Reliability and validity of the Norwegian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2014, Pages

  Haldorsen, Benjamin ^a   Svege, Ida ^a,b   Roe, Yngve ^c   Bergland, Astrid ^c  

^a MARTINA HANSENS HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^c OSLO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Norway)

Author keywords

Construct validity; DASH; Internal consistency; Outcome measure; Shoulder impingement syndrome; Test retest reliability

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONSTRUCT VALIDITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DISABILITIES OF THE ARM, SHOULDER AND HAND (SCORE); FEMALE; HUMAN; INTERNAL CONSISTENCY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEASUREMENT ERROR; NUMERIC PAIN RATING SCALE; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SHORT FORM 36; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; VALIDITY;

ADULT; AGED; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; PAIN MEASUREMENT; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOULDER IMPINGEMENT SYNDROME; SOFTWARE; TRANSLATING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84898416763     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712474     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-78     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Bot SDM, Terwee CB, van der Windt DAWN, Bouter LM, Dekker J, de Vet HCW, Ann Rheum Dis 2004 63 335 341 10.1136/ard.2003.007724 15020324 (Pubitemid 38453296)
2. Measures of adult shoulder function: Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH) and its short version (QuickDASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) Society standardized shoulder assessment form, Constant (Murley) Score (CS), Simple Shoulder Test (SST), Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS), Shoulder Disability Questionnaire (SDQ), and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI). Angst F, Schwyzer HK, Aeschlimann A, Simmen BR, Goldhahn J, Arthritis Care Res 2011 63 Suppl 11 174 S188
3. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: The DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand). Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, Beaton D, Cole D, Davies A, Hawker G, Katz JN, Makela M, Marx RG, Punnett L, Wright J, Am J Ind Med 1996 29 602 608 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:6<602::AID- AJIM4>3.0.CO;2-L 8773720 (Pubitemid 26172396)
4. The DASH (Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand) Outcome Measure: What do we know about it now? Beaton DE, Davis AM, Hudak P, McConnell S, Br J Hand Ther 2001 6 109 118
5. Kennedy CA, Beaton DE, Solway S, McConnell S, Bombardier C, The DASH and QuickDASH Outcome Measure User's Manual Toronto, Ontario: Institute for Work & Health 3 2011
6. The DASH outcome measure website. http://www.dash.iwh.on.ca/
7. Measuring shoulder function: a systematic review of four questionnaires. Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Woodhouse LJ, Arthritis Care Res 2009 61 623 632 10.1002/art.24396
8. Shoulder disorders in general practice: incidence, patient characteristics, and management. Van der Windt DAWM, Koes BW, de Jong BA, Bouter LM, Ann Rheum Dis 1995 54 959 964 10.1136/ard.54.12.959 8546527
9. Accuracy of physical examination in subacromial impingement syndrome. Silva L, Andréu JL, Muñoz P, Pastrana M, Millán I, Sanz J, Barbadillo C, Fernández-Castro M, Rheumatology (Oxford) 2008 47 679 683 10.1093/rheumatology/ken101 18375403 (Pubitemid 351619212)
10. Current concepts review. Subacromial impingement syndrome. Bigliani LU, Levine WN, J Bone Joint Surg 1997 79 1854 1868 9409800 (Pubitemid 28016591)
11. Anatomical and biomechanical mechanisms of subacromial impingement syndrome. Michener LA, McClure PW, Karduna AR, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2003 18 369 379 10.1016/S0268-0033(03)00047-0 (Pubitemid 36583581)
12. The translation and cultural adaptation of patient-reported outcome measures. McKenna SP, Doward LC, Value Health 2005 8 89 91 10.1111/j.1524-4733. 2005.08203.x 15804316 (Pubitemid 40525369)
13. Impingement syndrome in athletes. Hawkins RJ, Kennedy JC, Am J Sports Med 1980 8 151 158 10.1177/036354658000800302 7377445 (Pubitemid 10058007)
14. Norwegian version of the DASH questionnaire for evaluation of the arm, shoulder and hand. Finsen V, Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 2008 128 1070 (In Norwegian) 18451890
15. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y, Arthritis Care Res 1991 4 143 149 10.1002/art.1790040403 11188601
16. Responsiveness of the shoulder pain and disability index in patients with adhesive capsulitis. Tveitå EK, Ekeberg OM, Juel NG, Bautz-Holter E, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008 9 161 10.1186/1471-2474-9-161 19055757
