Walking tests for stroke survivors: A systematic review of their measurement properties

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 34, Issue 26, 2012, Pages 2207-2221

  Van Bloemendaal, Maijke ^a,b   Van De Water, Alexander T M ^c   Van De Port, Ingrid G L ^b,d,e  

^a Merem Rehabilitation centre De Trappenberg   (Netherlands)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c LA TROBE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d Rehabilitation Centre De Hoogstraat   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Measurement; Stroke; Walking

Indexed keywords

CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CHECKLIST; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREDICTIVE VALUE; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; SURVIVOR; WALKING;

CHECKLIST; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STROKE; SURVIVORS; WALKING;

EID: 84867814000     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3109/09638288.2012.680649     Document Type: Review

References (130)

1. Friedman PJ. Gait recovery after hemiplegic stroke. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:119-122.
2. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Recovery of walking function in stroke patients: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:27-32.
3. Van de Port I, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Community ambulation in patients with chronic stroke: How is it related to gait speed? J Rehabil Med 2008;40:23-27.
4. Maeda A, Yuasa T, Nakamura K, Higuchi S, Motohashi Y. Physical performance tests after stroke: Reliability and validity. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2000;79:519-525.
5. Wandel A, Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, Olsen TS. Prediction of walking function in stroke patients with initial lower extremity paralysis: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2000;81:736-738.
6. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK, Lindmark B. Exercise and health-related quality of life during the first year following acute stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj 2008;22:135-145.
7. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M. Community ambulation after stroke: How important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:234-239.
8. Lord SE, Rochester L. Measurement of community ambulation after stroke: Current status and future developments. Stroke 2005;36:1457-1461.
9. Van de Port I, Kwakkel G, Schepers VP, Lindeman E. Predicting mobility outcome one year after stroke: A prospective cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:218-223.
10. Fulk GD, Echternach JL, Nof L, O'Sullivan S. Clinometric properties of the six-minute walk test in individuals undergoing rehabilitation poststroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2008;24:195-204.
11. Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales. A practical guide to their development and use. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2008.
12. Mudge S, Stott NS. Outcome measures to assess walking ability following stroke: A systematic review of the literature. Physiotherapy 2007;93:189-200.
13. Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: A systematic review. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:1018-1033.
14. Tyson S, DeSouza L. The measurement of balance and walking post-stroke. Part 2: Functional performance tests. Phys Ther Rev 2002;7:187-191.
15. Tyson S, DeSouza L. A systematic review of methods to measure balance and walking post-stroke. Part 1: Ordinal scales. Phys Ther Rev 2002;7:173-186.
16. Terwee CB, Jansma EP, Riphagen II, de Vet HC. Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Qual Life Res 2009;18:1115-1123.
17. WHO-FIC Collaborating Centre in the Netherlands. Dutch translation of the international classification of functioning, disability and health. ICF. Bilthoven: Bohn Stafleu Van Loghum; 2007.
18. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: An international Delphi study. Qual Life Res 2010;19:539-549.
19. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: A clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:22.
20. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:737-745.
21. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33:159-174.
22. Chmura Kraemer H, Periyakoil VS, Noda A. Kappa coefficients in medical research. Stat Med 2002;21:2109-2129.
23. Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: The kappa statistic. Fam Med 2005;37:360-363.
24. Schellingerhout JM, Verhagen AP, Heymans MW, Koes BW, de Vet HC, Terwee CB. Measurement properties of disease-specific questionnaires in patients with neck pain: A systematic review. Qual Life Res 2012;21:659-670.
25. van der Leeden M, Steultjens MP, Terwee CB, Rosenbaum D, Turner D, Woodburn J, Dekker J. A systematic review of instruments measuring foot function, foot pain, and foot-related disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2008;59:1257-1269.
