Genetic diversity, linkage disequilibrium and power of a large grapevine (Vitis vinifera L) diversity panel newly designed for association studies

BMC Plant Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Nicolas, Stéphane D ^a,b   Péros, Jean Pierre ^a   Lacombe, Thierry ^a   Launay, Amandine ^a   Le Paslier, Marie Christine ^c   Bérard, Aurélie ^c   Mangin, Brigitte ^d   Valière, Sophie ^d   Martins, Frédéric ^d,e   Le Cunff, Loïc ^f   Laucou, Valérie ^a   Bacilieri, Roberto ^a   Dereeper, Alexis ^a,g   Chatelet, Philippe ^a   This, Patrice ^a   Doligez, Agnès ^a  

^a UMR AGAP   (France)

^b CNRS   (France)

^c CENTRE NATIONAL DE GÉNOTYPAGE   (France)

^d CEMAGREF   (France)

^e Université de Toulouse   (France)

^f IFV   (France)

^g INSTITUT DE RECHERCHE POUR LE DÉVELOPPEMENT   (France)

Author keywords

Association panel; Genome wide association studies; Haplotype; Kinship; Linkage disequilibrium; Power; SNP; SSR; sylvestris; Vassal collection; Vitis

Indexed keywords

GENETIC MARKER;

GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT GENE; PROCEDURES; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; VITIS;

GENES, PLANT; GENETIC MARKERS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; VITIS;

EID: 84962430700     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712229     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12870-016-0754-z     Document Type: Article

References (119)

