The effects of streaming in the secondary school on learning outcomes for Australian students - A review of the international literature

Australian Journal of Education

Volumn 60, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 42-59

  Johnston, Olivia ^a   Wildy, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Ability grouping; diversity; learning outcomes; literature review; Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA); social stratification; streaming

Indexed keywords

EID: 84962757124     PISSN: 00049441     EISSN: 20505884     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0004944115626522     Document Type: Review

References (77)

1. Ansalone G., (2003) Poverty, tracking, and the social construction of failure: International perspectives on tracking. Journal of Children and Poverty 9 (1): 3-20.
2. Ansalone G., (2010) Tracking: Educational differentiation or defective strategy? Educational Research Quarterly 24 (2): 3-17.
3. Ansalone, G. & Biafora, F. (2004). Elementary school teachers' perceptions and attitudes to educational structure of tracking. Education, 125 (2), 249-258. Retrieved from EbscoHost.
4. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2014). The Australian National Curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.australiancurriculum.edu.au/.
5. Australian Curriculum, Assessment and Reporting Authority. (2012). The shape of the Australian curriculum. Retrieved from http://www.acara.edu.au/verve/-resources/the-shape-of-the-australian-curriculum-v4.pdf.
6. Boaler J., (1997) Setting, social class and survival of the quickest. British Educational Research Journal 23 (5): 575-596.
7. Boaler, J. (2002). Experiencing school Mathematics traditional and reform approaches to teaching and their impact on student learning [Digital edition]. Retrieved from EBL.
8. Burtt H. E., Chassell L. M., Hatch E. M., (1923) Efficiency of instruction in unselected and selected sections in elementary psychology on basis of intelligence tests. Journal of Educational Psychology 14 (3): 154-161.
9. Carlgren, I., Handal, G., & Vaage, S. (1994). Teachers' minds and actions: Research on teachers' thinking and practice [Digital edition]. Retrieved from Googlebooks.
10. Caro D. H., (2009) Socio-economic status and academic achievement trajectories from childhood to adolescence. Canadian Journal of Education 32 (3): 558-591.
11. Charlton E., Mills M., Martino W., Beckett L., (2007) Sacrificial girls: A case study of the impact of streaming and setting on gender reform. British Educational Research Journal 33 (4): 459-478.
12. Coleman, J. S. (1966). Equality of Educational Opportunity Study. Retrieved from www.icpsr.uimich.edu.
13. Dar Y., (1985) Teachers' attitudes toward ability grouping: Educational considerations and social and organizational influences. Interchange 16 (2): 17-38.
14. Dvorak A., Rae J. J., (1929) Comparison of achievement of superior children in segregated and unsegregated first-grade classes. The Elementary School Journal 29 (5): 380-387.
15. Esposito D., (1973) Homogeneous and heterogeneous ability grouping: Principal findings and implications for evaluating and designing more effective educational environments. Review of Educational Research 43 (2): 163-179.
16. Forgasz H., (2010) Streaming for mathematics in Victorian secondary schools. Australian Mathematics Teacher 66 (1): 31-40.
17. Gallagher S., Smith S. R., Merrotsy P., (2011) Teachers' perceptions of the socio-emotional development of intellectually gifted primary aged students and their attitudes towards ability grouping and acceleration. Gifted and Talented International 26 (1): 11-24.
18. Gamoran, A., & Long, D. (2006). Equality of educational opportunity: A 40 year retrospective. Retrieved from http://socialcapitalfast.wceruw.org.
19. Gamoran A., Mare R. D., (1989) Secondary school tracking and education inequality: Compensation, reinforcement, or neutrality? American Journal of Sociology 94 (5): 1146-1183).
20. Gross M. U. M., (1999) Critical dialogue: Inequity in equity, the paradox of gifted education in Australia. Australian Journal of Education 43 (1): 87.
21. Hallam S., Ireson J., (2005) Secondary school teachers' pedagogic practices when teaching mixed ability and structured ability classes. Research Papers in Education 20 (1): 3-24.
22. Hallam, S., Rogers, L. & Ireson, J. (2008). Ability grouping in the secondary school: Attitude of teachers of practically based subjects. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31 (3), 181-193. Retrieved from EbscoHost.