17. Agreement, reliability and validity in 3 shoulder questionnaires in patients with rotator cuff disease. Ekeberg OM, Bautz-Holter E, Tveitå EK, Keller A, Juel NG, Brox JI, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2008 9 68 10.1186/1471-2474-9-68 18482438 (Pubitemid 351793266)
18. SF-36.org. http://www.sf-36.org/
19. Translation and performance of the Norwegian SF-36 health survey in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. I. data quality, scaling assumptions, reliability, and construct validity. Loge JH, Kaasa S, Hjermstad MJ, Kvien TK, J Clin Epidemiol 1998 51 1069 1076 10.1016/S0895-4356(98)00098-5 9817124 (Pubitemid 28527162)
20. Studies with pain rating scales. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM, Wright V, Branco JA, Anderson JA, Ann Rheum Dis 1978 37 378 381 10.1136/ard.37.4.378 686873 (Pubitemid 9017965)
21. Psychometric properties of the shortened disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (QuickDASH) and Numeric Pain Rating Scale in patients with shoulder pain. Mintken PE, Glynn P, Cleland JA, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009 18 920 926 10.1016/j.jse.2008.12.015 19297202
22. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWN, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW, J Clin Epidemiol 2007 60 34 42 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.03.012 17161752 (Pubitemid 44856236)
23. Field AP, Discovering statistics using SPSS Los Angeles, [Calif.]; London: SAGE 2009
24. Fleiss JL, The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments New York: Wiley 1986
25. Quantifying test-retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the SEM. Weir JP, J Strength Cond Res 2005 19 231 15705040
26. Minimal changes in health status questionnaires: distinction between minimally detectable change and minimally important change. de Vet HC, Terwee CB, Ostelo RW, Beckerman H, Knol DL, Bouter LM, Health Qual Life Outcomes 2006 4 54 10.1186/1477-7525-4-54 16925807 (Pubitemid 44501757)
27. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Bland JM, Altman DG, Stat Meth Med Res 1999 8 135 160 10.1191/096228099673819272 (Pubitemid 29425900)
28. Rowntree D, Statistics without tears: a primer for non-mathematicians Boston: Allyn and Bacon 2004
29. Validation of a German version of the Disabilities of Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (DASH-G). Offenbächer M, Ewert T, Sangha O, Stucki G, Z Rheumatol 2003 62 168 177 10.1007/s00393-003-0461-7 12721705 (Pubitemid 36578824)
30. The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire. Atroshi I, Gummesson C, Andersson B, Dahlgren E, Johansson A, Acta Orthop Scand 2000 71 613 618 10.1080/000164700317362262 11145390
31. Translation into Greek, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire (DASH). Themistocleous GS, Goudelis G, Kyrou I, Chloros GD, Krokos A, Galanos A, Gerostathopoulos NE, Soucacos PN, J Hand Ther 2006 19 350 357 10.1197/j.jht.2006.04.014 16861133 (Pubitemid 44067408)
32. Methodological properties of six shoulder disability measures in patients with rheumatic diseases referred for shoulder surgery. Christie A, Hagen KB, Mowinckel P, Dagfinrud H, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009 18 89 95 10.1016/j.jse.2008.07.008 19095181
33. The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons outcomes instruments: normative values from the general population. Hunsaker FG, Cioffi DA, Amadio PC, Wright JG, Caughlin B, J Bone Joint Surg 2002 84 208 215 11861726 (Pubitemid 37127481)
34. The cross-cultural adaptation of the DASH questionnaire in Canadian French. Durand MJ, Vachon B, Hong QN, Loisel P, J Hand Ther 2005 18 34 39 10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.010 15674785 (Pubitemid 40128584)
35. Evaluation of the Chinese version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH-HKPWH): cross-cultural adaptation process, internal consistency and reliability study. Lee EWC, Lau JSY, Chung MMH, Li APS, Lo SK, J Hand Ther 2004 17 417 423 15538683
36. Italian version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) questionnaire. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Padua R, Padua L, Ceccarelli E, Romanini E, Zanoli G, Amadio PC, Campi A, J Hand Surg Br 2003 28 179 186 10.1016/S0266-7681(02)00303-0 12631494 (Pubitemid 36401702)
37. Validation of the Japanese Society for Surgery of the Hand version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand questionnaire. Imaeda T, Toh S, Nakao Y, Nishida J, Hirata H, Ijichi M, Kohri C, Nagano A, J Orthop Sci 2005 10 353 359 10.1007/s00776-005-0917-5 16075166 (Pubitemid 41264820)
