Gender Bias in STEM Fields: Variation in Prevalence and Links to STEM Self-Concept

Psychology of Women Quarterly

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 65-79

  Robnett, Rachael D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

academic achievement; academic self concept; sex differences; sexism

Indexed keywords

EID: 84960088607     PISSN: 03616843     EISSN: 14716402     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0361684315596162     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. American Association of University Women. (2010). Why so few? Women in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Washington, DC: Author.
2. M.M.AyresC.Leaper (2013). Adolescent girls’ experiences of discrimination: An examination of coping strategies, social support, and self-esteem. Journal of Adolescent Research, 28, 479–508. doi:10.1177/0743558412457817
3. A.D.BennerS.Graham (2013). The antecedents and consequences of racial/ethnic discrimination during adolescence: Does the source of discrimination matter?Developmental Psychology, 49, 1602–1613. doi:10.1037/a0030557
4. G.M.BreakwellV.L.VignolesT.Robertson (2003). Stereotypes and crossed-category evaluations: The case of gender and science education. British Journal of Psychology, 94, 437–455. doi:10.1348/000712603322503024
5. C.S.BrownC.Leaper (2010). Latina and European American girls’ experiences with academic sexism and their self-concepts in mathematics and science during adolescence. Sex Roles, 63, 860–870. doi:10.1007/s11199-010-9856-5
6. J.Z.CarrA.M.SchmidtK.J.FordR.P.DeShon (2003). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 605–619. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.4.605
7. S.J.CeciD.K.GintherS.KahnW.M.Williams (2014). Women in academic science: A changing landscape. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 15, 75–141. doi:10.1177/1529100614541236
8. S.J.CeciW.M.Williams (2010). Sex differences in math-intensive fields. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 275–279. doi:10.1177/0963721410383241
9. S.J.CeciW.M.WilliamsS.M.Barnett (2009). Women’s underrepresentation in science: Sociocultural and biological considerations. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 218–261. doi:10.1037/a0014412
10. S.CheryanV.C.PlautP.G.DaviesC.M.Steele (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239
11. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy. (2007). Beyond bias and barriers: Fulfilling the potential of women in academic science and engineering. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences.
12. F.Crosby (1984). The denial of personal discrimination. American Behavioral Scientist, 27, 371–386. doi:10.1177/000276484027003008
13. N.Dasgupta (2011). Ingroup experts and peers as social vaccines who inoculate the self-concept: The stereotype inoculation model. Psychological Inquiry, 22, 231–246. doi:10.1080/1047840X.2011.607313
14. T.K.DeBackerR.M.Nelson (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. The Journal of Experimental Education, 93, 245–254. doi:10.1080/00220670009598713
15. A.M.DurikO.G.ShechterM.NohC.S.RozekJ.M.Harackiewicz (2015). What if I can’t? Success expectancies moderate the effects of utilize value information on situational interest and performance. Motivation and Emotion, 39, 104–118. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9419-0
16. A.H.EaglyS.J.Karau (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. doi:10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573
17. J.S.Eccles (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choices: Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement-related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–609. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.1994.tb01049.x
18. J.S.EcclesA.Wigfield (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
19. H.EtzkowitzC.KemelgorB.Uzzi (2000). Athena unbound: The advancement of women in science and technology. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
20. M.F.Fox (2000). Organizational environments and doctoral degrees awarded to women in science and engineering departments. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28, 47–61.
21. P.GlickS.T.Fiske (1996). The ambivalent sexism inventory: Differentiating hostile and benevolent sexism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 491–512. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.70.3.491
22. D.F.HalpernC.P.BenbowD.C.GearyR.C.GurJ.S.HydeM.A.Gernsbacher (2007). The science of sex differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–51. doi:10.1111/j.1529-1006.2007.00032.x
23. M.R.HeblJ.B.FosterL.M.MannixJ.F.Dovidio (2002). Formal and interpersonal discrimination: A field study of bias toward homosexual applicants. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 815–825. doi:10.1177/0146167202289010
24. A.H.Herzig (2004). “Slaughtering this beautiful math”: Graduate women choosing and leaving mathematics. Gender and Education, 16, 379–395. doi:10.1080/09540250042000251506
25. D.Kabat-FarrL.M.Cortina (2014). Sex-based harassment in employment: New insights into gender and context. Law and Human Behavior, 38, 58–73. doi:10.1037/lhb0000045
26. R.M.Kanter (1977). Men and women of the corporation. New York, NY: Basics Books, Inc.
27. U.Kessels (2005). Fitting into the stereotype: How gender-stereotyped perceptions of prototypical peers relate to liking for school subjects. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 20, 309–323. doi:10.1007/BF03173559
28. J.KonikL.M.Cortina (2008). Policing gender at work: Intersections of harassment based on sex and sexuality. Social Justice Research, 21, 313–337. doi:10.1007/s11211-008-0074-z
29. R.S.LazarusS.Folkman (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.
30. C.LeaperC.S.Brown (2008). Perceived experiences with sexism among adolescent girls. Child Development, 79, 685–704. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2008.01151.x
31. R.W.LentS.D.Brown (1996). Social cognitive approach to career development: An overview. The Career Development Quarterly, 44, 310–321.
