Beyond the conventional: Meeting the challenges of landscape governance within the European Landscape Convention?

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 92, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2754-2762

  Scott, Alister ^a  

^a BIRMINGHAM CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Culture; European landscape convention; Interdisciplinarity; Landscape perception

Indexed keywords

CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CULTURE; EUROPEAN LANDSCAPE CONVENTION; INTERDISCIPLINARITY; LANDSCAPE MANAGEMENT; LANDSCAPE PERCEPTIONS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORKS; POLICY MAKERS; SPATIAL PLANNING;

CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; EUROPEAN UNION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; INTERDISCIPLINARY APPROACH; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; POLICY MAKING; SPATIAL PLANNING;

ARTICLE; EUROPE; LANDSCAPE ECOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; POLICY; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; UNITED KINGDOM;

SCOTLAND; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 79960843077     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.06.017     Document Type: Article

References (76)

1. Anderson A. Talking whilst walking: a geographical archaeology of knowledge. Area 2004, 36(3):254-258.
2. Appleton J. The Experience of Landscape 1975, Wiley, Chichester.
3. Appleton K., Lovett A. GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: defining 'sufficient' realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 65(3):117-131.
4. Arnstein S.R. A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the Royal Town Planning Institute 1969, 35(4):216-224.
5. Barker, K., 2006. Barker Review of Land use Planning (Final Report) (accessed 25.01.10.). http://www.communities.gov.uk/planningandbuilding/planning/planningpolicyimplementation/reformplanningsystem/barkerreviewplanning/barkerreviewfinal/.
6. Bell S. Landscape pattern, perception and visualisation in the visual management of forests. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54(1-4):201-211.
7. Bishop I.D., Rohrmann B. Subjective responses to simulated and real environments: a comparison. Landscape and Urban Planning 2003, 65(4):261-277.
8. Bishop I.D., Wherrett J.R., Miller D.R. Assessment of path choices on a country walk using a virtual environment. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 52:225-237.
9. Blackstock K.L. Between a rock and a hard place: incompatible objectives at the heart of river basin planning?. Water Science and Technology 2009, 59:425-431.
10. Bourdieu P. Outline of a Theory of Practice 1977, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
11. Chanse V. Contexts and complexities: a case study in evolving participatory watershed stewardship. Landscape Journal 2011, 30:121-132.
12. Council of Europe, 2000. European Landscape Convention, ETS 176. (accessed 20.07.08.). http://www.google.co.uk/search%3Fhl%3Den&q%3DCouncil%2Bof%2BEurope%2B2000%2Blandscape%2BConvention%2B&meta%3D.
13. The LANDMAP Information System (Bangor, Countryside Council for Wales) 2001, Countryside Council for Wales.
14. Landscape Character Assessment: Guidance for England and Scotland 2002, Countryside Agency/ Scottish Natural Heritage, Countryside Agency, Cheltenham.
15. Crofts R.S. The landscape component approach to landscape evaluation. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1975, 66:124-129.
16. Daniel T.C., Boster R.S. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. U.S.D.A 1976, Fort Collins. USDA Forest Service Research Paper no. RM-167.
17. Daniel T.C., Meitner M.M. Representational validity of landscape visualizations: the effects of graphical realism on perceived scenic beauty of forest vistas. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2001, 21(1):61-72.
18. Daniel T.C., Vining J. Methodological Issues in the Assessment of Landscape Quality 1983, Plenum Press, New York.
19. Darvill T. Landscapes: myth or reality?. Landscapes Perception, Recognition and Management: Reconciling the Impossible 1998, 8-16. Wildtrack Publishing, Sheffield. M. Jones, I. Rotherham (Eds.).
