On the dangers of model complexity without ecological justification in species distribution modeling

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 330, Issue , 2016, Pages 50-59

  Bell, David M ^a   Schlaepfer, Daniel R ^b,c  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST RESEARCH STATION   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Extrapolation; Model fitting; Prediction; Species distribution modeling; Transferability

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGY; EXTRAPOLATION; FORECASTING; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION;

ECOLOGICAL PROCESS; ENVIRONMENTAL SPACE; INTERACTION EFFECT; MODEL FITTING; PREDICTIVE PERFORMANCE; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELING; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION MODELS; TRANSFERABILITY;

CLIMATE MODELS;

CLIMATE CONDITIONS; COMPLEXITY; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; PREDICTION; TRAINING;

EID: 84962361007     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2016.03.012     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Aguirre-Gutierrez J., Carvalheiro L.G., Polce C., van Loon E.E., Raes N., Reemer M., Biesmeijer J.C. Fit-for-purpose: species distribution model performance depends on evaluation criteria - Dutch Hoverflies as a case study. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e63708. 10.1371/journal.pone.0063708.
2. Allouche O., Tsoar A., Kadmon R. Assessing the accuracy of species distribution models: prevalence, kappa and the true skill statistic (TSS). J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43:1223-1232. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01214.x.
3. Araujo M.B., Pearson R.G., Thuiller W., Erhard M. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:1504-1513. 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01000.x.
4. Austin M.P. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Model. 2002, 157:101-118. 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00205-3.
5. Austin M.P. Vegetation and environment: discontinuities and continuities. Vegetation Ecology 2005, Blackwell Publishing, Inc., Oxford, UK. E. van der Maarel (Ed.).
6. Austin M. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol. Model. 2007, 200:1-19. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.07.005.
7. Austin M.P., Gaywood M.J. Current problems of environmental gradients and species response curves in relation to continuum theory. J. Veg. Sci. 1994, 5:473-482. 10.2307/3235973.
8. Austin M.P., Smith A.E. A new model for the continuum concept. Vegetatio 1989, 83:35-47.
9. Austin M.P., Van Niel K.P. Improving species distribution models for climate change studies: variable selection and scale. J. Biogeogr. 2011, 38:1-8.
10. Bahn V., McGill B.J. Testing the predictive performance of distribution models. Oikos 2013, 122:321-331. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2012.00299.x.
11. Bailey R.G. Description of the Ecoregions of the United States 1995, United States Department of Agriculture, Miscellaneous Publication No. 1391. 2nd ed. rev. and enl.
12. Barbet-Massin M., Thuiller W., Jiguet F. How much do we overestimate future local extinction rates when restricting the range of occurrence data in climate suitability models?. Ecography 2010, 33:878-886. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2010.06181.x.
13. Boucher-Lalonde V., Morin A., Currie D.J. How are tree species distributed in climatic space? A simple and general pattern. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2012, 21:1157-1166. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2012.00764.x.
14. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach. Learn. 2001, 45:5-32.
15. Brenning A. Spatial prediction models for landslide hazards: review, comparison and evaluation. Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. 2005, 5:853-862.
16. Buckley L.B., Waaser S.A., MacLean H.J., Fox R. Does including physiology improve species distribution model predictions of responses to recent climate change?. Ecology 2011, 92:2214-2221. 10.1890/11-0066.1.
17. Crase B., Liedloff A., Vesk P.A., Fukuda Y., Wintle B.A. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate-mediated range shifts. Global Change Biol. 2014, 20:2566-2579. 10.1111/gcb.12598.
18. Dormann C.F., McPherson J.M., Araújo M.B., Bivand R., Bolliger J., Carl G., Davies R.G., Hirzel A., Jetz W., Kissling W.D., Kühn I., Ohlemüller R., Peres-Neto P.R., Reineking B., Schröder B., Schurr F.M., Wilson R. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 2007, 30:609-628. 10.1111/j.2007.0906-7590.05171.x.
19. Elith J., Graham C.H. Do they? How do they? WHY do they differ? On finding reasons for differing performances of species distribution models. Ecography 2009, 32:66-77. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2008.05505.x.
