), 533–534.
52. 52 Tape, C.J., et al. Cell-specific labeling enzymes for analysis of cell–cell communication in continuous co-culture. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13 (2014), 1866–1876.
53. 53 Thompson, A., et al. Tandem mass tags: a novel quantification strategy for comparative analysis of complex protein mixtures by MS/MS. Anal. Chem. 75 (2003), 1895–1904.
54. 54 McAlister, G.C., et al. Increasing the multiplexing capacity of TMTs using reporter ion isotopologues with isobaric masses. Anal. Chem. 84 (2012), 7469–7478.
55. 55 Tape, C.J., et al. Reproducible automated phosphopeptide enrichment using magnetic TiO2 and Ti-IMAC. Anal. Chem. 86 (2014), 10296–10302.
56. 56 Tape, C.J., et al. Oncogenic KRAS regulates tumor cell signaling via stromal reciprocation. Cell, 2016, 10.1016/j.cell.2016.03.029.
57. 57 Ting, L., et al. MS3 eliminates ratio distortion in isobaric multiplexed quantitative proteomics. Nat. Methods 8 (2011), 937–940.
58. 58 Hebert, A.S., et al. Neutron-encoded mass signatures for multiplexed proteome quantification. Nat. Methods 10 (2013), 332–334.
59. 59 Merrill, A.E., et al. NeuCode labels for relative protein quantification. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13 (2014), 2503–2512.
60. 60 Balog, J., et al. Identification of biological tissues by rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Anal. Chem. 82 (2010), 7343–7350.
61. 61 Balog, J., et al. Intraoperative tissue identification using rapid evaporative ionization mass spectrometry. Sci. Transl. Med., 5, 2013, 194ra93.
62. 62 Drummond, E.S., et al. Proteomic analysis of neurons microdissected from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded Alzheimer's disease brain tissue. Sci. Rep., 5, 2015, 15456.
63. 63 Sharma, K., et al. Cell type- and brain region-resolved mouse brain proteome. Nat. Neurosci. 18 (2015), 1819–1831.
64. 64 Rajeeve, V., et al. Cross-species proteomics reveals specific modulation of signaling in cancer and stromal cells by phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors. Mol. Cell Proteomics 13 (2014), 1457–1470.
65. 65 Becher, O.J., Holland, E.C., Genetically engineered models have advantages over xenografts for preclinical studies. Cancer Res. 66 (2006), 3355–3358 Discussion, 3358-3359.
66. 66 Frese, K.K., Tuveson, D.A., Maximizing mouse cancer models. Nat. Rev. Cancer 7 (2007), 645–658.
67. 67 Elliott, T.S., et al. Proteome labeling and protein identification in specific tissues and at specific developmental stages in an animal. Nat. Biotechnol. 32 (2014), 465–472.
68. 68 Elsasser, S.J., et al. Genetic code expansion in stable cell lines enables encoded chromatin modification. Nat. Methods 13 (2016), 158–164.
69. 69 Qiu, P., et al. Extracting a cellular hierarchy from high-dimensional cytometry data with SPADE. Nat. Biotechnol. 29 (2011), 886–891.
70. 70 Amir el, A.D., et al. viSNE enables visualization of high dimensional single-cell data and reveals phenotypic heterogeneity of leukemia. Nat. Biotechnol. 31 (2013), 545–552.
71. 71 Riordan, D.P., et al. Automated analysis and classification of histological tissue features by multi-dimensional microscopic molecular profiling. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0128975.
72. 72 Pampaloni, F., et al. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 8 (2007), 839–845.
73. 73 Yamada, K.M., Cukierman, E., Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 130 (2007), 601–610.
74. 74 Lancaster, M.A., Knoblich, J.A., Organogenesis in a dish: modeling development and disease using organoid technologies. Science, 345, 2014, 1247125.
75. 75 Kaji, H., et al. Engineering systems for the generation of patterned co-cultures for controlling cell–cell interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1810 (2011), 239–250.