1. OIV. 2015 World viniviticulture situation. 2015. http://www.oiv.int/public/medias/2246/press-release-2015-bilan-vin-en-oiv.pdf. Accessed 13 October 2015.
2. IPCC. Intergovernmental panel on climate change. Fifth Assessment Report (AR5). 2015. http://www.ipcc.ch. Accessed 6 July 2015.
3. Hannah L, Roehrdanz PR, Ikegami M, Shepard AV, Shaw MR, Tabor G, et al. Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:6907-12.
4. van Leeuwen C, Schultz HR, de Cortazar-Atauri IG, Duchene E, Ollat N, Pieri P, et al. Why climate change will not dramatically decrease viticultural suitability in main wine-producing areas by 2050. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110:E3051-2.
5. Akkurt M, Welter L, Maul E, Töpfer R, Zyprian E. Development of SCAR markers linked to powdery mildew (Uncinula necator) resistance in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. and Vitis sp.). Mol Breed. 2007;19:103-11.
6. Riaz S, Tenscher AC, Graziani R, Krivanek AF, Ramming DW, Walker MA. Using marker-assisted selection to breed Pierce's disease-resistant grapes. Am J Enol Vitic. 2009;60:199-207.
7. Mejia N, Soto B, Guerrero M, Casanueva X, Houel C, Miccono MD, et al. Molecular, genetic and transcriptional evidence for a role of VvAGL11 in stenospermocarpic seedlessness in grapevine. BMC Plant Biol. 2011;11:57.
8. Schwander F, Eibach R, Fechter I, Hausmann L, Zyprian E, Topfer R. Rpv10: a new locus from the Asian Vitis gene pool for pyramiding downy mildew resistance loci in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;124:163-76.
9. Karaagac E, Vargas AM, de Andres MT, Carreno I, Ibanez J, Carreno J, et al. Marker assisted selection for seedlessness in table grape breeding. Tree Genet Genomes. 2012;8:1003-15.
10. Zohary D, Hopf M. Domestication of plants in the Old World: the origin and spread of cultivated plants in West Asia, Europe and the Nile Valley. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
11. McGovern P. Ancient wine. The search for the origins of viniculture. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press; 2003.
12. Aradhya MK, Dangl GS, Prins BH, Boursiquot JM, Walker MA, Meredith CP, et al. Genetic structure and differentiation in cultivated grape, Vitis vinifera L. Genet Res. 2003;81:179-92.
13. Arroyo-Garcia R, Ruiz-Garcia L, Bolling L, Ocete R, Lopez MA, Arnold C, et al. Multiple origins of cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L. ssp sativa) based on chloroplast DNA polymorphisms. Mol Ecol. 2006;15:3707-14.
14. Myles S, Boyko AR, Owens CL, Brown PJ, Grassi F, Aradhya MK, et al. Genetic structure and domestication history of the grape. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108:3530-5.
15. Bacilieri R, Lacombe T, Le Cunff L, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Laucou V, Genna B, et al. Genetic structure in cultivated grapevines is linked to geography and human selection. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:25.
16. Emanuelli F, Lorenzi S, Grzeskowiak L, Catalano V, Stefanini M, Troggio M, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure assessed by SSR and SNP markers in a large germplasm collection of grape. BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:39.
17. Negrul A. Origin and classification of cultivated grape. In: Baranov A, Lazarevski M, Palibin T, Prosmoserdov N, editors. The ampelography of the USSR, vol. 1. Moscou: Pischepromizdat; 1946. p. 159-216.
18. Lacombe T, Boursiquot JM, Laucou V, Di Vecchi-Staraz M, Peros JP, This P. Large-scale parentage analysis in an extended set of grapevine cultivars (Vitis vinifera L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126:401-14.
19. Costantini L, Battilana J, Lamaj F, Fanizza G, Grando MS. Berry and phenology-related traits in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). From Quantitative Trait Loci to underlying genes. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:38.
20. Battilana J, Costantini L, Emanuelli F, Sevini F, Segala C, Moser S, et al. The 1-deoxy-d-xylulose 5-phosphate synthase gene co-localizes with a major QTL affecting monoterpene content in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:653-69.
21. Fournier-Level A, Le Cunff L, Gomez C, Doligez A, Ageorges A, Roux C, et al. Quantitative genetic bases of anthocyanin variation in grape (Vitis vinifera L. ssp sativa) Berry: a quantitative trait locus to quantitative trait nucleotide integrated study. Genetics. 2009;183:1127-39.
