Evaluation of measurement properties of self-administered PROMs aimed at patients with non-specific shoulder pain and “activity limitations”: a systematic review

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 25, Issue 9, 2016, Pages 2141-2160

  Thoomes de Graaf, M ^a,b   Scholten Peeters, G G M ^a,b,c   Schellingerhout, J M ^d   Bourne, A M ^f   Buchbinder, R ^e,f   Koehorst, M ^g   Terwee, C B ^h   Verhagen, A P ^a,b  

^a AVANS UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Netherlands)

^b ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^d Het Huisartsenteam De Keen   (Netherlands)

^e CABRINI INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^f MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^g Institute for Master Education SOMT   (Netherlands)

^h VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Disability; Patient outcome assessment; Psychometrics; Questionnaire; Shoulder pain; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

AREA UNDER THE CURVE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CONTENT VALIDITY; CRITERION RELATED VALIDITY; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (SCORE); HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; JOINT LIMITATION; MEASUREMENT ERROR; MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE ASSESSMENT; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; SHOULDER DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; SHOULDER PAIN; SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX; SHOULDER RATING QUESTIONNAIRE; SIMPLE SHOULDER TEST; ADULT; CHECKLIST; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEDLINE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SHOULDER;

ACTIVITIES OF DAILY LIVING; ADULT; CHECKLIST; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEDLINE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES; QUALITY OF LIFE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOULDER; SHOULDER PAIN; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84962169610     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1277-7     Document Type: Review

References (67)

