Driving status and community integration after stroke

Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 212-221

  Griffen, Julie A ^a   Rapport, Lisa J ^a   Bryer, Renee Coleman ^a   Scott, Carolyn A ^a  

^a WAYNE STATE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Community integration; Driving; Gender differences; Social support; Stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DRIVING ABILITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; OCCUPATION; PATIENT MOBILITY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; SELF EVALUATION; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SEX FACTORS; SOCIAL ADJUSTMENT; SOCIAL DISTANCE; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; STROKE;

EID: 77954569462     PISSN: 10749357     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1310/tsr1603-212     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Bodenheimer CF, Roig RL, Worsowicz GM, Cifu DX. Geriatric rehabilitation. 5. The societal aspects of disability in the older adult. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85(S3):23-26.
2. Marshall SC, Molnar F, Man-Son-Hing M, et al. Predictors of driving ability following stroke: a systematic review. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(1): 98-114.
3. O'Neill D. Safe mobility for older people. Rev Clin Gerontol. 2000;40:181-191.
4. Poole D, Chaudry F, Jay WM. Stroke and driving. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008;15(1):37-41.
5. Ragland DR, Satariano WA, MacLeod KE. Driving cessation and increased depressive symptoms. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005;60A(3):399-403.
6. Fricke J, Unsworth C. Time use and importance of instrumental activities of daily living. Aust Occup Ther J. 2001;48(3):118-131.
7. Coleman Bryer R, Rapport LJ, Hanks RA. Determining fitness to drive: neuropsychological and psychological considerations. In: Pellerito J, ed. Driver Rehabilitation and Community Mobility: Principles and Practice. St. Louis, MO: Elsevier, Mosby; 2005:165-184.
8. Senior Site. The importance of driving for seniors. Available at: http://www.seniorsite.com/senior-driver-auto/importance-of-driving-for-seniors. asp. Accessed September 15, 2008.
9. Johnson JE. Urban older adults and the forfeiture of a driver's license. J Gerontol Nurs. 1999;25(12):12-18.
10. Liddle J, McKenna K. Older drivers and driving cessation. Br J Occup Ther. 2003;66(3):125-132.
11. Legh-Smith J, Wade DT, Hewer RL. Driving after a stroke. J R Soc Med. 1986;79(4):200-203.
12. Glass TA, Mendes de Leon CF, Marottoli RA, Berkman LF. Population based study of social and productive activities as predictors of survival among elderly Americans. BMJ. 1999;319:478-483.
13. Jewkes R, Murcott A. Meanings of community. Soc Sci Med. 1996;43:555-563.
14. Minnes P, Carlson P, McColl MA, Nolte ML, Johnston J, Buell K. Community integration: a useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Inj. 2003;17:149-59.
15. Hallett JD, Zasler ND, Maurer P, Cash S. Role change after traumatic brain injury in adults. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48(3):241-246.
16. Kreutzer JS, Marwitz JH, Walker W, et al. Moderating factors in return to work and job stability after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18(2):128-138.
17. Rapport LJ, Coleman Bryer R, Hanks RA. Driving and community integration after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:922-930.
18. Rapport, LJ, Hanks RA, Bryer RD. Barriers to driving and community integration after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(1):34-44.
19. Anderson CJ, Vogel LC. Employment outcomes of adults who sustained spinal cord injuries as children or adolescents. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83(6):791-801.
20. Siosteen A, Lundqvist C, Blomstrand C, Sullivan L, Sullivan M. The quality of life of three functional spinal cord injury subgroups in a Swedish community. Paraplegia. 1990;28(8):476-488.
21. Glasgow N. Transportation and social integration of nonmetropolitan older persons. In: Pillemer K, ed. Social Integration in the Second Half of Life. Baltimore; London: Johns Hopkins University Press; 2000:108-131.
22. Marottoli RA, de Leon CFM, Glass TA, Williams CS, Cooney LM, Berkman LF. Consequences of driving cessation: decreased out-of-home activity levels. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2000;55(6): S334-S340.
23. Fisk GD, Owsley C, Pulley LV. Driving after stroke: driving exposure, advice, and evaluation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78(12):1338-1345.
24. Heikkilä VM, Korpelainen J, Turkka J, Kallanranta T, Summala H. Clinical evaluation of the driving ability in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand. 1999;99(6):349-355.
25. Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Speechley MR. Community integration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2003;10(2):107-129.
26. Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Côt R, Durcan L, Carlton J. Activity, participation, and quality of life 6 months poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1035-1042.
27. Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R, Hinojosa MS, Haun J. Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge home. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2007;14(2):21-31.
28. Cohen S, Willis T. Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull. 1985;93: 310-357.
29. Rhodes GL, Lakey B. Social support and psychological disorder: insights from social psychology. In: Kowalski RM, Leary MR, eds. The Social Psychology of Emotional and Behavioural Problems: Interfaces of Social and Clinical Psychology. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1999:281-309.
30. Sarason IG, Sarason BR, Potter EH, Antoni MH. Life events, social support, and illness. Psychosom Med. 1985;47(2):156-163.
31. Travis LA, Lyness JM, Shields CG, King DA, Cox C. Social support, depression, and functional disability in older adult primary-care patients. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2004;12(3):265-271.
32. Tsouna-Hadjis E, Vemmos KN, Zakopoulos N, Stamatelopoulos S. First-stroke recovery process: the role of family social support. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81(7):881-887.
33. Anstey KJ, Windsor TD, Luszcz MA, Andrews GR. Predicting driving cessation over 5 years in older adults: psychological well-being and cognitive competence are stronger predictors than physical health. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(1):121-126.
34. Ragland DR, Satariano WA, MacLeod KE. Reasons given by older people for limitation or avoidance of driving. Gerontologist. 2004;44(2):237-244.
35. Siren A, Hakamies-Blomqvist L. Does gendered driving create gendered mobility? Communityrelated mobility in Finnish women and men aged 65+. Transp Res Part F - Traffic Psychol Behav. 2006;9(5):374-382.
36. Siren A, Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Lindeman M. Driving cessation and health in older women. J Appl Gerontol. 2004;23(1):58-69.
37. Brabyn JA, Schneck ME, Lott LA, Haegerstrom- Portnoy G. Night driving self-restriction: vision function and gender differences. Optom Vis Sci. 2005;82(8):755-764.
38. Bauer MJ, Adler G, Kuskowski MA, Rottunda S. The infl uence of age and gender on the driving patterns of older adults. J Women Aging. 2003;15(4):3-16.
39. Olstad R, Sexton H, Sogaard AJ. The Finnmark Study: a prospective population study of the social support buffer hypothesis, specific stressors and mental distress. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2001;36(12):582-589.
40. Takizawa T, Kondo T, Sakihara S, Ariizumi M, Watanabe N, Oyama H. Stress buffering effects of social support on depressive symptoms in middle age: reciprocity and community mental health. Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2006;60(6):652-661.
41. Whiteneck G, Fougeyrolles P, Gerhart KA. Elaborating the model of disablement. In: Fuhrer M, ed. Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcomes Research. Baltimore: Brooks Publishing Co; 1997.
42. Segal ME, Schall RR. Assessing handicap of stroke survivors. A validation study of Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995;74(4):276-286.
43. Walker N, Mellick D, Brooks CA, Whiteneck GG. Measuring participation across impairment groups using the Craig Handicap Assessment Reporting Technique. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;82(12):936-941.
44. Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, Johnson D, Embretson S, Laster LJ. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10): 2131-2140.
45. Duncan PW, Bode RK, Min LS, Perera S. Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003;84(7):950-963.
46. McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, Johnston J, Minnes P. The community integration measure: development and preliminary validation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82(4):429-434.
47. Minnes P, Carlson P, McColl MA, Nolte ML, Johnston J, Buell K. Community integration: a useful construct, but what does it really mean? Brain Inj. 2003;17(2):149-159.
48. Cutrona CE, Russell D. The provisions of social relationships and adaptation stress. In: Jones WH, Periman D. eds. Advances in Personal Relationships. Vol. 1. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press; 1998:37-68.
49. Rapport LJ, Hanks RA, Bryer RC. Barriers to driving and community integration after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2006;21(1): 4-44.
50. Rauch RJ, Ferry SM. Social networks as support interventions following traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation. 2001;16(1):11-16.
51. Wood RLL, Rutterford NA. Demographic and cognitive predictors of long-term psychosocial outcome following traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2006;12:350-358.
52. Hakamies-Blomqvist L, Siren A. Deconstructing a gender difference: driving cessation and personal driving history of older women. J Safety Res. 2003;34(4):383-388.
53. Goranson TE, Graves RE, Allison D, La Freniere R. Community integration following multidisciplinary rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2003;17(9):759-774.
54. Kaplan CP. The Community Integration Questionnaire with new scoring guidelines: concurrent validity and need for appropriate norms. Brain Inj. 2001;15(8):725-731.