Biologic scaffolds composed of central nervous system extracellular matrix

Biomaterials

Volumn 33, Issue 13, 2012, Pages 3539-3547

  Crapo, Peter M ^a   Medberry, Christopher J ^a   Reing, Janet E ^a   Tottey, Stephen ^a   van der Merwe, Yolandi ^a   Jones, Kristen E ^a   Badylak, Stephen F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH   (United States)

Author keywords

Central nervous system; Decellularization; Extracellular matrix; Regenerative medicine; Scaffolds; Tissue engineering

Indexed keywords

CELL PHENOTYPE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEMS; CHEMOATTRACTANTS; CONCENTRATION RANGES; DECELLULARIZATION; DECELLULARIZED; EXTRACELLULAR MATRICES; FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY; GROWTH FACTOR; IN-VITRO; MUSCLE TISSUES; NEURAL TISSUE; OPTIC NERVE; PC12 CELLS; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SPINAL CORDS; TISSUE TYPES; URINARY BLADDER;

CELL CULTURE; EYE PROTECTION; HISTOLOGY; MAMMALS; MUSCLE; SCAFFOLDS; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

SCAFFOLDS (BIOLOGY);

FIBROBLAST GROWTH FACTOR 2; MOLECULAR SCAFFOLD; NERVE GROWTH FACTOR; VASCULOTROPIN;

ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BLADDER; BRAIN; BRAIN TISSUE; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; IN VITRO STUDY; INHIBITION KINETICS; LIVER REGENERATION; LUNG; NEURAL CREST; NONHUMAN; OPTIC NERVE; PHENOTYPE; PHEOCHROMOCYTOMA; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REGENERATIVE MEDICINE; SPINAL CORD; SWINE; TISSUE ENGINEERING;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; CELL DEATH; CELL DIFFERENTIATION; CELL SURVIVAL; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM; CHEMOTAXIS; DNA; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX; EXTRACELLULAR MATRIX PROTEINS; HUMANS; INTERCELLULAR SIGNALING PEPTIDES AND PROTEINS; MITOGENS; PC12 CELLS; RATS; SUS SCROFA; TISSUE SCAFFOLDS;

MAMMALIA; SUS;