1. Stucki, G., Kostanjsek, N., Ustun, B., & Cieza, A. (2008). ICF-based classification and measurement of functioning. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(3), 315–328.
2. Cieza, A., & Stucki, G. (2008). The International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health: Its development process and content validity. European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, 44(3), 303–313.
3. Jelsma, J. (2009). Use of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: A literature survey. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 41(1), 1–12.
4. Van Der Windt, D. A. W. M., Van Der Heijden, G. J. M. G., De Winter, A. F., Koes, B. W., Deville, W., & Bouter, L. M. (1998). The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 57(2), 82–87.
5. Van Der Heijden, G. J. M. G., Leffers, P., & Bouter, L. M. (2000). Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 53(1), 29–38.
6. Roach, K. E., Budiman-Mak, E., Songsiridej, N., & Lertratanakul, Y. (1991). Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care & Research, 4(4), 143–149.
7. Hudak, P. L., Amadio, P. C., & Bombardier, C. (1996). Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and head). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 29(6), 602–608.
8. Bot, S. D., Terwee, C. B., van der Windt, D. A., Bouter, L. M., Dekker, J., & de Vet, H. C. (2004). Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: A systematic review of the literature. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(4), 335–341.
9. Roy, J. S., MacDermid, J. C., & Woodhouse, L. J. (2009). Measuring shoulder function: A systematic review of four questionnaires. Arthritis and Rheumatism, 61(5), 623–632.
10. St-Pierre, C., Desmeules, F., Dionne, C. E., Fremont, P., MacDermid, J. C., & Roy, J. S. (2016). Psychometric properties of self-reported questionnaires for the evaluation of symptoms and functional limitations in individuals with rotator cuff disorders: A systematic review. Disability and Rehabilitation, 38(2), 103–122. doi:10.3109/09638288.2015.1027004.
11. Angst, F., Schwyzer, H. K., Aeschlimann, A., Simmen, B. R., & Goldhahn, J. (2011). Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and Its Short Version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(SUPPL. 11), S174–S188.
12. Desai, A. S., Dramis, A., & Hearnden, A. J. (2010). Critical appraisal of subjective outcome measures used in the assessment of shoulder disability. Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England, 92(1), 9–13.
13. Fayad, F., Mace, Y., & Lefevre-Colau, M. M. (2005). Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Annales de Réadaptation et de Médecine Physique, 48(6), 298–306.
14. Wright, R. W., Brand, R. A., Dunn, W., & Spindler, K. P. (2007). How to write a systematic review. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, 455, 23–29.
15. Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Guillemin, F., & Ferraz, M. B. (2000). Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 25(24), 3186–3191.
16. Wang, W. L., Lee, H. L., & Fetzer, S. J. (2006). Challenges and strategies of instrument translation. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 28(3), 310–321.
17. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Knol, D. L., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 22.
18. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Gibbons, E., Stratford, P. W., Alonso, J., Patrick, D. L., et al. (2010). Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 10, 82.
19. Schellingerhout, J. M., Heymans, M. W., Verhagen, A. P., de Vet, H. C., Koes, B. W., & Terwee, C. B. (2011). Measurement properties of translated versions of neck-specific questionnaires: A systematic review. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 11, 87.
20. Schellingerhout, J. M., Verhagen, A. P., Heymans, M. W., Koes, B. W., de Vet, H. C., & Terwee, C. B. (2012). Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: A systematic review. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 659–670.
21. Mutsaers, J. H., Peters, R., Pool-Goudzwaard, A. L., Koes, B. W., & Verhagen, A. P. (2012). Psychometric properties of the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale for Physiotherapists: a systematic review. Man Ther, 17(3), 213–218.
22. van Bloemendaal, M., van de Water, A. T., & van de Port, I. G. (2012). Walking tests for stroke survivors: A systematic review of their measurement properties. Disability and Rehabilitation, 34(26), 2207–2221. doi:10.3109/09638288.2012.680649.
23. Schellingerhout, J. M., Verhagen, A. P., Thomas, S., & Koes, B. W. (2008). Lack of uniformity in diagnostic labeling of shoulder pain: time for a different approach. Manual Therapy, 13(6), 478–483.
24. Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.
25. Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.
26. Nunally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.
28. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.
29. van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., & Bouter, L. (2003). Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the cochrane collaboration back review group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 28(12), 1290–1299.
30. Dogu, B., Sahin, F., Ozmaden, A., Yilmaz, F., & Kuran, B. (2013). Which questionnaire is more effective for follow-up diagnosed subacromial impingement syndrome? A comparison of the responsiveness of SDQ, SPADI and WORC index. Journal of Back and Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, 26(1), 1–7.
31. Paul, A., Lewis, M., Shadforth, M. F., Croft, P. R., Van Der Windt, D. A. W. M., & Hay, E. M. (2004). A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 63(10), 1293–1299.
32. Christiansen, D. H., Andersen, J. H., & Haahr, J. P. (2013). Cross-cultural adaption and measurement properties of the Danish version of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Clinical Rehabilitation, 27(4), 355–360.
33. Ekeberg, O. M., Bautz-Holter, E., Keller, A., Tveita, E. K., Juel, N. G., & Brox, J. I. (2010). A questionnaire found disease-specific WORC index is not more responsive than SPADI and OSS in rotator cuff disease. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(5), 575–584.
34. Hill, C. L., Lester, S., Taylor, A. W., Shanahan, M. E., & Gill, T. K. (2011). Factor structure and validity of the shoulder pain and disability index in a population-based study of people with shoulder symptoms. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 12, 8.
35. Tveita, E. K., Sandvik, L., Ekeberg, O. M., Juel, N. G., & Bautz-Holter, E. (2008). Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. doi:10.1186/1471-2474-9-103.
36. Tveita, E. K., Ekeberg, O. M., Juel, N. G., & Bautz-Holter, E. (2008). Responsiveness of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 161.
37. Ekeberg, O. M., Bautz-Holter, E., Tveita, E. K., Keller, A., Juel, N. G., & Brox, J. I. (2008). Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 9, 68.