23. Hallinan M. T., (1996) Race effects on students' track mobility in high school. Social Psychology of Education 1 (1): 1-24.
24. Hallinan M. T., Williams R. A., (1989) Interracial friendship choices in secondary schools. American Sociological Review 54 (1): 67-79.
25. Hanushek E. A., Wobmann L., (2006) Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-indifferences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal 116 (510): 63-76.
26. Hargreaves D. H., (1967) Social relations in secondary school, London: Routledge & K. Paul.
27. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Retrieved from EBLReader.
28. Huang M., (2009) Classroom homogeneity and the distribution of student Math performance: A country-level fixed-effects analysis. Social Science Research 38 (4)): 981-791.
29. Human Capital Working Group. (2008). National Numeracy Review Report. Retrieved from www.coag.gov.au.
30. Hung, S. (1999). A comparison of the perceptions of teachers assigned to teach higher and lower ability groups. Master's Thesis. Retrieved from http://hub.hku.hk/bitstream/10722/29333/1/FullText.pdf?accept=1.
31. Ireson J., Hallam S., (1999) Raising standards: Is ability grouping the answer? Oxford Review of Education 25 (3): 342-348.
32. Ireson, J., & Hallam, S. (2001). Ability grouping in education [Digital edition]. Retrieved from EBL.
33. Ireson J., Hallam S., (2009) Academic self-concepts in adolescence: Relations with achievement and ability grouping in schools. Learning and Instruction 19 (3): 201-213.
34. Jackson, B. (1964). Streaming: An education system in miniature. Retrieved from Googlebooks.
35. Jussim L., Kent H., (2005) Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knowns and unknowns, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review 9 (2): 131-155.
36. Kilgour, P. (2006). Student, teacher and parent perceptions of classroom environments in streamed and unstreamed mathematics classrooms. Doctoral Dissertation. Retrieved from http://espace.library.curtin.edu.au.
37. Krahn, H., & Taylor, A. (2000). Streaming in the 10th grade in four Canadian provinces in 2000. Statistics Canada through University of Alberta. Retrieved from www.Statcan.gc.ca.
38. Kronborg L., Plunkett M., (2008) Curriculum differentiation: An innovative Australian secondary school program to extend academic talent. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 17 (2): 5-14.
39. Kronborg L., Plunkett M., (2011) Learning to be a teacher of the gifted: The importance of examining opinions and challenging misconceptions. Gifted and Talented International 26 (1): 31-46.
40. Kronborg L. G., Plunkett M. M., Kelly L., Urquhart F., (2008) Student attitudes towards learning in differentiated settings. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 17 (1): 19-29.
41. Kulik C. L., Kulik J. A., (1982) Effects of ability grouping on secondary school students: A meta-analysis of evaluation findings. American Education Research Journal 19 (3): 415-428.
42. Landvogt J., Lede G. C., Abbott C., (2001) Experiences of learning and teaching in an accelerated program: The view from within. TalentEd 19 (2): 1-9.
43. Lazear E. P., (2001) Educational production. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 116 (3): 777-803.
44. Liem G., Marsh H., Martin A., McInerney D., Yeung A., (2013) The big-fish-little-pond effect and a national policy of within-school ability streaming: Alternative frames of reference. American Educational Research Journal 50 (2): 326-370.
45. Letendre G., Hofer B., Shimizu H., (2003) What is tracking? Cultural expectations in the United States, Germany and Japan. American Educational Research Journal 40 (1): 43-89.
46. Lipps G. E., Lowe G. A., Halliday S., Morris-Patterson A., Clarke N., Wilson R. N., (2010) The association of academic tracking to depressive symptoms among adolescents in three Caribbean countries. Child and Adolescent Psychiatry and Mental Health 4 (16): 16-20.
47. Lucas S. R., (1999) Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools, New York, NY: College Teachers Press.
48. Macqueen S., (2010) Primary teacher attitudes in achievement-based literacy classes. Issues in Educational Research 20 (2): 118-136.
49. Macqueen S., (2012) Academic outcomes from between-class achievement grouping: The Australian primary context. The Australian Educational Researcher 39 (1): 59-73.
50. Macqueen S., (2013) Grouping for inequity. International Journal of Inclusive Education 17 (3): 295-309.
51. Marsh H. W., (1987) The big-fish-little-pond effect on academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Psychology 79 (3): 280-295.
