Do Smartphone Power Users Protect Mobile Privacy Better than Nonpower Users? Exploring Power Usage as a Factor in Mobile Privacy Protection and Disclosure

Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 179-185

  Kang, Hyunjin ^a   Shin, Wonsun ^b  

^a GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NANYANG TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRIVACY; SMARTPHONE; TRUST; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; DISCLOSURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRIVACY; SMARTPHONE; TRUST; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84962481185     PISSN: 21522715     EISSN: 21522723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0340     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Pew Research Center. (2014) Mobile technology fact sheet. www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/mobile-technology-factsheet (accessed Oct. 25, 2014).
2. Park YJ, Jang SM. Understanding privacy knowledge and skill in mobile communication. Computers in Human Behavior 2014; 38:296-303.
3. Federal Trade Commission. (2013) Mobile privacy disclosure: building trust through transparency. www.ftc.gov/reports/mobile-privacy-disclosures-building-trust-throughtransparency-federal-trade-commission (accessed on Apr. 29, 2014).
4. Boyles J, Smith A, Madden M. (2012). Privacy and data management on mobile devices. www.pewinternet.org/2012/09/05/privacy-and-data-management-on-mobile-devices (retrieved Jun. 22, 2015).
5. Bhargava HK, Feng J. American online's Internet access service: how to deter unwanted customers. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications 2004; 4:35-48.
6. Marathe SS, Sundar SS, Bijvank MN, et al. (2007) Who are these power users anyway? Building a psychological profile. Paper presented at the 57th annual conference of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
7. Sundar SS, Marathe SS. Personalization versus customization: The importance of agency, privacy, and power usage. Human Communication Research 2010; 36:298-322.
8. Warschauer M. Demystifying the digital divide. Scientific American 2003; 289:42-47.
9. Roberts DF, Foehr GF, Rideout V. (2005) Generation M: media in the lives of 8-18 year-olds. http://kaiserfamilyfound ation.files.wordpress.com/2013/01/generation-m-media-in-thelives-of-8-18-year-olds-report.pdf (accessed Nov. 1, 2014).
10. McAlearney AS, Schweikhart SB, Medow MA. Doctors' experience with handheld computers in clinical practice: qualitative study. British Medical Journal 2004; 328:1162-1165.
11. Heirman W, Walrave M, Ponnet K. Predicting adolescents' disclosure of personal information in exchange for commercial incentives: an application of an extended theory of planned behavior. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 2013; 16:81-87.
12. Schwaig KS, Segars AH, Grover V, et al. A model of consumers' perceptions of the invasion of information privacy. Information & Management 2013; 50:1-12.
13. Youn S. Determinants of online privacy concern and its influence on privacy protection behaviors among young adolescents. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 2009; 43: 389-418.
14. Bellur S, Sundar SS. How can we tell when a heuristic has been used? Design and analysis strategies for capturing the operation of heuristic. Communication Methods and Measures 2014; 8:116-137.
15. Sundar SS, Kang H, Wu M, et al. (2013) Unlocking the privacy paradox: do cognitive heuristics hold the key? In Proceedings of the 2013 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'13): ACM New York, NY. pp. 811-816.
16. Zhang B, Wu M, Kang H, et al. (2014) Effects of security warnings and instant gratification cues on attitudes toward mobile websites. In Proceedings of the 2014 Annual Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI'14): ACM New York, NY. pp. 111-114.
17. Joinson AN, Reips U, Buchanan T, et al. Privacy, trust, and self-disclosure online. Human-Computer Interaction 2010; 25:1-24.
18. Taddei S, Contena B. Privacy, trust and control: which relationships with online self-disclosure? Computers in Human Behavior 2013; 29:821-826.
19. Moscardelli D, Listin-Heyes C. Consumer socialization in a wired world: The effects of Internet use and parental communication on the development of skepticism to advertising. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practices 2005; 13:62-75.
20. Shin W, Huh J, Faber RJ. Developmental antecedents to children's responses to online advertising. International Journal of Advertising 2012; 31:719-740.
21. Mylonas A, Kastania A, Gritzalis D. Delegate the smartphone user? Security awareness in smartphone platforms. Computers & Security 2013; 34:47-66.
22. Norberg PA, Horne DR, Horne DA. The privacy paradox: personal information disclosure intentions versus behaviors. The Journal of Consumer Affairs 2007; 41:100-127.
23. Youn S. Parental influence and teens' attitude toward online privacy protection. Journal of Consumer Affairs 2003; 42:362-388.
24. Pan Y, Zinkhan G. Exploring the impact of online privacy disclosure on consumer trust. Journal of Retailing 2006; 82: 331-338.
25. Hayes AF. (2012) PROCESS: A versatile computational tool for observed variable mediation, moderation, and conditional process modeling [White paper]. www.processmacro.org/download.html (accessed on Nov.1, 2014).
26. Kalyanaraman S, Sundar SS. The psychological appeal of personalized online content in Web portals: does customization affect attitudes and behavior? Journal of Communication 2006; 56:110-132.
27. Chellappa R, Sin R. Personalization versus privacy: an empirical examination of the online consumer's dilemma. Information Technology and Management 2005; 6:181-202.
28. Alpert SR, Karat J, Karat CM, et al. User attitudes regarding a user-adaptive eCommerce web site. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 2003; 13:373-396.
29. Ho SY. The attraction of Internet personalization to Web users. Electronic Markets 2006; 16:41-50.
30. Jeon W, Kim J, Lee Y, et al. (2011) A practical analysis of smartphone security. In: Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Human Interface and the Management of Information: Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg. pp. 311-320.
31. Montgomery A, Smith MD. Prospects for personalization on the Internet. Journal of Interactive Marketing 2009; 23: 130-137.
32. Xu H, Luo X, Carroll JM, et al. The personalization privacy paradox: an exploratory study of decision making process for location-aware marketing. Decision Support Systems 2011; 51:42-52.
33. KeithM, Thompson S,Hale J, et al. Information disclosure on mobile devices: re-examining privacy calculus with actual user behavior. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 2013; 71:1163-1173.
34. Culnan MJ, Armstrong PK. Information privacy concerns, procedural fairness, and impersonal trust: an empirical investigation. Organizational Science 1999; 10:104-115.
35. Culnan MJ, Bies RJ. Consumer privacy: balancing economic and justice considerations. Journal of social issues 2003; 59:323-342.
36. Dinev T, Hart P. An extended privacy calculus model for e-commerce transactions. Information Systems Research 2006; 17:61-80.
37. Metzger, MJ. Communication privacy management in electronic commerce. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 2007; 12:335-361.
38. Yi Y, Jeon H. Effects of loyalty programs on value perception, program loyalty, and brand loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science 2003; 31:229-240.