Global multiple protein-protein interaction network alignment by combining pairwise network alignments

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 16, Issue 13, 2015, Pages

  Dohrmann, Jakob ^a   Puchin, Juris ^a   Singh, Rahul ^a,b  

^a SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b University of California at San Francisco   (United States)

Author keywords

Multiple network alignment; Pair wise network alignment; Protein protein interaction network

Indexed keywords

PROTEINS;

ANALYSIS TECHNIQUES; EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATIONS; MULTIPLE NETWORKS; NETWORK ALIGNMENTS; PAIRWISE ALIGNMENT; PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN-PROTEIN INTERACTION NETWORKS; TARGET IDENTIFICATION;

ALIGNMENT;

PROTEIN;

BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; PROTEIN INTERACTION MAPS; PROTEINS; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 84961575196     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-16-S13-S11     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Finley RL, Brent R: Interaction mating reveals binary and ternary connections between drosophila cell cycle regulators. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1994, 91 (26): 12980-12984. 10.1073/pnas.91.26.12980.
2. Bader GD, Hogue CW: Analyzing yeast protein-protein interaction data obtained from different sources. Nat Biotechnol. 2002, 20 (10): 991-997. 10.1038/nbt1002-991.
3. Ito T, Chiba T, Ozawa R, Yoshida M, Hattori M, et al: A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001, 98 (8): 4569-4574. 10.1073/pnas.061034498.
4. Mena F, Li J, Bray J, Collins S, Guo X, Ignatchenko A, et al: Global landscape of protein complexes in the yeast saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nature. 2006, 440 (7084): 637-643. 10.1038/nature04670.
5. Mann M, Aebersold R: Mass spectrometry-based proteomics. Nature. 2003, 422 (6928): 198-207. 10.1038/nature01511.
6. Han JD, Bertin N, Hao T, Goldberg DS, Berriz GF, Zhang LV, et al: Evidence for dynamically organized modularity in the yeast protein-protein interaction network. Nature. 2004, 430 (6995): 88-93. 10.1038/nature02555.
7. Nabieva E, Jim K, Agarwal A, Chazelle B, Singh M: Whole-proteome prediction of protein function via graph-theoretic analysis of interaction maps. Bioinformatics. 2005, 21 (suppl 1): i302-i310. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti1054.
8. Yook SH, Oltvai ZN, Barabasi AL: Functional and topological characterization of protein interaction networks. Proteomics. 2004, 4 (4): 928-942. 10.1002/pmic.200300636.
9. Goh CS, Cohen FE: Co-evolutionary analysis reveals insights into protein-protein interactions. J Mol Biol. 2002, 324 (1): 177-192. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01038-0.
10. Klingström T, Plewczynski D: Protein-protein interaction and pathway databases, a graphical review. Briefings in Bioinformatics. 2011, 12 (6): 702-713. 10.1093/bib/bbq064.
11. Kerrien S, Aranda B, Breuza L, Bridge A, Broackes-Carter F, Chen C, et al: The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2012. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40 (Database issue): D841-D846.
12. Stark C, Breitkreutz B, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M: Biogrid: A general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006, 34 (Database issue): D535-D539.
13. Jager S, Cimermancic P, Gulbahce N, Johnson J, McGovern K, Clarke SC, et al: Global landscape of hiv-human protein complexes. Nature. 2012, 481 (7381): 365-370.
14. Kuchaiev O, Pržulj N: Integrative network alignment reveals large regions of global network similarity in yeast and human. Bioinformatics. 2011, 27 (10): 1390-1396. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr127.
15. Flannick J, Novak A, Srinivasan BS, McAdams HH, Batzoglou S: Graemlin: General and robust alignment of multiple large interaction networks. Genome Res. 2006, 16 (9): 1169-1181. 10.1101/gr.5235706.
16. Kelley B, Sharan R, Karp R, Sittler T, Root D, Stockwell BR, et al: Conserved pathways within bacteria and yeast as revealed by global protein network alignment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003, 100 (20): 11394-11399. 10.1073/pnas.1534710100.
17. Dutkowski J, Tiuryn J: Identification of functional modules from conserved ancestral protein-protein interactions. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23 (13): i149-i158. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btm194.
18. Singh R, Xu J, Berger B: Global alignment of multiple protein interaction networks with application to functional orthology detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008, 105 (35): 12763-12768. 10.1073/pnas.0806627105.
19. Kacar B, Gaucher EA: Experimental evolution of protein-protein interaction networks. Biochem J. 2013, 453 (3): 311-319. 10.1042/BJ20130205.
20. Franzosa EA, Xia Y: Structural principles within the human-virus protein-protein interaction network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011, 108 (26): 10538-10543. 10.1073/pnas.1101440108.
21. Ideker T, Sharan R: Protein networks in disease. Genome Research. 2008, 18 (4): 644-652. 10.1101/gr.071852.107.