26. Herk IEv, Arendzen JH, Rispens P. Ten-metre walk, with or without a turn? Clin Rehabil 1998;12:30-35.
27. Eng JJ, Chu KS, Dawson AS, Kim CM, Hepburn KE. Functional walk tests in individuals with stroke: Relation to perceived exertion and myocardial exertion. Stroke 2002;33:756-761.
28. Collen FM, Wade DT, Bradshaw CM. Mobility after stroke: Reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:6-9.
29. Green J, Forster A, Young J. Reliability of gait speed measured by a timed walking test in patients one year after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2002;16:306-314.
30. Kosak M, Smith T. Comparison of the 2-, 6-, and 12-minute walk tests in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev 2005;42:103-107.
31. Van der Burgt GCM, Van Opstal M, Nelissen LH, Theunissen CTH, Lenssen AF. Reliability of the Trunk Control Test, Functional Ambulation Categories, and the 10-metre Timed Walking Test. Ned Tijdschr Fysiother 2005;115:154-157.
32. Roth EJ, Merbitz CT, Grip JC, Bogolub M, Mroczek K, Dugan S, Donadio K. The timer-logger-communicator gait monitor: Recording temporal gait parameters using a portable computerized device. Int Disabil Stud 1990;12:10-16.
33. Elsworth C, Dawes H, Winward C, Howells K, Collett J, Dennis A, Sackley C, Wade D. Pedometer step counts in individuals with neurological conditions. Clin Rehabil 2009;23:171-175.
34. Mehrholz J, Wagner K, Rutte K, Meissner D, Pohl M. Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1314-1319.
35. Hill KD, Goldie PA, Baker PA, Greenwood KM. Retest reliability of the temporal and distance characteristics of hemiplegic gait using a footswitch system. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:577-583.
36. Lin JH, Hsu MJ, Hsu HW, Wu HC, Hsieh CL. Psychometric comparisons of 3 functional ambulation measures for patients with stroke. Stroke 2010;41:2021-2025.
37. Flansbjer UB, Holmback AM, Downham D, Patten C, Lexell J. Reliability of gait performance tests in men and women with hemiparesis after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2005;37:75-82.
38. Eng JJ, Dawson AS, Chu KS. Submaximal exercise in persons with stroke: Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity with maximal oxygen consumption. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:113-118.
39. Taylor D, Stretton CM, Mudge S, Garrett N. Does clinic-measured gait speed differ from gait speed measured in the community in people with stroke? Clin Rehabil 2006;20:438-444.
40. Witte US, Carlsson JY. Self-selected walking speed in patients with hemiparesis after stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med 1997;29:161-165.
41. Macko RF, Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Coleman KL, Boone DA, Smith GV, Silver KH. Microprocessor-based ambulatory activity monitoring in stroke patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2002;34:394-399.
42. Mudge S, Stott NS, Walt SE. Criterion validity of the StepWatch Activity Monitor as a measure of walking activity in patients after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1710-1715.
43. Donovan K, Lord SE, McNaughton HK, Weatherall M. Mobility beyond the clinic: The effect of environment on gait and its measurement in community-ambulant stroke survivors. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:556-563.
44. Viosca E, Martinez JL, Almagro PL, Gracia A, Gonzalez C. Proposal and validation of a new functional ambulation classification scale for clinical use. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1234-1238.
45. Salbach NM, Mayo NE, Higgins J, Ahmed S, Finch LE, Richards CL. Responsiveness and predictability of gait speed and other disability measures in acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2001;82:1204-1212.
46. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Time dependency of walking classification in stroke. Phys Ther 2006;86:618-625.
47. de Vet HC, Terluin B, Knol DL, Roorda LD, Mokkink LB, Ostelo RW, Hendriks EJ, et al. Three ways to quantify uncertainty in individually applied "minimally important change" values. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:37-45.
48. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Dekker J, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Peat G, Jordan KP, Croft P, de Vet HC. Mind the MIC: Large variation among populations and methods. J Clin Epidemiol 2010;63:524-534.
49. Liu J, Drutz C, Kumar R, McVicar L, Weinberger R, Brooks D, Salbach NM. Use of the six-minute walk test poststroke: Is there a practice effect? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1686-1692.
50. Tyson SF. Measurement error in functional balance and mobility tests for people with stroke: What are the sources of error and what is the best way to minimize error? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2007;21:46-50.
51. English CK, Hillier SL, Stiller K, Warden-Flood A. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:52-55.
