Understanding the design context for Australian university teachers: Implications for the future of learning design

Learning, Media and Technology

Volumn 36, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 151-167

  Bennett, Sue ^a   Thomas, Lisa ^a   Agostinho, Shirley ^a   Lockyer, Lori ^a   Jones, Jennifer ^a   Harper, Barry ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

Author keywords

Higher education; Learning design; University teaching

Indexed keywords

EID: 79957603228     PISSN: 17439884     EISSN: 17439892     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17439884.2011.553622     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Agostinho, S. 2009. Learning design representations to document, model, and share teaching practice. In Handbook of research of learning design and learning objects: Issues, applications, and technologies, ed. L. Lockyer, S. Bennett, S. Agostinho, and B. Harper, 1-19. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
2. Ballantyne, R., J. Bain, and J. Packer. 1999. Researching university teaching in Australia: Themes and issues in academics' reflections. Studies in Higher Education 24, no. 2: 237-257.
3. Bennett, S., S. Agostinho, and L. Lockyer. 2005. Reusable learning designs in university education. In Proceedings of the IASTED International Conference on Education and Technology, ed. T.C. Montgomerie and J.R. Parker, 102-106. Anaheim, CA: ACTA Press.
4. Bennett, S., S. Agostinho, L. Lockyer, L. Kosta, J. Jones, R. Koper, and B. Harper. 2007. Learning designs: Bridging the gap between theory and practice. In Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Australasian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education, ed. R. Atkinson, C. McBeath, S.K.A. Soong, and C. Cheers, 51-60. Singapore: Ascilite.
5. Derntl, M., and L. Botturi. 2006. Essential use cases for pedagogical patterns. Computer Science Education 16, no. 2: 137-156.
6. Fincher, S., and I. Utting. 2002. Pedagogical patterns: Their place in the genre. SIGCSE Bulletin 34, no. 3: 199-202. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/637610.544482 (accessed February 19, 2010).
7. Goodyear, P., G. Salmon, M. Spector, C. Steeples, and S. Tickner. 2001. Competencies of online teaching: A special report. Educational Technology Research and Development 49, no. 1: 65-72.
8. Hernández-Leo, D., E. Villasclaras-Fernández, J. Asensio-Pérez, Y. Dimitriadis, M. Iván, I. Ruiz-Requies, and B. Rubia-Avi. 2006. COLLAGE: A collaborative learning design editor based on patterns. Educational Technology and Society 9, no. 1: 58-71.
9. Jones, J., S. Bennett, and L. Lockyer. 2009. Investigating lecturers' use of learning designs to support technology enhanced course design. In Proceedings of world conference on e-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2009, ed. T. Bastiaens, 2719-2725. Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
10. Kane, R., S. Sandretto, and C. Heath. 2002. Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research 72, no. 2: 177-228.
11. Kember, D. 1997. A reconceptualisation of the research into university academics' conceptions of teaching. Learning and Instruction 7, no. 3: 255-275.
12. McAndrew, P., P. Goodyear, and J. Dalziel. 2006. Patterns, designs and activities: Unifying descriptions of learning structures. International Journal of Learning Technology 2, nos. 2-3: 216-242.
13. Trigwell, K., and M. Prosser. 2004. Development and use of the approaches to teaching inventory. Educational Psychology Review 16, no. 4: 409-424.