22. LaCount D, Schoenfeld L, Ota I, Kurschner C, Bell R, Hesselberth JR, et al: A protein interaction network of the malaria parasite plasmodium falciparum. Nature. 2005, 438 (7064): 103-107. 10.1038/nature04104.
23. Tekir SD, Ulgen KO: Systems biology of pathogen-host interaction: Networks of protein-protein interaction within pathogens and pathogen-human interactions in the post-genomic era. Biotechnology Journal. 2013, 8 (1): 85-96. 10.1002/biot.201200110.
24. Murali TM, Dyer MD, Badger D, Tyler BM, Katze MG: Network-Based Prediction and Analysis of HIV Dependency Factors. PLoS Computat Biol. 2011, 7 (9): e1002164-10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002164.
25. Papadimitriou C: Computational Complexity. 1995, Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
26. Aladag AE, Erten C: SPINAL: Scalable protein interaction network alignment. Bioinformatics. 2013, 29 (7): 917-924. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt071.
27. Phan HT, Sternberg MJ: PINALOG: a novel approach to align protein interaction networks--implications for complex detection and function prediction. Bioinformatics. 2012, 28 (9): 1239-1245. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts119.
28. Neyshabur B, Khadem A, Hashemifar S, Arab S: NETAL: A new graph-based method for global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks. Bioinformatics. 2013, 29 (13): 1654-1662. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt202.
29. Dobin A, Davis CA, Schlesinger F, Drenkow J, Zaleski C, Jha S, et al: STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner. Bioinformatics. 2013, 29 (1): 15-21. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.
30. Sahraeian SM, Yoon BJ: SMETANA: Accurate and scalable algorithm for probabilistic alignment of large-scale biological networks. PLoS One. 2013, 8 (7): e67995-e67911. 10.1371/journal.pone.0067995.
31. Liao C, Lu K, Baym M, Singh R, Berger B: IsoRankN: Spectral methods for global alignment of multiple protein networks. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (12): i253-i258. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp203.
32. Sharan R, Suthram S, Kelley R, Kuhn T, McCuine S, Uetz P, et al: Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005, 102 (6): 1974-1979. 10.1073/pnas.0409522102.
33. Koyuturk M, Kim Y, Topkara U, Subramaniam S, Szpankowski W, et al: Pairwise alignment of protein interaction networks. J Comput Biol. 2006, 13 (2): 182-199. 10.1089/cmb.2006.13.182.
34. Berg J, Lassig M: Cross-species analysis of biological networks by Bayesian alignment. PNAS. 2006, 103 (39): 10967-10972.
35. Narayanan M, Karp RM: Comparing protein interaction networks via a graph match-and-split algorithm. J Comput Biol. 2007, 14 (7): 892-907. 10.1089/cmb.2007.0025.
36. Cootes AP, Muggleton SH, Sternberg MJ: The identification of similarities between biological networks: Application to the metabolome and interactome. J Mol Biol. 2007, 369 (4): 1126-1139. 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.03.013.
37. Ciriello G, Mina M, Guzzi P, Cannataro M, Guerra C: AlignNemo: A local network alignment method to integrate homology and topology. PLoS One. 2012, 7 (6): e38107-e38113. 10.1371/journal.pone.0038107.
38. Flannick J, Novak A, Do C, Srinivasan BS, Batzoglou S: Automatic parameter learning for multiple local network alignment. J Comput Biol. 2009, 16 (8): 1001-1022. 10.1089/cmb.2009.0099.
39. Chindelevitch L, Liao CS, Berger B: Local optimization for global alignment of protein interaction networks. Pac Symp Biocomput. 2010, 123-
40. Kuchaiev O, Milenkovic T, Memisevic V, Hayes W, Przulj N: Topological network alignment uncovers biological function and phylogeny. J R Soc Interface. 2010, 7 (50): 1341-1354. 10.1098/rsif.2010.0063.
41. Memišević V, Pržulj N: C-GRAAL: common-neighbors-based global GRAph ALignment of biological networks. Integr Biol. 2012, 4 (7): 734-743. 10.1039/c2ib00140c.
42. Milenkovï T, Ng WL, Hayes W, Pržulj N: Optimal network alignment with graphlet degree vectors. Cancer Inform. 2010, 9: 121-137.
43. Zaslavskiy M, Bach F, Vert J: Global alignment of protein-protein interaction networks by graph matching methods. Bioinformatics. 2009, 25 (12): i259-1267. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp196.
44. Ay F, Kellis M, Kahveci T: SubMAP: Aligning metabolic pathways with subnetwork mappings. J Comput Biol. 2011, 18 (3): 219-235. 10.1089/cmb.2010.0280.
45. Orchard S, Ammari M, Aranda B, Breuza L, Briganti L, et al: The MIntAct project--IntAct as a common curation platform for 11 molecular interaction databases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42 (Database issue): D358-
46. Pržulj N: Biological Network Comparison using graphlet degree distribution. Bioinformatics. 2007, 23: e177-e183. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btl301.
47. Clark C, Kalita J: A comparison of algorithms for the pairwise alignment of biological networks. Bioinformatics. 2014, 30 (16): 2351-2359. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu307.
48. Schlicker A, Albrecht M: FunSimMat: a comprehensive functional similarity database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36 (Database issue): D434-D439.