Uncovering landscape values and micro-geographies of meanings with the go-along method

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 122, Issue , 2014, Pages 108-121

  Bergeron, Julie ^a   Paquette, Sylvain ^a   Poullaouec Gonidec, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Go along; Landscape values; Mobile methodologies; Neighborhoods; Place; Urban planning

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; ECOLOGY;

GO-ALONG; LANDSCAPE VALUES; MOBILE METHODOLOGIES; NEIGHBORHOODS; PLACE;

URBAN PLANNING;

ENVIRONMENTAL VALUES; GEOGRAPHICAL REGION; LAND MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; PERCEPTION; URBAN AREA; URBAN PLANNING;

CANADA; QUEBEC [CANADA];

EID: 84892173452     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Anderson J. Talking whilst walking: A geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area 2004, 36(3):254-261. 10.1111/j.0004-0894.2004.00222.x.
2. Arefi M., Triantafillou M. Reflections on the pedagogy of place in planning and urban design. Journal of Planning Education and Research 2005, 25(1):75-88. 10.1177/0739456X04270195.
3. Ascher F. Les nouveaux principes de l'urbanisme 2010, Éditions de l'Aube, La Tour d'Aigues, France.
4. Binnie J., Edensor T., Holloway J., Millington S., Young C. Mundane mobilities, banal travels. Social & Cultural Geography 2007, 8(2):165-174. (Editorial). 10.1080/14649360701360048.
5. Büscher M., Urry J. Mobile methods and the empirical. European Journal of Social Theory 2009, 12(1):99-116. 10.1177/1368431008099642.
6. Carpiano R.M. Come take a walk with me: The "Go-Along" interview as a novel method for studying the implications of place for health and well-being. Health & Place 2009, 15(1):263-272. 10.1016/j.healthplace.2008.05.003.
7. Conrad E., Christie M., Fazey I. Is research keeping up with changes in landscape policy? A review of the literature. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(9):2097-2108. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.04.003.
8. Conrad E., Christie M., Fazey I. Understanding public perceptions of landscape: A case study from Gozo, Maltal. Applied Geography 2011, 31(1):159-170. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.03.009.
9. Council of Europe European landscape convention 2000, Retrieved from http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm.
10. Crouch D. Flirting with space: Thinking landscape relationally. Cultural Geographies 2010, 17(1):5-18. 10.1177/1474474009349996.
11. Dakin S. There's more to landscape than meets the eye: Towards inclusive landscape assessment in resource and environmental management. The Canadian Geographer 2003, 47(2):185-200. 10.1111/1541-0064.t01-1-00003.
12. EUROPAN7 Sub-urban challenge: Urban intensity and housing diversity 2003, Retrieved from http://www.europan-europe.eu/en/publications/europan-7-results.
13. Evans J., Jones P. The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography 2011, 31(2):849-858. 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.09.005.
14. Glover T.D., Stewart W.P., Gladdys K. Social ethics of landscape change. Qualitative Inquiry 2008, 14(3):84-401. 10.1177/1077800407309409.
15. Gustafson P. Meanings of place: Everyday experience and theoretical conceptualizations. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2001, 21(1):5-16. 10.1006/jevp.2000.0185.
16. Healey P. Urban complexity and spatial strategies towards a relational planning for our times 2007, Routledge, London.
17. Hein J.R., Evans J., Jones P. Mobile methodologies: Theory, technology and practice. Geography Compass 2008, 2(5):1266-1285. 10.1111/j.1749-8198.2008.00139.x.
18. Jones P., Bunce G., Evans J., Gibbs H., Hein J.R. Exploring space and place with walking interviews. Journal of Research Practice 2008, 4(2):1-9.
19. Jones P., Drury R., McBeath J. Using GPS-enabled mobile computing to augment qualitative interviewing: Two case studies. Field Methods 2011, 23(2):73-87. 10.1177/1525822X10388467.