22. Doligez A, Bertrand Y, Dias S, Grolier M, Ballester JF, Bouquet A, et al. QTLs for fertility in table grape (Vitis vinifera L.). Tree Genet Genomes. 2010;6:413-22.
23. Duchêne E, Butterlin G, Dumas V, Merdinoglu D. Towards the adaptation of grapevine varieties to climate change. QTLs and candidate genes for developmental stages. Theor Appl Genet. 2012;124:623-35.
24. Huang Y, Doligez A, Fournier-Level A, Cunff L, Bertrand Y, Canaguier A, et al. Dissecting genetic architecture of grape proanthocyanidin composition through quantitative trait locus mapping. BMC Plant Biol. 2012;12:30.
25. Doligez A, Bertrand Y, Farnos M, Grolier M, Romieu C, Esnault F, et al. New stable QTLs for berry weight do not colocalize with QTLs for seed traits in cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2013;13:217.
26. Grzeskowiak L, Costantini L, Lorenzi S, Grando MS. Candidate loci for phenology and fruitfulness contributing to the phenotypic variability observed in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126:2763-76.
27. Coupel-Ledru A, Lebon E, Christophe A, Doligez A, Cabrera-Bosquet L, Pechier P, et al. Genetic variation in a grapevine progeny (Vitis vinifera L. cvs GrenachexSyrah) reveals inconsistencies between maintenance of daytime leaf water potential and response of transpiration rate under drought. J Exp Bot. 2014;65:6205-18.
28. Houel C, Chatbanyong R, Doligez A, Rienth M, Foria S, Luchaire N, et al. Identification of stable QTLs for vegetative and reproductive traits in the microvine (Vitis vinifera L.) using the 18 K Infinium chip. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15:205.
29. Myles S, Peiffer J, Brown PJ, Ersoz ES, Zhang ZW, Costich DE, et al. Association mapping: critical considerations shift from genotyping to experimental design. Plant Cell. 2009;21:2194-202.
30. Huang XH, Han B. Natural variations and genome-wide association studies in crop plants. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2014;65:531-51.
31. Zhu CS, Gore M, Buckler ES, Yu JM. Status and prospects of association mapping in plants. Plant Genome. 2008;1:5-20.
32. Rafalski JA. Association genetics in crop improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2010;13:174-80.
33. Rincent R, Moreau L, Monod H, Kuhn E, Melchinger AE, Malvar RA, et al. Recovering power in association mapping panels with variable levels of linkage disequilibrium. Genetics. 2014;197:375-87.
34. Rincent R, Nicolas S, Bouchet S, Altmann T, Brunel D, Revilla P, et al. Dent and Flint maize diversity panels reveal important genetic potential for increasing biomass production. Theor Appl Genet. 2014;127:2313-31.
35. Yu JM, Zhang ZW, Zhu CS, Tabanao DA, Pressoir G, Tuinstra MR, et al. Simulation appraisal of the adequacy of number of background markers for relationship estimation in association mapping. Plant Genome. 2009;2:63-77.
36. Gao X, Starmer J, Martin ER. A multiple testing correction method for genetic association studies using correlated single nucleotide polymorphisms. Genet Epidemiol. 2008;32:361-9.
37. Rafalski A, Morgante M. Corn and humans: recombination and linkage disequilibrium in two genomes of similar size. Trends Genet. 2004;20:103-11.
38. Barnaud A, Lacombe T, Doligez A. Linkage disequilibrium in cultivated grapevine, Vitis vinifera L. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112:708-16.
39. Barnaud A, Laucou V, This P, Lacombe T, Doligez A. Linkage disequilibrium in wild French grapevine, Vitis vinifera L. subsp. silvestris. Heredity. 2010;104:431-7.
40. Doligez A, Adam-Blondon AF, Cipriani G, Laucou V, Merdinoglu D, Meredith CP, et al. An integrated SSR map of grapevine based on five mapping populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;113:369-82.
41. Jaillon O, Aury JM, Noel B, Policriti A, Clepet C, Casagrande A, et al. The grapevine genome sequence suggests ancestral hexaploidization in major angiosperm phyla. Nature. 2007;449:463-U5.
42. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A, Pruss D, et al. A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS One. 2007;2:e1326.
43. Vezzulli S, Troggio M, Coppola G, Jermakow A, Cartwright D, Zharkikh A, et al. A reference integrated map for cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) from three crosses, based on 283 SSR and 501 SNP-based markers. Theor Appl Genet. 2008;117:499-511.
44. Lijavetzky D, Cabezas JA, Ibanez A, Rodriguez V, Martinez-Zapater JM. High throughput SNP discovery and genotyping in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.) by combining a re-sequencing approach and SNPlex technology. BMC Genomics. 2007;8:424.
