Adolescent girls and young adult women's perceptions of superslims cigarette packaging: A Qualitative study

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Ford, Allison ^a   Moodie, Crawford ^a   Purves, Richard ^a   Mackintosh, Anne Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COSMETIC;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ADVERTIZING; AGE; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HALITOSIS; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PACKAGING; PUBLIC HEALTH MESSAGE; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SMOKING; SUPERSLIM PACKAGING; UNITED KINGDOM; YOUNG ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; HEALTH PROMOTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; PERCEPTION; PSYCHOLOGY; SATISFACTION; SCOTLAND; TOBACCO;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; FEMALE; FOCUS GROUPS; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PERSONAL SATISFACTION; PRODUCT LABELING; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SCOTLAND; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84960171889     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-010102     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Barnewolt D, Thrane D. Review of imagery appealing to women smokers. Brown and Williamson, 1986. Bates No. 682121192/1203. https://industrydocuments.library.ucsf.edu/tobacco/docs/#id=hgfm0132 (accessed 1 Jul. 2015).
2. US Department of Health and Human Services. Factors influencing tobacco use among women. In: Women and smoking: a report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta, GA: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2001:453-536.
3. Haglund M. Women and tobacco: a fatal attraction. Bull World Health Organ 2010;88:563.
4. Meredith P. Back to the future-how patents have influenced filter innovation. Tob J Int 2015;1:75-8.
5. Mapother J. Smoking kills-quit now. Tob J Int 2013;4:22-4.
6. Womack R. Middle East insights. Tob J Int 2014;2:62-5.
7. Tobacco Reporter. From the plains. Tobacco Reporter, 2012; November:72-4.
8. Hedley D. Russia-a battleground under threat. Tob J Int 2014;1:32-5.
9. Derbyshire D. Cigarette launch 'targets girls' with super-slim packs in female-friendly packaging. Daily Mail 20 October 2008. http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1078862/Cigarette-launch-targets-girlssuper-slim-packs-female-friendly-packaging.html (accessed 10 Aug. 2015).
10. Lambat I. Tobacco remains a main component of China's five-year plan. Tob Int 2015;1:16-22.
11. Ford A, Moodie C, Mackintosh AM, et al. How children perceive tobacco packaging and possible benefits of plain packaging. Educ Health 2013;31:83-8.
12. Moodie C, Ford A. Young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack innovation, pack colour and plain packaging. Australas Mark J 2011;19:174-80.
13. Doxey J, Hammond D. Deadly in pink: the impact of cigarette packaging among young women. Tob Control 2011;20:353-60.
14. Hammond D, Doxey J, Daniel S, et al. Impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging in the United States. Nicotine Tob Res 2011;13:579-88.
15. Hammond D, Daniel S, White C. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:151-7.
16. White CM, Hammond D, Thrasher JF, et al. The potential impact of plain packaging of cigarette products among Brazilian young women: an experimental study. BMC Public Health 2012;12:737.
17. Hammond D, White C, Anderson W, et al. The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, 'plain' cigarette packaging. Eur J Public Health 2014;24:537-43.
18. Ford A, MacKintosh AM, Moodie C, et al. Cigarette pack design and adolescent smoking susceptibility: a cross-sectional survey. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003282.
19. Kotnowski K, Fong GT, Gallopel-Morvan K, et al. The impact of cigarette packaging design among young females in Canada: findings from a discrete choice experiment. Nicotine Tob Res 2015. Published Online First: 11 June 2015. doi:10.1093/ntr/ntv114
20. European Commission. Impact assessment. Proposal for a directive of the European parliament and of the council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the member states concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
21. Borg T. New Tobacco Products Directive: an achievement for public health in Europe. EU Newsletter 130, 2014. http://ec.europa.eu/health/newsletter/130/focus-newsletter-en. htm (accessed 10 Aug. 2015).
22. Moodie C, Ford A, MacKintosh AM, et al. Are all cigarettes just the same? Female's perceptions of slim, coloured, aromatized and capsule cigarettes. Health Educ Res 2015;30:1-12.
23. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol 2006;3:77-101.
24. Putz R. Learning from cosmetics. Tob J Int 15 June 1998;3:20.
25. Hawkes C. Food packaging: the medium is the message. Public Health Nutr 2010;13:297-9.
26. Wansink B, Park SB. At the movies: how external cues and perceived taste impact on consumption volume. Food Qual Preference 2001;12:69-74.
27. Harris B. The intractable cigarette 'filter' problem. Tob Control 2011;20(Suppl 1):i10-16.
28. Mutti S, Hammond D, Borland R, et al. Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Four Country Survey. Addiction 2011;106:1166-75.
29. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: New evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002;11:i73-80.
30. Hine T The total package: the evolution and secret meanings of boxes, bottles, cans, and tubes. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Co, 1999.
31. BBC. Tobacco firms win legal right to challenge EU rules. BBC 3 November 2014. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-29876574 (accessed 10 Aug. 2015).
32. Thibodeau M, Martin J. Smoke gets in your eyes: branding and design in cigarette packaging. New York: Abbeville Press, 2000.