Patent valuation based on text mining and survival analysis

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 821-839

  Han, Eun Jin ^a   Sohn, So Young ^a  

^a Yonsei University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Patent infringement risk; Patent valuation; Singular value decomposition; Survival analysis; Text mining

Indexed keywords

3D PRINTERS; BIOINFORMATICS; DATA MINING; DECOMPOSITION; DIGITAL FILTERS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION;

AVERAGE NUMBERS; EUCLIDIAN DISTANCE; PATENT CLAIMS; PATENT INFRINGEMENTS; PATENT VALUATIONS; SURVIVAL ANALYSIS; SURVIVAL TIME; TEXT MINING;

PATENTS AND INVENTIONS;

EID: 84941073466     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-014-9367-6     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Albert, M., Avery, D., Narin, F., & McAllister, P. (1991). Direct validation of citation counts as indicators of industrially important patents. Research Policy,20(3), 251–259.
2. Amine, A., Elberrichi, Z., & Simonet, M. (2010). Evaluation of text clustering methods using wordNet. The International Arab Journal of Information Technology,7(4), 349–357.
3. Ananiadou, S., Kell, D. B., & Tsujii, J. I. (2006). Text mining and its potential applications in systems biology. Trends in Biotechnology,24(12), 571–579.
4. Baeza-Yates, R., & Ribeiro-Neto, B. (1999). Modern Information Retrival. New York: ACM Press.
5. Baudry, M., & Dumont, B. (2006). Patent renewals as options: improving the mechanism for weeding out lousy patents. Review of Industrial Organization,28(1), 41–62.
6. Bergmann, I., Butzke, D., Walter, L., Fuerste, J. P., Moehrle, M. G., & Erdmann, V. A. (2008). Evaluating the risk of patent infringement by means of semantic patent analysis: The case of DNA chips. R&D Management,38(5), 550–562.
7. Burke, P., & Reitzig, M. (2007). Measuring patent assessment quality: Analyzing the degree of kind of (in)consistency in patent offices’ decision making. Research Policy,36(9), 1404–1430.
8. Carpenter, M. P., Narin, F., & Woolf, P. (2005). Citation rates to technologically important patents. World Patent Information,3(4), 160–163.
9. Choo, K. N., & Park, K. H. (2010). A study on the Determinants of the Economic Value of Patents Using Renewal Data. The Knowledge Management Research,11(1), 65–81.
10. Dumais, S. T. (1991). Improving the retrieval of information from external sources. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers,23(2), 229–236.
11. Ernst, H., Leptien, C., & Vitt, J. (2000). Inventors are not alike: The distribution of patenting output among industrial R&D personnel. IEEE Transactions of Engineering Management,47(2), 184–199.
12. Fischer, T., & Henkel, J. (2012). Patent trolls on markets for technology: An empirical analysis of NPE’s patent acquisitions. Research Policy,41(9), 1519–1533.
13. Gronqvist, C. (2009). The private value of patents by patent characteristics: evidence from Finland. Journal of Technology Transfer,34(2), 159–168.
14. Guellec, D., & Van Pottelsbergue de la Potterie, B. (2000). Applications, grants and the value of patent. Economics Letters,69(1), 109–114.
15. Hall, B., Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2005). Market value and patent citations. The Rand Journal of Economics,36(1), 16–38.
16. Harhoff, D., Narin, F., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (1999). Citation frequency and the value of patented inventions. Review of Economics and Statistics,81(3), 511–515.
17. Harhoff, D., & Reitzig, M. (2004). Determinants of opposition against EPO patent grants: The case of biotechnology and pharmaceuticals. International Journal of Industrial Organization,22(4), 443–480.
18. Harhoff, D., Scherer, F., & Vopel, K. (2003). Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights. Research Policy,32(8), 1343–1363.
19. Homayouni, R., Heinrich, K., Wei, L., & Berry, M. W. (2005). Gene clustering by latent semantic indexing of MEDLINE abstracts. Bioinformatics,21(1), 104–115.
20. Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information,19(4), 269–272.
21. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Lanjouw, J. O., Pakes, A., & Putnam, J. (1998). How to count patents and value intellectual property: The uses of patent renewal and application data. The Journal of Industrial Economics,46(4), 405–432.
23. Lanjouw, J. O., Schankerman, M. (1999). The quality of ideas: Measuring innovation with multiple indicators. NBER Working Paper 7345.