EID: 84857445186     PISSN: 01429612     EISSN: 18785905     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2012.01.044     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Calve S., Odelberg S.J., Simon H.G. A transitional extracellular matrix instructs cell behavior during muscle regeneration. Dev Biol 2010, 344:259-271.
2. Vorotnikova E., McIntosh D., Dewilde A., Zhang J., Reing J.E., Zhang L., et al. Extracellular matrix-derived products modulate endothelial and progenitor cell migration and proliferation in vitro and stimulate regenerative healing in vivo. Matrix Biol 2010, 29:690-700.
3. Cortiella J., Niles J., Cantu A., Brettler A., Pham A., Vargas G., et al. Influence of acellular natural lung matrix on murine embryonic stem cell differentiation and tissue formation. Tissue Eng Part A 2010, 16:2565-2580.
4. Ott H.C., Clippinger B., Conrad C., Schuetz C., Pomerantseva I., Ikonomou L., et al. Regeneration and orthotopic transplantation of a bioartificial lung. Nat Med 2010, 16:927-933.
5. Zhang Y., He Y., Bharadwaj S., Hammam N., Carnagey K., Myers R., et al. Tissue-specific extracellular matrix coatings for the promotion of cell proliferation and maintenance of cell phenotype. Biomaterials 2009, 30:4021-4028.
6. Sellaro T.L., Ravindra A.K., Stolz D.B., Badylak S.F. Maintenance of hepatic sinusoidal endothelial cell phenotype in vitro using organ-specific extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007, 13:2301-2310.
7. Lin P., Chan W.C., Badylak S.F., Bhatia S.N. Assessing porcine liver-derived biomatrix for hepatic tissue engineering. Tissue Eng 2004, 10:1046-1053.
8. Wicha M.S., Lowrie G., Kohn E., Bagavandoss P., Mahn T. Extracellular matrix promotes mammary epithelial growth and differentiation in vitro. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1982, 79:3213-3217.
9. Nelson C.M., Bissell M.J. Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2006, 22:287-309.
10. Gassmann P., Enns A., Haier J. Role of tumor cell adhesion and migration in organ-specific metastasis formation. Onkologie 2004, 27:577-582.
11. Bissell M.J., Radisky D.C., Rizki A., Weaver V.M., Petersen O.W. The organizing principle: microenvironmental influences in the normal and malignant breast. Differentiation 2002, 70:537-546.
12. Barkan D., Green J.E., Chambers A.F. Extracellular matrix: a gatekeeper in the transition from dormancy to metastatic growth. Eur J Cancer 2010, 46:1181-1188.
13. Bonneh-Barkay D., Wiley C.A. Brain extracellular matrix in neurodegeneration. Brain Pathol 2009, 19:573-585.
14. Wainwright J.M., Hashizume R., Fujimoto K.L., Remlinger N.T., Pesyna C., Wagner W.R., et al. Right ventricular outflow tract repair with a cardiac biologic scaffold. Cells Tissues Organs 2012, 195:159-170.
15. Quarti A., Nardone S., Colaneri M., Santoro G., Pozzi M. Preliminary experience in the use of an extracellular matrix to repair congenital heart disases. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg 2011, 13:569-572.
16. Singelyn J.M., DeQuach J.A., Seif-Naraghi S.B., Littlefield R.B., Schup-Magoffin P.J., Christman K.L. Naturally derived myocardial matrix as an injectable scaffold for cardiac tissue engineering. Biomaterials 2009, 30:5409-5416.
17. O'Connor R.C., Harding J.N., Steinberg G.D. Novel modification of partial nephrectomy technique using porcine small intestine submucosa. Urology 2002, 60:906-909.
18. Palminteri E., Berdondini E., Colombo F., Austoni E. Small intestinal submucosa (SIS) graft urethroplasty: short-term results. Eur Urol 2007, 51:1695-1701. discussion 1701.
19. Badylak S.F., Kropp B., McPherson T., Liang H., Snyder P.W. Small intestinal submucosa: a rapidly resorbed bioscaffold for augmentation cystoplasty in a dog model. Tissue Eng 1998, 4:379-387.
20. Butler C.E., Langstein H.N., Kronowitz S.J. Pelvic, abdominal, and chest wall reconstruction with AlloDerm in patients at increased risk for mesh-related complications. Plast Reconstr Surg 2005, 116:1263-1275. discussion 1276-1277.
21. Mase V.J., Hsu J.R., Wolf S.E., Wenke J.C., Baer D.G., Owens J., et al. Clinical application of an acellular biologic scaffold for surgical repair of a large, traumatic quadriceps femoris muscle defect. Orthopedics 2010, 33:511.
22. Turner N.J., Yates A.J., Weber D.J., Qureshi I.R., Stolz D.B., Gilbert T.W., et al. Xenogeneic extracellular matrix as an inductive scaffold for regeneration of a functioning musculotendinous junction. Tissue Eng Part A 2010, 16:3309-3317.
23. Badylak S.F., Hoppo T., Nieponice A., Gilbert T.W., Davison J.M., Jobe B.A. Esophageal preservation in five male patients after endoscopic inner-layer circumferential resection in the setting of superficial cancer: a regenerative medicine approach with a biologic scaffold. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:1643-1650.
24. Karabekmez F.E., Duymaz A., Moran S.L. Early clinical outcomes with the use of decellularized nerve allograft for repair of sensory defects within the hand. Hand (N Y) 2009, 4:245-249.
25. Bejjani G.K., Zabramski J. Safety and efficacy of the porcine small intestinal submucosa dural substitute: results of a prospective multicenter study and literature review. J Neurosurg 2007, 106:1028-1033.
26. Haq I., Cruz-Almeida Y., Siqueira E.B., Norenberg M., Green B.A., Levi A.D. Postoperative fibrosis after surgical treatment of the porcine spinal cord: a comparison of dural substitutes. Invited submission from the Joint Section Meeting on Disorders of the Spine and Peripheral Nerves, March 2004. J Neurosurg Spine 2005, 2:50-54.
27. Ribatti D., Conconi M.T., Nico B., Baiguera S., Corsi P., Parnigotto P.P., et al. Angiogenic response induced by acellular brain scaffolds grafted onto the chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane. Brain Res 2003, 989:9-15.
28. Guo S.Z., Ren X.J., Wu B., Jiang T. Preparation of the acellular scaffold of the spinal cord and the study of biocompatibility. Spinal Cord 2010, 48:576-581.
