Who, What, When, and Where: Revisiting the influences of transit mode share

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2537, Issue , 2015, Pages 42-51

  Legrain, Alexander ^a   Buliung, Ron ^b   El Geneidy, Ahmed M ^a  

^a MCGILL UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DAILY FLUCTUATIONS; HAMILTONS; PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION; TIME-PERIODS; TORONTO; TRANSIT RIDERSHIPS; TRANSIT SERVICES; TRANSIT SYSTEMS; TRANSIT USE; TRANSPORTATION AGENCIES;

EMPLOYMENT;

EID: 84961150262     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2537-05     Document Type: Review

References (49)

1. Limtanakool, N., M. Dijst, and T. Schwanen. The Influence of Socio-economic Characteristics, Land Use, and Travel Time Considerations on Mode Choice for Medium- and Longer-Distance Trips. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 14, 2006, pp. 327-341.
2. Moniruzzaman, M., and A. Paez. Accessibility to Transit, by Transit, and Mode Share: Application of a Logistic Model with Spatial Filters. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 24, 2004, pp. 198-205.
3. Foth, N., K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy. Determinants of Mode Share over Time: How Changing Transport System Affects Transit Use in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2417, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2014, pp. 67-77.
4. Giuliano, G. Low Income, Public Transit, and Mobility. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1927, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 63-70.
5. Mercado, R., A. Paez, S. Farber, M. Roorda, and C. Morency. Explaining Transport Mode Use of Low-Income Persons for Journey to Work in Urban Areas: A Case Study of Ontario and Quebec. Transportmetrica, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2012, pp. 157-179.
6. Roorda, M., A. Paez, C. Morency, R. Mercado, and S. Farber. Trip Generation of Vulnerable Populations in Three Canadian Cities: A Spatial Ordered Probit Approach. Transportation, Vol. 37, 2005, pp. 525-548.
7. Vasconcellos, E. Transport Metabolism, Social Diversity and Equity: The Case of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 13, 2005, pp. 329-339.
8. Bento, A., M. Cropper, A. Mobarak, and K. Vinha. The Effects of Urban Spatial Structure on Travel Demand in the United States. Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 87, No. 3, 2005, pp. 466-478.
9. Hine, J. Transport Disadvantage and Social Exclusion in Urban Scotland. Built Environment, Vol. 30, No. 2, 2004, pp. 161-171.
10. Garrett, M., and B. Taylor. Reconsidering Social Equity in Public Transit. Berkley Planning Journal, Vol. 13, 1999, pp. 6-27.
11. Polzin, S. E., X. Chu, and J. R. Rey. Density and Captivity in Public Transit Success: Observations from 1995 Nationwide Personal Transportation Survey. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1735, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 10-18.
12. Blumenberg, E., and D. B. Hess. Measuring the Role of Transportation in Facilitating Welfare-to-Work Transition: Evidence from Three California Counties. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1859, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 93-101.
13. Glaeser, E., M. Kahn, and M. Rappaport. Why Do the Poor Live in Cities? The Role of Public Transportation. Journal of Urban Economics, Vol. 63, No. 1, 2006, pp. 1-24.
14. Hess, D. Access to Employment for Adults in Poverty in the Buffalo-Niagara Region. Urban Studies, Vol. 42, No. 7, 2005, pp. 1177-1200.
15. Foth, N., K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy. Towards Equitable Transit: Examining Transit Accessibility and Social Need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006. Journal of Transportation Geography, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 1-10.
16. Indicators of Well-Being in Canada. Employment and Social Development Canada, Government of Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. http://www4.hrsdc.gc.ca/.3ndic.1t.4r@-eng.jsp?iid=16. Accessed July 31, 2014.
17. Liu, C., and G. Painter. Travel Behaviour Among Latino Immigrants: The Role of Ethnic Concentration and Ethnic Employment. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2011, pp. 62-80.
18. Taylor, B., D. Miller, H. Iseki, and C. Fink. Nature and/or Nurture? Analyzing the Determinants of Transit Ridership Across US Urbanized Areas. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 43, 2009, pp. 60-77.
19. Study: Immigrants in Canada's Urban Centres. The Daily, Wed., Aug. 18, 2004. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/daily-quotidien/050601/dq050601a-eng.htm.
20. Luffman, J. Measuring Housing Affordability. Perspectives on Labour and Income, Vol. 7, No. 1, 2006. http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/75-001-x/11106/9519-eng.htm.
21. Foth, N., K. Manaugh, and A. M. El-Geneidy. Towards Equitable Transit: Examining Transit Accessibility and Social Need in Toronto, Canada, 1996-2006. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 1-10.
