Spatiotemporal dimensions of modal accessibility disparity in Boston and San Francisco

Environment and Planning A

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 183-198

  Kawabata, Mizuki ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCESSIBILITY; CAR USE; COMMUTING; GIS; METROPOLITAN AREA; PUBLIC TRANSPORT; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BOSTON; CALIFORNIA; MASSACHUSETTS; NORTH AMERICA; SAN FRANCISCO; UNITED STATES;

EID: 65949099523     PISSN: 0308518X     EISSN: 14723409     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1068/a4068     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. AASHTO, 2002, "Census Transportation Planning Package (CTPP) 2000: profiles for United States", American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, http://ctpp.transportation.org/home/us.htm
2. Banister D, 2002 Transport Planning 2nd edition (Spon, London)
3. Banister D, 2005 Unsustainable Transport: City Transport in the New Century (Routledge, London)
4. BART, 2007, "BART - line schedules", Bay Area Rapid Transit, http://www.bart.gov/stations/schedules/lineSchedules.asp
5. Bento A M, Cropper M L, Mobarak A M, Vinha K, 2005, "The effects of urban spatial structure on travel demand in the United States" The Review of Economics and Statistics 87 466-478
6. Blumenberg E, 2004, "En-gendering effective planning: spatial mismatch, low-income women, and transportation policy" Journal of the American Planning Association 70 269-281
7. Blumenberg E, Hess DB, 2003, "Measuring the role of transportation in facilitating welfare-to-work transition: evidence from three California counties" Transportation Research Record number 1859, 93-101
8. BTS, 2002 National Transportation Statistics 2002 Bureau of Transportation Statistics, US Department of Transportation, Washington, DC
9. Cervero R, Rood T, Appleyard B, 1999, "Tracking accessibility: employment and housing opportunities in the San Francisco Bay Area" Environment and Planning A 31 1259-1278
10. Davis S C, Diegel S W, 2006 Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 25 Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN
11. Geurs K T, van Wee B, 2004, "Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: review and research directions" Journal of Transport Geography 12 127-140
12. Geurs K T, van Wee B, Rietveld P, 2006, "Accessibility appraisal of integrated land-use - transport strategies: methodology and case study for the Netherlands Randstad area" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 639-660
13. Giuliano G,Horn BE, Kato H, Kii M, Kobayashi Y, Mignot D, Miyamoto K,Okada A, Sperling D, 2004, "The urban transport system", in Urban Transport and the Environment: An International Perspective World Conference on Transport Research Society, Institute for Transport Policy Studies (Elsevier, Oxford) pp 37-98
14. Handy S, 2002, "Accessibility- vs. mobility-enhancing strategies for addressing automobile dependence in the US", prepared for the European Conference of Ministers of Transport, Paris, http://www.vedavis.edu/faculty/handy/ECMT_report.pdf
15. Handy S L, Niemeier DA, 1997,"Measuring accessibility: an exploration of issues and alternatives" Environment and Planning A 29 1175-1194
16. Harris B, 2001, "Accessibility: concepts and applications" Journal of Transportation and Statistics 4(2/3) 15-30
17. Hess D B, 2005, "Access to employment for adults in poverty in the Buffalo - Niagara region" Urban Studies 42 1177-1200
18. Kawabata M, Shen Q, 2006, "Job accessibility as an indicator of auto-oriented urban structure: a comparison of Boston and Los Angeles with Tokyo" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 33 115-130
19. Kawabata M, Shen Q, 2007, "Commuting inequality between cars and public transit: the case of the San Francisco Bay Area, 1990-2000" Urban Studies 44 1759-1780
20. Kenworthy J R, Laube F B, Newman P, Barter P A, Raad T, Poboon C, Guia B Jr, 1999 An International Sourcebook of Automobile Dependence in Cities, 1960-1990 (University Press of Colorado, Boulder, CO)
21. Kwok R C W,Yeh A G O, 2004, "The use of modal accessibility gap as an indicator for sustainable transport development" Environment and Planning A 36 921-936
22. MBTA, 2007, "Commuter rail maps and schedules", Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority, http://www.mbta.com/ schedules_and_maps/rail/
23. MTC, 2002, "Workers by means of transportation to work - 1960 - 2000", Metropolitan Transportation Commission, http://www.mtc.ca.gov/maps and data/datamart/census/dp234/ Means19602000.htm
24. MTC, 2004, "Commuting to downtown highlights", Metropolitan Transportation Commission, http:/www.mtc.ca.gov/maps_and_data/datamart/ census/ctpp2000/
25. MTC, Caltrans District 4, 2002 Bay Area Transportation: State of the System 2002 Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Caltrans District 4, Oakland, CA
26. Morris J M, Dumble P L, Wigan M R, 1979, "Accessibility indicators for transport planning" Transportation Research A 13 91-109
27. Reschovsky C, 2004 Journey to Work: 2000 US Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistical Administration, US Census Bureau, http://www.census.gov/prod/2004pubs/c2kbr-33.pdf
28. Richardson BC, 2005,"Sustainable transport: analysis frameworks" Journal of Transport Geography 13 29-39
29. Rossetti M A, Eversole B S, 1993 Journey to Work Trends in the United States and Its Major Metropolitan Areas, 1960-1990 FHWA-PL-94-012, Federal Highway Administration, US Department of Transportation,Washington, DC
30. Schrank D, Lomax T, 2005 The 2005 Urban Mobility Report Texas Transportation Institute, The Texas A&M University System, http://mobility.tamu.edu
31. Shen Q, 1998, "Location characteristics of inner-city neighborhoods and employment accessibility of low-wage workers" Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design 25 345-365
32. Shen Q, 2001, "A spatial analysis of job openings and access in a US metropolitan area" Journal of the American Planning Association 67 53-68
33. Wachs M, Kumagai TG, 1973, "Physical accessibility as a social indicator" Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 7 437-456
34. Weibull J W, 1976, "An axiomatic approach to the measurement of accessibility" Regional Science and Urban Economics 6 357-379