Kinematic measures for upper limb motor assessment during robot-mediated training in patients with severe sub-acute stroke

Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 237-245

  Duret, Christophe ^a,b   Courtial, Ophélie ^a   Grosmaire, Anne Gaelle ^a  

^a Unite de Reeducation Neurologique Medecine Physique et Readaptation   (France)

^b CENTRE HOSPITALIER SUD FRANCILIEN   (France)

Author keywords

Hemiparesis; kinematics; robotic therapy; sub acute stroke; upper limb

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CORRELATIONAL STUDY; ERROR; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT SCALE; HUMAN; KINEMATICS; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOTOR STATUS SCALE; NEUROLOGIC DISEASE ASSESSMENT; PARESIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REHABILITATION EQUIPMENT; ROBOTICS; SUB ACUTE STROKE; UPPER LIMB ROBOT ASSISTED TRAINING; VELOCITY; BIOMECHANICS; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; COMPLICATION; CONVALESCENCE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER LIMB; VERY ELDERLY; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; BRAIN ISCHEMIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTICS; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STROKE; STROKE REHABILITATION; UPPER EXTREMITY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84963599551     PISSN: 09226028     EISSN: 18783627     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150565     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aisen, M.L., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., McDowell, F., & Volpe B.T. (1997). The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Archives of Neurology, 54, 443-446.
2. Alt Murphy, M., Willén, C., & Sunnerhagen, K.S. (2013). Responsiveness of Upper Extremity Kinematic Measures and Clinical Improvement During the First Three Months After Stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 27, 844-853.
3. Arya, K.N., Verma, R., & Garg, R.K. (2011). Estimating the minimal clinically important difference of an upper extremity recovery measure in subacute stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 599-610.
4. Bosecker, C., Dipietro, L., Volpe, B., & Krebs, H.I. (2010). Kinematic robot-based evaluation scales and clinical counterparts to measure upper limb motor performance in patients with chronic stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 24, 62-69.
5. Buma, F., Kwakkel, G., & Ramsey, N. (2013). Understanding upper limb recovery after stroke. Restorative Neurology Neuroscience, 31, 707-722.
6. Bütefisch, C., Hummelsheim, H., Denzler, P., & Mauritz, K. H. (1995). Repetitive training of isolated movements improves the outcome of motor rehabilitation of the centrally paretic hand. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 130, 59-68.
7. Carey, J.R., Durfee, W.K., Bhatt, E., Nagpal, A., Weinstein, S.A., Anderson, K.M.,& Lewis, S.M. (2007). Comparison of finger tracking versus simple movement training via telerehabilitation to alter hand function and cortical reorganization after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 21, 216-232.
8. Celik, O., O'Malley, M.K., Boake, C., Levin, H.S., Yozbatiran, N., & Reistetter, T.A. (2010). Normalized movement quality measures for therapeutic robots strongly correlate with clinical motor impairment measures. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 18, 433-444.
9. Cirstea, M.C., & Levin, M.F. (2000). Compensatory strategies for reaching in stroke. Brain, 123, 940-953.
10. Colombo, R., Pisano, F., Micera, S., Mazzone, A., Delconte, C., Carrozza, M.C., Dario, P., & Minuco, G. (2008). Assessing mechanisms of recovery during robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper limb. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 50-63.
11. Cooke, E.V., Mares, K., Clark, A., Tallis, R.C., & Pomeroy, V.M. (2010). The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med, 8, 60.
12. Cramer, S.C.,& Riley, J.D. (2008). Neuroplasticity and brain repair after stroke. Current Opinion in Neurology, 21, 76-82.
13. Cramer, S.C. (2010). Brain repair after stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1827-1829.
14. Dipietro, L., Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Stein, J., Bever, C., Mernoff, S.T., Fasoli, S.E., & Hogan, N. (2012). Learning, not adaptation, characterizes stroke motor recovery: Evidence from kinematic changes induced by robot-assisted therapy in trained and untrained task in the same workspace. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 20, 48-57.
15. Einav, O., Geva, D., Yoeli, D., Kerzhner, M., & Mauritz, K.H. (2011). Development and validation of the first robotic scale for the clinical assessment of upper extremity motor impairments in stroke patients. Top Stroke Rehabilitation, 18, 587-598.
16. Ferraro, M., Demaio, J.H., Krol, J., Trudell, C., Rannekleiv, K., Edelstein, L., Christos, P., Aisen, M., England, J., Fasoli, S., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., & Volpe, B.T. (2002). Assessing the motor status score: A scale for the evaluation of upper limb motor outcomes in patients after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 16, 283-289.
