Awareness-raising of landscape in practice. An analysis of Landscape Character Assessments in England

Land Use Policy

Volumn 36, Issue , 2014, Pages 441-449

  Butler, Andrew ^a   Åkerskog, Ann ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Awareness raising; Co creation of meaning; European Landscape Convention; Landscape; Landscape Character Assessment

Indexed keywords

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; LANDSCAPE;

ENGLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84886303152     PISSN: 02648377     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2013.09.020     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Antrop M. The language of landscape ecologists and planners: a comparative content analysis of concepts used in landscape ecology. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 55(3):163-173.
2. Bell S., Sarlöv Herlin I., Stiles R. Introduction: landscape architecture in a changing world. Exploring the Boundaries of Landscape Architecture 2012, 1-14. Routledge, Abingdon. S. Bell, I. Sarlöv Herlin, R. Stiles (Eds.).
3. Burningham K., Fielding J., Thrush D. 'It'll never happen to me': understanding public awareness of local flood risk. Disasters 2008, 32(2):216-238.
4. Carr A. Mountain places, cultural spaces: the interpretation of culturally significant landscapes. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 2004, 12(5):432-459.
5. Clemetsen M., Krogh E., Halvorsen Thorén K. Landscape perception through participation: developing new tools for landscape analysis in local planning processes in Norway. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 219-237. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Jones, M. Stenseke (Eds.).
6. Council of Europe Council of Europe in brief 2011, http://www.coe.int/aboutCoe/index.asp (retrieved 11.07.12).
7. Council of Europe European Landscape Convention 2000, Council of Europe, Florence, Strasbourg, CETS No. 176. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (retrieved 10.11.12).
8. Council of Europe European Landscape Convention: Explanatory Report 2000, Council of Europe, Florence, Strasbourg, CETS No. 176. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Reports/Html/176.htm (retrieved 10.11.12).
9. Council of Europe Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention 2008, https://wcd.coe.int/ViewDoc.jsp?Ref=CM/Rec(2008)3&Language=lanEnglish&Ver=original&Site=CM&BackColorInternet=9999CC&BackColorIntranet=FFBB55&BackColorLogged=FFAC75 (retrieved 01.04.11).
10. Conrad E., Christie M., Fazey I. Understanding public perceptions of landscape: a case study from Gozo, Malta. Applied Geography 2011, 31(1):159-170.
11. Conrad E., Cassar L.F., Jones M., Eiter S., Izaovičová Z., Barankova Z., Christie M., Fazey I. Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 2011, 13(1):23-47.
12. Déjeant-Pons M. The European Landscape Convention: from concepts to rights. The Right to Landscape: Contesting Landscape and Human Rights 2011, 51-56. Ashgate, Farnham. S. Egoz, J. Makhzoumi, G. Pungetti (Eds.).
13. Egoz S., Makhzoumi J., Pungetti G. The Right to Landscape: Contesting Landscape and Human Rights 2011, Ashgate Publishing Limited, Farnham.
14. E.U Europa - Unity in diversity 2011, http://europa.eu/about-eu/basic-information/symbols/motto/ (retrieved 10.11.12).
15. ESF/COST Landscape in a changing world. bridging divides, integrating disciplines, serving society. Social Policy Breifing October, No. 41 2010, http://www.esf.org/index.php?eID=tx_nawsecuredl&u=0&file=fileadmin/be_user/CEO_Unit/Science_Policy/ESF-COST/2010/Landscape_SPB/SPB_Landscape_ChangingWorld.pdf&t=1373713284&hash=a060e2cec3f394027949c165bf125ae5812adde1 (retrieved 10.11.12).
16. Gailing L., Leibenath M. The Social Construction of Landscapes: two theoretical lenses and their empirical applications. Landscape Research 2013, 1-16.
17. Howard P. Spatial planning for landscape: mapping the pitfalls. Landscape Research 2004, 29(4):423-434.
18. Howard P. Multiple interfaces of the European Landscape Convention - the interface with Heritage. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 2007, 61:211-213.
19. Ingold T. The Perception of the Environemnt 2000, Routledge, London.
20. Johnson C., Penning-Rowsell E., Parker D. Natural and imposed injustices: the challenges in implementing 'fair' flood risk management policy in England. Geographical Journal 2007, 173(4):374-390.
21. Jones M. The European Landscape Convention and the Question of Public Participation. Landscape Research 2007, 32(5):613-633.
22. Jones M. European Landscape and Participation - Rhetoric or Reality? The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, vol. 13:27-44. Springer, Dordrecht.
23. Jones M., Daugstad K. Usages of the cultural landscape concept in Norwegian and Nordic landscape administration. Landscape Research 1997, 22(3):267-281.
24. Jones M., Stenseke M. The issue of public participation in the European Landscape Convention. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 1-26. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Jones, M. Stenseke (Eds.).
25. Lewis S., Pea R., Rosen J. Beyond participation to co-creation of meaning: mobile social media in generative learning communities. Social Science Information 2010, 49(3):351-369.
26. Majchrowska A. The implementation of the European landscape convention in Poland. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 81-89. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Jones, M. Stenseke (Eds.).
27. Matland R. Synthesizing the implementation literature: the ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 1995, 5(2):157-176.
28. Mouffe C. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?. Social Research 1999, 66(3):745-758.
29. Natural England European Landscape Convention: Natural England's 2009/2010 Action Plan 2009, http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/ELC-actionplan0910_tcm6-20278.pdf (retrieved 11.07.11).
30. Natural England and Countryscape Landscape Character Network Database 2010, http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/ourwork/landscape/englands/character/lcn/nationaldatabase/default.aspx (retrieved 10.01.13).
