Community-level vs species-specific approaches to model selection

Ecography

Volumn 36, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 1291-1298

  Madon, Bénédicte ^a   Warton, David I ^a   Araújo, Miguel B ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^b MUSEO NACIONAL DE CIENCIAS NATURALES   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ÉVORA   (Portugal)

^d UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY COMPOSITION; DATA SET; DATABASE; MODELING; RARE SPECIES;

EID: 84888863508     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: 16000587     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0587.2013.00127.x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Akaike H. 1973. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. - In: Petrov B. N. and Csaki F. (eds), Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Akademiai Kiado, Budapest, pp. 267-281.
2. Araújo M. B. and Peterson A. T. 2012. Uses and misuses of bioclimatic envelope modelling. Ecology 93: 1527-1539.
3. Araújo M. B. et al. 2005. Validation of species-climate impact models under climate change. Global Change Biol. 11: 1504-1513.
4. Baselga A. and Araujo M. B. 2009. Individualistic vs community modelling of species distribution under climate change. Ecography 32: 55-65.
5. Baselga A. and Araújo M. B. 2010. Do community models fail to project community variation effectively? J. Biogeogr. 37: 1842-1850.
6. Chapman D. S. and Purse B. V. 2011. Community versus single-species distribution models for British plants. J. Biogeogr. 38: 1524-1535.
7. Cohen J. 1960. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ. Psychol. Meas. 20: 37-46.
8. Diniz-Filho J. A. F. et al. 2009. Partitioning and mapping uncertainties in ensembles of forecasts of species turnover under climate change. Ecography 32: 897-906.
9. Elith J. and Leathwick J. 2007. Predicting species distributions from museum and herbarium records using multiresponse models fitted with multivariate adaptive regression splines. Divers. Distrib. 13: 265-275.
10. Elith J. et al. 2006. Novel methods improve prediction of species' distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29: 129-151.
11. Ferrier S. and Guisan A. 2006. Spatial modelling of biodiversity at the community level. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 393-404.
12. Guisan A. et al. 1999. GLM versus CCA spatial modelling of plant species distribution. Plant Ecol. 143: 107-122.
13. Hanley J. A. and McNeil B. J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 143: 29-36.
14. Hastie T. et al. 2009. The elements of statistical learning, second edition. - Springer.
15. Humphries C. et al. 1999. Plant diversity in Europe: Atlas Florae Europaeae and WORLDMAP. Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 11-21.
16. Jalas J. and Suominen J. (eds) 1972-1996. Atlas Florae Europaeae. The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo.
17. Lahti T. and Lampinen R. 1999. From dot maps to bitmaps - Atlas Florae Europaeae goes digital. Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 5-9.
18. McCullagh P. and Nelder J. A. 1989. Generalized linear models. - Chapman and Hall.
19. Nogués-Bravo D. and Araújo M. B. 2006. Species richness, area and climate correlates. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 15: 452-460.
20. NSW Office of Environment and Heritage 2010. Atlas of NSW wildlife database. - , accessed 20 April 2010.
21. Ovaskainen O. and Soininen J. 2011. Making more out of sparse data: hierarchical modelling of species communities. Ecology 92: 289-295.
22. Rahbek C. and Graves G. R. 2001. Multiscale assessment of patterns of avian species richness. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 89: 4534-4539.
23. Schroter D. et al. 2005. Ecosystem service supply and vulnerability to global change in Europe. Science 310: 1333-1337.
24. Schwarz G. E. 1978. Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann. Stat. 6: 461-464.
25. Segurado P. and Araújo M. B. 2004. An evaluation of methods for modelling species distributions. J. Biogeogr. 10: 1555-1568.
26. Segurado P. et al. 2006. Consequences of spatial autocorrelation for niche-based models. J. Appl. Ecol. 43: 433-444.
27. Seo C. et al. 2009. Scale effects in species distribution models: implication for conservation planning under climate change. Biol. Lett. 5: 39-43.
28. Warton D. I. and Shepherd L. C. 2010. Poisson point process models solve the "pseudo-absence problem" for present-only data in ecology. Ann. Appl. Stat. 4: 1273-1402.
29. Warton D. I. and Hui F. K. C. 2011. The arcsine is asinine - the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology 92: 3-10.
30. Wenger S. J. and Olden J. D. 2012. Assessing transferability of ecological models: an underappreciated aspect of statistical validation. Methods Ecol. Evol. 3: 260-267.
31. Williams P. H. et al. 2000. Endemism and important areas for representing European biodiversity: a preliminary exploration of atlas data for plants and terrestrial vertebrates. Belgian J. Entomol. 2: 21-46.