Rhetoric and reporting of public participation in landscape policy

Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 23-47

  Conrad, Elisabeth ^a   Cassar, Louis F ^a   Jones, Michael ^b   Eiter, Sebastian ^c   Izaovičová, Zita ^d   Barankova, Zuzana ^d   Christie, Mike ^e   Fazey, Ioan ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALTA   (Malta)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE OF BIOECONOMY RESEARCH   (Norway)

^d INSTITUTE OF CHEMISTRY   (Slovakia)

^e ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^f UNIVERSITY OF ST ANDREWS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79953187653     PISSN: 1523908X     EISSN: 15227200     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1523908X.2011.560449     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. Aasetre, J. (2006) Perceptions of communication in Norwegian forest management, Forest Policy and Economics, 8(1), pp. 81-92.
2. Aitken, M. (2010) A three-dimensional view of public participation in Scottish land-use planning: Empowerment or social control? Planning Theory, 9(3), pp. 248-264.
3. Almasan, O. & Reinhard, Z. (2009) The negative impact of legislation pitfalls on meaningful participation, efficient policy-making and effective governance, Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 25E, pp. 5-12.
4. Arkitektkontoret ABO (2008a) Landskapsanalyse Erikajordet (Samnager: Arkitektkontoret ABO og Samnanger commune).
5. Arkitektkontoret ABO (2008b) Landskapsanalyse for Lønnebakken bustadområde - 2. Etappe (Samnager: Arkitektkontoret ABO og Samnanger commune).
6. Arnstein, A. (1969) A ladder of citizen participation, Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), pp. 216-224.
7. Asplan Viak (2007) Sund kommune kommunedelplan Skogsskiftet: Landskapsanalyse. Utkast 12-11-2007 (Bergen: Asplan Viak).
8. Asplan Viak (2008) Registrering - Analyse: KDP Skogsskiftet, Sund kommune, Delrapport 1 (Bergen og Sund: Asplan Viak AS og Sund commune).
9. Baldacchino, G. (2002) A nationless state? Malta, national identity and the EU, West European Politics, 25(4), pp. 191-206.
10. Bartholomew, K. (2007) Land use-transportation scenario planning: Promise and reality, Transportation, 34(4), pp. 397-412.
11. Bennett, A. F. (2003) Linkages in the Landscape: The Role of Corridors and Connectivity in Wildlife Conservation (Gland: IUCN).
12. Beresford, M. & Phillips, A. (2000) Protected landscapes: A conservation model for the 21st century, George Wright Forum, 17(1), pp. 15-26.
13. Bezak, P., Lieskovsky, J. & Petrovic, F. (2010) Particularities of political and socio-economical changes in Slovakia linked to spatial distribution of representative landscape ecosystems, in: UNISCAPE (Eds) Living Landscape: the European Landscape Convention in Research Perspective, Vol 2. pp. 185-190. (Florence: Bandecchi & Vivaldi).
14. Bhatnagar, B. & Williams, A. C. (1992) Participatory Development and the World Bank: Potential Directions for Change, World Bank Discussion Paper 183 (Washington, DC: World Bank).
15. Bjørnstad, K. (2009) Prosjektnotat Stadkjensleprosjektet - Ornes 2008/09: Del av Fagrapport fro områdeforvaltning av Ornes i Luster kommune. Notat 01 - 2009 (Aurland: Aurland naturverkstad).
16. Carr, D. S. & Halvorsen, K. (2001) An evaluation of three democratic, community-based approaches to citizen participation: Surveys, conversations with community groups, and community dinners, Society and Natural Resources, 14(2), pp. 107-126.
17. Caspersen, O. H. (2009) Public participation in strengthening cultural heritage: The role of Landscape Character Assessment in Denmark, Geografisk Tidsskrift-Danish Journal of Geography, 109(1), pp. 33-45.
18. Chess, C. & Purcell, K. (1999) Public participation and the environment: Do we know what works? Environmental Science & Technology, 33(16), pp. 2685-2692.
19. Clemetsen, M. (2009) Landskapsressursanalyser: verktøy for integrert stedsutviking og forvalting. Notat. Kurset 'natur-og kulturbasert nyskaping', første samling, Telemark (Aurland: Aurland naturverkstad).