17. Feys, H., De Weerdt, W., Verbeke, G., Steck, G.C., Capiau, C., Kiekens, C., Dejaeger, E., Van Hoydonck, G., Vermeersch, G., & Cras, P. (2004). Early and Repetitive Stimulation of the Arm Can Substantially Improve the Long-Term Outcome After Stroke:A5-year follow-up study of a RandomizedTrial. Stroke, 35, 924-929.
18. Fugl-Meyer, A.R., Jaasko, L., Leyman, I., Olsson, S., & Steglind, S. (1975). The post-stroke hemiplegic patient 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 7, 13-31.
19. Gilliaux, M., Lejeune, T.M., Detrembleur, C., Sapin, J., Dehez, B., Selves, C., & Stocart, G. (2014). Using the robotic device REAplan as a valid, reliable, and sensitive tool to quantify upper limb impairments in stroke patients. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 46, 117-125
20. Han, C., Wang, Q., Meng, P.P., & Qi, M.Z. (2013). Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27, 75-81.
21. Klamroth-Marganska, V., Blanco, J., Campen, K., Curt, A., Dietz, V., Ettlin, T., Felder, M., Fellinghauer, B., Guidali, M., Kollmar, A., Luft, A., Nef, T., Schuster-Amft, C., Stahel, W., & Riener, R. (2014). Three-dimensional, task-specific robot therapy of the arm after stroke: A multicentre, parallel-group randomised trial. Lancet Neurology, 13, 159-166.
22. Krabben, T., Molier, B.I., Houwink, A., Rietman, J.S., Buurke, J.H., & Prange, G.B. (2011). Circle drawing as evaluative movement task in stroke rehabilitation: An explorative study. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 248, 15.
23. Krebs, H.I., Aisen, M.L., Volpe, B.T., & Hogan, N. (1999). Quantization of continuous arm movements in humans with brain injury. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U S A, 96, 4645-4649.
24. Krebs, H.I. (2003). Rehabilitation Robotics: Performance-Based Progressive. Robot-Assisted Therapy. Autonomous Robots, 15, 7-20.
25. Krebs, H.I., Krams, M., Agrafiotis, D.K., DiBernardo, A., Chavez, J.C., Littman, G.S., Yang, E., Byttebier, G., Dipietro, L., Rykman, A., McArthur, K., Hajjar, K., Lees, K.R., & Volpe, B.T. (2014). Robotic measurement of arm movements after stroke establishes biomarkers of motor recovery. Stroke, 5, 200-204.
26. Kwakkel, G., Wagenaar, R.C., Twisk, J.W., Lankhorst, G.J., & Koestler, J.C. (1999). Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: A randomised trial. Lancet, 354, 189-194.
27. Kwakkel, G., van Peppen, R., Wagenaar, R.C., Dauphinee, S.W., Richards, C., Ashburn, A., Miller, K., Lincoln, N., Partridge, C., Wellwood, I., & Langhorne, P. (2004). Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. A meta-analysis. Stroke, 35, 2529-2536.
28. Kwakkel, G., Kollen, B., & Krebs, H.I. (2008). Effects of robotassisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: A systematic review. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 22, 111-121.
29. Levy, C.E., Nichols, D.S., Schmalbrock, P.M., Keller, P., & Chakeres, D.W. (2001). Functional MRI Evidence of Cortical Reorganization in Upper-Limb Stroke Hemiplegia Treated with Constraint-InducedMovement Therapy. American Journal of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation, 80, 4-12.
30. Liepert, J., Miltner, W.H., Bauder, H., Sommer, M., Dettmers, C., Taub, E., & Weiller C. (1998). Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neuroscience Letters, 250, 5-8.
31. Liepert, J., Graef, S., Uhde, I., Leidner, O., & Weiller, C. (2000). Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurologica Scandinavia, 101, 321-326.
32. Lin, J.H., Hsu, M.J., Sheu, C.F.,Wu, T.S., Lin, R.T., Chen, C.H.,& Hsieh, C.L. (2009). Psychometric comparisons of 4 measures for assessing upper-extremity function in people with stroke. Physical Therapy, 89, 840-850.
33. Lincoln, N.B., Parry, R.H.,& Vass, C.D. (1999). Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke, 30, 573-579.
34. Lindmark, B., & Hamrin, E. (1988). Evaluation of functional capacity after stroke as a basis for active intervention. Validation of a modified chart for motor capacity assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 20, 111-115.
35. Lo, A.C., Guarino, P.D., Richards, L.G., Haselkorn, J.K., Wittenberg, G.F., Federman, D.G., Ringer, R.J., Wagner, T.H., Krebs, H.I., Volpe, B.T., Bever, C.T. Jr., Bravata, D.M., Duncan, P.W., Corn, B.H., Maffucci, A.D., Nadeau, S.E., Conroy, S.S., Powell, J.M., Huang, G.D.,& Peduzzi, P. (2010). Robotassisted therapy for long-term upper-limb Impairment after stroke. The New England Journal of Medicine, 362, 1772-1783.
36. Lohse, K.R., Lang, C.E., & Boyd, L.A. (2014). Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke, 45, 2053-2058.
37. Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., Shor, P.C., Majmundar, M., & Van der Loos M. (2002). Robot-Assisted Movement Training Compared With Conventional Therapy Techniques for the Rehabilitation of Upper-Limb Motor Function After Stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 952-959.
38. Lum, P.S., Burgar, C.G., van der Loos, M., Shor, P.C., Majmumdar, M., & Yap R. (2006). MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 43, 631-642.
39. Lyle, R.C. (1981).Aperformance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 4, 483-492.