20. Elith J., Leathwick J.R. Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 2009, 40:677-697. 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159.
21. Elith J., Kearney M., Phillips S. The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2010, 1:330-342.
22. Ellenberg H. Physiologisches und ökologisches Verhalten derselben Pflanzenarten. Ber. Deutsch. Bot. Ges. 1953, 64:350-361.
23. Evans M.R., Bithell M., Cornell S.J., Dall S.R.X., Diaz S., Emmott S., Ernande B., Grimm V., Hodgson D.J., Lewis S.L., Mace G.M., Morecroft M., Moustakas A., Murphy E., Newbold T., Norris K.J., Petchey O., Smith M., Travis J.M.J., Benton T.G. Predictive systems ecology. Proc. Biol. Sci. 2013, 280:20131452. 10.1371/journal.pone.0031824.
24. Fielding A.H., Bell J.F. A review of methods for the assessment of prediction errors in conservation presence/absence models. Environ. Conserv. 1997, 24:38-49.
25. Fitzpatrick M.C., Weltzin J.F., Sanders N.J., Dunn R.R. The biogeography of prediction error: Why does the introduced range of the fire ant over-predict its native range?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2007, 16:24-33. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2006.00258.x.
26. Franklin J. Mapping Species Distributions: Spatial Inference and Prediction 2009, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
27. García-Callejas D., Araújo M.B. The effects of model and data complexity on predictions from species distributions models. Ecol. Model. 2016, 326:4-12.
28. Gauch H.G.J., Whittaker R.H. Coenocline simulation. Ecology 1972, 53:446-451.
29. Harrington C.A., Gould P.J. Tradeoffs between chilling and forcing in satisfying dormancy requirements for Pacific Northwest tree species. Front. Plant Sci. 2015, 6:120. 10.3389/fpls.2015.00120.
30. Heikkinen J., Mäkipää R. Testing hypotheses on shape and distribution of ecological response curves. Ecol. Model. 2010, 221:388-399. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.10.030.
31. Ibáñez I., Clark J.S., Dietze M.C., Feeley K., Hersh M., LaDeau S., McBride A., Welch N.E., Wolosin M.S. Predicting biodiversity change: outside the climate envelope, beyond the species-area curve. Ecology 2006, 87:1896-1906.
32. Iverson L.R., Schwartz M.W., Prasad A.M. How fast and far might tree species migrate in the eastern United States due to climate change?. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2004, 13:209-219. 10.1111/j.1466-822X.2004.00093.x.
33. Jimenez-Valverde A., Lobo J.M., Hortal J. Not as good as they seem: the importance of concepts in species distribution modelling. Divers. Distrib. 2008, 14:885-890. 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2008.00496.x.
34. Kraemer H.C. Correlation coefficients in medical research: from product moment correlation to the odds ratio. Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2006, 15:525-545. 10.1177/0962280206070650.
35. Le Rest K., Pinaud D., Monestiez P., Chadoeuf J., Bretagnolle V. Spatial leave-one-out cross-validation for variable selection in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2014, 23:811-820. 10.1111/geb.12161.
36. Liaw A., Wiener M. Classification and regression by randomForest. R News 2002, 2:18-22.
37. Madon B., Warton D.I., Araujo M.B. Community-level vs species-specific approaches to model selection. Ecography 2013, 36:1291-1298. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00127.x.
38. McMahon S.M., Harrison S.P., Armbruster W.S., Bartlein P.J., Beale C.M., Edwards M.E., Kattge J., Midgley G., Morin X., Prentice I.C. Improving assessment and modelling of climate change impacts on global terrestrial biodiversity. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26:249-259. 10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.012.
39. Merow C., Smith M.J., Edwards T.C., Guisan A., McMahon S.M., Normand S., Thuiller W., Wüest R.O., Zimmermann N.E., Elith J. What do we gain from simplicity versus complexity in species distribution models?. Ecography 2014, 37:1267-1281.
40. Mesgaran M.B., Cousens R.D., Webber B.L. Here be dragons: a tool for quantifying novelty due to covariate range and correlation change when projecting species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 2014, 20:1147-1159. 10.1111/ddi.12209.
41. Meynard C.N., Quinn J.F. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J. Biogeogr. 2007, 34:1455-1469. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2007.01720.x.
42. Meynard C.N., Kaplan D.M., Silman M. Using virtual species to study species distributions and model performance. J. Biogeogr. 2013, 40:1-8. 10.1111/jbi.12006.
