A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder

Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 1997, Pages 738-748

  L'Insalata, John C ^a   Warren, Russell F ^b   Cohen B A, Steven B ^b   Altchek, David W ^b   Peterson, Margaret G E ^b  

^a Hospital for Special Surgery ^*  (United States)

^b HOSPITAL FOR SPECIAL SURGERY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIFE SATISFACTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RECREATION; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF EVALUATION; SHOULDER GIRDLE; SHOULDER PAIN; SPORT; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; WORK CAPACITY;

EID: 0031008615     PISSN: 00219355     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-199705000-00014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Beaton, D. E., and Richards, R. R.: Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross-sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 78-A: 882-890, June 1996.
2. Burstein, A. H., and Cohen, J.: Editorial. Measurements in the conduct of research. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 75-A: 319-320, March 1993.
3. Callaghan, J. J.; Dysart, S. H.; Savory, C. F.; and Hopkinson, W. J.: Assessing the results of hip replacement. A comparison of five different rating systems. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 72-B(6): 1008-1009, 1990.
4. Cohen, J.: Weighted kappa. Nominal scale agreement with provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol. Bull., 70: 213-220, 1968.
5. Cohen, J.: Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. New York, Academic Press, 1977.
6. Cronbach, L. J.: Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16: 297-334, 1951.
7. Epstein, A. M.: The outcomes movement - will it get us where we want to go? New England J. Med., 323: 266-270, 1990.
8. Feinstein, A. R.: Clinimetrics. New Haven, Connecticut, Yale University Press, 1987.
9. Gartland, J. J.: Orthopaedic clinical research. Deficiencies in experimental design and determinations of outcome. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 70-A: 1357-1364, Oct. 1988.
10. Gerber, C.: Integrated scoring systems for the functional assessment of the shoulder. In The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability, pp. 531-550. Edited by F. A. Matsen, III, F. H. Fu, and R. J. Hawkins. Rosemont, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1993.
11. Guyatt, G.; Walter, S.; and Norman, G.: Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J. Chronic Dis., 40: 171-178, 1987.
12. Johanson, N. A.; Charlson, M. E.; Szatrowski, T. P.; and Ranawat, C. S.: A self-administered hip-rating questionnaire for the assessment of outcome after total hip replacement. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 74-A: 587-597, April 1992.
13. Keller, R. B.: How outcomes research should be done. In The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability, pp. 487-499. Edited by F. A. Matsen, III, F. H. Fu, and R. J. Hawkins. Rosemont, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1993.
14. Koran, L. M.: The reliability of clinical methods, data and judgments. New England J. Med., 293: 642-646, 1975.
15. Lea, R. D., and Gerhardt, J. J.: Current concepts review. Range-of-motion measurements. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 77-A: 784-798, May 1995.
16. Levine, D. W.; Simmons, B. P.; Koris, M. J.; Daltroy, L. H.; Hohl, G. G.; Fossel, A. H.; and Katz, J. N.: A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 75-A: 1585-1592, Nov. 1993.
17. Liang, M. H.; Fossel, A. H.; and Larson, M. G.: Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med. Care, 28: 632-642, 1990.
18. Lirette, R.; Morin, F.; and Kinnard, P.: The difficulties in assessment of results of anterior acromioplasty. Clin. Orthop., 278: 14-16, 1992.
19. Meenan, R. F.; Mason, J. H.; Anderson, J. J.; Guccione, A. A.; and Kazis, L. E.: AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 35: 1-10, 1992.
20. Meenan, R. F.; Anderson, J. J.; Kazis, L. E.; Egger, M. J.; Altz-Smith, M.; Samuelson, C. O., Jr.; Willkens, R. F.; Solsky, M. A.; Hayes, S. P.; Blocka, K. L.; Weinstein, A.; Guttadauria, M.; Kaplan, S. B.; and Klippel, J.: Outcome assessment in clinical trials. Evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure. Arthrit. and Rheumat., 27: 1344-1352, 1984.
21. Miller, J. E.: Guidelines for selecting a health status index: suggested criteria. In Health Status Indexes, pp. 243-251. Edited by R. L. Berg. Chicago, Hospital Research and Education Trust, 1973.
22. Richards, R. R.; An, K. N.; Bigliani, L. U.; Friedman, R. J.; Gartsman, G. M.; Gristina, A. G.; Iannotti, J. P.; Mow, V. C.; Sidles, J. A.; and Zuckerman, J. D.: A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J. Shoulder and Elbow Surg., 3: 347-352, 1994.
23. Rodkey, W. G.; Noble, J. S.; and Hintermeister, R. A.: Laboratory methods of evaluating the shoulder: strength, range of motion, and stability. In The Shoulder: A Balance of Mobility and Stability, pp. 551-577. Edited by F. A. Matsen, III, F. H. Fu, and R. J. Hawkins. Rosemont, Illinois, The American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1993.
24. Romeo, A. A.; Bach, B. R., Jr.; and O'Halloran, K. L.: Scoring systems for shoulder conditions. Am. J. Sports Med., 24: 472-476, 1996.
25. Sapega, A. A.: Current concepts review. Muscle performance evaluation in orthopaedic practice. J. Bone and Joint Surg., 72-A: 1562-1574, Dec. 1990.