The effect of species response form on species distribution model prediction and inference

Ecological Modelling

Volumn 220, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 2365-2379

  Santika, Truly ^a   Hutchinson, Michael F ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Autocovariate logistic; BIOCLIM; Classification and regression tree; Generalized additive modelling; Logistic regression; Spatial autocorrelation; Species response curve

Indexed keywords

AUTOCOVARIATE LOGISTIC; BIOCLIM; CLASSIFICATION AND REGRESSION TREE; GENERALIZED ADDITIVE MODELLING; LOGISTIC REGRESSION; SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION; SPECIES RESPONSE CURVE;

CORRELATION DETECTORS; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; ECOLOGY; ELECTRIC REACTORS; LOGISTICS; PHOTOMASKS;

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

CORRELATION; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ECOLOGICAL THEORY; ENVIRONMENTAL GRADIENT; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ADDITIVES; CORRELATION; DETECTORS; ECOLOGY; ELECTRICITY; MANAGEMENT; MATERIALS HANDLING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; REACTORS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TREES;

EID: 68949105820     PISSN: 03043800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2009.06.004     Document Type: Article

References (84)

1. Akaike H. New look at statistical-model identification. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr. AC19 (1974) 716-723
2. Anselin L. Under the hood: issues in the specification and interpretation of spatial regression models. Agricult. Econ. 17 (2002) 247-267
3. Araujo M.B., Pearson R.G., Thuiller W., and Erhard M. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 11 (2005) 1504-1513
4. Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A., and Buckland S.T. An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 33 (1996) 339-347
5. Augustin N.H., Mugglestone M.A., and Buckland S.T. The role of simulation in modelling spatially correlated data. Environmetrics 9 (1998) 175-196
6. Austin M.P. Nonlinear species response models in ordination. Vegetatio 33 (1976) 33-41
7. Austin M.P. Continuum concept, ordination methods and niche theory. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16 (1985) 39-61
8. Austin M.P. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol. Model. 157 (2002) 101-118
9. Austin M. Species distribution models and ecological theory: a critical assessment and some possible new approaches. Ecol. Model. 200 (2007) 1-19
10. Austin M.P., and Meyers J.A. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implication for management of forest biodiversity. Forest Ecol. Manag. 85 (1996) 95-106
11. Austin M.P., Nicholls A.O., Doherty M.D., and Meyers J.A. Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a beta-function. Vegetatio 5 (1994) 215-228
12. Austin M.P., Belbin L., Meyers J.A., Doherty M.D., and Luoto M. Evaluation of statistical models used for predicting plant species distributions: role of artificial data and theory. Ecol. Model. 199 (2006) 197-216
13. Bahn V., Krohn W.B., and O'Connor R.J. Dispersal leads to spatial autocorrelation in species distributions: a simulation model. Ecol. Model. 213 (2007) 285-292
14. Barry S., and Elith J. Error and uncertainty in habitat models. J. Appl. Ecol. 43 (2006) 413-423
15. Besag J. Spatial interaction and statistical-analysis of lattice systems. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 36 (1974) 192-236
16. Betts M.G., Diamond A.W., Forbes G.J., Villard M.A., and Gunn J.S. The importance of spatial autocorrelation, extent and resolution in predicting forest bird occurrence. Ecol. Model. 191 (2006) 197-224
17. Bivand, R., 2008. Spatial Dependence: Weighting Schemes, Statistics and Models. R package version 0.4-20.
18. Breiman L., Friedman J.H., Stone C.J., and Olshen R.A. Classification and Regression Trees (1984), Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, Monterey, CA
19. Buckland S.T., and Elston D.A. Empirical-models for the spatial-distribution of wildlife. J. Appl. Ecol. 30 (1993) 478-495
20. Busby J.R. BIOCLIM-A bioclimate analysis and prediction system. In: Margules C.R., and Austin M.P. (Eds). Nature Conservation: Cost Effective Biological Surveys and Data Analysis (1991), CSIRO, Melbourne 64-68
21. Cliff A.D., and Ord J.K. Spatial Processes: Models and Applications (1981), Pion Limited, London 266 pp.
22. Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20 (1960) 37-46
23. Dirnbock T., Dullinger S., and Grabherr G. A regional impact assessment of climate and land-use change on alpine vegetation. J. Biogeogr. 30 (2003) 401-417