43. Normand S., Treier U.A., Randin C., Vittoz P., Guisan A., Svenning J.-C. Importance of abiotic stress as a range-limit determinant for European plants: insights from species responses to climatic gradients. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2009, 18:437-449. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2009.00451.x.
44. Pagel J., Schurr F.M. Forecasting species ranges by statistical estimation of ecological niches and spatial population dynamics. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 21:293-304. 10.1111/j.1466-8238.2011.00663.x.
45. Parmesan C., Yohe G. A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 2003, 421:37-42. 10.1038/nature01286.
46. Phillips S.J., Dudik M., Schapire R.E. A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. Proceedings of the Twenty-First International Conference on Machine Learning 2004, 655-662.
47. PRISM Climate Group, 2012. http://prism.oregonstate.edu/.
48. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2010.
49. Randin C.F., Dirnböck T., Dullinger S., Zimmermann N.E., Zappa M., Guisan A. Are niche-based species distribution models transferable in space?. J. Biogeogr. 2006, 33:1689-1703.
50. Rehfeldt G.E., Crookston N.L., Warwell M.V., Evans J.S. Empirical analyses of plant-climate relationships for the western United States. Int. J. Plant Sci. 2006, 167:1123-1150. 10.1086/507711.
51. Ridgeway G. gbm: Generalized Boosted Regression Models. R Package Version 2.1.1 2015, https://cran.r-project.org/package=gbm.
52. Santika T., Hutchinson M.F. The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference. Ecol. Model. 2009, 220:2365-2379. 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.004.
53. Schibalski A., Lehtonen A., Schröder B. Climate change shifts environmental space and limits transferability of treeline models. Ecography 2014, 37:321-335. 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00368.x.
54. Segurado P., Araújo M.B., Kunin W.E. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models. J. Appl. Ecol. 2006, 43:433-444. 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2006.01162.x.
55. Stohlgren T.J., Jarnevich C.S., Esaias W.E., Morisette J.T. Bounding species distribution models. Curr. Zool. 2011, 57:642-647.
56. Thuiller W., Brotons L., Araujo M.B., Lavorel S. Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions. Ecography 2004, 27:165-172. 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03673.x.
57. Vanderwel M.C., Lyutsarev V.S., Purves D.W. Climate-related variation in mortality and recruitment determine regional forest-type distributions. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2013, 22:1192-1203.
58. Veloz S.D. Spatially autocorrelated sampling falsely inflates measures of accuracy for presence-only niche models. J. Biogeogr. 2009, 36:2290-2299. 10.1111/j.1365-2699.2009.02174.x.
59. Venables W.N., Ripley B.D. Modern Applied Statistics with S-PLUS 1997, 548. Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., New York, NY, USA.
60. Walther G.-R., Post E., Convey P., Menzel A., Parmesan C., Beebee T.J.C., Fromentin J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Bairlein F. Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 2002, 416:389-395. 10.1038/416389a.
61. White J.W., Rassweiler A., Samhouri J.F., Stier A.C., White C. Ecologists should not use statistical significance tests to interpret simulation model results. Oikos 2014, 123:385-388. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2013.01073.x.
62. Wiens J.A., Stralberg D., Jongsomjit D., Howell C.A., Snyder M.A. Niches, models, and climate change: assessing the assumptions and uncertainties. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:19729-19736.
63. Williams J.W., Jackson S.T. Novel climates, no-analog communities, and ecological surprises. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2007, 5:475-482.
64. Williams J.W., Jackson S.T., Kutzbach J.E. Projected distributions of novel and disappearing climates by 2100 AD. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:5738-5742. 10.1073/pnas.0606292104.
65. Williams A.P., Allen C.D., Macalady A.K., Griffin D., Woodhouse C.A., Meko D.M., Swetnam T.W., Rauscher S.A., Seager R., Grissino-Mayer H.D., Dean J.S., Cook E.R., Gangodagamage C., Cai M., McDowell N.G. Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality. Nat. Climate Change 2012, 3:292-297. 10.1038/nclimate1693.
66. Wood S. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R - Simon Wood - Google Books 2006, Chapman & Hall/CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
67. Zurell D., Berger U., Cabral J.S., Jeltsch F., Meynard C.N., Münkemüller T., Nehrbass N., Pagel J., Reineking B., Schröder B., Grimm V. The virtual ecologist approach: simulating data and observers. Oikos 2010, 119:622-635. 10.1111/j.1600-0706.2009.18284.x.