Strategic orientation and information technological turbulence: Contingency perspective in SMEs

Business Process Management Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 368-382

  Pratono, Aluisius Hery ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURABAYA   (Indonesia)

^b UNIVERSITI UTARA MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Business strategy; Contingency theory; Information technology; Performance; Small enterprizes

Indexed keywords

EID: 84961574813     PISSN: 14637154     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/BPMJ-05-2015-0066     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alexy, O., George, G. and Salter, A. (2013), “Cui bono? The selective revealing of knowledge and its implications for innovative activity”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 270-290.
2. Barney, J. (1991), “Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage”, Journal of Management, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 99-120.
3. Bazemer, P.-J., Peij, S., Maasen, G. and van Halder, H. (2012), “The changing role of the supervisory board chairman: the case of the Netherlands (1997-2007)”, Journal of Management Governance, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 37-55.
4. Bell, R. and Martin, J. (2012), “The relevance of scientific management and equity theory in everyday managerial communication situations”, Journal of Management Policy and Practice, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 106-115.
5. Betta, M., Jones, R. and Latham, J. (2010), “Entrepreneurship and the innovative self: a schumpeterian reflection”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behaviour & Research, Vol. 16 No. 3, pp. 229-244.
6. Bradley, S., Wiklund, J. and Shepherd, D. (2011), “Swinging a double-edged sword: the effect of slack on entrepreneurial management and growth”, Journal of Business Venturing, Vol. 26 No. 5, pp. 537-554.
7. Bundy, J., Shropshire, C. and Buchholtz, A. (2013), “Strategic cognition and issue salience: toward an explanation of firm responsiveness to stakeholder concerns”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 352-376.
8. Cao, G., Wiengarten, F. and Humphreys, P. (2011), “Toward a contingency resource-based view of IT business value”, Systemic Practice and Action Research, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 85-106.
9. Chi, T. and Sun, Y. (2013), “Development of firm export market oriented behavior: evidence from an emerging economy”, International Business Review, Vol. 22 No. 1, pp. 339-350.
10. Covin, J. and Lumpkin, G. (2011), “Entrepreneurial orientation theory and research: reflection on a needed construct”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 36 No. 4, pp. 855-872.
11. Cui, A. (2013), “Portfolio dynamics and alliance termination: the contingent role of resource dissimilarity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 77 No. 5, pp. 15-32.
12. Didonet, S., Simmons, G., Díaz-Villavicencio, G. and Palmer, M. (2012), “Firms with capability to leverage substantial technological resources to come up innovation”, Marketing Inteligence & Planning, Vol. 30 No. 7, pp. 757-779.
13. Donaldson, L. (1995), American Anti-Management Theories of Organization: A Critique of Paradigm Proliferation, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
14. Eisenhardt, K. and Martin, J. (2000), “Dynamic capabilities: what are they?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21 Nos 10-11, pp. 1105-1121.
15. Gürbüz, G. and Aykol, S. (2009), “Entrepreneurial management, entrepreneurial orientation and Turkish small firm growth”, Management Research News, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 321-336.
16. Hair, J., Sarstendt, M., Ringle, C. and Mena, J. (2012), “An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation model in marketing research”, Journal of Academic Marketing Science, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 414-433.
17. Henseler, J., Ringle, C. and Sinkovics, R. (2009), “The use of partial least squares path modeling in international marketing”, in Sinkovics, R.R. and Ghauri, P.N. (Eds), New Challenges to International Marketing (Advances in International Marketing, Volume 20), Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 277-319.
18. Henseler, J. and Fassott, G. (2010), “Testing moderating effects in PLS path models: an illustration of available procedures”, in Esposito, V.V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J. and Wang, H. (Eds), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, Vol. II), Springer, New York, NY, pp. 713-735.
19. Homburg, C., Artz, M. and Wieseke, J. (2012), “Marketing performance measuremant systems: does comprehensiveness really improve performance?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 76 No. 5, pp. 56-77.
20. Huesch, M. (2013), “Are there always synergies between productive resources and resource deployment capabilities?”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34 No. 11, pp. 1288-1313.
21. Jääskelainen, A., Laihonen, H., Lönnqvist, A., Palvalin, M., Sillanpää, V. and Perkkola, S. (2012), “A contingency approach to performance measurement in service operations”, Measuring Business Excellence, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 43-52.
22. Johannesson, J. and Palona, I. (2010), “Environmental turbulence and success of firm’s intelligence strategy: development of research instruments”, International Journal of Management, Vol. 27 No. 3, pp. 448-458.
23. Kansikas, J., Laakkonen, A., Sarpo, V. and Kontinen, T. (2012), “Entrepreneurial leadership and familiness as resources for strategic entrepreneurship”, International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, Vol. 8 No. 2, pp. 141-158.
