Using the robotic device REAplan as a valid, reliable, and sensitive too l to quantify upper limb impairments in stroke patients

Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 117-125

  Gilliaux, Maxime ^a   Lejeune, Thierry M ^a,b   Detrembleur, Christine ^a   Sapin, Julien ^a   Dehez, Bruno ^a   Selves, Clara ^b   Stoquart, Gaëtan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ CATHOLIQUE DE LOUVAIN   (Belgium)

^b CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Biomechanics; Outcome assessment; Reference standards; Reproducibility of results; Robotics; Stroke; Upper extremity

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARM; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ROBOTICS; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEUROMUSCULAR DISEASES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; ROBOTICS; STROKE; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84894620845     PISSN: 16501977     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-1245     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Mackay J, Mensah GA. Atlas of heart disease and stroke. Brighton: Myriad; 2004.
2. Duncan PW, Zorowitz R, Bates B, Choi JY, Glasberg JJ, Graham GD, et al. Management of adult stroke rehabilitation care: a clinical practice guideline. Stroke 2005; 36: 100-143.
3. Balasubramanian S, Colombo R, Sterpi I, Sanguineti V, Burdet E. Robotic assessment of upper limb motor function after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2012; 91: 255-269.
4. Mehrholz J, Hädrich A, Platz T, Kugler J, Pohl M. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012; 6: CD006876.
5. Sivan M, O'Connor R, Makower S, Levesley M, Bhakta B. Systematic review of the outcome measures used in the evaluation of robot-assisted upper limb exercise in stroke. J Rehabil Med 2011; 43: 181-189.
6. Daly JJ, Hogan N, Perepezko EM, Krebs HO, Rogers JM, Goyal KS, et al. Response to upper-limb robotics and functional neuromuscular stimulation following stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 723-736.
7. Caimmi M, Carda S, Giovanzana C, Maini ES, Sabatini AM, Smania N, et al. 'sing kinematic analysis to evaluate constraintinduced movement therapy in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008; 22: 31-39.
8. Finley MA, Fasoli SE, Dipietro L, Ohlhoff J, Macclellan L, Meister C, et al. Short-duration robotic therapy in stroke patients with severe upper-limb motor impairment. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005; 42: 683-692.
9. Bensmail D, Robertson JV, Fermanian C, Roby-Brami A. Botulinum toxin to treat upper-limb spasticity in hemiparetic patients: analysis of function and kinematics of reaching movements. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2010; 24: 273-281.
10. Reinkensmeyer DJ, Kahn LE, Averbuch M, McKenna-Cole A, Schmit BD, Rymer WZ. 'nderstanding and treating arm movement impairment after chronic brain injury: progress with the ARM guide. J Rehabil Res Dev 2000; 37: 653-662.
11. Kahn LE, Zygman ML, Rymer WZ, Reinkensmeyer DJ. Robotassisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2006; 3: 1-13.
12. Desrosiers J, Bravo G, Hébert R, Dutil E, Mercier L. Validation of the Box and Block Test as a measure of dexterity of elderly people: reliability, validity, and norms studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994; 75: 751-755.
13. Kovacs FM, Abraira V, Royuela A, Corcoll J, Alegre L, Tomás M, et al. Minimum detectable and minimal clinically important changes for pain in patients with nonspecific neck pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008; 9: 43.
14. Andresen EM. Criteria for assessing the tools of disability outcomes research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000; 81: 15-20.
15. Finley MA, Dipietro L, Ohlhoff J, Whitall J, Krebs HI, Bever CT. The effect of repeated measurements using an upper extremity robot on healthy adults. J Appl Biomech 2009; 25: 103-110.
16. Wagner JM, Rhodes JA, Patten C. Reproducibility and minimal detectable change of three-dimensional kinematic analysis of reaching tasks in people with hemiparesis after stroke. Phys Ther 2008; 88: 652-663.
17. Gilliaux M, Lejeune T, Detrembleur C, Sapin J, Dehez B, Stoquart G. A robotic device as a sensitive quantitative tool to assess upper limb impairments in stroke patients: a preliminary prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med 2012; 44: 210-217.
18. Sapin J. [Design of an interactive robot for the rehabilitation of the upper limb in stroke patients.] PhD thesis. Louvain-la-Neuve: 'niversité catholique de Louvain; 2010 (in French).
19. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 1975; 7: 13-31.
20. Sanford J, Moreland J, Swanson LR, Stratford PW, Gowland C. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment for testing motor performance in patients following stroke. Phys Ther 1993; 73: 447-454.
21. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs HI, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera WR, et al. Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 2002; 22: 8297-8304.
22. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Bouter LM. When to use agreement versus reliability measures. J Clin Epidemiol 2006; 59: 1033-1039.
23. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Palazzolo J, Rohrer B, Ferraro M, Fasoli S, et al. Robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation in stroke: interim results on the follow-up of 76 patients and on movement performance indices. In: Mokhtari M, editor. Integration of assistive technology in the information age. Amsterdam: IOS Press; 2001, p. 45-59.
24. Penta M, Tesio L, Arnould C, Zancan A, Thonnard JL. The ABILHAND questionnaire as a measure of manual ability in chronic stroke patients: Rasch-based validation and relationship to upper limb impairment. Stroke 2001; 32: 1627-1634.
25. Bouffioulx E, Arnould C, Thonnard JL. SATIS-Stroke: a satisfaction measure of activities and participation in the actual environment experienced by patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008; 40: 836-843.
26. Ozcan A, Tulum Z, Pinar L, Baskurt F. Comparison of pressure pain threshold, grip strength, dexterity and touch pressure of dominant and non-dominant hands within and between right-and left-handed subjects. J Korean Med Sci 2004; 19: 874-878.
27. Schaal S, Sternad D, Osu R, Kawato M. Rhythmic arm movement is not discrete. Nat Neurosci 2004; 7: 1136-1143.
28. Ikegami T, Hirashima M, Taga G, Nozaki D. Asymmetric transfer of visuomotor learning between discrete and rhythmic movements. J Neurosci 2010; 30: 4515-4521.
29. Howard IS, Ingram JN, Wolpert DM. Separate representations of dynamics in rhythmic and discrete movements: evidence from motor learning. J Neurophysiol 2011; 105: 1722-1731.
30. Lo HS, Xie SQ. Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation: state of the art and future prospects. Med Eng Phys 2012; 34: 261-268.
31. Jaspers E, Feys H, Bruyninckx H, Cutti A, Harlaar J, Molenaers G, Desloovere K. The reliability of upper limb kinematics in children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Gait Posture 2011; 33: 568-575.