40. Masiero, S., Celia, A., Rosati, G., & Armani M. (2007). Roboticassisted rehabilitation of the upper limb after acute stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 88, 142-149.
41. Masiero, S., Armani, M., & Rosati G. (2011). Upper-limb robotassisted therapy in rehabilitation of acute stroke patients: Focused review and results of new randomized controlled trial. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 48, 355-366.
42. Masiero, S., Armani, M., Ferlini, G., Rosati, G., & Rossi, A. (2014). Randomized trial of a robotic assistive device for the upper extremity during early inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 377-386.
43. Mazzoleni, S., Carrozza, M.C., Sale, P., Franceschini, M., Posteraro, F., & Tiboni, M. (2013). Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery of subacute stroke patients: A kinematic approach. IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics, 6650503.
44. Mehrholz, J., Hadrich, A., Platz, T., Kugler, J., & Pohl, M. (2012). Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function and muscle arm strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 6, CD006876.
45. Miller, K., Lincoln, N., Partridge, C.,Wellwood, I., & Langhorne, P. (2004). Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. A meta-analysis. Stroke, 35, 2529-2536.
46. Murphy, T.H., & Corbett, D. (2009). Plasticity during stroke recovery: From synapse to behaviour. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 861-872.
47. Nelles, G. (2004). Cortical reorganization-effects of intensive therapy. Restorative Neurology Neuroscience, 22, 239-244.
48. Nishibe, M., Barbay, S., Guggenmos, D., & Nudo, R.J. (2010). Reorganization of motor cortex after controlled cortical impact in rats and implications for functional recovery. Journal of Neurotrauma, 27, 2221-2232.
49. Nishibe, M., Urban, E.T. 3rd, Barbay, S., & Nudo, R.J. (2014). Rehabilitative Training Promotes Rapid Motor Recovery but Delayed Motor Map Reorganization in a Rat Cortical Ischemic Infarct Model. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 29, 472-482
50. Norouzi-Gheidari, N., Archambault, P.S., & Fung, J. (2012). Effects of robot-assisted therapy on stroke rehabilitation in upper limbs: Systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 49, 479-496.
51. Nudo, R.J., Milliken, G.W., Jenkins, W.M., & Merzenich, M.M. (1996). Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys. Journal of Neuroscience, 16, 785-807.
52. Nudo, R.J. (2007). Postinfarct cortical plasticity and behavioural recovery. Stroke, 38, 840-845.
53. Plautz, E.J., Milliken, G.W.,& Nudo, R.J. (2000). Effects of repetitive motor training on movement representations in adult Squirrel monkeys: Role of use versus learning. Neurobiology and Learning and Memory, 74, 27-55.
54. Rohrer, B., Fasoli, S., Krebs, H.I., Hughes, R., Volpe, B., Frontera, W.R., Stein, J., & Hogan, N. (2002). Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. Journal of Neuroscience, 22, 8297-8304.
55. Sale, P., Franceschini, M., Mazzoleni, S., Palma, E., Agosti, M., & Posteraro F. (2014). Effects of upper limb robot-assisted therapy on motor recovery in subacute stroke patients. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 11, 104.
56. Semans, S. (1967). The Bobath concept in treatment of neurological disorders; a neuro-developmental treatment. American Journal of Physical Medicine, 46, 732-788.
57. Shepherd, R.B., & Carr, J.H. (2006). Neurological rehabilitation. Disability and Rehabilitation, 28, 811-812.
58. Sivan, M., O'Connor, R.J., Makower, S., Levesley, M., & Bhakta, B. (2011). Systematic review of outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 43, 181-189.
59. Subramanian, S.K., Yamanaka, J., Chilingaryan, G., & Levin, M. F. (2010). Validity of movement pattern kinematics as measures of arm motor impairment poststroke. Stroke, 41, 2303-2308.
60. Takeuchi, N., & Izumi, S.I. (2013). Rehabilitation with poststroke motor recovery: A review with a focus on neural plasticity. Stroke Research and Treatment, 2013, 128641.
61. Turner, D.L., Ramos-Murguialday, A., Birbaumer, N., Hoffmann, U., & Luft, A. (2013). Neurophysiology of robot-mediated training and therapy: A perspective for future use in clinical populations. Frontiers in neurology, 4.
62. van Dokkum, L., Hauret, I., Mottet, D., Froger, J., Métrot, J., & Laffont, I. (2014). The contribution of kinematics in the assessment of upper limb motor recovery early after stroke. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 28, 4-12.
63. Volpe, B.T., Krebs, H.I., Hogan, N., Edelstein, L., Diels, C., & Aisen, M. (2000). A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology, 54, 1938-1944.
64. Wei, X.J., Tong, K.Y., & Hu, X.L. (2011). The responsiveness and correlation between Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Motor Status Scale, and the Action Research Arm Test in chronic stroke with upper-extremity rehabilitation robotic training. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 34, 349-356.
65. Zollo, L., Rossini, L., Bravi, M., Magrone, G., Sterzi, S., & Guglielmelli, E. (2011). Quantitative evaluation of upperlimb motor control in robot-aided rehabilitation. Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing, 49, 1131-1144.