52. Marsh H. W., (2004) Negative effects of school-average achievement on academic self-concept: A comparison of the big-fish-little-pond effect across Australian states and territories. Australian Journal of Education 48 (1): 5-26.
53. Marsh H. W., O'Mara A., (2008) Reciprocal effects between academic self-concept, self-esteem, achievement and attainment over seven adolescent years: Unidimensional and multidimensional perspectives of self-concept. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 34 (4): 543-552.
54. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MYCETTYA). (2006). Australian Directions in indigenous education 2005-2008. Retrieved from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/.
55. Mulkey L. M., Catsambis S., Steelman L. C., Crain R., (2005) The long-term effects of ability grouping in Mathematics: A national investigation. Social Psychology of Education 8 (2): 137-177.
56. Oakes J., (1985) Keeping track: How schools structure inequality, New York, NY: Vail-Ballou Press.
57. Oakes J., (1990) Opportunities, achievement, and choice: Women and minority students in science and Mathematics. Review of Research in Education 16 (1): 153-222.
58. Oakes J., Wells A., Jones M., (1997) Detracking: The social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record 96 (3): 482-510.
59. Oakes J., Welner K. G., (1996) (Li)ability grouping: The new susceptibility of school tracking systems to legal challenges. Harvard Educational Review 66 (3): 451-471.
60. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/50293148.pdf.
61. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Makes Schools Successful? Resources, Polices and Practices (Volume IV), PISA, OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264201156-en.
62. Otto H. J., Miller W. S., (1930) Analysis of experimental studies in homogeneous grouping. Journal of Educational Research 21 (1): 95-102.
63. Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA). (2012). Chapter 2 figures: Selecting and grouping students. PISA 2012 results: What makes schools successful? Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/888932957308.
64. Plunkett M., (2009) Re-conceptualizing ability grouping within a social justice framework: A student perspective. Australasian Journal of Gifted Education 18 (2): 5-16.
65. Preckel F., Gotz T., Frenzel A., (2010) Ability grouping of gifted students: Effects on academic self-concept and boredom. British Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (3): 451-472.
66. Rogers, K. B. (1991). The relationship of grouping practices to the education of the gifted and talented learner. The National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut.
67. Rosenbaum J. E., (1978) The structure of opportunity in school. Social Forces 57 (1): 236-256.
68. Rubie-Davies C. M., (2007) Classroom interactions: Exploring the practices of high and low expectation teachers. British Journal of Educational Psychology 77 (2): 289-306.
69. Rubie-Davies C. M., (2010) Teacher expectations and perceptions of student characteristics: Is there a relationship? British Journal of Educational Psychology 80 (2): 121-135.
70. Rubie-Davies, C. M. (2014). Becoming a high expectancy teacher: Raising the bar. Retrieved from EBSCOhost.
71. Schutz G., Ursprung H. W., Wößmann L., (2008) Educational policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos 61 (2): 279-308.
72. Seller, M., & Weis, L. (1997) Beyond black and white: New faces and voices in U.S. schools. Retrieved from GoogleBooks.
73. Slavin R. E., (1990) Achievement effects of ability grouping in secondary schools: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research 60 (3): 171-499.
74. Trautwein U., Lüdtke O., Marsh H., Köller O., Baumert J., (2006) Tracking, grading, and student motivation: Using group composition and status to predict self-concept and interest in ninth-grade mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology 98 (4): 788-806.
75. Venkatakrishnan H., Wiliam D., (2003) Tracking and mixed-ability grouping in secondary school Mathematics classrooms: A case study. British Educational Research Journal 29 (2): 189-204.
76. Wiliam D., Bartholomew H., (2004) It's not which school but which set you're in that matters: The influence of ability grouping practices on student progress in Mathematics. British Educational Research Journal 30 (2): 279-293.
77. Wong M., Watkins D., (2001) Self-esteem and ability grouping: A Hong Kong investigation of the big fish little pond effect. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Education Psychology 21 (1): 79-87.