52. Fulk GD, Echternach JL. Test-retest reliability and minimal detectable change of gait speed in individuals undergoing rehabilitation after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther 2008;32:8-13.
53. Lam HS, Lau FW, Chan GK, Sykes K. The validity and reliability of a 6-Metre Timed Walk for the functional assessment of patients with stroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2010;26:251-255.
54. Evans MD, Goldie PA, Hill KD. Systematic and random error in repeated measurements of temporal and distance parameters of gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997;78:725-729.
55. Jonsdottir J, Cattaneo D. Reliability and validity of the dynamic gait index in persons with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2007;88:1410-1415.
56. Thieme H, Ritschel C, Zange C. Reliability and validity of the functional gait assessment (German version) in subacute stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:1565-1570.
57. Stephens JM, Goldie PA. Walking speed on parquetry and carpet after stroke: Effect of surface and retest reliability. Clin Rehabil 1999;13:171-181.
58. Guyatt GH, Pugsley SO, Sullivan MJ, Thompson PJ, Berman L, Jones NL, Fallen EL, Taylor DW. Effect of encouragement on walking test performance. Thorax 1984;39:818-822.
59. Dean CM, Richards CL, Malouin F. Walking speed over 10 metres overestimates locomotor capacity after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2001;15:415-421.
60. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Gibbons E, Stratford PW, Alonso J, Patrick DL, Knol DL, et al. Inter-rater agreement and reliability of the COSMIN (COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health status Measurement Instruments) checklist. BMC Med Res Methodol 2010;10:82.
61. Terwee CB, Roorda LD, Knol DL, De Boer MR, De Vet HC. Linking measurement error to minimal important change of patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 2009;62:1062-1067.
62. Baer GD, Smith MT, Rowe PJ, Masterton L. Establishing the reliability of Mobility Milestones as an outcome measure for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2003;84:977-981.
63. Baer HR, Wolf SL. Modified emory functional ambulation profile: An outcome measure for the rehabilitation of poststroke gait dysfunction. Stroke 2001;32:973-979.
64. Baldrige RB. Functional assessment of measurements. Neurol Rep 1993;17:3-10.
65. Botner EM, Miller WC, Eng JJ. Measurement properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2005;27:156-163.
66. Buzzelli S, Di Francesco L, Villani S, Giaquinto S. Gait in stabilized hemiplegic outpatients in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil 2003; 25:964-967.
67. Caty GD, Arnould C, Stoquart GG, Thonnard JL, Lejeune TM. ABILOCO: A Rasch-built 13-item questionnaire to assess locomotion ability in stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:284-290.
68. Daley K, Mayo N, Danys I, Cabot R, Wood-Dauphinee S. The Stroke Rehabilitation Assessment of Movement (STREAM): Refining and validating the content. Physiother Can 1997;49:269-278.
69. Buck D, Jacoby A, Massey A, Steen N, Sharma A, Ford GA. Development and validation of NEWSQOL, the Newcastle Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Measure. Cerebrovasc Dis 2004;17:143-152.
70. Desrosiers J, Rochette A, Corriveau H. Validation of a new lower-extremity motor coordination test. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:993-998.
71. Graf C. The Lawton instrumental activities of daily living scale. Am J Nurs 2008;108:52-62; quiz 62.
72. Hale LA, Pal J, Becker I. Measuring free-living physical activity in adults with and without neurologic dysfunction with a triaxial accelerometer. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:1765-1771.
73. Mercer VS, Freburger JK, Chang SH, Purser JL. Step Test scores are related to measures of activity and participation in the first 6 months after stroke. Phys Ther 2009;89:1061-1071.
74. Lincoln NB, Gladman Jr. The Extended Activities of Daily Living scale: A further validation. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:41-43.
75. Willemsen AT, Bloemhof F, Boom HB. Automatic stance-swing phase detection from accelerometer data for peroneal nerve stimulation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1990;37:1201-1208.
76. Hill KD, Bernhardt J, McGann AM, Maltese D, Berkovits D. A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: Reliability, validity and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiother Can. 1996;48:257-262.
77. Lindmark B, Hamrin E, Tornquist K. Testing daily functions poststroke with standardized practical equipment. Scand J Rehabil Med 1990;22:9-14.
78. Ozgirgin N, Bolukbasi N, Beyazova M, Orkun S. Kinematic gait analysis in hemiplegic patients. Scand J Rehabil Med 1993;25:51-55.
79. Kierkegaard M, Tollback A. Inter- And intra-rater reliability of the B. Lindmark motor assessment. Adv Physiother. 2005;7:2-6.
80. Linder A, Winkvist L, Nilsson L, Sernert N. Evaluation of the Swedish version of the Modified Elderly Mobility Scale (Swe M-EMS) in patients with acute stroke. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:584-597.
