ECM hydrogel for the treatment of stroke: Characterization of the host cell infiltrate

Biomaterials

Volumn 91, Issue , 2016, Pages 166-181

  Ghuman, Harmanvir ^a,b   Massensini, Andre R ^a,c,e   Donnelly, Julia ^a   Kim, Sung Min ^b   Medberry, Christopher J ^a,b   Badylak, Stephen F ^a,b,d   Modo, Michel ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

^b University of Pittsburgh   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF MINAS GERAIS   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Biomaterial; Brain; Delivery; Extracellular matrix; Hydrogel; Injection; Macrophage; Magnetic resonance imaging; Neural progenitor; Phenotypes; Stereotactic; Stroke

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIALS; BRAIN; HYDROGELS; INJECTION (OIL WELLS); MACROPHAGES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; TISSUE;

DELIVERY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; NEURAL PROGENITOR; PHENOTYPES; STEREOTACTIC; STROKE;

CYTOLOGY;

CD86 ANTIGEN; COLLAGEN TYPE 1; HYDROGEL;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; ASTROCYTOSIS; BRAIN CELL; CELL DENSITY; CELL INFILTRATION; CELL INVASION; CELL STRUCTURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDOTHELIUM CELL; EXPERIMENTAL STROKE; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; GELATION; HOST CELL; HYDROGEL; MACROPHAGE; MALE; MICROGLIA; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OLIGODENDROGLIA; PHENOTYPE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; TISSUE INJURY; ANIMAL; BRAIN; CHEMISTRY; CYTOLOGY; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; PATHOLOGY; PIG; SPRAGUE DAWLEY RAT; STROKE; THERAPEUTIC USE; TISSUE SCAFFOLD; TRANSPLANTATION;

ANIMALS; BRAIN; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; HYDROGEL; INFARCTION, MIDDLE CEREBRAL ARTERY; MACROPHAGES; MALE; MICROGLIA; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; STROKE; SWINE; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