24. Dormann C.F., McPherson J.M., Araujo M.B., Bivand R., Bolliger J., Carl G., Davies R.G., Hirzel A., Jetz W., Kissling W.D., Kuhn I., Ohlemuller R., Peres-Neto P.R., Reineking B., Schroder B., Schurr F.M., and Wilson R. Methods to account for spatial autocorrelation in the analysis of species distributional data: a review. Ecography 30 (2007) 609-628
25. Elith J., Graham C.H., Anderson R.P., Dudik M., Ferrier S., Guisan A., Hijmans R.J., Huettmann F., Leathwick J.R., Lehmann A., Li J., Lohmann L.G., Loiselle B.A., Manion G., Moritz C., Nakamura M., Nakazawa Y., Overton J.M., Peterson A.T., Phillips S.J., Richardson K., Scachetti-Pereira R., Schapire R.E., Soberon J., Williams S., Wisz M.S., and Zimmermann N.E. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29 (2006) 129-151
26. Engler R., Guisan A., and Rechsteiner L. An improved approach for predicting the distribution of rare and endangered species from occurrence and pseudo-absence data. J. Appl. Ecol. 41 (2004) 263-274
27. Ferrer-Castan D., Calvo J.F., Esteveselma M.A., Torresmartinez A., and Ramirezdiaz L. On the use of 3 performance-measures for fitting species response curves. J. Veg. Sci. 6 (1995) 57-62
28. Ferrier S., Drielsma M., Manion G., and Watson G. Extended statistical approaches to modelling spatial pattern in biodiversity in northeast New South Wales II. Community-level modelling. Biodiver. Conserv. 11 (2002) 2309-2338
29. Fortin M.J., and Dale M.R.T. Spatial Analysis: A Guide for Ecologist (2005), Cambridge University Press
30. Friedman J.H. Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Ann. Statist. 19 (1991) 1-67
31. Guisan A., and Theurillat J.P. Equilibrium modeling of alpine plant distribution: how far can we go?. Phytocoenologia 30 (2000) 353-384
32. Guisan A., and Zimmermann N.E. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecol. Model. 135 (2000) 147-186
33. Guisan A., Weiss S.B., and Weiss A.D. GLM versus CCA spatial modeling of plant species distribution. Plant. Ecol. 143 (1999) 107-122
34. Gumpertz M.L., Graham J.M., and Ristaino J.B. Autologistic model of spatial pattern of Phytophthora epidemic in bell pepper: effects of soil variables on disease presence. J. Agricult. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2 (1997) 131-156
35. Haining R. Spatial Data Analysis in the Social and Environmental Sciences (1990), Cambridge University Press
36. Han J., and Kamber M. Data Mining: Concepts and Techniques. The Morgan Kaufmann Series in Data Management Systems (2000), Morgan Kaufmann
37. Hanley J.A., and McNeil B.J. The meaning and use of the area under a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143 (1982) 29-36
38. Hastie, T., 2006. gam: Generalized Additive Models. R package version 0.98.
39. Hastie T.J., and Tibshirani R. Generalized Additive Models (1990), Chapman & Hall, London
40. Hernandez P.A., Graham C.H., Master L.L., and Albert D.L. The effect of sample size and species characteristics on performance of different species distribution modeling methods. Ecography 29 (2006) 773-785
41. Hijmans R., Guarino L., Jarvis A., O'Brien R., Mathur P., Bussink C., Cruz M., Barrantes I., and Rojas E. DIVA-GIS Version 5.2 (2005), University of California
42. Hirzel A.H., Helfer V., and Metral F. Assessing habitat-suitability models with a virtual species. Ecol. Model. 145 (2001) 111-121
43. Hirzel A.H., Hausser J., Chessel D., and Perrin N. Ecological-niche factor analysis: how to compute habitat-suitability maps without absence data?. Ecology 83 (2002) 2027-2036
44. Hoeting J.A., Leecaster M., and Bowden D. An improved model for spatially correlated binary responses. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 5 (2000) 102-114
45. Hosmer D.W., and Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression (1989), Wiley Interscience Publication, Chichester, UK
46. Houlder D., Hutchinson M., Nix H.A., and MacMahon J. ANUCLIM Version 5.0 User Guide (1999), Centre for Resource and Environmental Studies, Australian National University, Canberra
47. Jewell K.J., Arcese P., and Gergel S.E. Robust predictions of species distribution: spatial habitat models for a brood parasite. Biol. Conserv. 140 (2007) 259-272
48. Knapp R.A., Matthews K.R., Preisler H.K., and Jellison R. Developing probabilistic models to predict amphibian site occupancy in a patchy landscape. Ecol. Appl. 13 (2003) 1069-1082
49. Kühn I. Incorporating spatial autocorrelation may invert observed patterns. Divers. Distrib. 13 (2007) 66-69
50. Le Lay G., Clergeau P., and Hubert-Moy L. Computerized map of risk to manage wildlife species in urban areas. Environ. Manage. 27 (2001) 451-461
51. Lennon J.J. Red-shifts and red herrings in geographical ecology. Ecography 23 (2000) 101-113
52. Liu C.R., Berry P.M., Dawson T.P., and Pearson R.G. Selecting thresholds of occurrence in the prediction of species distributions. Ecography 28 (2005) 385-393
53. Luoto M., Kuussaari M., and Toivonen T. Modelling butterfly distribution based on remote sensing data. J. Biogeorgr. 29 (2002) 1029-1037