24. Lee, T. H., (2003). Latent Semantic Analysis with Axes Rotation and Its Application to Topic Based Text Categorization and Contextual Disambiguation of a Word. Doctoral dissertation. Seoul national university, Korea.
25. Lee, Y. G. (2008). Patent licensability and life: A study of U.S. patents registered by South Korean public research institutes. Scientometrics,75(3), 463–471.
26. Lee, C., Song, B., & Park, Y. (2013). How to assess patent infringement risks: a semantic patent claim analysis using dependency relationships. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,25(1), 23–38.
27. Lerner, L. (1994). The importance of patent scope: an empirical analysis. RAND Journal of Economics,25(2), 319–333.
28. Liu, K., Arthurs, J., Cullen, J., & Alexander, R. (2008). Internal sequential innovations: How does interrelatedness affect patent renewal? Research Policy,37(5), 946–953.
29. Moehrle, M. G. (2010). Measures for textual patent similarities: a guided way to select appropriate approaches. Scientometrics,85(1), 95–109.
30. Moehrle, M. G., & Gerken, J. M. (2012). Measuring textual patent similarity on the basis of combined concepts: design decisions and their consequences. Scientometrics,91(3), 805–826.
31. Moore, K. (2005). Worthless patents. Berkeley Technology Law Journal,20(4), 1521–1552.
32. Nahm, U. Y., & Mooney, R. J., (2001). Mining soft-matching rules from textual data. In Proceedings of the 17th international joint conference on Artificial intelligence Vol. 2 (pp. 979–984). Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
33. Narin, F., Noma, E., & Perry, R. (1987). Patents as indicators of corporate technological strength. Research Policy,16(2–4), 143–155.
34. Oda, T., Gemba, K., & Matsushima, K. (2008). Enhanced co-citation analysis using frameworks. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,20(2), 217–229.
35. Pakes, A. (1986). Patents as options: Some estimates of the value of holding European patent stocks. Econometrica,54(4), 755–784.
36. Pakes, A., & Schankerman, M., (1979). The rate of obsolescence of knowledge, research gestation lags, and the private rate of return to research resources. NBER working paper series 346.
37. Park, Y., Lee, S., & Lee, S. (2012a). Patent analysis for promoting technology transfer in multi-technology industries: the Korean aerospace industry case. The Journal of Technology Transfer,37(3), 355–374.
38. Park, H., Yoon, J., & Kim, K. (2012b). Identifying patent infringement using SAO based semantic technological similarities. Scientometrics,90(2), 515–529.
39. Putnam, J. D. (1996). The value of international patent rights. UMI Dissertation services.
40. Reitzig, M. (2003). What determines patent value? Insights from the semiconductor industry. Research Policy,32(1), 13–26.
41. Reitzig, M. (2004). Improving patent valuations for management purposes: Validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy,33(6–7), 939–957.
42. Ruiz, A. M., & Banet, T. A. (2009). Toward the definition of a structural equation model of patent value: PLS path modeling with formative constructs. Revstat Statistical Journal,7(3), 265–290.
43. Sapsalis, E., Pottelsberghe, Van, de la Potterie, B., & Navon, R. (2006). Academic versus industry patenting: An in-depth analysis of what determines patent value. Research Policy,35(10), 1631–1645.
44. Schankerman, M., & Pakes, A. (1986). Estimates of the value of patent rights in European countries during post-1950 period. Economic Journal,96, 1052–1076.
45. Sterzi, V. (2013). Patent quality and ownership: An analysis of UK faculty patenting. Research Policy,42(2), 564–576.
46. Thomas, P. (1999). The effect of technological impact upon patent renewal decisions. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management,11(2), 181–197.
47. Trajtenberg, M. (1990). A penny for your quotes: Patent citations and the value of innovations. The Rand Journal of Economics,21(1), 172–187.
48. Tseng, Y. H., Lin, C. J., & Lin, Y. I. (2007). Text mining techniques for patent analysis. Information Processing and Management,43(5), 1216–1247.
49. USPTO status search homepage, http://portal.uspto.gov/pair/PublicPair?selectedTab=pair_search&isSubmitted=isSubmitted&dosnum=&public_selectedSearchOption=.
50. WISDOMAIN patent data, http://www.wisdomain.com.
51. Zaman, A. N. K., & Brown, C. G. (2010). Latent semantic indexing and large dataset: Study of term-weighting schemes. In Digital Information Management (ICDIM), 2010 5th International Conference on IEEE (pp. 1–4).
52. Zhong, N., Li, Y., & Wu, S. T. (2012). Effective pattern discovery for text mining. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on,24(1), 30–44.