Effects of restricting environmental range of data to project current and future species distributions

Ecography

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 165-172

  Thuiller, Wilfried ^a   Brotons, Lluis ^a   Araújo, Miguel B ^a   Lavorel, Sandra ^b  

^a CNRS   (France)

^b UNIVERSITÉ JOSEPH FOURIER   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOLOGICAL MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; TREE;

EID: 4744352914     PISSN: 09067590     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2004.03673.x     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Araújo, M. B. et al. 2001. Would environmental diversity be a good surrogate for species diversity? - Ecography 24: 103-110.
2. Austin, M. P. and Meyers, J. A. 1996. Current approaches to modelling the environmental niche of eucalypts: implications for management of forest biodiversity. - For. Ecol. Manage. 85: 95-106.
3. Austin, M. P. et al. 1990. Measurement of the realized qualitative niche: environmental niches of five Eucalyptus species. - Ecol. Monogr. 60: 161-177.
4. Austin, M. P. et al. 1994. Determining species response functions to an environmental gradient by means of a beta-function. - J. Veg. Sci. 5: 215-228.
5. Bakkenes, M. et al. 2002. Assessing effects of forecasted climate change on the diversity and distribution of European higher plants for 2050. - Global Change Biol. 8: 390-407.
6. Beerling, D. J. et al. 1995. Climate and the distribution of Fallopia japonica: use of an introduced species to test the predictive capacity of response surface. - J. Veg. Sci. 6: 269-282.
7. Guisan, A. and Zimmermann, N. E. 2000. Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. - Ecol. Model. 135: 147-186.
8. Hanley, J. A. and McNeil, B. J. 1982. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. - Radiology 143: 29-36.
9. Hastie, T. J. and Tibshirani, R. 1990. Generalized additive models. - Chapman and Hall.
10. Jalas, J. and Suominen, J. 1972-1996. Altas Florae Europaeae. - The Committee for Mapping the Flora of Europe and Societas Biologica Fennica Vanamo, Helsinki.
11. Lahti, T. and Lampinen, R. 1999. From dot maps to bitmaps - Altas Florae Europaeae goes digital. - Acta Bot. Fenn. 162: 5-9.
12. Lawton, J. H. 2000. Concluding remarks: a review of some open questions. - In: Hutchings, M. J., John, E. and Stewart, A. J. A. (eds), Ecological consequences of heterogeneity. Cambridge Univ. Press, pp. 401-424.
13. Leathwick, J. R. and Austin, M. P. 2001. Competitive interactions between tree species in New Zealand's old-growth indigenous forests. - Ecology 82: 2560-2573.
14. Loehle, C. and LeBlanc, D. 1996. Model-based assessments of climate change effects on forests: a critical review. - Ecol. Model. 90: 1-31.
15. Nakicenovic, N. and Swart, R. (eds) 2000. Emissions scenarios: a special report of working group III of the intergovermental panel on climate change. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
16. Oksanen, J. and Minchin, P. T. 2002. Continuum theory revisited: what shape are species responses along ecological gradients. - Ecol. Model. 157: 119-129.
17. Pearce, J. and Ferrier, S. 2000. Evaluating the predictive performance developed using logistic regression. - Ecol. Model. 133: 225-245.
18. Pearson, R. G. and Dawson, T. E. 2003. Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 361-372.
19. Pearson, R. G. et al. 2002. SPECIES: A Spatial Evaluation of Climate Impact on the Envelope of Species. - Ecol. Model. 154: 289-300.
20. Peterson, A. T. et al. 2002. Future projections for Mexican faunas under global climate change scenarios. - Nature 416: 626-629.
21. Thuiller, W. 2003. BIOMOD: Optimising predictions of species distributions and projecting potential future shifts under global change. - Global Change Biol. 9: 1353-1362.
22. Thuiller, W. et al. 2003a. Generalized models versus classification tree analysis: a comparative study for predicting spatial distributions of plant species at different scales. - J. Veg. Sci. 14: 669-680.
23. Thuiller, W. et al. in press. Do we need land-cover data to model species distributions in Europe? - J. Biogeogr.
24. Thuiller, W. et al. 2003b. Large-scale environmental correlates of forest tree distributions in Catalonia (NE Spain). - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 12: 313-325.
25. Tutin, T. G. et al. 1964-1993. Flora Europaea. - Cambridge Univ. Press.
26. Woodward, F. I. and Beerling, D. J. 1997. The dynamics of vegetation change: health warnings for equilibrium 'dodo' models. - Global Ecol. Biogeogr. Lett. 6: 413-418.