EID: 84961566684     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2016.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Mozaffarian D., Benjamin E.J., Go A.S., Arnett D.K., Blaha M.J., Cushman M., et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2015 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015, 131:e29-e322.
2. Cumberland Consensus Working G, Cheeran B., Cohen L., Dobkin B., Ford G., Greenwood R., et al. The future of restorative neurosciences in stroke: driving the translational research pipeline from basic science to rehabilitation of people after stroke. Neurorehabil. Neural Repair 2009, 23:97-107.
3. Dalise S., Ambrosio F., Modo M. Brain plasticity and recovery in preclinical models of stroke. Arch. Ital. Biol. 2014, 152:190-215.
4. Modo M., Ambrosio F., Friedlander R.M., Badylak S.F., Wechsler L.R. Bioengineering solutions for neural repair and recovery in stroke. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2013, 26:626-631.
5. Smith E.J., Stroemer R.P., Gorenkova N., Nakajima M., Crum W.R., Tang E., et al. Implantation site and lesion topology determine efficacy of a human neural stem cell line in a rat model of chronic stroke. Stem Cells 2012, 30:785-796.
6. Encarnacion A., Horie N., Keren-Gill H., Bliss T.M., Steinberg G.K., Shamloo M. Long-term behavioral assessment of function in an experimental model for ischemic stroke. J. Neurosci. Methods 2011, 196:247-257.
7. Moreau F., Patel S., Lauzon M.L., McCreary C.R., Goyal M., Frayne R., et al. Cavitation after acute symptomatic lacunar stroke depends on time, location, and MRI sequence. Stroke - J. Cereb. Circ. 2012, 43:1837-1842.
8. Park K.I., Teng Y.D., Snyder E.Y. The injured brain interacts reciprocally with neural stem cells supported by scaffolds to reconstitute lost tissue. Nat. Biotechnol. 2002, 20:1111-1117.
9. Bible E., Chau D.Y., Alexander M.R., Price J., Shakesheff K.M., Modo M. The support of neural stem cells transplanted into stroke-induced brain cavities by PLGA particles. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2985-2994.
10. Bible E., Dell'Acqua F., Solanky B., Balducci A., Crapo P.M., Badylak S.F., et al. Non-invasive imaging of transplanted human neural stem cells and ECM scaffold remodeling in the stroke-damaged rat brain by (19)F- and diffusion-MRI. Biomaterials 2012, 33:2858-2871.
11. Duncan K., Gonzales-Portillo G.S., Acosta S.A., Kaneko Y., Borlongan C.V., Tajiri N. Stem cell-paved biobridges facilitate stem transplant and host brain cell interactions for stroke therapy. Brain Res. 2015, 1623:160-165.
12. Bonnans C., Chou J., Werb Z. Remodelling the extracellular matrix in development and disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15:786-801.
13. Medberry C.J., Crapo P.M., Siu B.F., Carruthers C.A., Wolf M.T., Nagarkar S.P., et al. Hydrogels derived from central nervous system extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2013, 34:1033-1040.
14. Crapo P.M., Tottey S., Slivka P.F., Badylak S.F. Effects of biologic scaffolds on human stem cells and implications for CNS tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. A 2014, 20:313-323.
15. Badylak S.F. Decellularized allogeneic and xenogeneic tissue as a bioscaffold for regenerative medicine: factors that influence the host response. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 42:1517-1527.
16. Brown B.N., Sicari B.M., Badylak S.F. Rethinking regenerative medicine: a macrophage-centered approach. Front. Immunol. 2014, 5:510.
17. Sicari B.M., Dziki J.L., Siu B.F., Medberry C.J., Dearth C.L., Badylak S.F. The promotion of a constructive macrophage phenotype by solubilized extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2014, 35:8605-8612.
18. Dearth C.L., Slivka P.F., Stewart S.A., Keane T.J., Tay J.K., Londono R., et al. Inhibition of COX1/2 alters the host response and reduces ECM scaffold mediated constructive tissue remodeling in a rodent model of skeletal muscle injury. Acta Biomater. 2016, 31:50-60.
19. Piterina A.V., Cloonan A.J., Meaney C.L., Davis L.M., Callanan A., Walsh M.T., et al. ECM-based materials in cardiovascular applications: inherent healing potential and augmentation of native regenerative processes. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2009, 10:4375-4417.
20. Agrawal V., Johnson S.A., Reing J., Zhang L., Tottey S., Wang G., et al. Epimorphic regeneration approach to tissue replacement in adult mammals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:3351-3355.
21. Beattie A.J., Gilbert T.W., Guyot J.P., Yates A.J., Badylak S.F. Chemoattraction of progenitor cells by remodeling extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng. A 2009, 15:1119-1125.
22. Massensini A.R., Ghuman H., Saldin L.T., Medberry C.J., Keane T.J., Nicholls F.J., et al. Concentration-dependent rheological properties of ECM hydrogel for intracerebral delivery to a stroke cavity. Acta Biomater. 2015, 27:116-130.
23. Bible E., Chau D.Y., Alexander M.R., Price J., Shakesheff K.M., Modo M. Attachment of stem cells to scaffold particles for intra-cerebral transplantation. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:1440-1453.
24. Freytes D.O., Martin J., Velankar S.S., Lee A.S., Badylak S.F. Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials 2008, 29:1630-1637.
25. Saha K., Keung A.J., Irwin E.F., Li Y., Little L., Schaffer D.V., et al. Substrate modulus directs neural stem cell behavior. Biophys. J. 2008, 95:4426-4438.
26. Aurand E.R., Wagner J.L., Shandas R., Bjugstad K.B. Hydrogel formulation determines cell fate of fetal and adult neural progenitor cells. Stem Cell Res. 2014, 12:11-23.
27. Banerjee A., Arha M., Choudhary S., Ashton R.S., Bhatia S.R., Schaffer D.V., et al. The influence of hydrogel modulus on the proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated neural stem cells. Biomaterials 2009, 30:4695-4699.
28. Farnebo S., Woon C.Y., Schmitt T., Joubert L.M., Kim M., Pham H., et al. Design and characterization of an injectable tendon hydrogel: a novel scaffold for guided tissue regeneration in the musculoskeletal system. Tissue Eng. A 2014, 20:1550-1561.
