Dynamics of integrating landscape values in landscape character assessment: the hidden dominance of the objective outsider

Landscape Research

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 239-252

  Butler, Andrew ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

European Landscape Convention; landscape character assessment; Landscape values; objective outsider

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; ESTHETICS; LAND USE PLANNING; LANDSCAPE PLANNING;

EUROPE;

EID: 84960247272     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1135315     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. I.Altman,, & S.Low, (Eds.). (1992). Place attachment. New York, NY: Plenum Press.
2. P.Ariansen, (1993). Miljöfilosofi [Environmental philosophy]. Nora: Nya Doxa.
3. T.Arnesen, (1998). Landscapes lost. Landscape Research, 23, 39–50. doi:10.1080/01426399808706524
4. S.Bell,, I.Sarlöv Herlin,, & R.Stiles, (2012). Introduction: Landscape architecture in a changing world. In S.Bell, I.Sarlöv Herlin, & R.Stiles (Eds.), Exploring the boundaries of landscape architecture (pp. 1–12). Abingdon: Routledge.
5. J.Bergeron,, S.Paquette,, & P.Poullaouec-Gonidec, (2014). Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 108–121. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009
6. T.Bloemers,, S.Daniels,, G.Fairclough,, B.Pedroli,, & R.Stiles, (2010). Landscape in a changing world: Bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Strasbourg: European Science Foundation/COST.
7. G.Brown, (2004). Mapping spatial attributes in survey research for natural resource management: Methods and applications. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 17–39. doi:10.1080/08941920590881853
8. G.Brown,, & C.Raymond, (2007). The relationship between place attachment and landscape values: Toward mapping place attachment. Applied Geography, 27, 89–111. doi:10.1016/j.apgeog.2006.11.002
9. G.Brown,, & C.M.Raymond, (2014). Methods for identifying land use conflict potential using participatory mapping. Landscape and Urban Planning, 122, 196–208. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.007
10. G.G.Brown,, P.Reed,, & C.C.Harris, (2002). Testing a place-based theory for environmental evaluation: An Alaska case study. Applied Geography, 22, 49–76. doi:10.1016/S0143-6228(01)00019-4
11. G.Brunetta,, & A.Voghera, (2008). Evaluating landscape for shared values: Tools, principles, and methods. Landscape Research, 33, 71–87. doi:10.1080/01426390701773839
12. A.Butler,, & A.Åkerskog, (2014). Awareness-raising of landscape in practice. An analysis of landscape character assessments in England. Land Use Policy, 36, 441–449. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.020
13. A.Butler,, & U.Berglund, (2014). Landscape character assessment as an approach to understanding public interests within the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 39, 219–236. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.716404
14. E.Conrad,, L.Cassar,, M.Jones,, S.Eiter,, Z.Izaovičová,, Z.Barankova,, … I.Fazey, (2011). Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13, 23–47. doi:10.1080/1523908x.2011.560449
15. E.Conrad,, M.Christie,, & I.Fazey, (2011). Is research keeping up with changes in landscape policy? A review of the literature. Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2097–2108. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.003
16. D.Cosgrove, (1984). Social formation and symbolic landscape. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
17. Council of Europe. (2000). European Landscape Convention. Florence.
18. Council of Europe. (2008). Recommendation of the committee of ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention. Retrieved April 1, 2011, from http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/Landscape/VersionsOrientation/Default_en.asp
19. M.A.Davenport,, & D.H.Anderson, (2005). Getting from sense of place to place-based management: An interpretive investigation of place meanings and perceptions of landscape change. Society & Natural Resources, 18, 625–641. doi:10.1080/08941920590959613
20. M.de Certeau, (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
21. S.Eiter, (2010). Landscape as an area perceived through activity: Implications for diversity management and conservation. Landscape Research, 35, 339–359. doi:10.1080/01426391003746531
22. D.Gregory,, R.Johnston,, G.Pratt,, M.J.Watt,, & S.Whatmore, (Eds.). (2009). The dictionary of human geography. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
23. M.Henningsson,, M.Blicharska,, H.Antonson,, G.Mikusiński,, G.Göransson,, P.Angelstam,, … S.Jönsson, (2014). Perceived landscape values and public participation in a road-planning process—A case study in Sweden. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58, 631–653. doi:10.1080/09640568.2013.876391
24. F.Holstein, (1998). The values of the agricultural landscape: A discussion on value-related terms in natural and social sciences and the implications for the contingent valuation method. In S.Dabbert, A.Dubgaard, L.Slangen, & M.Whitby (Eds.), The economics of landscape and wildlife conservation (pp. 37–52). Wallingford, CT: CAB International.
25. P.Howard, (2013). Perceptual lenses. In P.Howard, I.Thompson, & E.Waterson (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 43–53). Abingdon: Routledge.
26. L.H.Jensen, (2006). Changing conceptualization of landscape in English landscape assessment methods. In B.Tress, G.Tress, G.Fry, & P.Opdam (Eds.), From landscape research to landscape planning (pp. 161–171). Dortrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-1-4020-5363-4
