Photovoltaic technology selection: A fuzzy MCDM approach

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 32, Issue , 2014, Pages 662-670

  Van De Kaa, Geerten ^a   Rezaei, Jafar ^a   Kamp, Linda ^a   De Winter, Allard ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Dominant design; Logarithmic fuzzy preference programming; Photovoltaic technology; Technology selection process

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS; PHOTOVOLTAIC CELLS;

DOMINANT DESIGN; ENERGY POLICY MAKERS; FUZZY PREFERENCE PROGRAMMING; GENERATION TECHNOLOGIES; MULTIPLE STAKEHOLDERS; PHOTOVOLTAIC MODULES; PHOTOVOLTAIC TECHNOLOGY; TECHNOLOGY SELECTION;

MONOCRYSTALLINE SILICON;

EID: 84893716338     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2014.01.044     Document Type: Review

References (50)

1. C Shapiro, and HR. Varian Information rules, a strategic guide to the network economy 1999 Harvard Business School Press Boston, Massachusetts
2. Van de Kaa G, Van Heck HWGM, De Vries HJ, Van den Ende JCM, Rezaei J, Supporting Decision-Making in Technology Standards Battles Based on a Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process, IEEE T Eng Manage. [forthcoming].
3. M.A. Schilling Technological lockout: an integrative model of the economic and strategic factors driving technology success and failure Acad Manage Rev 23 1998 267 274
4. FF. Suarez Battles for technological dominance: an integrative framework Res Policy 33 2004 271 286
5. G Van de Kaa, J Van den Ende, HJ De Vries, and E. Van Heck Factors for winning interface format battles: a review and synthesis of the literature Technol Forecast Soc Change 78 2011 1397 1411
6. MA. Schilling Technology success and failure in winner-take-all markets: the impact of learning orientation, timing, and network externalities Acad Manage J 45 2002 387 398
7. WB. Arthur Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events Econ J 99 1989 116 131
8. J Farrell, and G. Saloner Standardization, compatibility, and innovation Rand J Econ 16 1985 70 83
9. ML Katz, and C. Shapiro Network externalities, competition, and compatibility Am Econ Rev 75 1985 424 440
10. E. Brynjolfsson Network externalities in microcomputer software: an econometric analysis of the spreadsheet market Manage Sci 42 1996 1627 1647 (Pubitemid 126584790)
11. C Christensen, FF Suarez, and JM. Utterback Strategies for survival in fast-changing industries Manage Sci 44 1998 S207 S220
12. PA. David Clio and the economics of QWERTY Am Econ Rev 75 1985 332 337
13. MB Lieberman, and DB. Montgomery First-mover (Dis)advantages: retrospective and link with the resource-based view Strateg Manage J 19 1998 1111 1125 (Pubitemid 128468559)
14. DJ. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy Res Policy 15 1986 285 305
15. R Axelrod, W Mitchell, RE Thomas, DS Bennett, and E. Bruderer Coalition formation in standard-setting alliances Manage Sci 41 1995 1493 1508
16. R Garud, S Jain, and A. Kumaraswamy Institutional entrepreneurship in the sponsorship of common technological standards: the case of Sun Microsystems and Java Acad Manage J 45 2002 196 214
17. J Van den Ende, G Van de Kaa, S Den Uyl, and H. De Vries The paradox of standard flexibility: the effects of co-evolution between standard and interorganizational network Organiz Stud 33 2012 705 736
18. GE Willard, and AC. Cooper Survivors of industry shake-outs: the case of the U.S. color television set industry Strateg Manage J 6 1985 299 318
19. J Brown, and C. Hendry Public demonstration projects and field trials: accelerating commercialisation of sustainable technology in solar photovoltaics Energy Policy 37 2009 2560 2573
20. REN21. Renewables 2010 global status report (No. 5). Paris; 2010.
21. V. Smil General energetics: energy in the biosphere and civilization 1991 Wiley New York
