Landscape Character Assessment as an Approach to Understanding Public Interests within the European Landscape Convention

Landscape Research

Volumn 39, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 219-236

  Butler, Andrew ^a   Berglund, Ulla ^a  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; LANDSCAPE STRUCTURE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PERCEPTION;

ENGLAND; SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84904439364     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2012.716404     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Antrop, M. 2000. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 77 (1-2): 17 - 28.
2. Antrop, M. 2005. Why landscapes of the past are important for the future. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70 (1-2): 21 - 34.
3. Arnstein, S. R. 1969. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 34 (4): 216 - 225.
4. Berglund, U. and Nordin, K. 2007. Using GIS to make young people's voices heard in urban planning. Building Environment, 33 (4): 469 - 481.
5. Buchecker, M., Hunziker, M. and Kienast, F. 2003. Participatory landscape development: overcoming social barriers to public involvement. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64 (1-2): 29 - 46.
6. Canter, D. 1977. The Psychology of Place, London: The Architectural Press Ltd.
7. Clemetsen, M. and Krogh, E. 2011. " Landscape perception through participation: Developing new tools for landscape analysis in local planning processes in Norway ". In The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation, Edited by: Jones, M. and Stenseke, M. 219 - 237. Dordrecht: Springer.
8. Conrad, E. and Cassar, L. F. 2011. Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13 (1): 23 - 47.
9. Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 2001. " The case for participation as tyranny ". In Participation: The New Tyranny?, Edited by: Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 1 - 15. London: Zed Books.
10. Council of Europe (CoE). 2000a. European Landscape Convention. CETS No. 176, Florence and Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
11. CoE. 2000b. European Landscape Convention: Explanatory Report. CETS No. 176, Florence and Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
12. CoE. Recommendation CM/Rec(2008)3 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on the guidelines for the implementation of the European Landscape Convention. Available athttp://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/landscape/versionsorientation/anglais.pdf (accessed 4 January 2011)
13. CoE. Council of Europe in brief. Available at http://www.coe.int/aboutcoe/ (accessed 12 July
14. Cox, R. 2006. Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
15. Craik, K. 1986. " Psychological reflections on landscape ". In Landscape Meanings and Values, Edited by: Penning-Rowsell, E. and Lowenthal, D. 48 - 64. London: Allen & Unwin.
16. Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning & Riksantikvaren. 2010. Landskapsanalyse: Framgangsmåte for vurdering av landskapskarakter og landskapsverdi, Direktoratet for naturforvaltning og Riksantikvaren.
17. European Environment Agency (EEA). 2007. Europe's Environment-The Fourth Assessment, Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
18. Fry, G. 2001. Multifunctional landscapes: Towards transdisciplinary research. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57: 159 - 168.
19. Groening, G. 2007. The 'Landscape must become the law' or should it?. Landscape Research, 32 (5): 595 - 612.
20. Gunder, M. and Hillier, J. 2004. Conforming to the expectations of the profession: A Lacanian perspective on planning practice, norms and values. Planning Theory & Practice, 5 (2): 217 - 235.
21. Hague, C. and Jenkins, P. 2005. Place, Identity, Participation and Planning, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.
22. Healey, P. 1996. " The communicative turn in planning theory and its implications for spatial strategy formation ". In Readings in Planning Theory, Edited by: Campbell, S. F. 237 - 255. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Hilyard, N. and Hegde, P. 2001. " Pluralism, participation and power: Joint forest management in India ". In Participation: The New Tyranny?, Edited by: Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 56 - 71. London: Zed Books.
24. Home Office. What works in community involvement in area-based initiatives: A systematic review of literature. Available at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20110218135832/http://rds.homeoffice.gov.uk/rds/pdfs04/rdsolr5304.pdf (accessed 25 June 2009)
25. Höppner, C. and Frick, J. 2008. What drives people's willingness to discuss local landscape development?. Landscape Research, 33 (5): 605 - 622.
26. IAP2. IAP2 spectrum of public participation. Available at www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/IAP2%20Spectrum_vertical.pdf (accessed 15 June 2009)
27. Ingold, T. 2000. The Perception of the Environment, London: Routledge.
28. Innes, J. E. 2004. Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Planning Theory, 3 (1): 5 - 20.
29. Innes, J. B. and Booher, D. E. 2003. " Collaborative policy making: Governance through dialogue ". In Deliberative Policy Analysis, Edited by: Hajer, M. and Wagenaar, H. 33 - 59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Innes, J. E. and Booher, D. E. 2004. Reframing public participation: Strategies for the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5 (4): 419 - 436.
31. James, P. and Gittins, J. W. 2007. Local landscape character assessment: An evaluation of community-led schemes in Cheshire. Landscape Research, 32 (4): 423 - 442.