20. Derkzen P., Boch B. Partnership and role perception, three case studies on the meaning of being a representative in rural partnerships. Environment and Planning C 2009, 27:75-89.
21. Doble C., King M. Plural planning at multiple scales: from local communities to Statewide change. Landscape Journal 2011, 30:72-87.
22. Dower M. Seventh meeting of the Council of Europe Workshops for the implementation of the European landscape convention, Piestany, Slovakia 2008, 24-25th April 2008, (Opening keynote address).
23. Duffield B.S., Coppock J.T. The delineation of recreational landscapes: the role of computer based information systems. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1975, 66(2):141-148.
24. Gallent N., Bianconi M., Andersson J. Planning on the edge: England's rural-urban fringe and the spatial-planning agenda. Environment and Planning B 2006, 33:457-476.
25. Hodge I., Midmore P. Models of rural development and approaches to analysis evaluation and decision-making. Économie Rurale 2008, 307:21-38.
26. Hull R.B., Stewart W. The landscape Encountered while Hiking. Environment and Behavior 1995, 27(3):404-426.
27. Ittelson W.H. Environmental perception and contemporary perceptual theory. Environment and Cognition 1973, 1-19. Seminar Press, New York. W.H. Ittelson (Ed.).
28. Iwata H.F.T. Virtual Perambulator: A Novel Interface Device for Locomotion in Virtual Environment. Proceedings Of IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium 1996 1996.
29. Jones M. The European landscape convention and the question of public participation. Landscape Research 2007, 32(5):613-633.
30. Kaplan S. Environmental preference in a knowledge-seeking, knowledge using organism. The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture 1992, 581-598. Oxford University Press, New York. J.H. Barkow (Ed.).
31. Keating M., Stevenson L. Rural policy in Scotland after devolution. Regional Studies 2006, 40(3):397-407.
32. Kent R.L. Attributes, features and reasons for enjoyment of scenic routes: a comparison of experts, residents and citizens. Landscape Research 1993, 18(2):92-102.
33. Kisby B. The big society: power to the people,. Political Quarterly 2010, 81(4):484-491.
34. Lee J., Ingold T. Fieldwork on foot: perceiving, routing, socialising. Locating the Field. Space, Place and Context in Anthropology 2006, 67-86. Oxford, Berg. S. Coleman, P. Collins (Eds.).
35. Linton D.L. The assessment of scenery as a natural resource,. Scottish Geographical Magazine 1968, 84:219-238.
36. Lynch K., Rivkin M. A walk around the block. City Sense and City Design: Writings and Projects of Kevin Lynch 1990, 185-204. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA. T. Banerjee, M. Southworth (Eds.).
37. McIntyre N., Roggenbuck J.W. Nature/person transactions during an outdoor adventure experience: a multi-phasic analysis. Journal of Leisure Research 1998, 30(4):401-422.
38. The Interpretation of Ordinary Landscapes 1979, Oxford University Press. D.W. Meinig (Ed.).
39. Merleau-Ponty M. Phenomenology of Perception 1962, Humanities Press, New York.
40. Merriman P. Respect the life of the countryside': the country code, government and the conduct of visitors to the countryside in post-war England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2005, 30(3):336-350.
41. Mitchell D. Dead labor and the political economy of landscape - California living, California dying. Handbook of Cultural Geography 2003, 233-248. Sage, London. K. Anderson, M. Domosh, S. Pile, N. Thrift (Eds.).
42. Moore-Colyer R., Scott A.J. From elitism to inclusivity: temporal change in public participation and perception in landscape. Landscape Research 2005, 30(4):501-523.
43. Nature Conservation Act (Scotland), 2004. (accessed 01.06.11.). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2004/6/contents.
44. Orland B.B.K.U.J. Considering virtual worlds as representations of landscape realities and as tools for landscape planning. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54:139-148.
45. Palmer J.F., Hoffman R.E. Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning 2001, 54(1-4):149-161.
46. Penning-Rowsell E.C. Assessing the validity of landscape evaluations. Landscape Research 1981, 6(2):22-24.