20. Clemetsen, M. & Knagenhjelm, T. K. (2010) Landskapsressursanalyse: 'Telemarkskanalen som regionalpark'-Rapport 01-2010 (Aurland: Aurland naturverkstad).
21. Conrad, E. (2008) Conservation planning in a cultural context: An island perspective-the case of the Maltese Islands, International Journal of Environmental Consumerism, 4(7-8), pp. 37-42.
22. Conrad, E., Fazey, I. & Christie, M. (2010) Is research keeping up with changes in landscape policy? A review of the literature, submitted for publication.
23. Council of Europe (1996) Pan-European Biological and Landscape Diversity Strategy, Council of Europe Press. Available at http://www.peblds.org/ (accessed 22 May 2010).
24. Council of Europe (2000) European Landscape Convention. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed 22 July 2010).
25. Council of Europe (2010) Compendium of national data of landscape. Available at http://www.coe.int/t/dg4/cultureheritage/heritage/landscape/Compendium/Compendium_en.asp (accessed 19 July 2010).
26. Davidson, S. (1998) Spinning the wheel of empowerment, Planning, 3(4), pp. 14-15.
27. Déjeant-Pons, M. (2006) The European Landscape Convention, Landscape Research, 31(4), pp. 363-384.
28. Dietz, T. & Stern, P. C. (2008) Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making (Washington, DC: The National Academies Press).
29. Direktoratet for naturforvaltning & Riksantivaren (2010) Landskapsanalyse: Framgangsmåte for vurdering av landskapskarakter og landskap verdi. Versjon Februar 2010 (Trondheim & Osto: Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning og Ricksantikvaren).
30. Dudley, N., Gujja, B., Jackson, B., Jeanrenaud, J., Oviedo, G., Phillips, A., Rosabel, P., Stolton, S. & Wells, S. (1999) Challenges for protected areas in the 21st century, in: S. Stolton & N. Dudley (Eds), Partnerships for Protection: New Strategies for Planning and Management for Protected Areas, pp. 3-12. (London: Earthscan).
31. Eiter, S. (2010) Landscape as an area perceived through activity: Implications for diversity management and conservation, Landscape Research, 35(3), pp. 339-359.
32. Elgersma, A. (1996) Landskapsregioner i Norge, med underregioninndeling (Å s: Norsk institutt for jord- og skogkartlegging).
33. Evans, D., Pilkington, P. & McEachran, M. (2010) Rhetoric or reality? A systematic review of the impact of participatory approaches by UK public health units on health and social outcomes, Journal of Public Health, 32(3), pp. 418-426.
34. Everhart, W. C. (1972) The National Park Service (New York: Praeger Publishers).
35. Fischer, F. (2000) Citizens, Experts and the Environment. The Politics of Local Knowledge (London: Duke University Press).
36. Flint, R. W. (2010) Seeking resiliency in the development of sustainable communities, Human Ecology Review, 17(1), pp. 44-57.
37. Freeman, C., Nairn, K. & Sligo, J. (2003) 'Professionalising' participation: From rhetoric to practice, Children's Geographies, 1(1), pp. 53-70.
38. Fry, G., Puschmann, O. & Dramstad, W. (1999) Geographic information for research and policy: A Norwegian landscape perspective, in: M.B. Usher (Eds), Landscape character: Perspectives on Management and Change, pp. 189-203. (Edinburgh: The Stationery Office).
39. Fylkesmannen i Hordaland & Hordaland fylkeskommune (2007) Prosjektplan for Landskap i communal planlegging (Bergen: Fylkesmannen i Hordaland & Hordaland fylkeskommune).
40. Gaventa, J. (2002) Exploring citizenship, participation and accountability, IDS Bulletin, 33(2).
41. Gerasidi, A., Apostolaki, S., Manoli, E., Assimacopoulos, D. & Vlachos, E. (2009) Towards the formulation of a new strategy of water resource management for urban areas achieved through participatory processes, Urban Water Journal, 6(3), pp. 209-219.
42. Granvin Herad (2008) Kommuneplan for Granvin herad Arealdel 2008 2017-Informasjon, føresegnar og retningslinjer: Planforslag med konsekvensutgreiing mai 2008 (Granvin: Granvin herad).
43. Halvorsen, K. E. (2001) Assessing public participation techniques for comfort, convenience, satisfaction and deliberation, Environmental Management, 28(2), pp. 179-186.
