Quantifying technology-industry spillover effects based on patent citation network analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 105, Issue , 2016, Pages 140-157

  Kim, Dong Ha ^a   Lee, Bo Kyeong ^a   Sohn, So Young ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

MERIT concordance; Patent citation analysis; Technology concordance; Technology industry spillovers; Unmanned aerial vehicle

Indexed keywords

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; SOFTWARE TESTING; VEHICLES;

INTERNATIONAL PATENTS; MERIT CONCORDANCE; PATENT CITATION ANALYSIS; PATENT CITATION NETWORK ANALYSIS; QUANTIFICATION METHODS; SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY INDUSTRY; UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE;

UNMANNED AERIAL VEHICLES (UAV);

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS; NETWORK ANALYSIS; SPILLOVER EFFECT; TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT; UNMANNED VEHICLE;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84960866709     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.01.025     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Encyclopedia of Aerospace Engineering 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK. R. Blockley, W. Shyy (Eds.).
2. Borgatti S.P., Everett M.G. Network analysis of 2-mode data. Soc. Networks 1997, 19:243-269. 10.1016/S0378-8733(96)00301-2.
3. Breschi S., Lissoni F. Knowledge networks from patent data. Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research 2005, Springer, Netherlands.
4. Cai G., Lum K.-Y., Chen B.M., Lee T.H. A brief overview on miniature fixed-wing unmanned aerial vehicles. IEEE ICCA 2010 2010, 285-290. IEEE. 10.1109/ICCA.2010.5524453.
5. DeBresson C., Sirilli G., Hu X., Luk F.K. Structure and location of innovative activity in the Italian economy, 1981-85. Econ. Syst. Res. 1994, 6:135-158. 10.1080/09535319400000013.
6. Finn R.L., Wright D. Unmanned aircraft systems: surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. 2012, 28:184-194. 10.1016/j.clsr.2012.01.005.
7. Freeman L.C. Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Networks 1978, 1:215-239. 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7.
8. Freeman L. The gatekeeper, pair-dependency and structural centrality. Qual. Quant. 1980, 14. 10.1007/BF00184720.
9. Goldman E., Mahnken The Information Revolution in Military Affairs in Asia 2004.
10. Griliches Z. Issues in assessing the contribution of research and development to productivity growth. Bell J. Econ. 1979, 10:92-116.
11. Han E.J., Sohn S.Y. Patent valuation based on text mining and survival analysis. J. Technol. Transf. 2014, 40:821-839. 10.1007/s10961-014-9367-6.
12. Han E.J., Sohn S.Y. Technological Convergence in Standards for Information and Communication Technologies. Accepted for Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2016.
13. Harabi N. Channels of R&D spillovers: an empirical investigation of Swiss firms. Technovation 1997, 17:627-635. 10.1016/S0166-4972(97)00064-3.
14. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M. Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy 2002.
15. Jaffe A.B., Trajtenberg M., Henderson R. Geographic Localization of Knowledge Spillovers as Evidenced by Patent Citations 1992.
16. Jaffe A.B., Fogarty M.S., Banks B.A. Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. J. Ind. Econ. 1998, 46:183-205. 10.1111/1467-6451.00068.
17. Ju Y., Sohn S.Y. Patent-based QFD framework development for identification of emerging technologies and related business models: a case of robot technology in Korea. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2014, 94:44-64. 10.1016/j.techfore.2014a.04.015.
18. Ju Y., Sohn S.Y. Identifying patterns in rare earth element patents based on text and data mining. Scientometrics 2014, 102:389-410. 10.1007/s11192-014-1382-8.
19. Kendall M.G. Rank Correlation Methods 1955, Griffin, London, UK.