32. R.W.LentS.D.Brown (2006). On conceptualizing and assessing social cognitive constructions in career research: A measurement guide. Journal of Career Assessment, 14, 12–35. doi:10.1177/1069072705281364
33. R.W.LentS.D.BrownB.BrennerS.B.ChopraT.DavisR.TalleyrandV.Suthakaran (2001). The role of contextual supports and barriers in the choice of math/science educational options: A test of social cognitive hypotheses. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 48, 474–483. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.48.4.474
34. V.J.MagleyC.L.HulinL.F.FitgeraldM.DeNardo (1999). Outcomes of self-labeling harassment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 390–402. doi:0021-9010/99
35. J.MargolisA.FisherF.Miller (2000). The anatomy of interest: Women in undergraduate computer science. Women’s Studies Quarterly, 28, 104–127.
36. R.F.MartellD.M.LaneC.Emrich (1996). Male-female differences: A computer simulation. American Psychologist, 51, 157–158. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.51.2.157
37. C.A.Moss-RacusinJ.F.DovidioV.L.BrescollM.J.GrahamJ.Handelsman (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favoring male students. Proceedings from the National Academy of Sciences, 109, 16474–16479. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1211286109
38. M.C.MurphyC.M.SteeleJ.J.Gross (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18, 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x
39. National Science Foundation. (2012). Survey of earned doctorates, 2013. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
40. M.OngC.WrightL.L.EspinsoaG.Orfield (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81, 172–208.
41. L.Perez-FelknerS.McDonaldB.SchneiderE.Grogan (2012). Female and male adolescents’ subjective orientations to mathematics and the influence of those orientations on postsecondary majors. Developmental Psychology, 48, 1658–1673. doi:10.1037/a0027020
42. R.D.RobnettM.M.ChemersE.L.Zurbriggen (2015). Longitudinal associations among undergraduates’ research experience, self-efficacy, and identity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 52, 847–867. doi: 10.1002/tea.21221
43. R.D.RobnettC.Leaper (2013). Friendship groups, personal motivation, and gender in relation to high school students’ STEM career interest. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 23, 652–664. doi:10.1111/jora.12013
44. L.A.RudmanC.A.Moss-RacusinJ.E.PhelanS.Nauts (2012). Status incongruity and backlash effects: Defending the gender hierarchy motivates prejudice against female leaders. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48, 165–179. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.10.008
45. I.H.SettlesL.M.CortinaN.T.BuchananK.N.Miner (2013). Derogation, discrimination, and (dis)satisfaction with jobs in science: A gendered analysis. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 37, 179–191. doi:10.1177/0361684312468727
46. S.D.SimpkinsP.E.Davis-KeanJ.S.Eccles (2006). Math and science motivation: A longitudinal examination of the links between choices and beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 42, 70–83. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.70
47. G.Sonnert (1995). Gender equity in science: Still an elusive goal. Issues in Science and Technology, 12, 53–58.
48. G.SonnertM.FoxA.Adkins (2007). Undergraduate women in science and engineering: Effects of faculty, field, and institutions over time. Social Science Quarterly, 88, 1333–1356. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6237.2007.00505.x
49. J.E.Stake (2003). Understanding male bias against women in science. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33, 667–682. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2003.tb01918.x
50. J.E.StakeK.R.Mares (2001). Science enrichment programs for gifted high school girls and boys: Predictors of program impact on science confidence and motivation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38, 1065–1088. doi:10.1002/tea.10001
51. J.SteeleJ.B.JamesR.C.Barnett (2002). Learning in a man’s world: Examining the perceptions of undergraduate women in male-dominated academic areas. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 26, 46–50. doi:10.1111/1471-6402.00042
52. J.G.StoutN.DasguptaM.HunsingerM.A.McManus (2011). STEMing the tide: Using ingroup experts to inoculate self-concept in science, technology, engineering, and math. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 255–270. doi:10.1037/a0021385
53. J.K.SwimK.M.EyssellE.Q.MurdochM.J.Ferguson (2010). Self-silencing to sexism. Journal of Social Issues, 66, 493–507. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2010.01658.x
54. The White House Briefing Room. (2011, 926). First Lady Michelle Obama at the National Science Foundation family-friendly policy rollout. Retrieved fromhttps://www.whitehouse.gov/photos-and-video/video/2011/09/26/first-lady-michelle-obama-national-science-foundation-family-frien#transcript
55. G.M.WaltonG.L.Cohen (2007). A question of belonging: Race, social fit, and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 82–96. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.1.82
56. G.M.WaltonG.L.CohenD.CwirS.J.Spencer (2012). Mere belonging: The power of social connections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 513–532. doi:10.1037/a0025731
57. M.WangJ.Degol (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy-value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33, 304–340. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001
58. S.A.WastiL.M.Cortina (2002). Coping in context: Sociocultural determinants of responses to sexual harassment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 394–405. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.83.2.394
59. H.M.G.Watt (2006). The role of motivation in gendered educational and occupational trajectories related to maths. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 305–322. doi:10.1080/13803610600765562
60. E.S.WeisgramR.S.Bigler (2007). Effects of learning about gender discrimination on adolescent girls’ attitudes toward and interest in science. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 262–269. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2007.00369.x