32. Jones, M. 2007. The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research, 32 (5): 613 - 633.
33. Lowenthal, D. 1986. " Introduction ". In Landscape Meanings and Values, Edited by: Penning-Rowsell, E. and Lowenthal, D. 1 - 2. London: Allen & Unwin.
34. Luginbu{double acute}hl, Y. 2006. " Landscape and individual and social well-being ". In Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention, 29 - 51. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
35. Manzo, L. C. and Perkins, D. D. 2006. Finding common ground: The importance of place attachment to community participation and planning. Journal of Planning Literature, 20 (4): 335 - 350.
36. Miljøministeriet. 2007. Vejledning om Landskabet i kommunenplanlægningen, Copenhagen: Miljöministeriet.
37. Monmonier, M. 1996. How to Lie with Maps, Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
38. Mosse, D. 2001. " People's knowledge', participation and patronage: Operations and representation in rural development ". In Participation: The New Tyranny?, Edited by: Cooke, B. and Kothari, U. 16 - 35. London: Zed Books.
39. Mouffe, C. 1999. Deliberative democracy or agonistic pluralism?. Social Research, 66 (3): 745 - 758.
40. Natural England. European Landscape Convention: Natural England's 2009/2010 Action Plan. Available at http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/ELC-actionplan0910_tcm6-20278.pdf (accessed 11 July 2011)
41. Naveh, Z. 2001. Ten major premises for a holistic conception of multifunctional landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 57 (3-4): 269 - 284.
42. Olwig, K. R. 2007. The practice of landscape 'Conventions' and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research, 32 (5): 579 - 594.
43. Oreszczyn, S. and Lane, A. 2000. The meaning of hedgerows in the English landscape: Different stakeholder perspectives and the implications for future hedge management. Journal of Environmental Management, 60 (1): 101 - 118.
44. Pløger, J. 2004. " Strife: Urban planning and antagonism ". In Contemporary Movements in Planning Theory, Edited by: Hillier, J. and Healey, P. 199 - 220. Aldershot: Ashgate Publishing.
45. Prieur, M. 2006. " Landscape and social, economic, cultural and ecological approaches ". In Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention, 11 - 28. Strasbourg: Council of Europe.
46. Prieur, M. and Durousseau, S. 2006. " Landscape and public participation ". In Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention, 165 - 207. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
47. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141 (10): 2417 - 2431.
48. Reiter, O. 2006. Det Skånska landsbgdsprogrammet - Ett utvecklingsprogram med landskapsperspektiv, Malmö: Lånsstyrelsen i Skåne Län.
49. Sager, T. 2005. Planning through inclusive dialogue: No escape from social choice dilemmas. Economic Affairs, 25 (4): 32 - 35.
50. Sager, T. 2009. Planners' role: Torn between dialogical ideals and neo-liberal realities. European Planning Studies, 17 (1): 65 - 84.
51. Scott, A. 2002. Assessing public perception of landscape: The LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research, 27 (3): 271 - 295.
52. Scott, A. 2003. Assessing public perception of landscape: From practice to policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5 (2): 123 - 144.
53. Scott, A. 2011. Beyond the conventional: Meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention?. Journal of Environmental Management, 92 (10): 2754 - 2762.
54. Selman, P. 2006. Planning at the Landscape Scale, London: Routledge.
55. Sevenant, M. and Antrop, M. 2010. Transdisciplinary landscape planning: Does the public have aspirations? Experiences from a case study in Ghent (Flanders, Belgium). Land Use Policy, 27 (2): 373 - 386.
56. Stahlschmidt, P. and Nellemann, V. 2009. Metoder til Landskabsanalyse: Kortlægning af stedets karakter og potentiale, Forlaget Grønt Miljø.
57. Stephenson, J. 2008. The cultural values model: An integrated approach to values in landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 84 (2): 127 - 139.
58. Swanwick, C. 2002. Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland, Cheltenham and Edinburgh: Landscape Character Assessment Guidance, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham and Scottish Natural Heritage. Available at http://www.landscapecharacter.org.uk/files/pdfs/LCA-Guidance.pdf (accessed 4 January 2012)
59. Swanwick, C. and Bingham, L. 2002. " Topic Paper 3-Landscape Character Assessment. How stakeholders can help ". In Landscape Character Assessment Guidance, Cheltenham and Edinburgh: Countryside Agency and Scottish Natural Heritage.
60. Tilley, C. 2004. The Materiality of Stone: Explorations in Landscape Phenomenology, Oxford: Berg Publishers.
61. Tress, B. and Tress, G. 2003. " Interdisciplinarity and transdisciplinarity in landscape studies: The Wageningen DELTA approach ". In Interdisciplinary and Transdisciplinary Landscape Studies: Potential and Limitations, Edited by: Tress, B. T. and van der Valk, G. A. Wageningen: Alterra Green World Research.
62. UNECE. 1998. Aarhus Convention on Access to Information, Public Participation in Decision-making and Access to Justice on Environmental Matters, Aarhus: UNECE, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe. http://www.unece.org/env/pp/
63. Uzzell, D. L. 1991. Environmental psychological perspectives on landscape. Landscape Research, 16 (1): 3 - 10.
64. Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape, Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.