Genetic determinants for enhanced glycerol growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Metabolic Engineering

Volumn 36, Issue , 2016, Pages 68-79

  Swinnen, Steve ^a   Ho, Ping Wei ^a   Klein, Mathias ^a   Nevoigt, Elke ^a  

^a JACOBS UNIVERSITY BREMEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Genetic mapping; Glycerol; GUT1; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; SSK1; UBR2

Indexed keywords

CARBON; DNA SEQUENCES; ELECTRIC CIRCUIT BREAKERS; GENES; GLYCEROL; MAPPING; METABOLIC ENGINEERING;

GENETIC MAPPING; GUT1; HETEROLOGOUS EXPRESSION; MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GROWTH RATES; SSK1; UBR2; WHOLE GENOME SEQUENCES; YEAST SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

YEAST;

FUNGAL PROTEIN; GLYCEROL; GLYCEROL KINASE; SSK1 PROTEIN; UBIQUITIN PROTEIN LIGASE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; RECOMBINANT PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ALLELE; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME; CYBERLINDNERA JADINII; FUNGAL GENE; FUNGAL GENETICS; FUNGAL STRAIN; FUNGUS GROWTH; GENE IDENTIFICATION; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC BACKGROUND; GROWTH RATE; HEMIZYGOSITY; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; BACTERIAL GENOME; BIOSYNTHESIS; CHROMOSOMAL MAPPING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GENETICS; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

