Role of Environmental Factors on Resuming Valued Activities Poststroke: A Systematic Review of Qualitative and Quantitative Findings

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 97, Issue 6, 2016, Pages 991-1002.e1

  Jellema, Sandra ^a,b   van der Sande, Rob ^a,b   van Hees, Suzanne ^a   Zajec, Jana ^a   Steultjens, Esther M ^b   Nijhuis van der Sanden, Maria W ^a,b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b HAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Environment; Human activities; Rehabilitation; Review publication type ; Social participation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; COMMUNITY LIVING; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; HUMAN; PHYSICAL CAPACITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUANTITATIVE STUDY; REVIEW; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE PATIENT; SURVIVOR; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; ATTITUDE; CONSTRUCTION WORK AND ARCHITECTURAL PHENOMENA; COPING BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENT; HUMAN RELATION; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LEISURE; SELF HELP DEVICE; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIOECONOMICS; STROKE REHABILITATION;

ADAPTATION, PSYCHOLOGICAL; ARCHITECTURAL ACCESSIBILITY; ATTITUDE; ENVIRONMENT; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; LEISURE ACTIVITIES; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SELF-HELP DEVICES; SOCIAL PARTICIPATION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STROKE REHABILITATION;

EID: 84962176740     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: 1532821X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.01.015     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. 1 Egan, M., Davis, C.G., Dubouloz, C.J., Kessler, D., Kubina, L.A., Participation and well-being poststroke: evidence of reciprocal effects. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 95 (2014), 262–268.
2. 2 Moeller, D., Carpenter, C., Factors affecting quality of life for people who have experienced a stroke. Int J Ther Rehabil 20 (2013), 207–216.
3. 3 Clarke, P., Quality of life following stroke: negotiating disability, identity, and resources. J Appl Gerontol 24 (2005), 319–336.
4. 4 Arntzen, C., Borg, T., Hamran, T., Long-term recovery trajectory after stroke: an ongoing negotiation between body, participation and self. Disabil Rehabil 37 (2015), 1626–1634.
5. 5 Salter, K., Hellings, C., Foley, N., Teasell, R., The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 40 (2008), 595–602.
6. 6 Whiteneck, G., Dijkers, M.P., Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90:11 Suppl (2009), S22–S35.
7. 7 Hoyle, M., Gustafsson, L., Meredith, P., Ownsworth, T., Participation after stroke: do we understand all the components and relationships as categorised in the ICF?. Brain Impair 13 (2012), 4–15.
8. 8 Hammel, J., Magasi, S., Heinemann, A., et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96 (2015), 578–588.
9. 9 Lewin, K., Principles of topological psychology. 1936, McGraw-Hill, New York.
10. 10 Wang, P.P., Badley, E.M., Gignac, M., Exploring the role of contextual factors in disability models. Disabil Rehabil 28 (2006), 135–140.
11. 11 Jahiel, R.I., Scherer, M.J., Initial steps towards a theory and praxis of person–environment interaction in disability. Disabil Rehabil 32 (2015), 1467–1474.
12. 12 Magasi, S., Wong, A., Gray, D.B., et al. Theoretical foundations for the measurement of environmental factors and their impact on participation among people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96 (2015), 569–577.
13. 13 WHO, International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). 2001, WHO, Geneva.
14. 14 Badley, E.M., Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Soc Sci Med 66 (2008), 2335–2345.
15. 15 CASP, U.K., Casp checklists. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) Oxford. Available at: http://www.Casp-uk.Net, 2013 Accessed January 20, 2014.
16. 16 Daly, J., Kellehear, A., Gliksman, M., The public health researcher: a methodological approach. 1997, Oxford Univ Pr, Melbourne.
17. 17 Timulak, L., Creaner, M., Experiences of conducting qualitative meta-analysis. Counselling Psychology Review 28 (2013), 94–104.
18. 18 Glaser, B.G., Strauss, A.L., The discovery of grounded theory: strategies for qualitative research. 1967, Aldine de Gruyter, Chicago.