38. Bicer, A., & Ankarali, H. (2010). Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: A validation study in Turkish women. Singapore Medical Journal, 51(11), 865–870.
39. MacDermid, J. C., Solomon, P., & Prkachin, K. (2006). The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 7, 12.
40. Staples, M. P., Forbes, A., Green, S., & Buchbinder, R. (2010). Shoulder-specific disability measures showed acceptable construct validity and responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(2), 163–170.
41. Jamnik, H., & Spevak, M. K. (2008). Shoulder pain and disability Index: Validation of slovene version. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31(4), 337–341.
42. Ozsahin, M., Akgun, K., Aktas, I., & Kurtais, Y. (2008). Adaptation of the shoulder disability questionnaire to the Turkish population, its reliability and validity. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 31(3), 241–245.
43. de Winter, A. F., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., Scholten, R. J. P. M., van der Windt, D. A. W. M., & Bouter, L. M. (2007). The Shoulder Disability Questionnaire differentiated well between high and low disability levels in patients in primary care, in a cross-sectional study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(11), 1156–1163.
44. Beaton, D. E., Katz, J. N., Fossel, A. H., Wright, J. G., Tarasuk, V., & Bombardier, C. (2001). Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Journal of Hand Therapy, 14(2), 128–146.
45. Haldorsen, B., Svege, I., Roe, Y., & Bergland, A. (2014). Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 15(1), 78.
46. Offenbaecher, M., Ewert, T., Sangha, O., & Stucki, G. (2002). Validation of a German version of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand questionnaire (DASH-G). Journal of Rheumatology, 29(2), 401–402.
47. L’Insalata, J. C., Warren, R. F., Cohen, B. A. S. B., Altchek, D. W., & Peterson, M. G. E. (1997). A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery Series A, 79(5), 738–748.
48. Vermeulen, H. M., Boonman, D. C. G., Schuller, H. M., Obermann, W. R., van Houwelingen, H. C., Rozing, P. M., & Vliet Vlieland, T. P. M. (2005). Translation, adaptation and validation of the Shoulder Rating Questionnaire (SRQ) into the Dutch language. Clin Rehabil, 19(3), 300–311.
49. Lippitt, S. B., Harryman, D. T., & Matsen, F. A. (1993). A practical tool for evaluating function: the Simple Shoulder Test. In The shoulder: a balance of mobility and stability (pp. 501–518). Rosemont: The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
50. van Kampen, D. A., van Beers, L. W. A. H., Scholtes, V. A. B., Terwee, C. B., & Willems, W. J. (2012). Validation of the Dutch version of the Simple Shoulder Test. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 21(6), 808–814.
51. Tashjian, R. Z., Deloach, J., Green, A., Porucznik, C. A., & Powell, A. P. (2010). Minimal clinically important differences in ASES and simple shoulder test scores after nonoperative treatment of rotator cuff disease. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 92(2), 296–303.
52. Mintken, P. E., Glynn, P., & Cleland, J. A. (2009). Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 18(6), 920–926.
53. Godfrey, J., Hamman, R., Lowenstein, S., Briggs, K., & Kocher, M. (2007). Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the simple shoulder test: Psychometric properties by age and injury type. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 16(3), 260–267.
54. Croft, P., Pope, D., Zonca, M., O’Neill, T., & Silman, A. (1994). Measurement of shoulder related disability: Results of a validation study. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 53(8), 525–528.
55. Terwee, C. B., Schellingerhout, J. M., Verhagen, A. P., Koes, B. W., & de Vet, H. C. (2011). Methodological quality of studies on the measurement properties of neck pain and disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 34(4), 261–272.
56. Wild, D., Eremenco, S., Mear, I., Martin, M., Houchin, C., Gawlicki, M., et al. (2009). Multinational trials-recommendations on the translations required, approaches to using the same language in different countries, and the approaches to support pooling the data: The ISPOR patient-reported outcomes translation and linguistic validation good research practices task force report. Value Health, 12(4), 430–440.
57. Reeve, B. B., Wyrwich, K. W., Wu, A. W., Velikova, G., Terwee, C. B., Snyder, C. F., et al. (2013). ISOQOL recommends minimum standards for patient-reported outcome measures used in patient-centered outcomes and comparative effectiveness research. Quality of Life Research, 22(8), 1889–1905.
58. Beaton, D. E., Wright, J. G., & Katz, J. N. (2005). Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 87(5), 1038–1046.
59. Beaton, D. E., Wright, J. G., & Katz, J. N. (2005). Development of the QuickDASH: Comparison of three item-reduction approaches. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 87A(5), 1038–1046.
60. Turner, R. R., Quittner, A. L., Parasuraman, B. M., Kallich, J. D., Cleeland, C. S., & Mayo, F. D. A. P.-R. O. C. M. G. (2007). Patient-reported outcomes: Instrument development and selection issues. Value Health, 10(Suppl 2), S86–S93.
61. Rose, M., Bjorner, J. B., Becker, J., Fries, J. F., & Ware, J. E. (2008). Evaluation of a preliminary physical function item bank supported the expected advantages of the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS). Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 61(1), 17–33.
62. Hays, R. D., Spritzer, K. L., Amtmann, D., Lai, J. S., Dewitt, E. M., Rothrock, N., et al. (2013). Upper-extremity and mobility subdomains from the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) adult physical functioning item bank. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 94(11), 2291–2296.
63. Cloke, D. J., Lynn, S. E., Watson, H., Steen, I. N., Purdy, S., & Williams, J. R. (2005). A comparison of functional, patient-based scores in subacromial impingement. Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 14(4), 380–384.
64. Fan, Z. J., Smith, C. K., & Silverstein, B. A. (2008). Assessing validity of the QuickDASH and SF-12 as surveillance tools among workers with neck or upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders. Journal of Hand Therapy, 21(4), 354–365.
65. Offenbacher, M., Ewert, T., Sangha, O., & Stucki, G. (2003). Validation of a German version of the ‘Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand’ questionnaire (DASH-G). Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 62(2), 168–177.
66. Alvarez-Nemegyei, J., Puerto-Ceballos, I., Guzman-Hau, W., Bassol-Perea, A., & Nuno-Gutierrez, B. L. (2005). Development of a Spanish-language version of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. J Clin Rheumatol, 11(4), 185–187.
67. Jeldi, A. J., Aseer, A. L., Dhandapani, A. G., & Roach, K. E. (2012). Cross-cultural adaption, reliability and validity of an Indian (Tamil) version for the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. Hong Kong Physiother J, 30(2), 99–104.