54. Manel S., Dias J.M., and Ormerod S.J. Comparing discriminant analysis, neural networks and logistic regression for predicting species distributions: a case study with a Himalayan river bird. Ecol. Model. 120 (1999) 337-347
55. McCullagh P., and Nelder J.A. Generalized Linear Models (1983), Chapman & Hall, London 511 pp.
56. McMillen D.P. Spatial autocorrelation or model misspecification?. Int. Regional Sci. Rev. 26 (2003) 208-217
57. McPherson J.M., and Jetz W. Effect of species' ecology on the accuracy of occurrence models. Ecogaphy 30 (2007) 135-151
58. McPherson J.M., Jetz W., and Rogers D.J. The effects of species' range sizes on the accuracy of distribution models: ecological phenomenon or statistical artefact?. J. Appl. Ecol. 41 (2004) 811-823
59. Meynard C.N., and Quinn J.F. Predicting species distributions: a critical comparison of the most common statistical models using artificial species. J. Biogeogr. 34 (2007) 1455-1469
60. Miller J., Franklin J., and Aspinall R. Incorporating spatial dependence in predictive vegetation models. Ecol. Model. 202 (2007) 225-242
61. Minchin P.R. Simulation of multidimensional community patterns: towards a comprehensive model. Vegetatio 71 (1987) 145-156
62. Moran P.A.P. Notes on continuous stochastic phenomena. Biometrika 37 (1950) 17-23
63. NCAR Research Application Program, 2008. Verification: Forecast Verification Utilities. R package version 1.26.
64. Nix H.A. A Biogeographic Analysis of Australian Elapid Snakes (1986), Australian Government Publications Service, Canberra
65. Oksanen J., and Minchin P.R. Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients?. Ecol. Model. 157 (2002) 119-129
66. Olden J.D., and Jackson D.A. A comparison of statistical approaches for modelling fish species distributions. Freshwater Biol. 47 (2002) 1976-1995
67. Osborne P.E., Alonso J.C., and Bryant R.G. Modelling landscape-scale habitat use using GIS and remote sensing: a case study with great bustards. J. Appl. Ecol. 38 (2001) 458-471
68. Palma L., Beja P., and Rodrigues M. The use of sighting data to analyse Iberian lynx habitat and distribution. J. Appl. Ecol. 36 (1999) 812-824
69. Pierce D.A., and Schafer D.W. Residuals in generalized linear models. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 81 (1986) 977-986
70. Piorecky M.D., and Prescott D.R.C. Multiple spatial scale logistic and autologistic habitat selection models for northern pygmy owls, along the eastern slopes of Alberta's Rocky Mountains. Biol. Conserv. 129 (2006) 360-371
71. R Development Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing (2007), R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
72. Robertson M.P., Peter C.I., Villet M.H., and Ripley B.S. Comparing models for predicting species' potential distributions: a case study using correlative and mechanistic predictive modelling techniques. Ecol. Model. 164 (2003) 153-167
73. Sanderson R.A., Eyre M.D., and Rushton S.P. Distribution of selected macroinvertebrates in a mosaic of temporary and permanent freshwater ponds as explained by autologistic models. Ecography 28 (2005) 355-362
74. Schadt S., Revilla E., Wiegand T., Knauer F., Kaczensky P., Breitenmoser U., Bufka L., Cervený J., Koubek P., Huber T., Stanisa C., and Trepl L. Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx. J. Appl. Ecol. 39 (2002) 189-203
75. Segurado P., and Araujo M.B. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 31 (2004) 1555-1568
76. Segurado P., Araujo M.B., and Kunin W.E. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models. J. Appl. Ecol. 43 (2006) 433-444
77. Stockwell D.R.B., and Peterson A.T. Effects of sample size on accuracy of species distribution models. Ecol. Model. 148 (2002) 1-13
78. Swan J.M.A. An examination of some ordination problems by use of simulated vegetational data. Ecology 51 (1970) 89-102
79. Syartinilia, and Tsuyuki S. GIS-based modeling of Javan Hawk-Eagle distribution using logistic and autologistic regression models. Biol. Conserv. 141 (2008) 756-769
80. Therneau, T.M., Atkinson, B., 2008. rpart: Recursive Partitioning. R package version 3.1-4.1.
81. Thuiller W. BIOMOD-optimizing predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. Global Change Biol. 9 (2003) 1353-1362
82. Wintle B.A., and Bardos D.C. Modeling species-habitat relationships with spatially autocorrelated observation data. Ecol. Appl. 16 (2006) 1945-1958
83. Wisz M.S., Hijmans R.J., Li J., Peterson A.T., Graham C.H., Guisan A., and NCEAS Predicting Species Distributions Working Group. Effects of sample size on the performance of species distribution models. Divers. Distrib. 14 (2008) 763-773
84. Yáñez M., and Floater G. Spatial distribution and habitat preference of the endangered tarantula Brachypelma klaasi (Araneae: Theraphosidae) in Mexico. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000) 795