81. Liston RA, Brouwer BJ. Reliability and validity of measures obtained from stroke patients using the Balance Master. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996;77:425-430.
82. Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:615-619.
83. Malouin F, McFadyen B, Dion L, Richards CL. A fluidity scale for evaluating the motor strategy of the rise-to-walk task after stroke. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:674-684.
84. Owolabi MO, Platz T. Proposing the Stroke Levity Scale: A valid, reliable, simple, and time-saving measure of stroke severity. Eur J Neurol 2008;15:627-633.
85. Poissant L, Mayo NE, Wood-Dauphinee S, Clarke AE. The development and preliminary validation of a Preference-Based Stroke Index (PBSI). Health Qual Life Outcomes 2003;1:43.
86. Powell R, Johnston M, Johnston DW. Assessing walking limitations in stroke survivors: Are self-reports and proxy-reports interchangeable? Rehabil Psychol 2007;52:177-183.
87. Rand D, Eng JJ, Tang PF, Jeng JS, Hung C. How active are people with stroke?: use of accelerometers to assess physical activity. Stroke 2009;40:163-168.
88. Roques CF, Felez A, Marque P, Chatain M, Condouret J, Tuffery R. A motor scale for the hemiplegic patients' motor function assessment. Ann Readapt Med Phys 1997;40:147-158.
89. Simondson JA, Goldie P, Greenwood KM. The Mobility Scale for Acute Stroke Patients: Concurrent validity. Clin Rehabil 2003;17:558-564.
90. Stanko E, Goldie P, Nayler M. Development of a new mobility scale for people living in the community after stroke: Content validity. Aust J Physiother 2001;47:201-208.
91. Teixeira-Salmela LF, Devaraj R, Olney SJ. Validation of the human activity profile in stroke: A comparison of observed, proxy and self-reported scores. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1518-1524.
92. Thilmann A, Nachtmann A, Scharff A. [Neurological Reha-Score. An instrument to measure outcome and expenditure of neurologic rehabilitation]. Nervenarzt 2006;77:1456-1463.
93. Tooth LR, McKenna KT, Smith M, O'Rourke PK. Reliability of scores between stroke patients and significant others on the Reintegration to Normal Living (RNL) Index. Disabil Rehabil 2003;25:433-440.
94. Velozo CA, Magalhaes LC, Pan AW, Leiter P. Functional scale discrimination at admission and discharge: Rasch analysis of the Level of Rehabilitation Scale-III. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1995;76:705-712.
95. Rousseaux M, Beaucamp F, Wigneron G, Daveluy W. Validation of a comfort/discomfort scale for stroke patients. J Neurol 2009;256:S38.
96. Grootendorst P, Feeny D, Furlong W. Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Med Care 2000;38:290-299.
97. Engberg A, Garde B, Kreiner S. Rasch analysis in the development of a rating scale for assessment of mobility after stroke. Acta Neurol Scand 1995;91:118-127.
98. Edgar S, Swyka T, Fulk G, Sazonov ES. Wearable shoe-based device for rehabilitation of stroke patients. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010;2010:3772-3775.
99. Gray DB, Hollingsworth HH, Stark SL, Morgan KA. Participation survey/ mobility: Psychometric properties of a measure of participation for people with mobility impairments and limitations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:189-197.
100. Salter K, Jutai J, Foley N, Teasell R. Clinical Outcome Variables Scale: A retrospective validation study in patients after stroke. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:609-613.
101. Blennerhassett JM, Jayalath VM. The Four Square Step Test is a feasible and valid clinical test of dynamic standing balance for use in ambulant people poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2008;89:2156-2161.
102. Vartiainen MV, Savolainen S, Alaranta HT. Reliability and agreement in gait measurements among patients with brain injury. Adv Physiother 2009;11:22-29.
103. Miller PA, Moreland J, Stevenson TJ. Measurement properties of a standardized version of the two- minute walk test for individuals with neurological dysfunction. Physiother Can 2002;54:241.
104. Vos-Vromans DC, de Bie RA, Erdmann PG, van Meeteren NL. The responsiveness of the ten-meter walking test and other measures in patients with hemiparesis in the acute phase. Physiother Theory Pract 2005;21:173-180.
105. McIntosh L, Woronuk J, May L, Whitridge M, Elton G. Development of the Glenrose Ambulation Rating (GAR): Validity and inter-rater reliability. J Rehabil Outcomes Meas 1999;3:1-11.
106. Badke MB, Di Fabio RP, Leonard E, Margolis M, Franke T. Reliability of a functional mobility assessment tool with application to neurologically impaired patients: A preliminary report. Physiother Can 1993;45:15-20.
107. Volpato S, Cavalieri M, Guerra G, Sioulis F, Ranzini M, Maraldi C, Fellin R, Guralnik JM. Performance-based functional assessment in older hospitalized patients: Feasibility and clinical correlates. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 2008;63:1393-1398.