44. Hentschel, J. (1994) Does participation cost the bank more? Emerging evidence, in: World Bank (Eds), Human Resources Development and Operations Policy Working Papers 31 (Washington, DC:World Bank).
45. International Association for Public Participation (2007a) IAP2 core values of public participation. Available at http://www.iap2.org/displaycommon.cfm?an=4 (accessed 1 May 2010).
46. International Association for Public Participation (2007b) The spectrum of participation. Available at http://www.iap2.org/associations/4748/files/IAP2%20Spectrum_vertical.pdf (accessed 20/05/10).
47. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development (London: Routledge).
48. Ivakovičová, Z. & Bezak, P. (2009) The representative landscape ecosystems of Slovakia: Management tool for sustainable development? in: M. Jones & M. Stenseke (Eds) Scientific Symposium: Geography and Sustainable Development Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia, October 22-25, 2009.
49. Johnson, D. E. & Dagg, S. (2003) Achieving public participation in coastal zone environmental impact assessment, Journal of Coastal Conservation, 9(1), pp. 13-18.
50. Jones, M. (2007) The European Landscape Convention and the question of public participation, Landscape Research, 32(5), pp. 613-633.
51. Jones, M. (2011) European landscape and participation-rhetoric or reality? in: M. Jones & M. Stenseke (Eds) The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation (Dordrecht Springer).
52. Jones, M. & Stenseke, M. (2011) The issue of public participation in the European Landscape Convention, The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of Participation (Dordrecht Springer).
53. Jones, B. & Murphree, M. (2001) The evolution of policy on community conservation in Namibia and Zimbabwe, in: D. Hulme & M. Murphree (Eds), African Wildlife and Livelihoods: The Promise and Performance of Community Conservation, pp. 38-58. (Oxford: James Currey).
54. Jones, M., Howard, P., Olwig, K. R., Primdahl, J. & Sarlöv Herlin, I. (2007) Multiple interfaces of the European Landscape Convention, Norsk Geografisk Tidsskrift-Norwegian Journal of Geography, 61(4), pp. 207-215.
55. Jonsson, A., Andersson, L., Alkan-Olsson, J. & Arheimer, B. (2007) How participatory can participatory modeling be? Degrees of influence of stakeholder and expert perspectives in six dimensions of participatory modeling, Water Science and Technology, 56(1), pp. 207-214.
56. Kathlene, L. & Martin, J. A. (1991) Enhancing citizen participation: Panel designs, perspectives and planning, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 10(1), pp. 46-63.
57. Keogh, B. (1990) Public participation in community tourism planning, Annals of Tourism Research, 17(3), pp. 449-465.
58. Kim, K. H. & Pauleit, S. (2007) Landscape character, biodiversity and land use planning: The case of Kwangju City Region, South Korea, Land Use Policy, 24(1), pp. 264-274.
59. Kovalev, N., Koeppel, J., Drozdov, A. & Dittrich, E. (2009) Democracy and the environment in Russia, Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 11(2), pp. 161-173.
60. Landscape Character Network (2009) Landscape Character Assessment. Available at http://www.landscapecharacter.org.uk/lca (accessed 20 April 2009).
61. Landscape Character Network (2010) Microsite: Database of Landscape Character Assessments in England, Available at http://www.landscapecharacter.org.uk/database (accessed 19 June 2010).
62. Lasker, R. D. & Weiss, E. S. (2003) Broadening participation in community problem solving: A multidisciplinary model to support collaborative practice and research, Journal of Urban Health: Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 80(1), pp. 14-60.
63. Lauber, B. T. & Knuth, B. A. (1999) Measuring fairness in citizen participation: A case study of moose management, Society and Natural Resources, 1(1), pp. 19-37.
64. Laurian, L. & Shaw, M.M. (2009) Evaluation of public participation: The practices of certified planners, Journal of Planning Education and Research, 28(3), pp. 293-309.
65. Lee, M. & Abbot, C. (2003) The usual suspects? Public participation under the Aarhus Convention, The Modern Law Review, 66(1), pp. 80-108.