19. 19 Kubina, L.A., Dubouloz, C.J., Davis, C.G., Kessler, D., Egan, M.Y., The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 35 (2013), 236–243.
20. 20 Anderson, S., Whitfield, K., An ecological approach to activity after stroke: it takes a community. Top Stroke Rehabil 18 (2011), 509–524.
21. 21 Northcott, S., Hilari, K., Why do people lose their friends after a stroke?. Int J Lang Commun Disord 46 (2011), 524–534.
22. 22 Dalemans, R.J., de Witte, L., Wade, D., van den Heuvel, W., Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord 45 (2010), 537–550.
23. 23 Erikson, A., Park, M., Tham, K., Place integration through daily activities 1 year after stroke. OTJR 30 (2010), 68–77.
24. 24 O'Sullivan, C., Chard, G., An exploration of participation in leisure activities post-stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 57 (2010), 159–166.
25. 25 Liddle, J., Turpin, M., McKenna, K., Kubus, T., Lambley, S., McCaffrey, K., The experiences and needs of people who cease driving after stroke. Brain Impair 10 (2009), 271–281.
26. 26 Casey, D., Murphy, K., Cooney, A., O'Shea, E., Patient perceptions having suffered a stroke in Galway. Br J Community Nurs 13 (2008), 384–390.
27. 27 Damush, T.M., Plue, L., Bakas, T., Schmid, A., Williams, L.S., Barriers and facilitators to exercise among stroke survivors. Rehabil Nurs 32 (2007), 253–260 262.
28. 28 Barker, D.J., Reid, D., Cott, C., The experience of senior stroke survivors: factors in community participation among wheelchair users. Can J Occup Ther 73 (2006), 18–25.
29. 29 Anderson, S., Whitfield, K., Social identity and stroke: ‘They don't make me feel like, there's something wrong with me’. Scand J Caring Sci 27 (2013), 820–830.
30. 30 Vestling, M., Ramel, E., Iwarsson, S., Thoughts and experiences from returning to work after stroke. Work 45 (2013), 201–211.
31. 31 Barnsley, L., McCluskey, A., Middleton, S., What people say about travelling outdoors after their stroke: a qualitative study. Aust Occup Ther J 59 (2012), 71–78.
32. 32 Corrigan, R., McBurney, H., Community ambulation: perceptions of rehabilitation physiotherapists in rural and regional communities. Physiother Theory Pract 28 (2012), 10–17.
33. 33 Lindqvist, E., Borell, L., Computer-based assistive technology and changes in daily living after stroke. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 7 (2012), 364–371.
34. 34 White, J.H., Miller, B., Magin, P., Attia, J., Sturm, J., Pollack, M., Access and participation in the community: a prospective qualitative study of driving post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 34 (2012), 831–838.
35. 35 Egbert, N., Koch, L., Coeling, H., Ayers, D., The role of social support in the family and community integration of right-hemisphere stroke survivors. Health Commun 20 (2006), 45–55.
36. 36 Hammel, J., Jones, R., Gossett, A., Morgan, E., Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 13 (2006), 43–58.
37. 37 Lock, S., Jordan, L., Bryan, K., Maxim, J., Work after stroke: focusing on barriers and enablers. Disabil Soc 20 (2005), 33–47.
38. 38 Reid, D., Accessibility and usability of the physical housing environment of seniors with stroke. Int J Rehabil Res 27 (2004), 203–208.
39. 39 Lund, A., Mangset, M., Wyller, T.B., Sveen, U., Occupational transaction after stroke constructed as threat and balance. J Occup Sci 22 (2015), 146–159.
40. 40 Klinke, M.E., Hafsteinsdottir, T.B., Thorsteinsson, B., Jonsdottir, H., Living at home with eating difficulties following stroke: a phenomenological study of younger people's experiences. J Clin Nurs 23 (2014), 250–260.
41. 41 Robison, J., Wiles, R., Ellis-Hill, C., McPherson, K., Hyndman, D., Ashburn, A., Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps?. Disabil Rehabil 31 (2009), 1555–1566.