45. Le Cunff L, Fournier-Level A, Laucou V, Vezzulli S, Lacombe T, Adam-Blondon AF, et al. Construction of nested genetic core collections to optimize the exploitation of natural diversity in Vitis vinifera L. subsp sativa. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8:31.
46. Riahi L, Zoghlami N, Dereeper A, Laucou V, Mliki A, This P. Single nucleotide polymorphism and haplotype diversity of the gene NAC4 in grapevine. Ind Crop Prod. 2013;43:718-24.
47. Emanuelli F, Battilana J, Costantini L, Le Cunff L, Boursiquot JM, This P, et al. A candidate gene association study on muscat flavor in grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). BMC Plant Biol. 2010;10:241.
48. Vargas AM, Le Cunff L, This P, Ibanez J, de Andres MT. VvGAI1 polymorphisms associate with variation for berry traits in grapevine. Euphytica. 2013;191:85-98.
49. Fernandez L, Le Cunff L, Tello J, Lacombe T, Boursiquot JM, Fournier-Level A, et al. Haplotype diversity of VvTFL1A gene and association with cluster traits in grapevine (V. vinifera). BMC Plant Biol. 2014;14:209.
50. INRA Domaine de Vassal, Centre de Ressources Génétiques de la Vigne. 2014. http://www1.montpellier.inra.fr/vassal/. Accessed 20 Feb 2014.
51. Laucou V, Lacombe T, Dechesne F, Siret R, Bruno JP, Dessup M, et al. High throughput analysis of grape genetic diversity as a tool for germplasm collection management. Theor Appl Genet. 2011;122:1233-45.
52. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155:945-59.
53. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164:1567-87.
54. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14:2611-20.
55. Lacombe T. Chapitre 2: Etude multicritère pour la constitution de l'échantillon de travail. In: Contribution à l'étude de l'histoire évolutive de la vigne cultivée (Vitis vinifera L.) par l'analyse de la diversité génétique neutre et de gènes d'intérêt. PhD thesis, Montpellier Supagro. 2012. http://www.supagro.fr/theses/extranet/12-0040_Lacombe.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2013.
56. Perrier X, Jacquemoud-Collet J. DARwin software. 2006. http://darwin.cirad.fr/. Accessed 16 May 2014.
57. Gerber S, Chabrier P, Kremer A. FAMOZ: a software for parentage analysis using dominant, codominant and uniparentally inherited markers. Mol Ecol Notes. 2003;3:479-81.
58. Kalinowski ST, Wagner AP, Taper ML. ML-RELATE: a computer program for maximum likelihood estimation of relatedness and relationship. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:576-9.
59. Marguerit E, Boury C, Manicki A, Donnart M, Butterlin G, Nemorin A, et al. Genetic dissection of sex determinism, inflorescence morphology and downy mildew resistance in grapevine. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:1261-78.
60. URGI: Plant and Fungi Data Integration. Vitis. Annotations. V0 annotation of the 12X.0 genome assembly (Genoscope). 2015. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Species/Vitis/Annotations. Accessed 28 Feb 2015.
61. Thareau V, Dehais P, Serizet C, Hilson P, Rouze P, Aubourg S. Automatic design of gene-specific sequence tags for genome-wide functional studies. Bioinformatics. 2003;19:2191-8.
62. Koressaar T, Remm M. Enhancements and modifications of primer design program Primer3. Bioinformatics. 2007;23:1289-91.
63. Philippe R, Courtois B, McNally KL, Mournet P, El-Malki R, Paslier MC, et al. Structure, allelic diversity and selection of Asr genes, candidate for drought tolerance, in Oryza sativa L. and wild relatives. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:769-87.
64. Machado M, Magalhães W, Sene A, Araújo B, Faria-Campos A, Chanock S, et al. Phred-Phrap package to analyses tools: a pipeline to facilitate population genetics re-sequencing studies. Investig Genet. 2011;2:3.
65. Staden R, Beal KF, Bonfield JK. The Staden Package. In: Misener S, Krawetz S, editors. Computer methods in molecular biology, Bioinformatics Methods and Protocols, vol. 132. Totowa: The Humana Press Inc; 1998. p. 115-30.
66. Dereeper A, Nicolas S, Le Cunff L, Bacilieri R, Doligez A, Peros JP, et al. SNiPlay: a web-based tool for detection, management and analysis of SNPs. Application to grapevine diversity projects. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:134.
67. SNiPlay. 2014. http://sniplay.southgreen.fr/cgi-bin/SNPqueries_v3.cgi. Accessed 10 Nov 2014.
68. NCBI/BLAST. 2015. https://blast.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Blast.cgi. Accessed 20 May 2014.