22. V Vasseur, LM Kamp, and SO. Negro A comparative analysis of photovoltaic technological innovation systems including international dimensions - the cases of Japan and The Netherlands J Clean Prod 48 2013 200 210
23. REN21. Renewables 2012 global status report (No. 7). Paris; 2012.
24. A Luque, and S. Hegedus Handbook of photovoltaic science and engineering 2011 John Wiley & Sons West Sussex
25. WP. Hirshman Cell production 2010 - survey Photon Int 3 2011 173 201
26. TL. Saaty A scaling method for priorities in hierarchycal structures J Math Psychol 15 1977 234 281
27. TL. Saaty The analytic hierarchy process: planning, priority setting, resource allocation 1980 McGraw-Hill New York
28. S Sipahi, and M. Timor The analytic hierarchy process and analytic network process: an overview of applications Manage Decis 48 2010 775 808
29. OS Vaidya, and S. Kumar Analytic hierarchy process: an overview of applications Eur J Oper Res 169 2006 1 29 (Pubitemid 41336610)
30. TL Saaty, and LG. Vargas Models, methods, concepts and applications of the analytic hierarchy process 2000 Kluwer Academic Publishers Dordrecht
31. N Bhushan Strategic decision making: applying the analytic hierarchy process 2004 Springer London
32. A Ishizaka, and A. Labib Analytic hierarchy process and expert choice: benefits and limitations OR Insight 22 2009 201 220
33. A Ishizaka, and A. Labib Review of the main developments in the analytic hierarchy process Exp Syst Applic 38 2011 14336 14345
34. J Rezaei, and S. Dowlatshahi A rule-based multi-criteria approach to inventory classification Int J Prod Res 48 2010 7107 7126
35. Tang SL, Ahmad IU, Ahmed SM, Lu M. Quantitative techniques for decision making in construction. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press; 2004.
36. SH Zanakis, A Solomon, N Wishart, and S. Dublish Multi-attribute decision making: a simulation comparison of select methods Eur J Oper Res 107 1998 507 529 (Pubitemid 128388886)
37. YM Wang, and KS. Chin Fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: a logarithmic fuzzy preference programming methodology Int J Approximate Reasoning 52 2011 541 553
38. LA. Zadeh The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning Inf Sci 8 1975 199 249
39. L. Mikhailov Deriving priorities from fuzzy pairwise comparison judgements Fuzzy Sets Syst 134 2003 365 385
40. DY. Chang Application of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP Eur J Oper Res 95 1996 649 655
41. PJM Van Laarhoven, and W. Pedrycz A fuzzy extension of Saaty's priority theory Fuzzy Sets Syst 11 1983 229 241 (Pubitemid 14507023)
42. O. ÇakIr On the order of the preference intensities in fuzzy AHP Comput Ind Eng 54 2008 993 1005 (Pubitemid 351458395)
43. IEA-PVPS. Trends in photovoltaic applications a survey report of selected IEA Countries between 1992 and 2010, report IEA-PVPS T1-20; 2011.
44. W. Jager Stimulating the diffusion of photovoltaic systems: a behavioural perspective Energy Policy 34 2006 1935 1943
45. ML Katz, and C. Shapiro Technology adoption in the presence of network externalities J Polit Econ 94 1986 822 841
46. Joint solar programme. Annual report; 2011.
47. Barton JH. Intellectual property and access to clean energy technologies in developing countries: an analysis of solar photovoltaic, biofuels and wind technologies. ICTSD trade and sustainable energy series. 2007;2.
48. S Jacobsson, and V. Lauber The politics and policy of energy system transformation-explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology Energy Policy 34 2006 256 276 (Pubitemid 41510264)
49. TM Razykov, CS Ferekides, D Morel, E Stefanakos, HS Ullal, and HM. Upadhyaya Solar photovoltaic electricity: current status and future prospects Sol Energy 85 2011 1580 1608
50. J Rezaei, R Ortt, and V. Scholten An improved fuzzy preference programming to evaluate entrepreneurship orientation Appl Soft Comput 13 2013 2749 2758