31. Nilsson K., Åkerlund U., Konijnendijk C., Alekseev A., Caspersen O., Guldager S., Kuznetsov E., Mezenko A., Selikhovkin A. Implementing urban greening aid projects - The case of St. Petersburg, Russia. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 2007, 6(2):93-101.
32. Nonaka I., von Krogh G. Tacit knowledge and knowledge conversion: controversy and advancement in organizational knowledge creation theory. Organization Science 2009, 20(3):635-652.
33. Olwig K. Multiple interfaces of the European Landscape Convention - the European Landscape Convention as 'interface'. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 2007, 6:214-215.
34. Olwig K.R. The practice of landscape 'Conventions' and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research 2007, 32(5):579-594.
35. Peak District National Park Authority Peak District Landscape Character Assessment 2007, http://www.peakdistrict.gov.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0007/90493/lca-fullreport.pdf (retrieved 03.07.13).
36. Pedroli B., Wascher D., de Blust G., Paracchini M.L., van Doorn A. Introduction: Europe's living landscapes at a turning point. Europe's Living Landscapes 2007, 11-18. KNNV Publishing, Zeist. B. Pedroli, A. Van Doorn, G. Be Blust (Eds.).
37. Planchat-Héry C. The Prospective Vision. Integrating the farmers' point of view into French and Belgium local planning. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 175-198. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Jones, M. Stenseke (Eds.).
38. Pløger J. Strife: urban planning and antagonism. Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory 2004, 199-220. Ashgate, Aldershot. J. Hillier, P. Healey (Eds.).
39. Polanyi M. The Tacit Dimension 1966, The Chicago University Press, Chicago.
40. Prieur M. Landscape and social, economic, cultural and ecological approaches. Landscape and sustainable development: challenges of the European Landscape Convention 2006, 11-28. Strasbourg Council of Europe. M. Prieur, Y. Luginbuehl, F. Zoido Naranjo, B. de Montmollin, B. Pedroli, J.D. van Mansvelt, S. Durousseau (Eds.).
41. Primmer E., Kyllönen S. Goals for public participation implied by sustainable development, and the preparatory process of the Finnish National Forest Programme. Forest Policy and Economics 2006, 8(8):838-853.
42. Proshansky H., Fabian A., et al. Place-identity: physical world socialization of the self. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1983, 3:57-83.
43. Read A.D. A weekly doorstep recycling collection, I had no idea we could! Overcoming the local barriers to participation. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 1999, 26(3/4):217-249.
44. Reed M.S., Evely A.C., Cundill G., Fazey I., Glass J., Laing A., Newig J., Parrish B., Prell C., Raymond C., Stringer L.C. What is social learning?. Ecology and Society 2010, 15(4). r1. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/resp1/.
45. Sack R.D. Homo Geographicus 1997, The John Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
46. Sarlöv Herlin I. Multiple interfaces of the European Landscape Convention - the interface with landscape ecology. Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift 2007, 61:210-211.
47. Sassatelli M. European identity between flows and places: insight from emerging European landscape Policies. Sociology 2010, 44(1):67-83.
48. Sayers R. Principles of Awareness-Raising: information Literacy, a case study 2006, UNESCO, Bangkok, http://drtc.isibang.ac.in/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1849/290/Principles_of_awareness-raising_Information_literacy_a_case_study_by_Richard_Sayers.pdf?sequence=1 (retrieved 15.06.12).
49. Schön D.A. The Reflective Practitioner: How professionals think in action 1983, Ashgate, Aldershot.
50. Scott A. Assessing public perception of landscape:the LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research 2002, 27(3):271-295.
51. Scott A. Beyond the conventional: meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention?. Journal of Environmental Management 2011, 92(10):2754-2762.
52. Selman P. Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscape. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 2004, 47:365-392.
53. Sevenant M., Antrop M. Transdisciplinary landscape planning: does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy 2010, 27(2):373-386.
54. Soini K. Between insideness and outsideness: studying local's perceptions of landscape. European Rural Landscapes: Persistence and Change in a Globalising Environment 2004, 83-98. Kluwer, Dordrecht. H.S. Palang, H.M. Antrop, G. Setten (Eds.).
55. Spencer N. Participation within the landscape of the River Dart Catchment, Devon, England. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation 2011, 239-260. Springer, Dordrecht. M. Jones, M. Stenseke (Eds.).
56. Stahlschmidt P., Nellemann V. Metoder til Landskabsanalyse: Kortlǽǽgning af stedets karakter og potentiale 2009, Forlaget Grønt Miljø.
57. Stenseke M. Local participation in cultural landscape maintenance: lessons from Sweden. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(2):214-223.
58. Swanwick C. Landscape Character Assessment, Guidance for England and Scotland 2002, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh.
59. Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(Suppl. 1(0)):62-75.
60. Swanwick C., Bingham L., Parfitt A. Topic paper 3 - Landscape Character Assesment - How stakeholders can help. Landscape Character Assessment Guidance 2002, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh.
61. Tilley C. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology 2004, Berg Publishers, Oxford.
62. Tuan Y. Topophilia: Study of Environmental Perception, Attitude and Value 1977, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
63. UNECE Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice on Environmental Matters 1998, UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Aarhus, http://www.unece.org/env/pp/ (retrieved 10.05.12).
64. Vouligny É., Domon G., Ruiz J. An assessment of ordinary landscapes by an expert and by its residents: landscape values in areas of intensive agricultural use. Land Use Policy 2009, 26(4):890-900.