69. URGI: Plant and Fungi Data Integration. Vitis. Data & Sequences. Genome Sequences. 2015. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/Species/Vitis/Data-Sequences/Genome-sequences. Accessed 3 March 2014.
70. Bowman AW, Azzalini A. R package 'sm': nonparametric smoothing methods (version 2.2-5.4). 2014. http://www.stats.gla.ac.uk/~adrian/sm , http://azzalini.stat.unipd.it/Book_sm. Accessed 12 March 2015.
71. The R Project for Statistical Computing. 2015. http://www.r-project.org/. Accessed 23 May 2015.
72. Fox J, Weisberg S. An {R} companion to applied regression, Second Edition. 2011. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. http://socserv.socsci.mcmaster.ca/jfox/Books/Companion. Accessed 18 June 2015.
73. Jombart T. Adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics. 2008;24:1403-5.
74. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6:288-95.
75. Peakall R, Smouse PE. GenAlEx 6.5: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research-an update. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2537-9.
76. Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G. CoCoa: a software tool for estimating the coefficient of coancestry from multilocus genotype data. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:2753-4.
77. Maenhout S, De Baets B, Haesaert G. Marker-based estimation of the coefficient of coancestry in hybrid breeding programmes. Theor Appl Genet. 2009;118:1181-92.
78. Bernardo R. Estimation of coefficient of coancestry using molecular markers in maize. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;85:1055-62.
79. Loiselle BA, Sork VL, Nason J, Graham C. Spatial genetic structure of a tropical understry shrub, Psychotria officinalis (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot. 1995;82:1420-5.
80. Thompson EA. The estimation of pairwise relationships. Ann Hum Genet. 1975;39:173-88.
81. Mangin B, Siberchicot A, Nicolas S, Doligez A, This P, Cierco-Ayrolles C. Novel measures of linkage disequilibrium that correct the bias due to population structure and relatedness. Heredity. 2012;108:285-91.
82. Hill W, Weir B. Variance and covariance of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor Popul Biol. 1988;33:54-78.
83. Shin J, Blay S, McNeney B, Graham J. LDheatmap. An R function for graphical display of pairwise linkage disequilibria between single nucleotide polymorphisms. J Stat Soft. 2006;16:Code Snippet 3.
84. Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1084-97.
85. Yu JM, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nature Genet. 2006;38:203-8.
86. Li J, Ji L. Adjusting multiple testing in multilocus analyses using the eigenvalues of a correlation matrix. Heredity. 2005;95:221-7.
87. IMIDRA, Colección de variedades de vid. 2015. http://www.madrid.org/coleccionvidencin. Accessed 8 Oct 2015.
88. Boursiquot JM, Dessup M, Rennes C. Distribution of the main phenological, agronomical and technological characters of Vitis vinifera L. Vitis. 1995;34:31-5.
89. Schoen DJ, Brown AHD. Conservation of allelic richness in wild crop relatives is aided by assessment of genetic-markers. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993;90:10623-7.
90. Gouesnard B, Bataillon TM, Decoux G, Rozale C, Schoen DJ, David JL. MSTRAT: An algorithm for building germ plasm core collections by maximizing allelic or phenotypic richness. J Hered. 2001;92:93-4.
91. Kumar S, Garrick DJ, Bink MCAM, Whitworth C, Chagne D, Volz RK. Novel genomic approaches unravel genetic architecture of complex traits in apple. BMC Genomics. 2013;14:393.
92. Yu JM, Holland JB, McMullen MD, Buckler ES. Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics. 2008;178:539-51.
93. Dell'Acqua M, Gatti DM, Pea G, Cattonaro F, Coppens F, Magris G, et al. Genetic properties of the MAGIC maize population: a new platform for high definition QTL mapping in Zea mays. Genome Biol. 2015;16:167.
94. Sannemann W, Huang BE, Mathew B, Leon J. Multi-parent advanced generation inter-cross in barley: high-resolution quantitative trait locus mapping for flowering time as a proof of concept. Mol Breeding. 2015;35:86.
95. Thepot S, Restoux G, Goldringer I, Hospital F. Efficiently tracking selection in a multiparental population: the case of earliness in wheat. Genetics. 2015;199:609-21.
96. Chaib J, Torregrosa L, Mackenzie D, Corena P, Alain Bouquet A, Thomas MR. The grape microvine: a model system for rapid forward and reverse genetics of grapevines. Plant J. 2010;62:1083-92.
97. Morrell PL, Buckler ES, Ross-Ibarra J. Crop genomics: advances and applications. Nat Rev Genet. 2012;13:85-96.