20. Lee W.J., Sohn S.Y. Patent analysis to identify shale gas development in China and the United States. Energy Policy 2014, 74:111-115. 10.1016/j.enpol.2014.08.009.
21. Lim K. The many faces of absorptive capacity: spillovers of copper interconnect technology for semiconductor chips. Ind. Corp. Chang. 2009, 18:1249-1284. 10.1093/icc/dtp044.
22. McNeal G,.S. New Software Allows Fleets Of Drones To Be Controlled By The Cloud. Forbes 2014, Dec 15 2014. http://www.forbes.com/sites/gregorymcneal/2014/12/15/new-software-allows-fleets-of-drones-to-be-controlled-by-the-cloud/.
23. Nakagawa M., Watanabe C., Griffy-Brown C. Changes in the technology spillover structure due to economic paradigm shifts: a driver of the economic revival in Japan's material industry beyond the year 2000. Technovation 2009, 29:5-22. 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.08.003.
24. Niosi J., Zhegu M. Aerospace clusters: local or global knowledge spillovers?. Ind. Innov. 2005, 12:5-29. 10.1080/1366271042000339049.
25. Önöz B., Bayazit M. The power of statistical tests for trend detection. Turk. J. Eng. Environ. Sci. 2003, 27(4):247-251.
26. Park Y., Lee S., Lee S. Patent analysis for promoting technology transfer in multi-technology industries: the Korean aerospace industry case. J. Technol. Transf. 2010, 37:355-374. 10.1007/s10961-010-9181-8.
27. Pavitt K. Technologies, products and organization in the innovating firm: what Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Ind. Corp. Chang. 1998, 7:433-452. 10.1093/icc/7.3.433.
28. Saritas O., Burmaoglu S. Future of sustainable military operations under emerging energy and security considerations. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2015, 10.1016/j.techfore.2015.08.010.
29. Scherer F.M. Inter-industry technology flows and productivity growth. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1982, 64:4. (United States).
30. Schmoch U. Concept of a technology classification for country comparisons. Final Report to the World Intellectial Property Office (WIPO) 2008, Fraunhofer ISI, Karslruhe.
31. Shih H.-Y., Chang T.-L.S. International diffusion of embodied and disembodied technology: a network analysis approach. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76:821-834. 10.1016/j.techfore.2008.09.001.
32. Shiue, Y.-C., Chang, C.-C., 2010. Forecasting Unmanned Vehicle Technologies: Use of Patent Map, in: 2010 Second International Conference on Computer Research and Development. IEEE, pp. 752-755. doi:10.1109/ICCRD.2010.143.
33. Sohn S.Y., Lee W.S., Ju Y.H. Valuing academic patents and intellectual properties: different perspectives of willingness to pay and sell. Technovation 2013, 33:13-24. 10.1016/j.technovation.2012.10.003.
34. Suh J., Sohn S.Y. Analyzing technological convergence trends in a business ecosystem. Ind. Manag. Data Syst. 2015, 115:718-739. 10.1108/IMDS-10-2014-0310.
35. Sun Y., Liu F. Measuring international trade-related technology spillover: a composite approach of network analysis and information theory. Scientometrics 2012, 94:963-979. 10.1007/s11192-012-0860-0.
36. Trajtenberg M., Jaffe A.B., Fogarty M.S. Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: evidence from a survey of inventors. Am. Econ. Rev. 2000, 90:215-218.
37. Verspagen B. Estimating international technology spillovers using technology flow matrices. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch. 1997, 133:226-248. 10.1007/BF02707461.
38. Verspagen B., De Loo I. Technology spillovers between sectors. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1999, 60:215-235. 10.1016/S0040-1625(98)00046-8.
39. Verspagen B., van Moergastel T., Slabbers M. MERIT concordance table: IPC-ISIC (rev.2) 1994.
40. Yoon J., Kim M., Kim D., Kim J., Park H. Monitoring the Change of Technological Impacts of Technology Sectors Using Patent Information: the Case of Korea. Ind. Eng. Manag. Syst 2015, 14(1):58-72. 10.7232/iems.2015.14.1.058.