A comparison of four shoulder-specific questionnaires in primary care

Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases

Volumn 63, Issue 10, 2004, Pages 1293-1299

  Paul, A ^b   Lewis, M ^a   Shadforth, M F ^b   Croft, P R ^a   Van Der Windt, D A W M ^c   Hay, E M ^a,b  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b Staffordshire Rheumatology Centre   (United Kingdom)

^c VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DUTCH SHOULDER DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSICAL DISABILITY; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROC CURVE; SHOULDER PAIN; SHOULDER PAIN AND DISABILITY INDEX; SHOULDER RATING QUESTIONNAIRE; SPORT; UNITED KINGDOM SHOULDER DISABILITY QUESTIONNAIRE; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; WORK;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DISABILITY EVALUATION; FEMALE; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SHOULDER JOINT; SHOULDER PAIN;

EID: 4644252018     PISSN: 00034967     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ard.2003.012088     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Felson DT, Meenan RF, Dayno SJ, Gertman P. Referral of musculoskeletal disease patients by family and general practitioners. Arthritis Rheum 1985;28:1156-62.
2. Croft P. Measuring up to shoulder pain. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:65-6.
3. Green S, Buchbinder R, Glazier R, Forbes A. Systematic review of randomised controlled trials of interventions for painful shoulder: selection criteria, outcome assessment, and efficacy. BMJ 1998;316:354-60.
4. Michener LA, Leggin BG. A review of self-report scales for the assessment of functional limitation and disability of the shoulder. J Hand Ther 2001;14:68-76.
5. Roach KE, Budiman-Mak E, Songsiridej N, Lertratanakul Y. Development of a shoulder pain and disability index. Arthritis Care Res 1991;4:143-9.
6. Lippitt SB, Harryman DT, Matsen III FA. A practical tool for evaluating function: the simple shoulder test. In: Matsen III FA, Fu FH, Hawkins RJ, eds. The shoulder: a balance of mobilty and stability. Rosemont, Illinois: American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, 1993:501-18.
7. Croft P, Pope D, Zonca M, O'Neill T, Silman A. Measurement of shoulder related disability: results of a validation study. Ann Rheum Dis 1994;53:525-8.
8. Richards RR, An K-N, Bigliani LU, Friedman RJ, Gartsman GM, Gristina AG, et al. A standardized method for the assessment of shoulder function. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1994;3:347-52.
9. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about shoulder surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1996;78:593-600.
10. Kohn D, Geyer M. The subjective shoulder rating system. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1997;116:324-8.
11. L'lnsalata JC, Warren RF, Cohen SB, Altchek DW, Peterson MG. A self-administered questionnaire for assessment of symptoms and function of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1997;79:738-48.
12. van der Windt DAWM, van der Heijden GJ, de Winter AF, Koes BW, Deville W, Bouter LM. The responsiveness of the Shoulder Disability Questionnaire. Ann Rheum Dis 1998;57:82-7.
13. van der Heijden GJ, Leffers P, Bouter LM. Shoulder disability questionnaire design and responsiveness of a functional status measure. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:29-38.
14. de Winter AF. Diagnosis and classification of shoulder complaints. Amsterdam: EMGO Institute Press, 1999 (PhD thesis).
15. Pope DP, Croft PR, Pritchard CM, Silman AJ. Prevalence of shoulder pain in the community: the influence of case definition. Ann Rheum Dis 1997;56:308-12.
16. Williams JW Jr, Holleman DR Jr, Simel DL. easuring shoulder function with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index. J Rheumatol 1995;22:727-32.
17. Beaton DE, Richards RR. Measuring function of the shoulder. A cross sectional comparison of five questionnaires. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1996;78:882-90.
18. Beaton D, Richards RR. Assessing the reliability and responsiveness of 5 shoulder questionnaires. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998;7:565-72.
19. Heald SL, Riddle DL, Lamb RL. The shoulder pain and disability index: the construct validity and responsiveness of a region-specific disability measure. Phys Ther 1997;77:1079-89.
20. Roddey TS, Olson SL, Cook KF, Gartsman GM, Hanten W. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: single-administration reliability and validity. Phys Ther 2000;80:759-68.
21. Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A. Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 1998;316:736-41.
22. Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, Gladman DD. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol 2000;53:459-68.
23. Kazis LE, Anderson JJ, Meenan RF. Effect sizes for interpreting changes in health status. Med Care 1989;27(suppl 3):S178-89.
24. Liang MH, Fossel AH, Larson MG. Comparisons of five health status instruments for orthopedic evaluation. Med Care 1990;28:632-42.
25. Guyatt G, Walter S, Norman G. Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluative instruments. J Chronic Dis 1987;40:171-8.
26. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology 1982;143:29-36.
27. van der Schouw YT, Verbeek AL, Ruijs JH. RCC curves for the initial assessment of new diagnostic tests. Fam Pract 1992;9:506-11.
28. Jordan K. Statistical assessment of cervical spine and shoulder range of motion. Keele: Department of Health Planning and Management and Department of Mathematics, 2000 (PhD thesis).