98. Khan MA, Zhao YF, Korban SS. Identification of genetic loci associated with fire blight resistance in Malus through combined use of QTL and association mapping. Physiol Plant. 2013;148:344-53.
99. Cadic E, Coque M, Vear F, Grezes-Besset B, Pauquet J, Piquemal J, et al. Combined linkage and association mapping of flowering time in Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126:1337-56.
100. Bao Y, Vuong T, Meinhardt C, Tiffin P, Denny R, Chen SY, et al. Potential of association mapping and genomic selection to explore pi 88788 derived soybean cyst nematode resistance. Plant Genome 2014;7(3): 1-13. doi: 10.3835/plantgenome2013.11.003.
101. McClure KA, Sawler J, Gardner KM, Money D, Myles S. Genomics: a potential panacea for the perennial problem. Am J Bot. 2014;101:1780-90.
102. Eckert AJ, Bower AD, Wegrzyn JL, Pande B, Jermstad KD, Krutovsky KV, et al. Asssociation genetics of coastal douglas fir (Pseudotsuga menziesu var. menziesii, Pinaceae). I. Cold-hardiness related traits. Genetics. 2009;182:1289-302.
103. Chhatre VE, Byram TD, Neale DB, Wegrzyn JL, Krutovsky KV. Genetic structure and association mapping of adaptive and selective traits in the east Texas loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) breeding populations. Tree Genet Genomes. 2013;9:1161-78.
104. Yang N, Lu YL, Yang XH, Huang J, Zhou Y, Ali F, et al. Genome wide association studies using a new nonparametric model reveal the genetic architecture of 17 agronomic traits in an enlarged maize association panel. PLoS Genet. 2014;10:e1004573.
105. Huang XH, Wei XH, Sang T, Zhao QA, Feng Q, Zhao Y, et al. Genome-wide association studies of 14 agronomic traits in rice landraces. Nature Genet. 2010;42:961-U76.
106. Gurung S, Mamidi S, Bonman JM, Xiong M, Brown-Guedira G, Adhikari TB. Genome-wide association study reveals novel quantitative trait loci associated with resistance to multiple leaf spot diseases of spring wheat. PLoS One. 2014;9:e108179.
107. Sham PC, Purcell SM. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:335-46.
108. Casa AM, Pressoir G, Brown PJ, Mitchell SE, Rooney WL, Tuinstra MR, et al. Community resources and strategies for association mapping in sorghum. Crop Sci. 2008;48:30-40.
109. Jin L, Lu Y, Xiao P, Sun M, Corke H, Bao JS. Genetic diversity and population structure of a diverse set of rice germplasm for association mapping. Theor Appl Genet. 2010;121:475-87.
110. Camus-Kulandaivelu L, Veyrieras JB, Madur D, Combes V, Fourmann M, Barraud S, et al. Maize adaptation to temperate climate: Relationship between population structure and polymorphism in the Dwarf8 gene. Genetics. 2006;172:2449-63.
111. Tenesa A, Wright AF, Knott SA, Carothers AD, Hayward C, Angius A, et al. Extent of linkage disequilibrium in a Sardinian sub-isolate: sampling and methodological considerations. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13:25-33.
112. Fournier-Level A, Lacombe T, Le Cunff L, Boursiquot JM, This P. Evolution of the VvMybA gene family, the major determinant of berry colour in cultivated grapevine (Vitis vinifera L.). Heredity. 2010;104:351-62.
113. Khan MA, Korban SS. Association mapping in forest trees and fruit crops. J Exp Bot. 2012;63:4045-60.
114. Pavy N, Namroud MC, Gagnon F, Isabel N, Bousquet J. The heterogeneous levels of linkage disequilibrium in white spruce genes and comparative analysis with other conifers. Heredity. 2012;108:273-84.
115. Kim S, Plagnol V, Hu TT, Toomajian C, Clark RM, Ossowski S, et al. Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nature Genet. 2007;39:1151-5.
116. Unterseer S, Bauer E, Haberer G, Seidel M, Knaak C, Ouzunova M, et al. A powerful tool for genome analysis in maize: development and evaluation of the high density 600 k SNP genotyping array. BMC Genomics. 2014;15:823.
117. Le Paslier M-C, Choisne N, Scalabrin S, Bacilieri R, Berard A, Bounon R, et al. The GrapeReSeq 18 K Vitis genotyping chip. Ninth International Symposium on Grapevine Physiology & Biotechnology, La Serena, Chili, 21-26 April 2013. https://urgi.versailles.inra.fr/About-us/Team/Genome-analysis/Nathalie-Choisne/THE-GRAPERESEQ-18K-VITIS-GENOTYPING-CHIP.
118. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM. Genomic selection using low-density marker panels. Genetics. 2009;182:343-53.
119. Fodor A, Segura V, Denis M, Neuenschwander S, Fournier-Level A, Chatelet P, et al. Genome-wide prediction methods in highly diverse and heterozygous species: proof-of-concept through simulation in grapevine. PLoS One. 2014;9:e110436.