20. Krevling C. The plan of Nashville: Avenues to a great city 2005, Vanderbilt University Press, Nashville, TN.
21. Kusenbach M. Street phenomenology: The go-along as ethnographic research tool. Ethnography 2003, 4(3):455-485. 10.1177/146613810343007.
22. Laurier E., Lorimer H., Brown B., Jones O., Juhlin O., Noble A., et al. Driving and "passengering": Notes on the ordinary organization of car travel. Mobilities 2008, 3(1):1-23. 10.1080/17450100701797273.
23. Lupi T., Musterd S. The suburban "community question". Urban Studies 2006, 43(4):801-817. 10.1080/00420980600597723.
24. Manzo L.C., Perkins D.D. Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature 2006, 20(4):335-350. 10.1177/0885412205286160.
25. Paquette S., Poullaouec-Gonidec P., Gagnon C. Le projet de paysage comme espace de dialogues publics et d'actions locales. Le paysage, un projet politique 2009, 207-219. Presses de l'Université du Québec, Sainte-Foy, Quebec. M. Bédard (Ed.).
26. Paquette S., Poullaouec-Gonidec P., Domon G. Le paysage, une qualification socioculturelle du territoire. Material History Review 2005, 62:60-72.
27. Perkins H.C. The country in the town: The role of real estate developers in the construction of the meaning of place. Journal of Rural Studies 1989, 5(1):61-74. 10.1016/0743-0167(89)90021-1.
28. Petiteau J.-Y., Pasquier E. La méthode des itinéraires: récits et parcours. L'espace urbain en méthodes 2001, 63-77. Éditions Parenthèses, Marseilles. M. Grosjean, J.-Y. Thibaud (Eds.).
29. Philadelphia LandVisions Philadelphia LandVisions - An international design competition 2005, Retrieved from www.landvisions.org/index.php.
30. Ross N.J., Renold E., Holland S., Hillman A. Moving stories: Using mobile methods to explore the everyday lives of young people in public care. Qualitative Research 2009, 9(5):605-623. 10.1177/1468794109343629.
31. Scott A., Carter C., Brown K., White V. Seeing is not everything": Exploring the landscape experiences of different publics. Landscape Research 2009, 34(4):397-424. 10.1080/01426390903009289.
32. Sevenant M., Anthrop M. Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy 2010, 27(2):373-386. 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.05.005.
33. Sheller M. Automotive emotions: Feeling the car. Theory, Culture & Society 2004, 21(4-5):221-242. 10.1177/0263276404046068.
34. Sheller M., Urry J. The new mobilities paradigm. Environment and Planning A 2006, 38(2):207-226. 10.1068/a37268.
35. Smaldone D., Harris C., Sanyal N. An exploration of place as a process: The case of Jackson Hole, WY. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2005, 25(4):397-414. 10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.12.003.
36. Spinney J. A chance to catch a breath: Using mobile video ethnography in cycling research. Mobilities 2011, 6(2):161-182. 10.1080/17450101.2011.552771.
37. Stephenson J. The Cultural Values Model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning 2008, 84(2):127-139. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.07.003.
38. Stewart W.P., Liebert D., Larkin K.W. Community identities as visions for landscape change. Landscape and Urban Planning 2004, 69(2-3):315-334. 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.07.005.
39. Sutton S., Kemp S. Integrating social science and design inquiry through interdisciplinary design charrettes: An approach to participatory community problem solving. American Journal of Community Psychology 2006, 38(1):125-139. 10.1007/s10464-006-9065-0.
40. Thrift N. Driving in the city. Theory, Culture & Society 2004, 21(4-5):41-59. 10.1177/0263276404046060.
41. Wylie J. Depths and folds: On landscape and the gazing subject. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space 2006, 24(4):519-535. 10.1068/d380t.
42. Winchester H.P.M., Kong L., Dunn K. Landscapes: Ways of imagining the world 2003, Pearson/Prentice Hall, Edinburgh, Harlow.