29. Crapo P.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3233-3243.
30. Marcal H., Ahmed T., Badylak S.F., Tottey S., Foster L.J. A comprehensive protein expression profile of extracellular matrix biomaterial derived from porcine urinary bladder. Regen. Med. 2012, 7:159-166.
31. Crapo P.M., Medberry C.J., Reing J.E., Tottey S., van der Merwe Y., Jones K.E., et al. Biologic scaffolds composed of central nervous system extracellular matrix. Biomaterials 2012, 33:3539-3547.
32. Taylor Z., Miller K. Reassessment of brain elasticity for analysis of biomechanisms of hydrocephalus. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1263-1269.
33. Aurand E.R., Wagner J., Lanning C., Bjugstad K.B. Building biocompatible hydrogels for tissue engineering of the brain and spinal cord. J. Funct. Biomater. 2012, 3:839-863.
34. Gefen A., Margulies S.S. Are in vivo and in situ brain tissues mechanically similar?. J. Biomech. 2004, 37:1339-1352.
35. Modo M., Stroemer R.P., Tang E., Veizovic T., Sowniski P., Hodges H. Neurological sequelae and long-term behavioural assessment of rats with transient middle cerebral artery occlusion. J. Neurosci. Methods 2000, 104:99-109.
36. Modo M. Long-term survival and serial assessment of stroke damage and recovery - practical and methodological considerations. J. Exp. Stroke Transl. Med. 2009, 2:52-68.
37. Stille M., Smith E.J., Crum W.R., Modo M. 3D reconstruction of 2D fluorescence histology images and registration with in vivo MR images: application in a rodent stroke model. J. Neurosci. Methods 2013, 219:27-40.
38. Ashioti M., Beech J.S., Lowe A.S., Hesselink M.B., Modo M., Williams S.C. Multi-modal characterisation of the neocortical clip model of focal cerebral ischaemia by MRI, behaviour and immunohistochemistry. Brain Res. 2007, 1145:177-189.
39. Rossetti T., Nicholls F., Modo M. Intra-cerebral cell implantation: preparation and characterization of cell suspensions. Cell Transplant. May 2016, PMID: 26720923.
40. Ito D., Tanaka K., Suzuki S., Dembo T., Fukuuchi Y. Enhanced expression of Iba1, ionized calcium-binding adapter molecule 1, after transient focal cerebral ischemia in rat brain. Stroke - J. Cereb. Circ. 2001, 32:1208-1215.
41. Aurand E.R., Lampe K.J., Bjugstad K.B. Defining and designing polymers and hydrogels for neural tissue engineering. Neurosci. Res. 2012, 72:199-213.
42. Simona B.R., Hirt L., Demko L., Zambelli T., Voros J., Ehrbar M., et al. Density gradients at hydrogel interfaces for enhanced cell penetration. Biomater. Sci. 2015, 3:586-591.
43. Bjugstad K.B., Lampe K., Kern D.S., Mahoney M. Biocompatibility of poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels in the brain: an analysis of the glial response across space and time. J. Biomed. Mater Res. A 2010, 95:79-91.
44. Fournier E., Passirani C., Montero-Menei C.N., Benoit J.P. Biocompatibility of implantable synthetic polymeric drug carriers: focus on brain biocompatibility. Biomaterials 2003, 24:3311-3331.
45. Ma Y., Wang J., Wang Y., Yang G.Y. The biphasic function of microglia in ischemic stroke. Prog. Neurobiol. 2016, PMID: 26851161.
46. Mauney J.R., Adam R.M. Dynamic reciprocity in cell-scaffold interactions. Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 2015, 82-83:77-85.
47. Bracher M., Bezuidenhout D., Lutolf M.P., Franz T., Sun M., Zilla P., et al. Cell specific ingrowth hydrogels. Biomaterials 2013, 34:6797-6803.
48. Plantman S. Proregenerative properties of ECM molecules. Biomed. Res. Int. 2013, 2013:981695.
49. Meng F.W., Slivka P.F., Dearth C.L., Badylak S.F. Solubilized extracellular matrix from brain and urinary bladder elicits distinct functional and phenotypic responses in macrophages. Biomaterials 2015, 46:131-140.
50. Hosseini Y., Agah M., Verbridge S.S. Endothelial cell sensing, restructuring, and invasion in collagen hydrogel structures. Integr. Biol. Camb. 2015, 7:1432-1441.
51. Blakney A.K., Swartzlander M.D., Bryant S.J. The effects of substrate stiffness on the in vitro activation of macrophages and in vivo host response to poly(ethylene glycol)-based hydrogels. J. Biomed. Mater Res. A 2012, 100:1375-1386.
52. Wolf M.T., Dearth C.L., Ranallo C.A., LoPresti S.T., Carey L.E., Daly K.A., et al. Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh. Biomaterials 2014, 35:6838-6849.
53. Keane T.J., Londono R., Turner N.J., Badylak S.F. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials 2012, 33:1771-1781.
54. Mokarram N., Merchant A., Mukhatyar V., Patel G., Bellamkonda R.V. Effect of modulating macrophage phenotype on peripheral nerve repair. Biomaterials 2012, 33:8793-8801.
55. Brown B.N., Valentin J.E., Stewart-Akers A.M., McCabe G.P., Badylak S.F. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1482-1491.
56. Roll L., Faissner A. Influence of the extracellular matrix on endogenous and transplanted stem cells after brain damage. Front. Cell Neurosci. 2014, 8:219.
57. Stabenfeldt S.E., Munglani G., Garcia A.J., LaPlaca M.C. Biomimetic microenvironment modulates neural stem cell survival, migration, and differentiation. Tissue Eng. A 2010, 16:3747-3758.
58. Tate M.C., Shear D.A., Hoffman S.W., Stein D.G., Archer D.R., LaPlaca M.C. Fibronectin promotes survival and migration of primary neural stem cells transplanted into the traumatically injured mouse brain. Cell Transplant. 2002, 11:283-295.
59. Hsiao T.W., Tresco P.A., Hlady V. Astrocytes alignment and reactivity on collagen hydrogels patterned with ECM proteins. Biomaterials 2015, 39:124-130.
60. Macaya D.J., Hayakawa K., Arai K., Spector M. Astrocyte infiltration into injectable collagen-based hydrogels containing FGF-2 to treat spinal cord injury. Biomaterials 2013, 34:3591-3602.
61. Georges P.C., Miller W.J., Meaney D.F., Sawyer E.S., Janmey P.A. Matrices with compliance comparable to that of brain tissue select neuronal over glial growth in mixed cortical cultures. Biophys. J. 2006, 90:3012-3018.
62. Leipzig N.D., Shoichet M.S. The effect of substrate stiffness on adult neural stem cell behavior. Biomaterials 2009, 30:6867-6878.