29. DeQuach J.A., Yuan S.H., Goldstein L.S., Christman K.L. Decellularized porcine brain matrix for cell culture and tissue engineering scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:2583-2592.
30. Stern M.M., Myers R.L., Hammam N., Stern K.A., Eberli D., Kritchevsky S.B., et al. The influence of extracellular matrix derived from skeletal muscle tissue on the proliferation and differentiation of myogenic progenitor cells ex vivo. Biomaterials 2009, 30:2393-2399.
31. Crapo P.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3233-3243.
32. Freytes D.O., Stoner R.M., Badylak S.F. Uniaxial and biaxial properties of terminally sterilized porcine urinary bladder matrix scaffolds. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2008, 84:408-414.
33. Freytes D.O., Tullius R.S., Valentin J.E., Stewart-Akers A.M., Badylak S.F. Hydrated versus lyophilized forms of porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder. J Biomed Mater Res A 2008, 87:862-872.
34. Freytes D.O., Tullius R.S., Badylak S.F. Effect of storage upon material properties of lyophilized porcine extracellular matrix derived from the urinary bladder. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2006, 78:327-333.
35. Keane T.J., Londono R., Turner N.J., Badylak S.F. Consequences of ineffective decellularization of biologic scaffolds on the host response. Biomaterials 2012, 33:1771-1781.
36. Brown B.N., Valentin J.E., Stewart-Akers A.M., McCabe G.P., Badylak S.F. Macrophage phenotype and remodeling outcomes in response to biologic scaffolds with and without a cellular component. Biomaterials 2009, 30:1482-1491.
37. Valentin J.E., Stewart-Akers A.M., Gilbert T.W., Badylak S.F. Macrophage participation in the degradation and remodeling of extracellular matrix scaffolds. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:1687-1694.
38. Ishii K.J., Akira S. Innate immune recognition of, and regulation by, DNA. Trends Immunol 2006, 27:525-532.
39. Gilbert T.W., Freund J.M., Badylak S.F. Quantification of DNA in biologic scaffold materials. J Surg Res 2009, 152:135-139.
40. Goto N. Discriminative staining methods for the nervous system: luxol fast blue-periodic acid-Schiff-hematoxylin triple stain and subsidiary staining methods. Stain Technol 1987, 62:305-315.
41. Reing J.E., Brown B.N., Daly K.A., Freund J.M., Gilbert T.W., Hsiong S.X., et al. The effects of processing methods upon mechanical and biologic properties of porcine dermal extracellular matrix scaffolds. Biomaterials 2010, 31:8626-8633.
42. Reing J.E., Zhang L., Myers-Irvin J., Cordero K.E., Freytes D.O., Heber-Katz E., et al. Degradation products of extracellular matrix affect cell migration and proliferation. Tissue Eng Part A 2009, 15:605-614.
43. Greene L.A., Tischler A.S. Establishment of a noradrenergic clonal line of rat adrenal pheochromocytoma cells which respond to nerve growth factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1976, 73:2424-2428.
44. Rydel R.E., Greene L.A. Acidic and basic fibroblast growth factors promote stable neurite outgrowth and neuronal differentiation in cultures of PC12 cells. J Neurosci 1987, 7:3639-3653.
45. Santos S.D., Verveer P.J., Bastiaens P.I. Growth factor-induced MAPK network topology shapes Erk response determining PC-12 cell fate. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9:324-330.
46. Hall F.L., Fernyhough P., Ishii D.N., Vulliet P.R. Suppression of nerve growth factor-directed neurite outgrowth in PC12 cells by sphingosine, an inhibitor of protein kinase C. J Biol Chem 1988, 263:4460-4466.
47. Allan G., Krakowka S., Ellis J., Charreyre C. Discovery and evolving history of two genetically related but phenotypically different viruses, porcine circoviruses 1 and 2. Virus Res 2012, Available from: URL. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21945213.
48. Mankertz A., Persson F., Mankertz J., Blaess G., Buhk H.J. Mapping and characterization of the origin of DNA replication of porcine circovirus. J Virol 1997, 71:2562-2566.
49. Paul P.S., Halbur P., Janke B., Joo H., Nawagitgul P., Singh J., et al. Exogenous porcine viruses. Curr Top Microbiol Immunol 2003, 278:125-183.
50. Zeev-Brann A.B., Lazarov-Spiegler O., Brenner T., Schwartz M. Differential effects of central and peripheral nerves on macrophages and microglia. Glia 1998, 23:181-190.
51. Lazarov-Spiegler O., Solomon A.S., Schwartz M. Peripheral nerve-stimulated macrophages simulate a peripheral nerve-like regenerative response in rat transected optic nerve. Glia 1998, 24:329-337.
52. Vijayraghavan S., Wang M., Birnbaum S.G., Williams G.V., Arnsten A.F. Inverted-U dopamine D1 receptor actions on prefrontal neurons engaged in working memory. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:376-384.
53. Mendes F.A., Onofre G.R., Silva L.C., Cavalcante L.A., Garcia-Abreu J. Concentration-dependent actions of glial chondroitin sulfate on the neuritic growth of midbrain neurons. Brain Res Dev Brain Res 2003, 142:111-119.
54. Endeman D., Kamermans M. Cones perform a non-linear transformation on natural stimuli. J Physiol 2010, 588:435-446.
55. Agrawal V., Tottey S., Johnson S.A., Freund J.M., Siu B.F., Badylak S.F. Recruitment of progenitor cells by an extracellular matrix cryptic peptide in a mouse model of digit amputation. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:2435-2443.
56. Tottey S., Corselli M., Jeffries E.M., Londono R., Peault B., Badylak S.F. Extracellular matrix degradation products and low-oxygen conditions enhance the regenerative potential of perivascular stem cells. Tissue Eng Part A 2011, 17:37-44.
57. Freytes D.O., Martin J., Velankar S.S., Lee A.S., Badylak S.F. Preparation and rheological characterization of a gel form of the porcine urinary bladder matrix. Biomaterials 2008, 29:1630-1637.
58. Hong Y., Huber A., Takanari K., Amoroso N.J., Hashizume R., Badylak S.F., et al. Mechanical properties and in vivo behavior of a biodegradable synthetic polymer microfiber-extracellular matrix hydrogel biohybrid scaffold. Biomaterials 2011, 32:3387-3394.