Factors associated with community reintegration in the first year after stroke: A qualitative meta-synthesis

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 37, Issue 18, 2015, Pages 1599-1608

  Walsh, Mary E ^a   Galvin, Rose ^a   Loughnane, Cliona ^b   Macey, Chris ^b   Horgan, N Frances ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF SURGEONS IN IRELAND   (Ireland)

^b IRISH HEART FOUNDATION   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Barriers; Community reintegration; Facilitators; Qualitative; Rehabilitation; Stroke

Indexed keywords

AGED; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; PSYCHOLOGY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE; SURVIVOR;

AGED; COMMUNITY INTEGRATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL SUPPORT; STROKE; SURVIVORS;

EID: 84937838798     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2014.974834     Document Type: Review

References (44)

1. Di Carlo A. Human and economic burden of stroke. Age Ageing 2009;38:4-5.
2. Norrving B, Kissela B. The global burden of stroke and need for a continuum of care. Neurology 2013;80:S5-12.
3. Forster A, Young J, Nixon J, et al. A cluster randomized controlled trial of a structured training programme for caregivers of inpatients after stroke (TRACS). Int J Stroke 2012;7:94-9.
4. Wood JP, Connelly DM, Maly MR. 'Getting back to real living': a qualitative study of the process of community reintegration after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2010;24:1045-56.
5. Pang MY, Eng JJ, Miller WC. Determinants of satisfaction with community reintegration in older adults with chronic stroke: role of balance self-efficacy. Phys Ther 2007;87:282-91.
6. Dijkers M. Community Integration: conceptual issues and measurement approaches in rehabilitation research. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 1998;4:1-15.
7. Bhogal SK, Teasell RW, Foley NC, Speechley MR. Community reintegration after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2003; 10:107-29.
8. Langhorne P, Holmqvist LW. Early supported discharge after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2007;39:103-8.
9. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:741-54.
10. Dimyan MA, Cohen LG. Neuroplasticity in the context of motor rehabilitation after stroke. Nat Rev Neurol 2011;7:76-85.
11. Cott CA, Wiles R, Devitt R. Continuity, transition and participation: preparing clients for life in the community post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1566-74.
12. Reed MC, Wood V, Harrington R, Paterson J. Developing stroke rehabilitation and community services: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:553-63.
13. Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, Teasell R. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med 2008;40: 595-602.
14. Korhonen A, Hakulinen-Viitanen T, Jylha V, Holopainen A. Meta-synthesis and evidence-based health care - A method for systematic review. Scand J Caring Sci 2013;27:1027-34.
15. Bondas T, Hall EO. Challenges in approaching metasynthesis research. Qual Health Res 2007;17:113-21.
16. Campbell R, Pound P, Pope C, et al. Evaluating meta-ethnography: a synthesis of qualitative research on lay experiences of diabetes and diabetes care. Soc Sci Med 2003;56:671-84.
17. Critical Appraisal Skills Programme. 2011. Available from: http://www.casp-uk.net/wp-content/uploads/2011/11/CASP-Qualitative-Research-Checklist-31.05.13.pdf [last accessed 25 Aug 2013].
18. Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, Morgan E. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach. Top Stroke Rehabil 2006;13: 43-58.
19. Carlsson GE, Moller A, Blomstrand C. Managing an everyday life of uncertainty - A qualitative study of coping in persons with mild stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31:773-82.
20. Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, Penhale B. Working after a stroke: survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil 2007; 29:1858-69.
21. Robison J, Wiles R, Ellis-Hill C, et al. Resuming previously valued activities post-stroke: who or what helps? Disabil Rehabil 2009;31: 1555-66.
22. Jones F, Mandy A, Partridge C. Reasons for recovery after stroke: a perspective based on personal experience. Disabil Rehabil 2008;30: 507-16.
23. Ellis-Hill C, Robison J, Wiles R, et al. Going home to get on with life: patients and carers experiences of being discharged from hospital following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2009;31: 61-72.
24. Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Place integration through daily activities 1 year after stroke. OTJR Occupation, Participation and Health 2010;30:68-77.
25. Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: a qualitative, longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during the one year of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:831-8.
26. Burton CR. Living with stroke: a phenomenological study. J Adv Nurs 2000;32:301-9.
27. Gustafsson L, Bootle K. Client and carer experience of transition home from inpatient stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35: 1380-6.
28. White JH, Miller B, Magin P, et al. Access and participation in the community: a prospective qualitative study of driving post-stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:831-8.
29. White JH, Gray KR, Magin P, et al. Exploring the experience of post-stroke fatigue in community dwelling stroke survivors: a prospective qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil 2012;34:1376-84.
30. Rittman M, Boylstein C, Hinojosa R, et al. Transition experiences of stroke survivors following discharge home. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:21-31.
31. Dickson S, Barbour RS, Brady M, et al. Patients' experiences of disruptions associated with post-stroke dysarthria. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2008;43:135-53.
32. Kubina L-A, Dubouloz C-J, Davis CG, et al. The process of re-engagement in personally valued activities during the two years following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2013;35:236-43.
33. O'Sullivan C, Chard G. An exploration of participation in leisure activities post-stroke. Aust Occup Ther J 2010;57:159-66.
34. Barnsley L, McCluskey A, Middleton S. What people say about travelling outdoors after their stroke: a qualitative study. Aust Occup Ther J 2012;59:71-8.
35. Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Bravo G, et al. Changes in participation after a mild stroke: quantitative and qualitative perspectives. Top Stroke Rehabil 2007;14:59-68.
36. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a1035.
37. Lawrence M. Young adults' experience of stroke: a qualitative review of the literature. Brit J Nurs 2010;19:241-8.
38. Bright FA, Kayes NM, McCann CM, McPherson KM. Understanding hope after stroke: a systematic review of the literature using concept analysis. Top Stroke Rehabil 2011;18:490-508.
39. Sarre S, Redlich C, Tinker A, et al. A systematic review of qualitative studies on adjusting after stroke: lessons for the study of resilience. Disabil Rehabil 2014;36:716-26.
40. Nicholson S, Sniehotta FF, Van Wijck F, et al. A systematic review of perceived barriers and motivators to physical activity after stroke. Int J Stroke 2013;8:357-64.
41. Peoples H, Satink T, Steultjens E. Stroke survivors' experiences of rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Scand J Occup Ther 2011;18:163-71.
42. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guideline for stroke. 4th ed. London: Royal College of Physicians; 2012.
43. Bangalore S, Schwamm L, Smith EE, et al. Secondary prevention after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack. Am J Med 2014; 127:728-38.
44. Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, et al. A consensus on stroke: early supported discharge. Stroke 2011;42:1392-7.