66. Lindås Kommune (2008) Planprogram Kommunedelplan for Linda °sosane, Lygra og Lurefjorden (Lindås: Lindås kommune).
67. Lindås Kommune (2009) Landskapsanalyse for Lindåsosane, Lygra og Lurefjorden (Lindå s: Lindås kommune).
68. Lockwood, M. & Kothari, A. (2006) Social context, in: M. Lockwood, G.L.Worboys & A. Kothari (Eds), Managing Protected Areas: A Global Guide, pp. 41-72. (London: Earthscan).
69. Macnaghten, P. & Jacobs, M. (1997) Public identification with sustainable development: Investigating cultural barriers to participation, Global Environmental Change, 7(1), pp. 5-24.
70. Mallia, F. (2004) The European Landscape Convention and its relevance to the Maltese context, Malta Environment and Planning Authority, Available at http://www.mepa.org.mt/news-details?id=459 (accessed 03/02/10).
71. Malta Environment and Planning Authority (2004) Landscape Assessment Study of the Maltese Islands, Available at http://www.mepa.org.mt/lpg-structureplanreview#Landscape (accessed 22 July 2010).
72. Manwaring, R. (2010) Unequal voices: 'Strategic' consultation in South Australia, Australian Journal of Public Administration, 69(2), pp. 178-189.
73. Martin, A. & Sherington, J. (1997) Participatory research methods-implementation, effectiveness and institutional context, Agricultural Systems, 55(2), pp. 195-216.
74. Mascarenhas, M. & Scarce, R. (2004) 'The intention was good': Legitimacy, consensus-based decision making, and the case of forest planning in British Columbia, Canada, Society and Natural Resources, 17(1), pp. 17-38.
75. Miklos, L. & Kocicky, E. (2009) Representative landscape element types of the Slovak Republic-Map 1:500 000.
76. Miljøverndepartementet (2008) LOV 2008-06-27 nr 71: Lov om planlegging og byggesaksbehandling (plan- og bygningsloven). Available at http://www.lovdata.no/cgi-wift/ldles?doc=/all/nl-20080627-071.html (accessed 13 July 2010).
77. Miller, K. R. (1999) Bioregional planning and biodiversity conservation, in: S. Stolton & N. Dudley (Eds), Partnerships for Protection: New Strategies for Planning and Management for Protected Aareas, pp. 41-49. (London: Earthscan).
78. Mišiková, P. (2009) Council of Europe, linking land and planning, cultural heritage and landscape protection, Environmagazin, 14(2), pp. 10-11.
79. Mutebi, J. (2003) Co-managed protected areas: From conflict to collaboration-experience in Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, in:, Vth World Parks Congress, Durban.
80. Norton, T. (2007) The structuration of public participation: Organizing environmental control, Environmental Communication-A Journal of Nature and Culture, 1(2), pp. 146-170.
81. Obar, J. A. & Schejter, A. M. (2010) Inclusion or illusion? An analysis of the FCC's public hearings on media ownership 2006-2007, Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 54(2), pp. 212-227.
82. Olwig, K. R. (2002) Landscape, Nature and the Body Politic: From Britain's Renaissance to America's New World (Madison: The University of Wisconsin Press).
83. Olwig, K. R. (2005) Editorial: Law, polity and the changing meaning of landscape, Landscape Research, 30(3), pp. 293-298.
84. Olwig, K. R. (2007) The practice of landscape 'conventions' and the just landscape: The case of the European Landscape Convention, Landscape Research, 32(5), pp. 579-594.
85. Ozerol, G. & Newig, J. (2008) Evaluating the success of public participation in water resources management: Five key constituents, Water Policy, 10(6), pp. 639-655.
86. O'Regan, T. (2008) A Guide to Undertaking a Landscape Circle Study in Seven Easy Steps (Cork: Landscape Alliance Ireland).
87. Petts, J. & Leach, B. (2000) Evaluating Methods for Public Participation: Literature Review, R&D Technical Report: E135 (Bristol: Environment Agency).
88. Phillips, A. (2000) International policies and landscape protection, in: J. Benson & M.H. Roe (Eds), Landscape and Sustainability, pp. 98-120. (London: Spon Press).
89. Phillips, A. (2002) Management Guidelines for IUCN Category V Protected Areas: Protected Landscapes/Seascapes, p. 7(Gland: IUCN).
90. Phillips, A. (2009) Landscape-The maturing of an idea over 60 years. Available at http://www.naturalengland.org.uk/Images/Adrian%20Phillips_speech_tcm6-15764.pdf (accessed 13 July 2010).
