The effects of increased dose of exercise-based therapies to enhance motor recovery after stroke: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BMC Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Cooke, Emma V ^a   Mares, Kathryn ^b   Clark, Allan ^b   Tallis, Raymond C ^c   Pomeroy, Valerie M ^b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^c NONE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; EXERCISE; HAND GRIP; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; MOTOR ACTIVITY; MOTOR CONTROL; MOTOR DYSFUNCTION; RISK FACTOR; STROKE; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WALKING SPEED; CONVALESCENCE; KINESIOTHERAPY; PHYSIOTHERAPY; REVIEW;

EXERCISE THERAPY; HUMANS; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 77957742659     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17417015     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-60     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Langhorne P, Wagenaar R, Partridge C. Physiotherapy after stroke: more is better?. Physiotherapy Research International 1996, 1:75-88.
2. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Koelman TW, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Effects of intensity of rehabilitation after stroke. A research synthesis. Stroke 1997, 28:1550-1556.
3. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, Wood-Dauphinee S, Richards C, Ashburn A, Miller K, Lincoln N, Partridge C, Wellwood I, Langhorne P. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke. A meta analysis. Stroke 2004, 35:2529-2536. 10.1161/01.STR.0000143153.76460.7d, 15472114.
4. Van Peppen RPS, Kwakkel G, Wood-dauphinee S, Hendricks HJM, Van der Wees P, Dekker J. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke. What's the evidence?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004, 18:833-862. 10.1191/0269215504cr843oa, 15609840.
5. Galvin R, Murphy B, Cusack T, Stokes E. The impact of increased duration of exercise therapy on functional recovery following stroke - what is the evidence?. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation 2008, 15:365-377. 10.1310/tsr1504-365, 18782739.
6. Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmier RL, Wagner JM, Miller JP, Videen TO, Powers WJ, Wolf SL, Edwards DF. Very early constraint-induced movement during stroke rehabilitation (VECTORS). Neurology 2009, 73:195-201. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ab2b27, 2715572, 19458319.
7. Kozlowski DA, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of neuronal injury after unilateral sensorimotor cortex lesions. The Journal of Neuroscience 1996, 16:4776-4786.
8. Humm JL, Kozlowski DA, Bland ST, James DC, Schallert T. Use-dependent exaggeration of brain injury: is glutamate involved?. Experimental Neurology 1999, 157:349-358. 10.1006/exnr.1999.7061, 10364446.
9. Bland S, Schallert T, Strong R, Aronowski J, Grotta JC. Early exclusive use of the affected forelimb after moderate transient focal ischemia in rats. Functional and anatomical outcome. Stroke 2000, 31:1144-1152.
10. Risedal A, Zeng J, Johansson BB. Early training may exacerbate brain damage after focal brain ishemia in the rat. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism 1999, 19:997-1003.
11. Biernaskie J, Corbett D. Enriched rehabilitative training promotes improved forelimb motor function and enhanced dendritic growth after focal ischemic injury. The Journal of Neuroscience 2001, 21:5272-5280.
12. Nugent JA, Schurr KA, Adams RD. A dose-response relationship between amount of weight-bearing exercise and walking outcome following cerebrovascular accident. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994, 75:399-402. 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90162-7, 8172498.
13. Byl NN, Pitsch EA, Abrams GM. Functional outcomes can vary by dose: learning-based sensorimotor training for patients stable poststroke. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair 2008, 22:494-504.
14. Sterr A, Elbert T, Berthold I, Kolbel B, Taub E. Longer versus shorter daily constraint-induced movement therapy of chronic hemipareis an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002, 83:1374-1377. 10.1053/apmr.2002.35108, 12370871.
15. Cooke E. The effects of type and intensity of physiotherapy on strength and function after stroke. PhD Thesis St. George's, University of London.
16. Kwakkel G. Impact of intensity of practice after stroke: issues for consideration. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006, 28:823-830. 10.1080/09638280500534861, 16777769.
17. Higgins JPT, Altman DG. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions Version 5.02 (updated September 2009). 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration., http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
18. Kwakkel G, Wagenaar RC, Twisk JWR, Lankhorst GJ, Koetsier JC. Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomized trial. The Lancet 1999, 354:191-196.
19. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Wagenaar RC. Long term effects of intensity of upper and lower limb training after stroke: a randomised trial. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002, 72:473-479. 1737834, 11909906.
20. Kwakkel G. Dynamics in functional recovery after stroke. 1998, Proefschrift Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, ISBN 9080449717.
21. The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study (GAPS) Group Can augmented physiotherapy input enhance recovery of mobility after stroke? A randomized controlled trial. Clinical Rehabilitation 2004, 18:529-537. 10.1191/0269215504cr768oa, 15293487, The Glasgow Augmented Physiotherapy Study (GAPS) Group.
22. Lincoln NB, Parry RH, Vass CD. Randomized, controlled trial to evaluate increased intensity of physiotherapy treatment of arm function after stroke. Stroke 1999, 30:573-579.
23. Partridge C, Mackenzie M, Edwards S, Reid A, Jayawardena S, Guck N, Potter J. Is dosage of physiotherapy a critical factor in deciding patterns of recovery from stroke: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Physiotherapy Research International 2000, 5:230-240. 10.1002/pri.203, 11129665.
24. Rodgers H, Mackintosh J, Price C, Wood R, Mcnamee P, Fearon T, Marritt A, Curless R. Does an early increased-intensity interdisciplinary upper limb therapy programme following acute stroke improve outcome?. Clinical Rehabilitation 2003, 17:579-589. 10.1191/0269215503cr652oa, 12971702.
25. Donaldson C, Tallis R, Miller S, Sunderland A, Lemon R, Pomeroy VM. Effects of conventional therapy and functional strength training on upper limb motor recovery after stroke: a randomized Phase II study. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2009, 2:389-397.
26. Cooke EV, Tallis RC, Clark A, Pomeroy VM. Efficacy of functional strength training on restoration of lower-limb motor function early after stroke: Phase ! randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair 2010, 24:88-96. 10.1177/1545968309343216, 19704158.
27. Putman K, De Wit L, Schupp W, Ilse B, Berman P, Connell L, Dejager E, De Meyer A-M, De Weerdt W, feys H, Walter J, Bincoln N, Louckx F, Anneleen M, Birgit S, Smith B, Leys M. Use of time by physiotherapists and occupational therapists in a stroke rehabilitation unit: a comparison between four European rehabilitation centres. Disability and Rehabilitation 2006, 28:1417-1424. 10.1080/09638280600638216, 17071574.
28. Turner PA, Whitfield TA. Physiotherapists' reasons for selection of treatment techniques: A cross-national survey. Physiotherapy Theory and Practice 1999, 15:235-246.
29. Pomeroy VM, King L, Pollock A, Baily-Hallam A, Langhorne P. Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2006, (2):CD003241. pub2.
30. Dobkin BH. Progressive staging of pilot studies to improve Phase III trials for motor interventions. Neurorehabilitation & Neural Repair 2009, 23:197-206.
31. Pomeroy VM, Tallis RC. Need to focus research in stroke rehabilitation. Lancet 2000, 355:836-837. 10.1016/S0140-6736(99)08143-X, 10711941.