47. Roberts G., Scott A.J., Hughes E., Howard P. Identifying Good Practice from Countries Implementing the European Landscape Convention. Report to the Scottish Government ICP/001/07 2009, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
48. Sauer C. The Morphology of Landscape 1925, 1968 reprint, Johnson Reprint Corp, New York.
49. Scarles C. Mediating landscape: the processes and practices of image construction in tourist brochures of Scotland. Tourist Studies 2004, 4(1):43-67.
50. Scott A.J. Assessing public perception of landscape: the LANDMAP experience. Landscape Research 2002, 27(3):271-295.
51. Scott A.J. Public perception of landscape in Wales; implications for the town and country planning system. Journal of Environment Policy and Planning 2003, 5(2):123-144.
52. Scott A.J., Carter C. The rural urban fringe: a forgotten opportunity space. Town and Country Planning 2011, May/June:231-234.
53. Scott A.J., Shorten J. What Kind of Countryside Do We Want 2004, report to the Welsh Assembly Government, WAG, Cardiff.
54. Scott A.J., Shannon P. Local landscape designations in Scotland: opportunity or barrier to effective landscape management?. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2007, 81:257-269.
55. Scott A.J., Carter C., White V., Brown K. Seeing is not everything: exploring the landscape experiences of different publics. Landscape Research 2009, 34(4):397-424.
56. Scott A.J., Shorten J., Owen R., Owen I.G.O. What kind of countryside do we want: perspectives from Wales UK. Geojournal 2009, online. 10.1007/s10708-009-9256-y.
57. Government Economic Strategy. Scottish Government, Edinburgh 2007, Scottish Government.
58. National Planning Framework for Scotland 2 Proposed Framework 2008, Scottish Government, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
59. Scottish Government, 2008b. Rural Development Programme for Scotland 2007-2013. (accessed 12.01.10.). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2008/04/01115039/0.
60. Scotland's Living Landscapes: Places for People, Report to the Scottish Government 2007, Scottish Landscape Forum, SNH, Edinburgh.
61. Scotland's Future Landscapes: Encouraging a Wider Debate 2003, Scottish Natural Heritage, Scottish Natural Heritage, Edinburgh.
62. Seddon A. Landscape planning: a conceptual perspective. Landscape and Urban Planning 1986, 13:335-347.
63. Selman P. Multi-function landscape plans: a missing link in sustainability planning?. Local Environment 2002, 7(3):283-294.
64. Selman P., Wragg A. Local sustainability planning: from interest-driven networks to vision-driven super-networks. Planning Practice and Research 1999, 14:329-340.
65. Shoard M. The Lure of the Moors. Valued Environments 1982, Allen and Unwin, London. J. Burgess, J. Gold (Eds.).
66. Swanwick C. Society's attitudes to and preferences for land and landscape. Land Use Policy26S 2009, S62-S75.
67. Tress G., Tress B., Fry G. Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landscape Ecology 2004, 20(4):479-493.
68. Tress B., Tress G., Fry G. Integrative studies on rural landscapes: policy expectations and research practice. Landscape and Urban Planning 2005, 70(1/2):177-191.
69. Tyrvainen L., Gustavsson R., Konijnendijk C., Ode A. Visualization and landscape laboratories in planning, design and management of urban woodlands. Forest Policy Economics 2006, 8(8):811-826.
70. Tuan Y.-F. Space and Place The Perspective of Experience 1977, University of Minnesota Press, Mineappolis.
71. Convention on Access to Information, Public Particpation in Decision Making and Access to Justice in Environmental Matters 1998, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (UNECE), UNECE, Geneva.
72. Warren C.R., McFadyen M. Does community ownership affect public attitudes to wind energy? A case study from south-west Scotland. Land Use Policy 2010, 27(2):204-213.
73. Wherret J.R. Creating landscape preference models using internet survey techniques. Landscape Research 2000, 75(1):79-96.
74. Woods M. Conflicting environmental visions of the rural: Windfarm development in Mid Wales. Sociologia Ruralis 2003, 43(3):271-288.
75. Wylie J. An essay on ascending Glastonbury Tor. Geoforum 2002, 33:451-454.
76. Zube E.H., Sell J.L., Taylor J.G. Landscape perception: research, application and theory. Landscape Planning 1982, 9:1-33.