91. Poisner, J. (1996) A civic republican perspective on the National Environmental Policy Act's process for citizen participation, Environmental Law, 26(1), pp. 53-94.
92. Pretty, J. N. (1995) Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture, World Development, 23(8), pp. 1247-1263.
93. Prieur, M. (2006) Landscape and social, economic, cultural and ecological approaches, in: Council of Europe (Eds), Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention, pp. 11-28. (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing).
94. Prieur, M. & Durousseau, S. (2006) Landscape and public participation, in: of Europe Council (Eds), Landscape and Sustainable Development: Challenges of the European Landscape Convention, pp. 165-207. (Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing).
95. Puschmann, O. (1998) The Norwegian Landscape Reference System-Use of Different Sources as a Base to Describe Landscape Regions, NIJOS-report 12/98, Ås: Norwegian Institute of Land Inventory.
96. Puschmann, O. (2005) Nasjonalt referansesystem for landskap: Beskrivelse av Norges 45 landskapsregioner, NIJOS-rapport 10/2005, A ° s: Norsk institutt for jord- og skogkartlegging.
97. Rauschmayer, F., van den Hove, S. & Koetz, T. (2009) Participation in EU biodiversity governance: How far beyond rhetoric? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), pp. 42-58.
98. Reed, M. S. (2008) Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review, Biological Conservation, 141(10), pp. 2417-2431.
99. Richards, C., Blackstock, K. L. & Carter, C. E. (2004) Practical Approaches to Participation: SERG Policy Brief No. 1 (Aberdeen: Macauley Land Use Research Institute).
100. Rössler, M. (1995) Neue Perspektiven für den Schutz von Kulturlandschaften: Natur und Kultur im Rahmen der Welterbekonvention, Geographische Rundschau, 47(6), pp. 343-347.
101. Rössler, M. (2006) World Heritage cultural landscapes: A UNESCO flagship programme 1992-2006, Landscape Research, 31(4), pp. 333-353.
102. Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2000) Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation, Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), pp. 3-29.
103. Rowe, G. & Frewer, L. J. (2004) Evaluating public participation exercises: A research agenda, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(4), pp. 512-557.
104. Rowe, G., Marsh, R. & Frewer, L. J. (2004) Evaluation of a deliberative conference, Science, Technology and Human Values, 29(1), pp. 88-121.
105. Sinclair, A. J., Sims, L. & Spaling, H. (2009) Community-based approaches to strategic environmental assessment: Lessons from Costa Rica, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 29(3), pp. 147-156.
106. Skjerdal, I. B. (2009) Fagrapport for områdeforvaltning av Ornes i Luster kommune-Rapport 01-2009 (Aurland: Aurland naturverkstad).
107. Skjerdal, I. B. & Clemetsen, M. (2007) Landskapsanalyse for Granvin herad (Aurland: Aurland naturverkstad BA), Rapport 12-2007.
108. Stanners, D. & Bourdeau, P. (1995) Europe's Environment: The Dobríš Assessment (Copenhagen: European Environment Agency).
109. Stringer, L. C., Reed, M. S., Dougill, A. J., Rokitzki, M. & Seely, M. (2007) Enhancing participation in the implementation of the United Nations Convention to Combat Desertification, Natural Resources Forum, 31, pp. 198-211.
110. Swanwick, C. & Land Use Consultants (2002) Landscape Character Assessment-Guidance for England and Scotland (Cheltenham: Countryside Agency).
111. Swanwick, C., Bingham, L. & Parfitt, A. (2002) LCA Topic Paper 3: Landscape Character Assessment-How Stakeholders Can Help (Wetherby: Countryside Agency Publications).
112. Tuler, S. & Webler, T. (1999) Voices from the forest: What participants expect of a public participation process, Society and Natural Resources, 12(5), pp. 437-453.
113. Turney, J. (1996) Public understanding of science, The Lancet, 347, pp. 1087-1090.
114. Valencia-Sandoval, C., Flanders, D. N. & Kozak, R. A. (2010) Participatory landscape planning and sustainable community development: Methodological observations from a case study in rural Mexico, Landscape and Urban Planning, 94(1), pp. 63-70.
115. Wallerstein, N. (1999) Power between evaluator and community: Research relationships within New Mexico's healthier communities, Social Science & Medicine, 49(1), pp. 39-53.