22. Cao, X., P. Mokhtarian, and S. Handy. Examining the Impacts of Residential Self-selection on Travel Behaviour: A Focus on Empirical Findings. Transport Reviews, Vol. 29, No. 3, 2009, pp. 359-395.
23. Cervero, R., and K. Kockelman. Travel Demand and the 3Ds: Density, Diversity, and Design. Transportation Research Part D, Vol. 2, No. 3, 1997, pp. 199-219.
24. Ewing, R., and R. Cervero. Travel and the Built Environment. Journal of the American Planning Association, Vol. 76, No. 3, 2010, pp. 265-294.
25. Crowley, D. F., A. S. Shalaby, and H. Zarei. Access Walking Distance, Transit Use, and Transit-Oriented Development in North York City Center, Toronto, Canada. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2110, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2009, pp. 96-105.
26. Kawabata, M. Spatiotemporal Dimensions of Modal Accessibility Disparity in Boston and San Francisco. Environment and Planning A, Vol. 41, 2009, pp. 183-198.
27. Geurs, K., and B. Van Wee. Accessibility Evaluation of Land-Use and Transport Strategies: Review and Research Directions. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 12, 2004, pp. 127-140.
28. Polzin, S. E., R. M. Pendyala, and S. Navari. Development of Time-of-Day-Based Transit Accessibility Analysis Tool. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1799, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 35-41.
29. Niemeier, D. A. Accessibility: An Evaluation Using Consumer Welfare. Transportation, Vol. 24, 1997, pp. 377-396.
30. Moos, M., and A. Skaburskis. Workplace Restructuring and Urban Form: The Changing National Settlement Patterns of the Canadian Workforce. Journal of Urban Affairs, Vol. 32, No. 1, 2009, pp. 25-53.
31. Government of Canada. Job Bank: Wage Report, Toronto CMA. http://www.jobbank.gc.ca/LMI-report-area.do?reportOption=wage&PROVINCE-ID=35&GEOAREA-CD=9219&selectLocation=Continue. Accessed June 1, 2014.
32. Wang, F. Job Proximity and Accessibility for Workers of Various Wage Groups. Urban Geography, Vol. 24, No. 3, 2003, pp. 253-271.
33. Farber, S., M. Z. Morang, and M. J. Widener. Temporal Variability in Transit-Based Accessibility to Supermarkets. Applied Geography, Vol. 53, 2014, pp. 149-159.
34. Dill, J., M. A. Schlossberg, L. Ma, and C. Meyer. Predicting Transit Ridership at Stop Level: Role of Service and Urban Form. Presented at 92nd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2013.
35. Mavoa, S., K. Witten, T. McCreanor, and D. O'Sullivan. GIS-Based Destination Accessibility via Public Transit and Walking in Auckland, New Zealand. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 20, 2012, pp. 15-22.
36. Lei, T. L., Y. Chen, and K. G. Goulias. Opportunity-Based Dynamic Transit Accessibility in Southern California: Measurement, Findings, and Comparison with Automobile Accessibility. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2276, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2012, pp. 26-37.
37. Fan, Y., A. Guthrie, and D. Levinson. Impact of Light-Rail Implementation on Labor Market Accessibility: A Transportation Equity Perspective. Journal of Transportation and Land Use, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2012, pp. 28-39.
38. Owen, A., and D. M. Levinson. Modeling the Commute Mode Share of Transit Using Continuous Accessibility to Jobs. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
39. Keil, R. Governance Restructuring in Los Angeles and Toronto: Amalgamation or Secession? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 24, No. 4, 2000, pp. 758-780.
40. Census Metropolitan Area of Hamilton, Ontario. In Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2011.
41. Census Metropolitan Area of Toronto, Ontario. In Focus on Geography Series, 2011 Census, Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2011.
42. Mackenzie, H., and J. Stanford. A Living Wage for Toronto. Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, Ottawa, Ontario, 2008.
43. 2011 National Household Survey. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2011.
44. National Household Survey User Guide. Statistics Canada, Ottawa, Ontario, 2011.
45. Levinson, D., and A. M. El-Geneidy. The Minimum Circuity Frontier and the Journey to Work. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 39, No. 6, 2009, pp. 732-738.
46. O'Sullivan, S., and J. Morrall. Walking Distances to and from Light-Rail Transit Stations. In Transportation Research Record 1538, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 19-26.
47. Hansen, W. How Accessibility Shapes Land Use. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, Vol. 25, No. 2, 1959, pp. 73-76.
48. OpenTripPlanner. http://www.opentripplanner.org. Accessed July 30, 2014.
49. Metrolinx. The Big Move: Transforming Transportation in the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area. Greater Toronto Transportation Authority (Metrolinx), Toronto, Ontario, 2008.