24. Kapoor, R. and Lee, J. (2013), “Coordinating and competing in ecosystems: how organizational forms shape new technology investment”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34 No. 3, pp. 274-296.
25. Klingebiel, R. and Rammer, C. (2014), “Resource allocation strategy for innovation portfolio management”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 246-268.
26. Krejcie, R. and Morgan, D. (1970), “Determining sample size for research activities”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, Vol. 30 No. 3, pp. 607-610.
27. Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R. and Leone, R. (2011), “Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing?”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 75 No. 1, pp. 16-30.
28. Kunc, M. and Morecroft, J. (2010), “Managerial decision making and firm performance under a resource-based paradigm”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 31 No. 11, pp. 1164-1182.
29. Li, Q., Smith, K., Tesluk, P. and Katila, R. (2013), “Top management attention to innovation: the role of search selection and intensity in new product introductions”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 56 No. 3, pp. 893-916.
30. Lim, D., Celly, N., Morse, E. and Rowe, G. (2013), “Rethinking the effectiveness of asset and cost retrenchment: the contingency effect of firm’s rent creation mechanism”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 42-61.
31. Linström, J. (2012), “A model to explain a business contingency process”, Disaster Prevention and Management, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 269-281.
32. Luo, X., Andrews, M., Song, Y. and Aspara, J. (2014), “Group-buying deal popularity”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 20-33.
33. McGrath, R. (2013), The End of Competitive Advantage, Harvard Business Review Press, Boston, MA.
34. Mintzberg, H. and Waters, J. (1985), “Of strategies, deliberate and emergent”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 257-272.
35. Park, R. and Kruse, D. (2014), “Group incentives and financial performance: the moderating role of innovation”, Human Resource Management Journal, Vol. 24 No. 1, pp. 77-94.
36. Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
37. Pheng, L. and Shang, G. (2011), “Bridging Western management theories and Japanese management practices: case of the Toyota way model”, Emerald Emerging Market Case Studies, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 1-20.
38. Pratono, A. and Mahmood, R. (2015), “Mediating effect of marketing capability and reward philosophy in the relationship between entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance”, Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Vol. 5 No. 5, pp. 1-12.
39. Puranam, P., Alexy, O. and Reitzig, M. (2014), “What’s ‘new’ about new forms of organizing?”, Academy of Management Review, Vol. 39 No. 2, pp. 162-180.
40. Risselada, H., Verhoef, P. and Bijmolt, T. (2014), “Dynamic effects of social influence and direct marketing onthe adoption of high-technology product”, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 78 No. 3, pp. 52-68.
41. Ruiz-Ortega, M., Parra-Requena, G., Rodrigo-Alarcón, J. and García-Villaverde, P. (2013), “Environmental dynamism and entrepreneurial orientation: the moderating role of firm’s capability”, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 26 No. 3, pp. 475-493.
42. Schilke, O. (2014), “On the contingent value of dynamic capabilities for competitive advantage: the nonlinear moderating effect of environmental dynamism”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 2, pp. 179-203.
43. Sheppard, R. and Radulovich, L. (2010), “Construction of a seasonal subjective performance instrument for a primary industry sector”, The Journal of Applied Business and Economics, Vol. 10 No. 4, pp. 48-63.
44. Sundqvist, S., Kyläheiko, K., Kuivalainen, O. and Cadogan, J. (2012), “Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurial-oriented behavior in turbulent export markets”, International Marketing Review, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 203-209.
45. Wang, M.-C. and Fang, S.-C. (2012), “The moderating effect of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between network structures and the innovative performance of a new venture”, Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, Vol. 27 No. 4, pp. 311-323.
46. Wiesner, R. and Millet, B. (2012), “Strategic approaches in Australian SMEs: deliberate or emergent?”, Journal of Management and Organization, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 98-122.
47. Wu, B., Wan, Z. and Levinthal, D. (2014), “Complementary assets as pipes and prisms: innovation incentives and trajectory choices”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 35 No. 9, pp. 1257-1278.
48. Zellweger, T. and Sieger, P. (2012), “Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms”, Small Business Economics, Vol. 38 No. 1, pp. 67-84.
49. Zhang, J. and Duan, Y. (2010), “The impact of different types of market orientation on product innovation performance”, Management Decision, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 849-867.
50. Zhao, X., Lynch, J. and Chen, Q. (2010), “Reconsidering Baron and Kenny: myths and truths about mediation analysis”, The Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 37 No. 2, pp. 197-206.
51. Pearson, A., Carr, J. and Shaw, J. (2008), “Toward a theory of familiness: a social capital perspective”, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Vol. 32 No. 6, pp. 949-969.
52. Wales, W., Gupta, V. and Moussa, F. (2011), “Empirical research on entrepreneurial orientation: an assessment and suggestions for future research”, International Small Business Journal, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 357-383.