108. Roorda LD, Roebroeck ME, van Tilburg T, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM; Measuring Mobility Study Group. Measuring activity limitations in climbing stairs: Development of a hierarchical scale for patients with lower-extremity disorders living at home. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:967-971.
109. Roorda LD, Roebroeck ME, van Tilburg T, Molenaar IW, Lankhorst GJ, Bouter LM, Boonstra AM, et al.; Measuring Mobility Study Group. Measuring activity limitations in walking: Development of a hierarchical scale for patients with lower-extremity disorders who live at home. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:2277-2283.
110. Holden MK, Gill KM, Magliozzi MR, Nathan J, Piehl-Baker L. Clinical gait assessment in the neurologically impaired. Reliability and meaningfulness. Phys Ther 1984;64:35-40.
111. Sacks L, Yee K, Huijbregts M, Miller PA, Aggett T, Salbach NM. Validation of the activity inventory of the Chedoke-McMaster stroke assessment and the clinical outcome variables scale to evaluate mobility in geriatric clients. J Rehabil Med 2010;42:90-92.
112. Lord SE, Rochester L, Weatherall M, McPherson KM, McNaughton HK. The effect of environment and task on gait parameters after stroke: A randomized comparison of measurement conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:967-973.
113. Viosca E, Lafuente R, Martinez JL, Almagro PL, Gracia A, Gonzalez C. Walking recovery after an acute stroke: Assessment with a new functional classification and the Barthel Index. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2005;86:1239-1244.
114. Mehrholz J. Functional Ambulation Categories (FAC). Zeitschrift Physiother. 2007;59:1096-1104.
115. Tilson JK, Sullivan KJ, Cen SY, Rose DK, Koradia CH, Azen SP, Duncan PW; Locomotor Experience Applied Post Stroke (LEAPS) Investigative Team. Meaningful gait speed improvement during the first 60 days poststroke: Minimal clinically important difference. Phys Ther 2010;90:196-208.
116. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Longitudinal robustness of variables predicting independent gait following severe middle cerebral artery stroke: A prospective cohort study. Clin Rehabil 2006;20:262-268.
117. Kollen B, Kwakkel G, Lindeman E. Hemiplegic gait after stroke: Is measurement of maximum speed required? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2006;87:358-363.
118. Weir NU, Counsell CE, McDowall M, Gunkel A, Dennis MS. Reliability of the variables in a new set of models that predict outcome after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr 2003;74:447-451.
119. Kishimoto M, Yoshida T, Hayasaka T, Mori D, Imai Y, Matsuki N, Ishikawa T, Yamaguchi T. An internet-based wearable watch-over system for elderly and disabled utilizing EMG and accelerometer. Technol Health Care 2009;17:121-131.
120. Taylor D, Stretton C, Mudge S, Garrett N. Clinical performance of walking and 'real world' walking in people with stroke: Are they the same? Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1649-1650.
121. Giansanti D, Tiberi Y, Maccioni G. New wearable system for the step counting based on the codivilla-spring for daily activity monitoring in stroke rehabilitation. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2008;2008:4720-4723.
122. Giansanti D, Tiberi Y, Silvestri G, Maccioni G. New wearable system for step-counting telemonitoring and telerehabilitation based on the Codivilla spring. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:1096-1100.
123. Haeuber E, Shaughnessy M, Forrester LW, Coleman KL, Macko RF. Accelerometer monitoring of home- And community-based ambulatory activity after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2004;85:1997-2001.
124. Mudge S, Stott NS. Test-retest reliability of the StepWatch Activity Monitor outputs in individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil 2008;22:871-877.
125. Mudge S, Stott NS. Timed walking tests correlate with daily step activity in persons with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2009;90:296-301.
126. Mudge S, Stott S, Walt S. The validity of the STEPWATCH Activity Monitor as a measure of gait ability in individuals following stroke. Disabil Rehabil 2007;29:1655-1656.
127. Wade DT, Wood VA, Heller A, Maggs J, Langton Hewer R. Walking after stroke. Measurement and recovery over the first 3 months. Scand J Rehabil Med 1987;19:25-30.
128. Carvalho C, Sunnerhagen KS, Willen C. Walking speed and distance in different environments of subjects in the later stage post-stroke. Physiother Theory Pract 2010;26:519-527.
129. Bi SQ, Weng CS, Li M, Tian Z, Li BY, Yu ZZ. Objective evidence of walking functional recovery: Reliability and concurrent validity of comfortable and maximal gait speed test. Chin J Clin Rehabil 2004;8:6822-6823.
130. Garcia S, Cortes A, Viosca E, Escuder A, Gonzalez C, Querol M. Validation of the functional ambulation classification of the Hospital of Sagunto. Rehabilitacion 2010;44:53-59.