Identifying patterns in rare earth element patents based on text and data mining

Scientometrics

Volumn 102, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 389-410

  Ju, Yonghan ^a   Sohn, So Young ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Association rule; Patent; Patent network analysis; Quadratic assignment procedure (QAP); Rare earth elements; Text mining; Topic detection

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937788651     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: 15882861     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-014-1382-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adams, S. (2010). The text, the full text and nothing but the text: Part 1—Standards for creating textual information in patent documents and general search implications. World Patent Information, 32(1), 22–29
2. Antonelli, D., Baralis, E., Bruno, Gl., Cerquitelli, T., Chiusano, S., & Mahoto, N. (2013). Analysis of diabetic patients through their examination history. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(11), 4672–4678
3. Apte, C., Damerau, F., & Weiss, S. (1998). Text mining with Decision Rules and Decision Trees. In Proceedings of the conference on automated learning and discovery, June
4. Borgatti, A. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27(1), 55–71
5. Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). UCINET 6 for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard: Analytic Technologies
6. Breschi, S., Cassi, L., Malerba, F., & Vonortas, N. V. (2009). Network research: European policy intervention in ICTs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 21(7), 833–857
7. Chen, C. (2003). Patents, citation, & innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(8), 802–803
8. Corney, M., DeVel, O., Anderson, A., & Mohay, G. (2002). Gender-preferential text mining of e-main discourse. Proceedings of 18th annual computer security application conference (ACSAC) (pp. 282–289). IEEE Computer Society, 9–13, December, Las Vegas
9. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233–242
10. Hotho, A., Nurnberger, A., & Paaß, G. (2005). A brief survey of text mining. 20th LVD Forum
11. Humphries, M. (2010). Rare earth elements: The global supply chain. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service
12. Izatt, S. R., Izatt, N. E., & Bruening, R. L. (2010). Metal separations of interest to the Chinese metallurgical industry. Journal of Rare Earths, 28, 22–29
13. Kostoff, R. N., Koytcheff, R. G., & Lau, C. G. (2007). Global nanotechnology research metrics. Scientometrics, 70(3), 565–601
14. Lee, B., & Jeong, Y. (2008). Mapping Korea’s national R&D domain of robot technology by using the coword analysis. Scientometrics, 77(1), 3–19
15. Lee, P., Su, H., & Wu, F. (2010). Quantitative mapping of patented technology—The case of electrical conducting polymer nanocomposite. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77, 466–478
16. Liu, C., Hsaio, W., Lee, C., & Chen, C. (2013). Clustering tagged documents with labeled and unlabeled documents. Information Processing and Management, 49(3), 596–606
17. Magerman, T., Looy, B. V., & Song, X. (2010). Exploring the feasibility and accuracy of latent semantic analysis based on text mining techniques to detect similarity between patent documents and scientific publications. Scientometrics, 82, 289–306
18. Maggioni, M. A., & Uberti, T. E. (2005). International networks of knowledge flows: An econometric analysis (No. 0519). Papers on economics and evolution
19. Mancheri, N. (2012). Chinese monopoly in rare earth elements: Supply–demand and industrial applications. China Report, 48(4), 449–468
20. Mittermayer, M. (2004). Forecasting intraday stock price trends with text mining techniques. Proceedings of the 37th annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS’04)—Track 3 (Vol. 3, p. 30064b)
21. Porter, A. L., Kongthon, A., & Lu, J. (2002). Research profiling: Improving the literature review. Scientometrics, 53(3), 351–370
22. Schmoch, U. (1993). Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26(1), 193–211
23. Simpson, W. (2001, March). QAP: The quadratic assignment procedure. In North American Stata Users’ Group meeting
24. Suzuki, J., & Kodama, F. (2004). Technological diversity of persistent innovators in Japan: Two case studies of large Japanese firms. Research Policy, 33(3), 531–549
25. Tremblay, M. C., Berndt, D. J., Luther, S. L., Foulis, P. R., & French, D. D. (2009). Identifying fall-related injuries: Text mining the electronic medical record. Information Technology and Management, 10, 253–265
26. Tseng, Y., Lin, C., & Lin, Y. (2007a). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management, 43, 1216–1247
27. Tseng, Y., Wang, Y., Lin, Y., Lin, C., & Juang, D. (2007b). Patent surrogate extraction and evaluation in the context of patent mapping. Journal of Information Science, 33(6), 718–736
28. UCINET 6.493. (2013). http://www.analytictech.com/ucinet.
29. Verspagen, B., van Moergastel, T., & Slabbers, M. (1994). MERIT concordance table: IPC-ISIC (rev. 2). MERIT Research Memorandum 94-004
30. Zheng, J., Zhao, Z. Y., Zhang, X., Chen, D. Z., & Huang, M. H. (2013). International collaboration development in nanotechnology: A perspective of patent network analysis. Scientometrics, 1–20.