The perceptions of UK youth of branded and standardized, 'plain' cigarette packaging

European Journal of Public Health

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 537-543

  Hammond, David ^a   White, Christine ^a   Anderson, Will ^b   Arnott, Deborah ^b   Dockrell, Martin ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b Action on Smoking and Health   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CONSUMER ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PACKAGING; PSYCHOLOGY; SMOKING; TOBACCO; UNITED KINGDOM;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; CHILD; CONSUMER BEHAVIOR; DATA COLLECTION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; PRODUCT LABELING; PRODUCT PACKAGING; SMOKING; TOBACCO PRODUCTS;

EID: 84905031562     PISSN: 11011262     EISSN: 1464360X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckt142     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Moodie C, Hastings G. Tobacco packaging as promotion. Tob Control 2010;19: 168-70.
2. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Preventing tobacco use among youth and young adults: a report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health, 2012.
3. Gallopel-Morvan K, Moodie C, Hammond D, et al. Consumer perceptions of cigarette pack design in France: a comparison of regular, limited edition and plain packaging. Tob Control 2012;21:502-6.
4. World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe. Empower Women-combating tobacco industry marketing in the WHO European Region. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2010.
5. Moodie C, Angus K, Ford A. The importance of cigarette packaging in a 'dark' market: the 'Silk Cut' experience. Tob Control 2012. Nov 14; [Epub ahead of print].
6. Hammond D, Parkinson C. The impact of cigarette package design on perceptions of risk. J Public Health (Oxf) 2009;31:345-53.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine measured yields of tar and nicotine. Bethesda, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Services, National Institutes of Health; National Cancer Institute, 2001.
8. Hammond D, Dockrell M, Arnott D, et al. Cigarette pack design and perceptions of risk among UK adults and youth. Eur J Public Health 2009;19:631-7.
9. Mutti S, Hammond D, Borland R, et al. Beyond light and mild: cigarette brand descriptors and perceptions of risk in the International Tobacco Control (ITC) four country survey. Addiction 2011;106:1166-75.
10. The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia. Tobacco plain packaging bill. Canberra: The Parliament of the Commonwealth of Australia.
11. UK Department of Health. Healthy lives, healthy people: a tobacco control plan for England. London, UK: Department of Health, 2011.
12. Moodie C, Stead M, Bauld L, et al. Plain tobacco packaging: a systematic review. London: Public Health Research Consortium, 2012.
13. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011;20:327-37.
14. Germain D, Wakefield MA, Durkin SJ. Adolescents' perceptions of cigarette brand image: does plain packaging make a difference? J Adolesc Health 2010;46: 385-92.
15. Moodie C, Ford A, Mackintosh AM, Hastings G. Young people's perceptions of cigarette packaging and plain packaging: an online survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2012; 14:98-105.
16. Hammond D, Daniel S, White CM. The effect of cigarette branding and plain packaging on female youth in the United Kingdom. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:151-7. 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.003.
17. Hoek J, Gendall P, Gifford H, et al. Tobacco branding, plain packaging, pictorial warning, and symbolic consumption. Qual Health Res 2012;22:630-9.
18. Doxey J, Hammond D. Deadly in pink: the impact of female-oriented cigarette packaging among young women. Tob Control 2011;20:353-60.
19. Mitchell AD, Studdert DM. Plain packaging of tobacco products in Australia: a novel regulation faces legal challenge. JAMA 2012;307:261-2.
20. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol 1995;57: 289-300.
21. Cummings KM, Morley CP, Horan JK, et al. Marketing to America's youth: evidence from corporate documents. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl. 1):i5-17.
22. Wakefield M, Morley C, Horan JK, et al. The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents. Tob Control 2002; 11(Suppl. 1):i73-80.
23. Ferris Wayne F, Connolly GN. How cigarette design can affect youth initiation into smoking: Camel cigarettes 1983-93. Tob Control 2002;11(Suppl. 1):i32-9.
24. Moodie C, Ford A. Young adult smokers' perceptions of cigarette pack innovation, pack colour and plain packaging. Australas Mark J 2011;19:174-80.
25. Borland R, Sawas S, Sharkie F, et al. The impact of structural packaging design on young adult perceptions of tobacco products. Tob Control 2013;22:97-102.
26. Kotnowski K, Hammond D. The impact of cigarette pack shape, size and opening: evidence from tobacco company documents. Addiction 2013;108:1658-68.
27. European Commission. Proposal for a Directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States concerning the manufacture, presentation and sale of tobacco and related products. Brussels: European Commission, 2012.
28. Les Études De Marché Créatec. Quantitative study of Canadian youth smokers and vulnerable non smokers: effects of modified packaging through increasing the size of warnings on cigarette packages. Prepared for Health Canada. Montréal, Canada: Les Études De Marché Créatec, 2008.
29. Wakefield M, Germain D, Durkin S, et al. Do larger pictorial health warnings diminish the need for plain packaging of cigarettes. Addiction 2012;107:1159-67.
30. Environics Research Group. Testing the size of cigarette package health warnings: an online survey of Canadian youth. Prepared on behalf of the Canadian Cancer Society. Toronto: Environics Research Group, 2011.
31. GfKBluemoon. Market research to determine effective plain packaging of tobacco products report. Prepared for the Australia Department of Health and Ageing. Sydney: GfKBluemoon, 2011.
32. Munafó MR, Roberts N, Bauld L, et al. Plain packaging increases visual attention to health warnings on cigarette packs in non-smokers and weekly smokers but not daily smokers. Addiction 2011;106:1505-10.
33. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, et al. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control 2011;20:183-8.