27. M.Jones, (1993). Conference proceedings: Landscape as a resource and the problem of landscape values. In C.Rusten & H.Wøien (Eds.), The politics of environmental conservation: Proceedings from a workshop (pp. 19–33). Trondheim: The University of Trondheim.
28. M.Jones, (2007). The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32, 613–633. doi:10.1080/01426390701552753
29. M.Jones, (2009). Analysing landscape values expressed in planning conflicts over change in the landscape. In V.Van Eetvelde, M.Sevenant, & L.Van De Velde (Eds.), Re-Marc-able landscapes: Marc-ante Landschappen (pp. 193–205). Gent: Academia Press.
30. M.Jones,, & M.Stenseke, (Eds.). (2011). The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of participation. Dordrecht: Springer.
31. S.Küchler, (1993). Landscape as memory. In B.Bender (Ed.), Landscape: Politics and perspective (pp. 85–106). Oxford: Berg.
32. M.Lockwood, (1997). Integrated value theory for natural areas. Ecological Economics, 20, 83–93. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(96)00075-4
33. D.Meinig, (1979). The beholding eye: Ten versions of the same scene. In D.Meinig (Ed.), The interpretation of ordinary landscapes: Geographical essays (pp. 33–50). New York, NY: Oxford Unviversity Press.
34. R.Muir, (1999). Approaches to landscape. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
35. K.Olwig, (2005). The landscape of ‘customary’ law versus that of ‘natural’ law. Landscape Research, 30, 299–320. doi:10.1080/01426390500165385
36. K.R.Olwig, (2007). The practice of landscape ‘Conventions’ and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 32, 579–594. doi:10.1080/01426390701552738
37. A.Paasi, (2002). Bounded spaces in the mobile world: Deconstructing ‘regional identity’. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 93, 137–148. doi:10.1111/1467-9663.00190
38. G.B.M.Pedroli,, T.Van Elsen,, & J.D.Van Mansvelt, (2007). Values of rural landscapes in Europe: Inspiration or by-product? NJAS—Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 54, 431–447. doi:10.1016/S1573-5214(07)80014-5
39. E.Penning-Rowsell, (1986). Themes, speculations and an agenda for landscape research. In E.Penning-Rowsell & D.Lowenthal (Ed.), Landscape meanings and values (pp. 115–128). London: Allwen & Unwin.
40. C.Planchat-Héry, (2011). The prospective vision: Integrating the farmers’ point of view into French and Belgium local planning. In M.Jones & M.Stenseke (Eds.), The European landscape convention: Challenges of participation (pp. 175–197). Dordrecht: Springer.10.1007/978-90-481-9932-7
41. C.Price, (2013). Research the economics of landscape. In P.Howard, I.Thompson, & E.Waterton (Eds.), The Routledge companion to landscape studies (pp. 308–321). Abingdon: Routledge.
42. E.Relph, (1976). Place and placelessness. London: Pion Limited.
43. M.Roe, (2013). Policy change and ELC implementation: Establishment of a baseline for understanding the impact on UK national policy of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research, 38, 768–798. doi:10.1080/01426397.2012.751968
44. R.L.Ryan, (2011). The social landscape of planning: Integrating social and perceptual research with spatial planning information. Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 361–363.10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.01.015
45. I.Sarlöv Herlin, (2007). Multiple interfaces of the European landscape convention: The interface with landscape ecology. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift, 61, 210–211.
46. A.Scott, (2011). Beyond the conventional: Meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention? Journal of Environmental Management, 92, 2754–2762. doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.017
47. J.Stephenson, (2005). Values in space and time: A framework for understanding and linking multiple cultural values in landscape (PhD thesis). University of Otoga, Dunedin.
48. J.Stephenson, (2008). The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84, 127–139. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003
49. J.Stephenson, (2010a). The dimensional landscape model: Exploring differences in expressing and locating landscape qualities. Landscape Research, 35, 299–318. doi:10.1080/01426391003743934
50. J.Stephenson, (2010b). People and place. Planning Theory & Practice, 11, 9–21. doi:10.1080/14649350903549878
51. V.Strang, (1997). Uncommon ground: Landscape, values and the environment. Oxford: Berg.
52. C.Swanwick,, & Land Use Consultants. (2002). Landscape character assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland. Cheltenham: Countryside Agency\Edinburgh: Scottish Natural Heritage.
53. T.S.Terkenli, (2001). Towards a theory of the landscape: The Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 197–208. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00204-3
54. I.H.Thompson, (2000). Ecology, community and delight. London: Spon.10.4324/9780203362495
55. B.Tress,, & G.Tress, (2001). Capitalising on multiplicity: A transdisciplinary systems approach to landscape research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57, 143–157. doi:10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00200-6
56. Y.Tuan, (1977). Space and place: The perspectives of experience Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
57. C.Tudor, (2014). An approach to landscape character assessment. Natural England. Retrieved March 13, 2014, from https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/landscape-character-assessments-identify-and-describe-landscape-types
58. A.van der Brink,, & D.Bruns, (2012). Strategies for enhancing landscape architecture research. Landscape Research, 39, 7–20.
59. A.Whiston-Spirn, (2000). The language of landscape. New York, NY: Yale University Press.