BIOSYNTHETIC PATHWAYS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, BACTERIAL; GENETIC ENHANCEMENT; GENOME, BACTERIAL; GLYCEROL; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLIC FLUX ANALYSIS; METABOLIC NETWORKS AND PATHWAYS; RECOMBINANT PROTEINS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 84962523487     PISSN: 10967176     EISSN: 10967184     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.03.003     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Akada R., Hirosawa I., Kawahata M., Hoshida H., Nishizawa Y. Sets of integrating plasmids and gene disruption cassettes containing improved counter-selection markers designed for repeated use in budding yeast. Yeast 2002, 19:393-402.
2. Akiyoshi B., Nelson C.R., Duggan N., Ceto S., Ranish J.A., Biggins S. The Mub1/Ubr2 ubiquitin ligase complex regulates the conserved Dsn1 kinetochore protein. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003216.
3. Aldiguier A.S., Alfenore S., Cameleyre X., Goma G., Uribelarrea J.L., Guillouet S.E., Molina-Jouve C. Synergistic temperature and ethanol effect on Saccharomyces cerevisiae dynamic behaviour in ethanol bio-fuel production. Bioprocess Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 26:217-222.
4. Babazadeh R., Furukawa T., Hohmann S., Furukawa K. Rewiring yeast osmostress signalling through the MAPK network reveals essential and non-essential roles of Hog1 in osmoadaptation. Sci. Rep. 2014, 4:4697.
5. Borodina I., Nielsen J. Advances in metabolic engineering of yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae for production of chemicals. Biotechnol. J. 2014, 9:609-620.
6. Bouwman J., Kiewiet J., Lindenbergh A., van Eunen K., Siderius M., Bakker B.M. Metabolic regulation rather than de novo enzyme synthesis dominates the osmo-adaptation of yeast. Yeast 2011, 28:43-53.
7. Brewster J.L., de Valoir T., Dwyer N.D., Winter E., Gustin M.C. An osmosensing signal transduction pathway in yeast. Science 1993, 259:1760-1763.
8. Brewster J.L., Gustin M.C. Hog1: 20 years of discovery and impact. Sci. Signal. 2014, 7. re7.
9. Chao R., Yuan Y., Zhao H. Recent advances in DNA assembly technologies. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15:1-9.
10. Crabtree H.G. Observations on the carbohydrate metabolism of tumours. Biochem. J. 1929, 23:536-545.
11. David F., Siewers V. Advances in yeast genome engineering. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015, 15:1-14.
12. De Bont, J.A.M., Teunissen, A.W.R.H., Klaassen, P., Hartman, W.W.A., van Beusekom, S., 2013. Yeast strains engineered to produce ethanol from acetic acid and glycerol. WO2013081456.
13. Delvigne F., Lejeune A., Destain J., Thonart P. Stochastic models to study the impact of mixing on a fed-batch culture of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Prog. 2006, 22:259-269.
14. Dohmen R.J., Willers I., Marques A.J. Biting the hand that feeds: Rpn4-dependent feedback regulation of proteasome function. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1773:1599-1604.
15. Enfors S.O., Jahic M., Rozkov A., Xu B., Hecker M., Jurgen B., Kruger E., Schweder T., Hamer G., O'Beirne D., Noisommit-Rizzi N., Reuss M., Boone L., Hewitt C., McFarlane C., Nienow A., Kovacs T., Tragardh C., Fuchs L., Revstedt J., Friberg P.C., Hjertager B., Blomsten G., Skogman H., Hjort S., Hoeks F., Lin H.Y., Neubauer P., van der Lans R., Luyben K., Vrabel P., Manelius A. Physiological responses to mixing in large scale bioreactors. J. Biotechnol. 2001, 85:175-185.
16. +symporter in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 2005, 16:2068-2076.
17. Finley D., Ulrich H.D., Sommer T., Kaiser P. The ubiquitin-proteasome system of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 2012, 192:319-360.
18. Fowler J.D., Dunlop E.H. Effects of reactant heterogeneity and mixing on catabolite repression in cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1989, 33:1039-1046.
19. Gietz R.D., Schiestl R.H., Willems A.R., Woods R.A. Studies on the transformation of intact yeast cells by the LiAc/SS-DNA/PEG procedure. Yeast 1995, 11:355-360.
20. Gonzalez-Ramos D., van den Broek M., van Maris A.J., Pronk J.T., Daran J.M. Genome-scale analyses of butanol tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae reveal an essential role of protein degradation. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6:48.
21. Gueldener U., Heinisch J., Koehler G.J., Voss D., Hegemann J.H. A second set of loxP marker cassettes for Cre-mediated multiple gene knockouts in budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002, 30:e23.
22. Hahn J.S., Neef D.W., Thiele D.J. A stress regulatory network for co-ordinated activation of proteasome expression mediated by yeast heat shock transcription factor. Mol. Microbiol. 2006, 60:240-251.
23. Hasunuma T., Ishii J., Kondo A. Rational design and evolutional fine tuning of Saccharomyces cerevisiae for biomass breakdown. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2015, 29:1-9.
24. Hoffman C.S., Winston F. A ten-minute DNA preparation from yeast efficiently releases autonomous plasmids for transformation of Escherichia coli. Gene 1987, 57:267-272.
25. Hohmann S. Osmotic stress signaling and osmoadaptation in yeasts. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2002, 66:300-372.
26. Hong K.K., Nielsen J. Metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a key cell factory platform for future biorefineries. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2012, 69:2671-2690.
27. Horak J. The role of ubiquitin in down-regulation and intracellular sorting of membrane proteins: insights from yeast. BBA-Biomembr 2003, 1614:139-155.
28. Huxley C., Green E.D., Dunham I. Rapid assessment of S. cerevisiae mating type by PCR. Trends Genet. 1990, 6:236.
29. Jelinsky S.A., Estep P., Church G.M., Samson L.D. Regulatory networks revealed by transcriptional profiling of damaged Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells: Rpn4 links base excision repair with proteasomes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2000, 20:8157-8167.
30. Johnston J.R. Molecular genetics of yeast: a practical approach 1994, Oxford University Press, New York.
31. Kruegel U., Robison B., Dange T., Kahlert G., Delaney J.R., Kotireddy S., Tsuchiya M., Tsuchiyama S., Murakami C.J., Schleit J., Sutphin G., Carr D., Tar K., Dittmar G., Kaeberlein M., Kennedy B.K., Schmidt M. Elevated proteasome capacity extends replicative lifespan in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002253.
32. Li R., Li Y., Fang X., Yang H., Wang J., Kristiansen K., Wang J. SNP detection for massively parallel whole-genome resequencing. Genome Res. 2009, 19:1124-1132.
33. Liti G., Louis E.J. Advances in quantitative trait analysis in yeast. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002912.
