Technology evaluation and selection of 3DIC integration using a three-stage fuzzy MCDM

Sustainability (Switzerland)

Volumn 8, Issue 2, 2016, Pages

  Lee, Yen Chun ^a   James Chou, C ^a  

^a NATIONAL CHIAO TUNG UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Fuzzy multicriteria decision making (MCDM); Semiconductors; Technology selection; Three dimensional integrated circuit (3DIC) integration

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; MARKET CONDITIONS; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; SEMICONDUCTOR INDUSTRY; SILICON; STRATEGIC APPROACH; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; THREE-DIMENSIONAL MODELING;

TAIWAN;

EID: 84960469756     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20711050     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/su8020114     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Mack, C.A. Fifty years of Moore's law. IEEE Trans. Semicond. Manuf. 2011, 24, 202-207.
2. Salah, K.; Ismail, Y.; El-Rouby, A. Introduction: Work around Moore's law. In Arbitrary Modeling of Tsvs for 3D Integrated Circuits; Springer: Heidelberg, Germany, 2015; pp. 1-15.
3. Kim, A.; Choi, E.; Son, H.; Pyo, S.G. Development and applications of 3-dimensional integration nanotechnologies. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2014, 14, 2001-2011.
4. Tavana, M.; Khalili-Damghani, K.; Abtahi, A.-R. A hybrid fuzzy group decision support framework for advanced-technology prioritization at NASA. Expert Syst. Appl. 2013, 40, 480-491.
5. Van de Kaa, G.; Rezaei, J.; Kamp, L.; de Winter, A. Photovoltaic technology selection: A fuzzy mcdm approach. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 2014, 32, 662-670.
6. Dat, L.Q.; Chou, S.-Y.; Le, N.T.; Wiguna, E.; Yu, T.H.-K.; Phus, P.N.K. Selecting renewable energy technology via a fuzzy mcdm approach. IOS Press 2014.
7. Bose, G.K. Selecting significant process parameters of ecg process using Fuzzy-MCDM technique. IJMFMP 2015, 2, 38-53.
8. Ilangkumaran, M.; Sakthivel, G.; Sasirekha, V. Waste water treatment technology selection using fahp and gra approaches. Int. J. Environ. Waste Manag. 2014, 14, 392-413.
9. Demirtas, N.; Özgürler, Ş.; Özgürler, M.; Güneri, A.F. Selecting e-purse smart card technology via fuzzy AHP and ANP. J. Appl. Math. 2014, 2014, 1-14.
10. Vinodh, S.; Nagaraj, S.; Girubha, J. Application of fuzzy VIKOR for selection of rapid prototyping technologies in an agile environment. Rapid Prototyping J. 2014, 20, 523-532.
11. Sadaka, M.; Radu, I.; di Cioccio, L. 3D integration: Advantages, enabling technologies & applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference on IC Design and Technology, Grenoble, France, 2-4 June 2010; pp. 106-109.
12. Lau, J.H. Evolution, challenge, and outlook of TSV, 3D IC integration and 3D silicon integration. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Advanced Packaging Materials, Xiamen, China, 25-28 October 2011; pp. 462-488.
13. Lau, J.H.; Chan, Y.; Lee, R. 3D IC Integration with TSV Interposers for High-Performance Applications; Chip Scale Review: San Josa, CA, USA, 2010; pp. 26-29.
14. Santarini, M. 2.5D ICs Are More than a Stepping Stone to 3D ICs. Available online: http://www.eetimes.com/document.asp?doc_id=1279514 (assessed on 10 October 2015).
15. Chand, S.; Singh, V.K. Importance of fuzzy logic in multiple powers generating area over pid. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 2, 350-355.
16. Zhao, X.; Lin, R.; Wei, G. Fuzzy prioritized operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Appl. Math. Model. 2013, 37, 4759-4770.
17. Wei, G.; Zhao, X.;Wang, H.; Lin, R. Fuzzy power aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. Technol. Econ. Dev. Econ. 2013, 19, 377-396.
18. Noorderhaven, N.G. Strategic Decision Making; Addison-Wesley: Boston, USA, 1995; pp. 206-208.
19. Cheng, J. Indexes of competitive power and core competence in selecting Asia-Pacific ports. J. Chin. Inst. Transp. 2001, 13, 1-25.
20. Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resources Allocation; RWS: Pennsylvania, PA, USA, 1990; pp. 26-47.
21. Saaty, T.L. How to make a decision: The analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1990, 48, 9-26.
22. Csutora, R.; Buckley, J.J. Fuzzy hierarchical analysis: The lambda-max method. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 2001, 120, 181-195.
23. Opricovic, S.; Tzeng, G.-H. Defuzzification within a multicriteria decision model. Int. J. Uncertain. Fuzz. 2003, 11, 635-652.
24. Hwang, C.; Yoon, K. Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems. In Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications; Springer-Verlag: Berlin, Germany, 1981; pp. 166-186.
25. Tzeng, G.H.; Huang, J.J. Multiple Attribute Decision Making: Methods and Applications; Taylor & Francis: New York, NY, USA, 2011; pp. 248-260.
26. Awasthi, A.; Chauhan, S.S.; Goyal, S. A fuzzy multicriteria approach for evaluating environmental performance of suppliers. Int. J. Product. Econ. 2010, 126, 370-378.
27. Yazdani, M.; Alidoosti, A.; Basiri, M.H. Risk analysis for critical infrastructures using fuzzy TOPSIS. J. Manag. Res. 2012, 4, 1-19.