Patent-based QFD framework development for identification of emerging technologies and related business models: A case of robot technology in Korea

Technological Forecasting and Social Change

Volumn 94, Issue , 2015, Pages 44-64

  Ju, Yonghan ^a   Sohn, So Young ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Convergence of iterated correlations (CONCOR); Patent network analysis; Quality function deployment (QFD); R D planning

Indexed keywords

ENTERTAINMENT INDUSTRY; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENT; ROBOTICS; ROBOTS;

CONVERGENCE OF ITERATED CORRELATIONS (CONCOR); CORRELATION ANALYSIS; EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES; FRAMEWORK DEVELOPMENT; HIERARCHICAL STRUCTURES; PATENT NETWORK ANALYSIS; QUALITY FUNCTION DEPLOYMENTS (QFD); ROBOTICS TECHNOLOGY;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 84929522151     PISSN: 00401625     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abraham B.P., Moitra S.D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation 2001, 21(4):245-252.
2. Akao Y. Function Deployment: Integrating Customer Requirements into Product Design 1990, Productivity Press, Cambridge, MA.
3. Bengisu M., Nekhili R. Forecasting emerging technologies with the aid of science and technology databases. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(7):835-844.
4. Berlea A., Dohring M., Reuschling N. Content and communication based sub-community detection using probabilistic topic models. IADIS International Conference Intelligent System and Agents 2009.
5. Bonacich P. Power and centrality: a family of measure. Am. J. Sociol. 1987, 92(5):1170-1182.
6. Borgatti S. Centrality and network flow. Soc. Network 2005, 27(1):55-71.
7. Breiger R.L., Boorman S.A., Arabie P. An algorithm for clustering relational data with applications to social network analysis and comparison with multidimensional scaling. J. Math. Psychol. 1975, 12(3):328-393.
8. Caetano M., Amaral D.C. Roadmapping for technology push and partnership: a contribution for open innovation environments. Technology 2011, 31:320-335.
9. Campbell R.S. Patent trends as a technological forecasting tool. World Patent Inf. 1983, 5(3):137-143.
10. Chang P.C., Wang Y.W. Fuzzy Delphi and back-propagation model for sales foresight in PCB industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2006, 30(4):715-726.
11. Choi C., Park Y. Monitoring the organic structure of technology based on the patent development paths. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2009, 76(6):754-768.
12. Czaplicka-Kolarz K., Stańczyk K., Kapusta Krzysztof Technology foresight for a vision of energy sector development in Poland till 2030. Delphi survey as an element of technology foresighting. Technol. Foresight Soc. Chang. 2009, 76(3):327-338.
13. Daim T.U., Rueda G., Martin H., Gerdsri P. Forecasting emerging technologies: use of bibliometrics and patent analysis. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2006, 73(8):981-1012.
14. Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (ETRI) ETRI Technology Vision for 2020 2008.
15. Ernst H. The use of patent data for technological forecasting: the diffusion of CNC-technology in the machine tool industry. Small Bus. Econ. 1997, 9(4):361-381.
16. Grupp H., Linstone H. National technology foresight activities around the globe: resurrection and new paradigms. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 1999, 60(1):85-94.
17. Han S., Kim H., Cho K., Kim M.K., Kim H., Park S. Research planning mythology for technology fusion in construction. Proceeding 23rd International Symposium on Automation and Robotics in Construction, IAARC, Tokyo, Japan 1998.
18. Han Y., Park Y. Patent network analysis of inter-industrial knowledge flows: the case of Korea between traditional and emerging industries. World Patent Inf. 2006, 28(3):235-247.
19. Harhoff D., Narin F., Scherer F.M., Vopel K. Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Rev. Econ. Stat. 1999, 81(3):511-515.
20. Hauser J.R., Clausing D. The house of quality. Harv. Bus. Rev. 1988, 66(3):63-73.
21. Kano N., Seraku N., Takahashi F., Tsuji S. Attractive quality and must-be quality. J. Japan. Soc. Qual. Control 1984, 14(2):39-48.
22. Kim Y.G., Suh J.H., Park S.C. Visualization of patent analysis for emerging technology. Expert Syst. Appl. 2008, 34:1804-1812.
23. Korea Institute of Science and Technology Information (KISTI) Analyst Report for Robot Vision and Production Automation Technology Trends 2008.
24. Lee G.L., Song Y.L. Selecting the key research area in nano-technology field using technology cluster analysis: a case study based on national R&D programs in South Korea. Technovation 2007, 27(1-2):57-64.
25. Liu S., Shyu J. Strategic planning for technology development with patent analysis. Int. J. Technol. Manag. 1997, 13(5-6):661-680.
26. McLaughlin C.P., Stratman J.K. Improving the quality of corporate technical planning: dynamic analogues of QFD. R&D Manag. 1997, 27(3):269-279.
27. Millett S.M., Honton E.J. A Manager's Guide to Technology and Strategy Analysis Method 1991, Battelle Press, Columbus.
28. Phaal R., Farrukh C.J.P., Probert D.R. Fast-start technology roadmapping. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Management of Technology (IAMOT 2000) 2000.
29. Shen Y.C., Chang S.H., Lin G.T., Yu H.C. A hybrid selection model for emerging technology. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 2010, 77(1):151-166.
30. Shin J., Park Y. Building the national ICT frontier: the case of Korea. Inf. Econ. Policy 2007, 19(2). (249-277.3).
31. Small H., Boyack K.W., Klavans R. Identifying emerging topics in science and technology. Res. Policy 2014, (in press). 10.1016/j.respol.2014.02.005.
32. Sternitzke C., Bartkowski A., Schramm R. Visualizing patent statistics by means of social network analysis tools. World Patent Inf. 2008, 30(2):115-131.
33. Trappey C.V., Trappey A.J.C., Hwang S. A computerized quality function deployment approach for retail series. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1996, 30(4):611-622.
34. Trajtenberg M. A penny for your quotes: patent citations and the value of innovations. RAND J. Econ. 1990, 21(1):172-187.
35. Walsh S.T. Roadmapping a disruptive technology: a case study. The emerging microsystems and top-down nanosystems industry. Technol. Foresight Soc. Chang. 2004, 71(1-2):161-185.
36. Wang K., Tong S., Roucoules L., Eynard B. Analysis of Consumer's Requirements for Data/Information Quality by Using HOQ 2008, Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management.
37. Yang C.C. The refined Kano's model and its application. Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 2005, 16(10):1127-1137.
38. Yu P., Lee J.H. A hybrid approach using two-level SOM and combined AHP rating and AHP/DEA-AR method for selecting optimal promising emerging technology. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40(1):300-314.
39. Lowe A., Ridgway K., Atkinson H. QFD in new production technology evaluation. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 2000, 67(2):103-112.
40. Kim K., Park K., Seo S. A matrix approach for telecommunications technology selection. Comput. Ind. Eng. 1997, 33(3):833-836.
41. Groenveld P. Roadmapping integrates business and technology. Res. Technol. Manag. 1997, 40(5):48-55.