Patent analysis for promoting technology transfer in multi-technology industries: The Korean aerospace industry case

Journal of Technology Transfer

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2012, Pages 355-374

  Park, Yongtae ^a   Lee, Sungjoo ^b   Lee, Sora ^a  

^a Seoul National University   (South Korea)

^b Ajou University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Aerospace industry; Korea; Multi technology; Patent citation analysis; R D efficiency; R D planning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84860533585     PISSN: 08929912     EISSN: 15737047     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10961-010-9181-8     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Archibugi, D., & Pianta, M. (1996). Innovation surveys and patents as technology indicators: The state of the art. In OECD (Ed.), Innovation, Patents and Technological Strategies, OECD. Paris: OECD.
2. Bach, L., Cohendet, P., & Schenk, E. (2002). Technological transfers from the European space programs: A dynamic view and comparison with other R&D projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(4), 321-338.
3. Bowonder, B., Yadav, S., & Kumar, S. (2000). R&D spending patterns of global firms. Research-Technology Management, 43, 40-56.
4. Chakrabarti, A. K. (1991). Competition in high technology: Analysis of patents of U. S., Japan, U. K., France, West Germany, and Canada. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(1), 78-84.
5. Chakrabarti, A. K., Dror, I., & Eakabuse, N. (1991). Interorganisational transfer of knowledge: An analysis of patent citations of a defense firm. Paper presented at the PICMET for Technology Management: The New International Language, Oct.
6. Criscuolo, P. (2003). Reverse technology transfer: A patent citation analysis of the European chemical and pharmaceutical sectors. SPRU Electronic Working Paper, 107.
7. Duguet, E., & MacGarvie, M. (2005). How well do patent citations measure flows of technology? Evidence from French innovation surveys. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14(5), 375-393.
8. Engelsman, E. C., & van Rann, A. F. F. (2004). A patent-based cartography of technology. Research Policy, 23(1), 1-26.
9. Ernst, H. (1998). Patent portfolios for strategic R&D planning. Journal of Engineering Technology Management, 15(4), 279-308.
10. Ernst, H. (2003). Patent information for strategic technology management. World Patent Information, 25(3), 233-242.
11. Evenson, R., & Putnam, J. (1988). The Yale-Canada patent flow concordance. Economic Growth Centre Working Paper, New Haven Connecticut: Yale University.
12. Ford, D. (1988). Develop your technology strategy. Long Range Planning, 21(5), 85-89.
13. Foster, R. N., & Rea, R. H. (1970). An integrated technological forecasting and R&D planning system. Semptember: Futures-An Integrated Planning System.
14. Granstrand, O., & Sjölander, S. (1990). Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations. Research Policy, 19, 35-60.
15. Hall, B., Jaffe, A. B., & Trajtenberg, M. (2001). The NBER patent citation file: Lessons, insights and methodological tools. NBER Working Paper, 8498.
16. Hertzfeld, H. R. (2002). Technology transfer in the space sector: An international perspective. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(1), 307-309.
17. Hu, A., & Jaffe, A. B. (2001). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. NBER Working Paper, 8528.
18. Hu, A., & Jaffe, A. B. (2003). Patent citations and international knowledge flow: The cases of Korea and Taiwan. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 21, 849-880.
19. Jaffe, A. B. (1998). Demand and supply influences in R&D intensity and productivity growth. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 70(3), 431-437.
20. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. S. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90(2), 215-218.
21. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1992). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. NBER Working Paper, 3993.
22. Jaffe, A. B., & Tranjtenberg, M. (1999). International knowledge flows: Evidence from patent citations. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8, 105-136.
23. Johnson, D. K. N. (2002). The OECD technology concordance (OTC): Patents by industry of manufacture and sector of use. STI Working Papers, 5, Paris: OECD.
24. Jung, S., & Imm, K. (2002). The patent activities of Korea and Taiwan: A comparative case study of patent statistics. World Patent Information, 24(4), 303-311.
25. Karki, M. M. S. (1997). Patent citation analysis: A policy analysis tool. World Patent Information, 19(4), 269-272.
26. Keller, W. (2000). Geographic localization of international technology diffusion. NBER Working Paper, 7509.
27. Lee, G. (2005). Direct versus indirect international R&D spillovers. International Economics and Policy, 17(3), 334-348.
28. Lee, G. (2006). The effectiveness of international knowledge spillover channels. European Economic Review, 50(8), 2075-2088.
29. Park, Y., Yoon, B., & Lee, S. (2005). The idiosyncrasy and dynamism of technological innovation across industries: Patent citation analysis. Technology in Society, 27(4), 471-485.
30. Patel, P., & Pavitt, K. (1997). The technological competencies of the world's largest firms: Complex and path-dependent, but not much variety. Research Policy, 26(2), 141-156.
31. Pavitt, K. (1998). Technologies, products and organisation in the innovating firm: What Adam Smith tells us and Joseph Schumpeter doesn't. Industrial and Corporate Change, 7(3), 433-452.
32. Peretz, D. (1972). R&D and corporate planning in government. December: Futures - An Integrated Planning System.
33. Sa′nchez, A. M., & Pe′rez, M. P. (2002). R&D project efficiency management in the Spanish industry. International Journal of Project Management, 20, 545-560.
34. Scherer, F. M. (1965). Corporate inventive output, profits, and growth. Journal of Political Economics, 73(3), 290-297.
35. Scherer, F. M. (1981). Using linked patent and R&D data to measure inter-industry technology flows. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), R&D, patents, and productivity (pp. 417-464). Chicago: University of Chicago Press for NBER.
36. Schmoch, U., Laville, F., Patel, P., & Frietsch, R. (2003). Linking technology areas to industrial sectors: Final report to the European commission. DG Research, Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer ISI.
37. Schmookler, J. (1966). Invention and economic growth. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
38. Singh, J. (2004). Innovation and knowledge diffusion in the global economy, PhD dissertation, Harvard School of Business Administration and Department of Economics.
39. Tijssen, R. J. W. (2001). Global and domestic utilisation of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy, 30, 35-54.
40. Verspagen, B., Morgastel, T., & Slabbers, M. (1994). MERIT concordance table: IPC-ISIC (rev. 2). Maastricht: MERIT Research Memorandum.
41. Wang, E. C. (2007). R&D efficiency and economic performance: A cross-country analysis using the stochastic frontier approach. Journal of Policy Modeling, 29, 345-360.
42. Yamin, M., & Otto, J. (2004). Patterns of knowledge flows and MNE innovative performance. Journal of International Management, 10(2), 239-258.
43. Yoon, B. (2005). Methodology for managing technological knowledge and developing new technology using patent analysis. PhD dissertation. Seoul National University.