42. 42 Medin, J., Barajas, J., Ekberg, K., Stroke patients’ experiences of return to work. Disabil Rehabil 28 (2006), 1051–1060.
43. 43 Corr, S., Wilmer, S., Returning to work after a stroke: an important but neglected area. Br J Occup Ther 66 (2003), 186–192.
44. 44 Chimatiro, G., Rhoda, A., Environmental barriers to reintegration experienced by stroke clients post discharge from a rehabilitation centre in Malawi. South African Journal of Physiotherapy 70 (2014), 18–23.
45. 45 Fotiadou, D., Northcott, S., Chatzidaki, A., Hilari, K., Aphasia blog talk: how does stroke and aphasia affect a person's social relationships?. Aphasiology 28 (2014), 1281–1300.
46. 46 Le Dorze, G., Salois-Bellerose, E., Alepins, M., Croteau, C., Halle, M.C., A description of the personal and environmental determinants of participation several years post-stroke according to the views of people who have aphasia. Aphasiology 28 (2014), 421–439.
47. 47 Koch, L., Egbert, N., Coeling, H., Ayers, D., Returning to work after the onset of illness: experiences of right hemisphere stroke survivors. Rehabil Counsel Bull 48 (2005), 209–218.
48. 48 Rochette, A., Desrosiers, J., Noreau, L., Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 23 (2001), 559–569.
49. 49 Perrin, P.B., Heesacker, M., Stidham, B.S., Rittman, M.R., Gonzalez-Rothi, L.J., Structural equation modeling of the relationship between caregiver psychosocial variables and functioning of individuals with stroke. Rehabil Psychol 53 (2008), 54–62.
50. 50 Atler, K.E., Gliner, J.A., Post stroke activity and psychosocial factors. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr 7 (1989), 13–27.
51. 51 Chang, K.H., Lin, Y.N., Liao, H.F., et al. Environmental effects on WHODAS 2.0 among patients with stroke with a focus on ICF category e120. Qual Life Res 23 (2014), 1823–1831.
52. 52 Griffen, J.A., Rapport, L.J., Bryer, R.C., Scott, C.A., Driving status and community integration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 16 (2009), 212–221.
53. 53 Beckley, M.N., Community participation following cerebrovascular accident: Impact of the buffering model of social support. Am J Occup Ther 60 (2006), 129–135.
54. 54 Gottlieb, A., Golander, H., Bar-Tal, Y., Gottlieb, D., The influence of social support and perceived control on handicap and quality of life after stroke. Aging (Milan, Italy) 13 (2001), 11–15.
55. 55 Giaquinto, S., Buzzelli, S., Di Francesco, L., Nolfe, G., Evaluation of sexual changes after stroke. J Clin Psychiatry 64 (2003), 302–307.
56. 56 Wallace, G.L., Profile of life participation after stroke and aphasia. Top Stroke Rehabil 17 (2010), 432–450.
57. 57 McKevitt, C., Luse, A., Wolfe, C., The unfortunate generation: stroke survivors in Riga, Latvia. Soc Sci Med 56 (2003), 2097–2108.
58. 58 Verdonschot, M.M., de Witte, L.P., Reichrath, E., Buntinx, W.H., Curfs, L.M., Impact of environmental factors on community participation of persons with an intellectual disability: a systematic review. J Intellect Disabil Res 53 (2009), 54–64.
59. 59 Heinemann, A.W., Magasi, S., Hammel, J., et al. Environmental factors item development for persons with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 96 (2015), 589–595.
60. 60 Riley, G.A., Brennan, A.J., Powell, T., Threat appraisal and avoidance after traumatic brain injury: why and how often are activities avoided?. Brain Inj 18 (2004), 871–888.
61. 61 Goldstein, K., Effect of brain damage on the personality. Psychiatry 15 (1952), 245–260.
62. 62 Walsh, M.E., Galvin, R., Loughnane, C., Macey, C., Horgan, N.F., Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil 37 (2015), 1599–1608.