34. London M.K., Keck B.I., Ramos P.C., Dohmen R.J. Regulatory mechanisms controlling biogenesis of ubiquitin and the proteasome. FEBS Lett. 2004, 567:259-264.
35. Luyten K., Albertyn J., Skibbe W.F., Prior B.A., Ramos J., Thevelein J.M., Hohmann S. Fps1, a yeast member of the MIP family of channel proteins, is a facilitator for glycerol uptake and efflux and is inactive under osmotic stress. EMBO J. 1995, 14:1360-1371.
36. Maeda T., Wurgler-Murphy S.M., Saito H. A two-component system that regulates an osmosensing MAP kinase cascade in yeast. Nature 1994, 369:242-245.
37. Mannhaupt G., Schnall R., Karpov V., Vetter I., Feldmann H. Rpn4p acts as a transcription factor by binding to PACE, a nonamer box found upstream of 26S proteasomal and other genes in yeast. FEBS Lett. 1999, 450:27-34.
38. Merico A., Ragni E., Galafassi S., Popolo L., Compagno C. Generation of an evolved Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain with a high freeze tolerance and an improved ability to grow on glycerol. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2011, 38:1037-1044.
39. Nevoigt E. Progress in metabolic engineering of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2008, 72:379-412.
40. Nevoigt E., Stahl U. Osmoregulation and glycerol metabolism in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 1997, 21:231-241.
41. Nijkamp J.F., van den Broek M., Datema E., de Kok S., Bosman L., Luttik M.A., Daran-Lapujade P., Vongsangnak W., Nielsen J., Heijne W.H., Klaassen P., Paddon C.J., Platt D., Kotter P., van Ham R.C., Reinders M.J., Pronk J.T., de Ridder D., Daran J.M. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb. Cell Fact. 2012, 11:36.
42. O'Rourke S.M., Herskowitz I. Unique and redundant roles for HOG MAPK pathway components as revealed by whole-genome expression analysis. Mol. Biol. Cell 2004, 15:532-542.
43. Ochoa-Estopier A., Lesage J., Gorret N., Guillouet S.E. Kinetic analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain adapted for improved growth on glycerol: Implications for the development of yeast bioprocesses on glycerol. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102:1521-1527.
44. Ota I.M., Varshavsky A. A yeast protein similar to bacterial two-component regulators. Science 1993, 262:566-569.
45. Owsianik G., Balzi l, L., Ghislain M. Control of 26S proteasome expression by transcription factors regulating multidrug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 2002, 43:1295-1308.
46. Pavlik P., Simon M., Schuster T., Ruis H. The glycerol kinase (GUT1) gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: cloning and characterization. Curr. Genet. 1993, 24:21-25.
47. Posas F., Saito H. Osmotic activation of the HOG MAPK pathway via Ste11p MAPKKK: scaffold role of Pbs2p MAPKK. Science 1997, 276:1702-1705.
48. Posas F., Wurgler-Murphy S.M., Maeda T., Witten E.A., Thai T.C., Saito H. Yeast HOG1 MAP kinase cascade is regulated by a multistep phosphorelay mechanism in the SLN1-YPD1-SSK1 "two-component" osmosensor. Cell 1996, 86:865-875.
49. R Core Team R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.
50. Rep M., Krantz M., Thevelein J.M., Hohmann S. The transcriptional response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to osmotic shock. Hot1p and Msn2p/Msn4p are required for the induction of subsets of high osmolarity glycerol pathway-dependent genes. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:8290-8300.
51. Ronnow B., Kielland-Brandt M.C. GUT2, a gene for mitochondrial glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 1993, 9:1121-1130.
52. Saito H., Posas F. Response to hyperosmotic stress. Genetics 2012, 192:289-318.
53. Sato N., Kawahara H., Toh-e A., Maeda T. Phosphorelay-regulated degradation of the yeast Ssk1p response regulator by the ubiquitin-proteasome system. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2003, 23:6662-6671.
54. Sherman F., Hicks J. Micromanipulation and dissection of asci. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 194:21-37.
55. Sprague G.F., Cronan J.E. Isolation and characterization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants defective in glycerol catabolism. J. Bacteriol. 1977, 129:1335-1342.
56. Steinmetz L.M., Sinha H., Richards D.R., Spiegelman J.I., Oefner P.J., McCusker J.H., Davis R.W. Dissecting the architecture of a quantitative trait locus in yeast. Nature 2002, 416:326-330.
57. Swinnen S., Klein M., Carrillo M., McInnes J., Nguyen H.T., Nevoigt E. Re-evaluation of glycerol utilization in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: characterization of an isolate that grows on glycerol without supporting supplements. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2013, 6:157.
58. Swinnen S., Schaerlaekens K., Pais T., Claesen J., Hubmann G., Yang Y., Demeke M., Foulquie-Moreno M.R., Goovaerts A., Souvereyns K., Clement L., Dumortier F., Thevelein J.M. Identification of novel causative genes determining the complex trait of high ethanol tolerance in yeast using pooled-segregant whole-genome sequence analysis. Genome Res. 2012, 22:975-984.
59. Swinnen S., Thevelein J.M., Nevoigt E. Genetic mapping of quantitative phenotypic traits in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2012, 12:215-227.
60. Tamas M.J., Luyten K., Sutherland F.C., Hernandez A., Albertyn J., Valadi H., Li H., Prior B.A., Kilian S.G., Ramos J., Gustafsson L., Thevelein J.M., Hohmann S. Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol. Microbiol. 1999, 31:1087-1104.
61. Thompson J.C., He B.B. Characterization of crude glycerol from biodiesel production from multiple feedstocks. Appl. Eng. Agric. 2006, 22:261-265.
62. Verduyn C., Postma E., Scheffers W.A., Van Dijken J.P. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast 1992, 8:501-517.
63. Wang L., Mao X., Ju D., Xie Y. Rpn4 is a physiological substrate of the Ubr2 ubiquitin ligase. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:55218-55223.
64. Westfall P.J., Patterson J.C., Chen R.E., Thorner J. Stress resistance and signal fidelity independent of nuclear MAPK function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:12212-12217.
65. Yang Y., Foulquie-Moreno M.R., Clement L., Erdei E., Tanghe A., Schaerlaekens K., Dumortier F., Thevelein J.M. QTL analysis of high thermotolerance with superior and downgraded parental yeast strains reveals new minor QTLs and converges on novel causative alleles involved in RNA processing. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003693.
66. Yazdani S.S., Gonzalez R. Anaerobic fermentation of glycerol: a path to economic viability for the biofuels industry. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 2007, 18:213-219.
67. Zhang L., Tang Y., Guo Z., Shi G. Engineering of the glycerol decomposition pathway and cofactor regulation in an industrial yeast improves ethanol production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2013, 40:1153-1160.