38. Validation of the French version of the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (F-DASH). Fayad F, Lefevre-Colau MM, Macé Y, Fermanian J, Mayoux-Benhamou A, Roren A, Rannou F, Roby-Brami A, Gautheron V, Revel M, Poiraudeau S, Joint Bone Spine 2008 75 195 200 10.1016/j.jbspin.2007. 04.023 17983829 (Pubitemid 351418266)
39. Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, Askary-Ashtiani A, Karimi A, Khorsandi A, Mehdian H, Clin Rehabil 2008 22 749 757 10.1177/0269215508085821 18678575
40. Measuring the whole or the parts? Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand outcome measure in different regions of the upper extremity. Beaton DE, Katz JN, Fossel AH, Wright JG, Tarasuk V, Bombardier C, J Hand Ther 2001 14 128 142 10.1016/S0894-1130(01)80043-0 11382253
41. Translation into Brazilian Portuguese, cultural adaptation and evaluation of the reliability of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire. Orfale AG, Araújo PMP, Ferraz MB, Natour J, Braz J Med Biol Res 2005 38 293 10.1590/S0100-879X2005000200018 15785841
42. The reliability and validity of the disabilities of arm, shoulder, and hand, EuroQol-5D, health utilities index, and Short Form-6D outcome instruments in patients with proximal humeral fractures. Slobogean GP, Noonan VK, O'Brien PJ, J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010 19 342 348 10.1016/j.jse.2009.10.021 20189839
43. A comparison of two time intervals for test-retest reliability of health status instruments. Marx RG, Menezes A, Horovitz L, Jones EC, Warren RF, J Clin Epidemiol 2003 56 730 735 10.1016/S0895-4356(03)00084-2 12954464 (Pubitemid 37040808)
44. The minimal detectable change should not replace the minimal important difference. de Vet HCW, J Clin Epidemiol 2010 63 804 805 10.1016/j.jclinepi. 2009.12.015 20399609
45. Minimal change is sensitive, less specific to recovery: a diagnostic testing approach to interpretability. Beaton DE, van Eerd D, Smith P, van der Velde G, Cullen K, Kennedy CA, Hogg-Johnson S, J Clin Epidemiol 2011 64 487 496 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.012 21109396
46. A systematic review of measures of shoulder pain and functioning using the International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Roe Y, Soberg HL, Bautz-Holter E, Ostensjo S, BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2013 14 73 10.1186/1471-2474-14-73 23445557
47. Evaluation of the construct validity of the DASH questionnaire by correlation to the SF-36. SooHoo NF, McDonald AP, Seiler JG, McGillivary GR, J Hand Surg Am 2002 27 537 541 10.1053/jhsu.2002.32964 12015732 (Pubitemid 34522585)
48. Construct validity and reliability of the disability of arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire for upper extremity complaints in rheumatoid arthritis. Raven EEJ, Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, van Montfoort DO, Pöll RG, Blankevoort L, Tak PP, J Rheumatol 2008 35 2334 2338 10.3899/jrheum.080067 19004045
49. Construct validity of the Chinese version of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH-HKPWH). Lee EWC, Chung MMH, Li APS, Lo SK, J Hand Surg Br 2005 30 29 34 10.1016/j.jhsb.2004.09.010 15620488 (Pubitemid 40058051)
50. The DASH and the QuickDASH instruments. Normative values in the general population in Norway. Aasheim T, Finsen V, J Hand Surg Eur Vol 2014 39 140 144 10.1177/1753193413481302 23520389
51. Measuring levels of upper-extremity disability in employed adults using the DASH Questionnaire. Jester A, Harth A, Germann G, J Hand Surg Am 2005 30 1074 e1-1074.e10 16182070
52. Assessing physical function in adult acquired major upper-limb amputees by combining the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Outcome Questionnaire and clinical examination. Ostlie K, Franklin RJ, Skjeldal OH, Skrondal A, Magnus P, Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2011 92 1636 1645 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.04.019 21872841
53. The Western Ontario rotator cuff index in rotator cuff disease patients: a comprehensive reliability and responsiveness validation study. de Witte PB, Henseler JF, Nagels J, Vliet Vlieland TP, Nelissen RG, Am J Sports Med 2012 40 1611 1619 10.1177/0363546512446591 22582227
54. Upper limb motor strategies in persons with and without shoulder impingement syndrome across different speeds of movement. Roy JS, Moffet H, McFadyen BJ, Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 2008 23 1227 1236 10.1016/j. clinbiomech.2008.07.009
55. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, Alonso J, Stratford PW, Knol DL, Bouter LM, de Vet HC, J Clin Epidemiol 2010 63 737 745 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.02.006 20494804